1
Mytton G, Diem P, Dam PH van. Media audience research: a guide for professionals. Third edition. Thousand Oaks, California: : SAGE Publications, Incorporated 2016. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=4440204
2
Lacey N. Media institutions and audiences: key concepts in media studies. Basingstoke: : Palgrave 2002. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=327969
3
McKee A. Textual analysis: a beginner’s guide. London: : Sage Publications 2003. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=254647
4
Sconce J. Haunted media: electronic presence from telegraphy to television. Durham, NC: : Duke University Press 2000.
5
Radway JA. Reading the romance: women, patriarchy, and popular literature. 2nd ed. Chapel Hill: : University of North Carolina Press 1991. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=880363
6
Kavka M. Reality television, affect and intimacy: reality matters. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2008.
7
Duffy BE. Remake, remodel: women’s magazines in the digital age. Urbana, Illinois: : University of Illinois Press 2013.
8
Alasuutari P. Rethinking the media audience: the new agenda. London: : Sage 1999.
9
Ross K, Nightingale V. Media and audiences: new perspectives. Maidenhead, Berkshire, England: : Open University Press 2003. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=295455
10
Long P, Wall T. Media studies: texts, production, context. 2nd ed. Harlow: : Pearson 2012. http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=812615
11
Eagleton T. Ideology. London: : Longman 1994. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1746767
12
Gorton K. Media audiences: television, meaning and emotion. Edinburgh: : Edinburgh University Press 2009. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=536997
13
Cantril H, Gaudet H, Herzog H, et al. The invasion from Mars: a study in the psychology of panic : with the complete script of the famous Orson Welles broadcast. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 1982.
14
Williams K. Effects What Effects chapter 7. In: Understanding Media Theory. Arnold 2003.
15
McLeod D, Wise D, Perryman M. Thinking about the media: A review of theory and research on media perceptions, media effects perception and their consequences. Review of Communication REsearch 2017;Volume 5.
16
Abercrombie N, Longhurst B. Changing audiences, changing paradigms of research Chapter one. In: Audiences: a sociological theory of performance and imagination. London: : Sage 1998. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1024126
17
Webster, James G. Audience, The. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 1998;42.http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jbem42&collection=journals&page=190
18
Abercrombie N, Longhurst B. Audiences: a sociological theory of performance and imagination. London: : Sage 1998. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1024126
19
Schrøder KC. Convergence of Antagonistic Traditions? The Case of Audience Research. European journal of communication 1987;2:7–31.
20
Barker M, Petley J. Introduction: from bad research to good. In: Ill effects: the media violence debate. London: : Routledge 2001. http://le.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=5665221790002746&institutionId=2746&customerId=2745
21
Livingstone SM. Making sense of television: the psychology of audience interpretation. 2nd ed. London: : Routledge 1998.
22
Gauntlett D. Ten things wrong with the "effects model.”. In: Approaches to audiences: a reader. London: : Arnold 1998.
23
Redman P, Open University. Attachment: sociology and social worlds. Manchester: : Manchester University Press in association with the Open University 2008.
24
Nightingale V. Studying the television audience: the shock of the real. London: : Routledge 1996.
25
Tulloch J. The implied audience in soap opera production: Everyday Rhetorical Strategies among television professionals. In: Rethinking the media audience: the new agenda. London: : Sage 1999. 151–78.http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.myilibrary.com?id=226264
26
Gerbner et al G. Growing up with television: The Cultivation Perspective. In: Media effects: advances in theory and research. New York: : Routledge 2009. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=10274244
27
Blackman L, Walkerdine V. Mass hysteria: critical psychology and media studies. Basingstoke: : Macmillan 2000.
28
Barker M, Petley J. Ill effects: the media violence debate. 2nd ed. London: : Routledge 2001. http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=84561
29
Michael O’Shaughnessy. Promoting ‘emotion’: Feelings, film studies and teaching or understanding films; understanding ourselves. Metro Media and Education 1994;97:44–8.
30
Mayer V. The Places Where Audience Studies and Production Studies Meet. Television & New Media 2016;17:706–18. doi:10.1177/1527476416652482
31
Gray J. Reviving audience studies. Critical Studies in Media Communication 2017;34:79–83. doi:10.1080/15295036.2016.1266680
32
Hermes J, van den Berg A, Mol M. Sleeping with the enemy: Audience studies and critical literacy. International Journal of Cultural Studies 2013;16:457–73. doi:10.1177/1367877912474547
33
Behrenshausen BG. The active audience, again: Player-centric game studies and the problem of binarism. New Media & Society 2013;15:872–89. doi:10.1177/1461444812462843
34
Athique A. The dynamics and potentials of big data for audience research. Media, Culture & Society 2018;40:59–74. doi:10.1177/0163443717693681
35
Das R. Audiences: a decade of transformations – reflections from the CEDAR network on emerging directions in audience analysis. Media, Culture & Society 2017;39:1257–67. doi:10.1177/0163443717717632
36
Ross K, Playdon P. Black marks: minority ethnic audiences and media. Aldershot: : Ashgate 2001.
37
Social comparison, social media, and self-esteem. Psychology of Popular Media Culture Published Online First: 2014.http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy4.lib.le.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pdh&AN=2014-33471-001&site=ehost-live
38
Sconce J. The Voice from the Void. International Journal of Cultural Studies 1998;1:211–32. doi:10.1177/13678779980010020401
39
Kavka M. Reality television, affect and intimacy: reality matters. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2008.
40
Jackson RL, Sage reference on-line. Encyclopedia of identity. London: : SAGE 2010. http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://knowledge.sagepub.com/view/identity/SAGE.xml
41
Rosengren k. E. Uses and Gratifications: A Paradigm Outlined. In: The uses of mass communications: current perspectives on gratifications research. Beverly Hills, Calif: : Sage Publications 1974. 269–86.
42
Shanahan J, Morgan M. Television and its viewers: cultivation research and theory. Cambridge, UK: : Cambridge University Press 1999. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=5001729
43
Michael O’Shaughnessy. Promoting ‘emotion’: Feelings, film studies and teaching or understanding films; understanding ourselves. Metro Media and Education 1994;97:44–8.
44
Elliott P. Uses and gratifications research: A critique and a sociological alternative. In: The uses of mass communications: current perspectives on gratifications research. Beverly Hills, Calif: : Sage Publications 1974. 249–68.
45
Seiter ellen. Making distinctions in TV audience research: Case study of a troubling interview. Cultural Studies 1990;4.
46
Palmgreen p, Wenner LA, Rosengren KE. Uses and gratifications research: the past ten years. In: Media gratifications research: current perspectives. Beverly Hills: : Sage 1985. xx–xxx.
47
Ruggiero TE. Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st Century. Mass Communication and Society 2000;3:3–37. doi:10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_02
48
Redman P, Open University. Attachment: sociology and social worlds. Manchester: : Manchester University Press in association with the Open University 2008.
49
Whitehouse-Hart J. Psychosocial explorations of film and television viewing: ordinary audience. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1880204
50
Bainbridge C, Ward I, Yates C. Television and psychoanalysis: psycho-cultural perspectives. London: : Karnac 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1574555
51
Seiter ellen. Making distinctions in TV audience research: Case study of a troubling interview. Cultural Studies 1990;4.
52
Rosengren K. Chapter 2 - Combinations, comparisons and confrontations: towards a comprehensive theory of audience research. In: The audience and its landscape. Boulder, Colo: : Westview Press 1996. 23–51.
53
Seiter E. Remote control: television, audiences and cultural power. London: : Routledge 1989.
54
Brooker W, Jermyn D. The audience studies reader. London: : Routledge 2003.
55
Modleski T. Loving with a vengeance: mass-produced fantasies for women. New York: : Methuen 1984.
56
Hall S. Encoding/ decoding. In: Culture, media, language: working papers in cultural studies, 1972-79. London: : Hutchinson in association with the Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies, University of Birmingham 1980. 117–28.http://le.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=5665769750002746&institutionId=2746&customerId=2745
57
Ang I. On the politics of empirical audience research. In: Media and cultural studies: keyworks. Malden, MA: : Blackwell 2006. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=239901
58
Hall S. Reflections upon the Encoding/Decoding Model: An Interview with Stuart Hall. In: Viewing, reading, listening: audiences and cultural reception. Boulder, Colo: : Westview Press 1994. 253–74.
59
Ang I, Couling D. Watching Dallas: soap opera and the melodramatic imagination. New York: : Routledge 1996. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=10763823
60
Radway JA. Reading the romance: women, patriarchy and popular literature. Chapel Hill, N.C.: : University of North Carolina Press 1991. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=880363
61
Ginsburg FD, Abu-Lughod L, Larkin B. Media worlds: anthropology on new terrain. Berkeley: : University of California Press 2002. http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=10058549
62
Hobson D. Crossroads: the drama of a soap opera. London: : Methuen 1982.
63
Gillespie M. Television, ethnicity and cultural change. London: : Routledge 1995.
64
Liebes T, Katz E. The export of meaning: cross-cultural readings of Dallas. 2nd ed. Cambridge: : Polity Press 1993.
65
Helen Wood. The mediated conversational floor: an interactive approach to audience reception analysis. Media, Culture & Society,;29:75–103. doi:10.1177/0163443706072000
66
Martin J. Barker. The Lord of the Rings and ‘Identification’: A Critical Encounter. European Journal of Communication,;20:353–78.http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0267323105055262
67
Tincknell E, Raghuram P. Big Brother: Reconfiguring the `active’ audience of cultural studies? European Journal of Cultural Studies 2002;5:199–215. doi:10.1177/1364942002005002159
68
Victor Costello. Cultural Outlaws: An Examination of Audience Activity and Online Television Fandom. Television & New Media,;8:124–43. doi:10.1177/1527476406299112
69
Elizabeth Jane Evans. Character, audience agency and transmedia drama. Media, Culture & Society,;30:197–213. doi:10.1177/0163443707086861
70
Skeggs B, Wood H. The labour of transformation and circuits of value ‘around’ reality television. Continuum 2008;22:559–72. doi:10.1080/10304310801983664
71
Brand New You | Kanopy. https://le.kanopy.com/video/brand-new-you-makeover-television-and-american-dream
72
Skeggs B, Thumim N, Wood H. ‘Oh goodness, I am watching reality TV’. European Journal of Cultural Studies 2008;11:5–24. doi:10.1177/1367549407084961
73
Jin D. New Korean Wave: Transnational Cultural Power in the Age of Social Media. Baltimore: : University of Illinois Press 2016. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=4443546
74
Livingstone S, Das R. The End of Audiences? Theoretical echoes of reception amidst the uncertainties of use. In: A companion to new media dynamics. Chichester: : John Wiley & Sons 2013. 104–22.http://le.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=5665206730002746&institutionId=2746&customerId=2745
75
Cavalcante A, Press A, Sender K. Feminist reception studies in a post-audience age: returning to audiences and everyday life. Feminist Media Studies 2017;17:1–13. doi:10.1080/14680777.2017.1261822
76
Kavka M. Reality television, affect and intimacy: reality matters. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2008.
77
Wasko J. Reality TV: Performance, Authenticity, and Television Audiences. In: A companion to television. Malden, Mass: : Blackwell 2005. A-Hill.http://le.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=5665769740002746&institutionId=2746&customerId=2745
78
Paddy Scannell. Big Brother as a Television Event. Television & New Media,;3:271–82. doi:10.1177/152747640200300303
79
Piper H. Understanding Reality Television * Reality TV - Audiences and Popular Factual Television * Reality TV - Realism and Revelation. Screen 2006;47:133–8. doi:10.1093/screen/hjl012
80
Dovey J. Freakshow: first person media and factual television. London: : Pluto Press 2000. http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=2001153
81
Skeggs B, Wood H. Reality television and class. London: : BFI 2011.
82
Skeggs B, Wood H. Reacting to reality television: performance, audience and value. New York: : Routledge 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=957761
83
Couldry N. The Extended Audience: Scanning the Horizon’. In: Media audiences. Maidenhead: : Open University Press 2005.
84
Gillespie M. Television, ethnicity and cultural change. London: : Routledge 1995.
85
Wood H. What Reading the Romance Did for Us. European Journal of Cultural Studies 2004;7:147–54. doi:10.1177/1367549404042487
86
Ong JC. Watching the Nation, Singing the Nation: London-Based Filipino Migrants’ Identity Constructions in News and Karaoke Practices. Communication, Culture & Critique 2009;2:160–81. doi:10.1111/j.1753-9137.2009.01033.x
87
Skeggs B, Thumim N, Wood H. ‘Oh goodness, I am watching reality TV’. European Journal of Cultural Studies 2008;11:5–24. doi:10.1177/1367549407084961
88
Skeggs B, Wood H. Turning it on is a class act: immediated object relations with television. Media, Culture & Society 2011;33:941–51. doi:10.1177/0163443711412298
89
Skeggs B, Wood H. Reacting to Reality Television: Performance, Audience and Value. Florence: : Taylor & Francis Group 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=957761
90
Skeggs B, Wood H. Reality television and class. London: : BFI 2011.
91
Sender K, Sullivan M. Epidemics of will, failures of self-esteem: Responding to fat bodies in                              and. Continuum 2008;22:573–84. doi:10.1080/10304310802190046
92
Sender K. Reconsidering Reflexivity: Audience Research and Reality Television. The Communication Review 2015;18:37–52. doi:10.1080/10714421.2015.996414
93
Readdy T, Ebbeck V. Weighing in on NBC’s The Biggest Loser. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 2012;83:579–86. doi:10.1080/02701367.2012.10599255
94
Sender K. The makeover: reality television and reflexive audiences. New York: : New York University Press 2012. https://dx.doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814740699.001.0001
95
Sender K. Queens for a Day:                              and the Neoliberal Project. Critical Studies in Media Communication 2006;23:131–51. doi:10.1080/07393180600714505
96
Redman P, Maples W, Open University. Good essay writing: a social sciences guide. Fifth edition. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2017.
97
Bonnett A. How to argue: a student’s guide. Harlow: : Pearson Education 2001. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=5185704
98
Pears R, Shields GJ. Cite them right: the essential referencing guide. 12th edition. New York: : Bloomsbury Academic 2022. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=6992940
99
Lowes R, Peters H, Turner MC. The international student’s guide: studying in English at university. Thousand Oaks, Calif: : SAGE 2004. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=10218078
100
Ferrucci P, Painter C. Print Versus Digital. Journal of Communication Inquiry 2017;41:124–39. doi:10.1177/0196859917690533
101
Madianou M, Miller D. Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies 2013;16:169–87. doi:10.1177/1367877912452486
102
Madianou M. Smartphones as Polymedia. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2014;19:667–80. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12069
103
Ytre-Arne B. ‘I want to hold it in my hands’: readers’ experiences of the phenomenological differences between women’s magazines online and in print. Media, Culture & Society 2011;33:467–77. doi:10.1177/0163443711398766
104
Das R, Sonia L. The End of Audiences? Theoretical echoes of reception amidst the uncertainties of use. In: A companion to new media dynamics. Chichester: : John Wiley & Sons 2013. http://le.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=5665880050002746&institutionId=2746&customerId=2745
105
Hartley J, Burgess J, Bruns A. A companion to new media dynamics. Chichester: : John Wiley & Sons 2013. http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=531267
106
Mirca Madianou. Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies,;16:169–87.http://ics.sagepub.com/search?author1=Madianou&fulltext=Polymedia:%20Towards%20a%20new%20theory%20of%20digital%20media%20in%20interpersonal%20communication&pubdate_year=2013&volume=16&firstpage=169&submit=yes
107
Mediatization and the ‘molding force’ of the media. doi:10.1515/commun-2012-0001
108
Hepp A. Cultures of mediatization. Cambridge: : Polity 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1180925
109
Ian Hutchby. Technologies, Texts and Affordances. Sociology 2001;35:441–56.http://www.jstor.org/stable/42856294?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
110
Miller D. Tales from Facebook. Cambridge: : Polity 2011. http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=571931
111
Jenkins H. Convergence culture: where old and new media collide. Updated and with a new afterword. New York, N.Y.: : New York University Press 2008.
112
Dallas S. On the Audience Commodity and its work. In: Approaches to media: a reader. London: : Arnold 1995.
113
Toynbee J. The Media’s View of the Audience. In: Media Production. Maidenhead: : Open University Press 2006. 91–133.
114
Long P, Wall T. Media studies: texts, production, context. 2nd ed. Harlow: : Pearson 2012. http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=812615
115
Lee McGuigan. Consumers: The Commodity Product of Interactive Commercial Television, or, Is Dallas Smythe’s Thesis More Germane Than Ever? The Journal of Communication Inquiry 2012;36. doi:10.1177/0196859912459756
116
Ang, Ien. Desperately Seeking the Audience. Routledge 1991. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=165716
117
Webster JG, Phalen PF, Lichty LW. Ratings analysis: the theory and practice of audience research. 3rd ed. Mahwah, N.J.: : L. Erlbaum Associates 2006.
118
Gitlin T. Inside prime time. Rev. ed. Berkeley, Calif: : University of California Press 2000.
119
Greene, Kira. TV’s test pilots. Broadcasting & Cable 2000;130.http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bah&AN=3364522&site=ehost-live
120
Hayes, Dade dhayes@nbmedia.com. Inside TV’s Secret Lab. (cover story). Broadcasting & Cable 2015;145:4–6.http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bah&AN=102711548&site=ehost-live
121
P M. Made to Order and Standardized Audiences: forms of reality in audience measurements. In: Audience making: how the media create the audience. Thousand Oaks, Calif: : Sage 1994. 57–74.
122
Serials Solutions Article Linker -. http://gl9sn3dh2u.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=book&rft.title=Audience+Economics&rft.au=PHILIP+M.+NAPOLI&rft.date=2003-09-25&rft.pub=Columbia+University+Press&rft_id=info:doi/10.7312%2Fnapo12652&rft.externalDocID=napo12652&paramdict=en-US
123
Twitter to drive TV Ratings beyond an ‘assumption’ of engagement. B and T Weekly. 7AD.http://www.bandt.com.au/media/twitter-to-drive-tv-ratings-beyond-an-assumption-o
124
Neilsen Launches ‘Neilsen Twitter TV Ratings’. http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=1&sid=263c30ed-675a-4554-859f-e35ae5e4887b%40sessionmgr120&hid=110&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=bwh&AN=bizwire.c51050908
125
Radway JA. Reading the romance: women, patriarchy, and popular literature. 2nd ed. Chapel Hill: : University of North Carolina Press 1991. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=880363
126
Livingstone sonia. Relationships between media and audiences: Prospects for future audience reception studies. In: Media, ritual, and identity. London: : Routledge 1998. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=169411
127
Morley D. Unanswered Questions in Audience Research. The Communication Review 2006;9:101–21. doi:10.1080/10714420600663286
128
Barker M. I Have Seen the Future and It Is Not Here Yet ...; or, On Being Ambitious for Audience Research. The Communication Review 2006;9:123–41. doi:10.1080/10714420600663310
129
Seiter E. Remote control: television, audiences and cultural power. London: : Routledge 1989.
130
Birgitta Höijer. Ontological Assumptions and Generalizations in Qualitative (Audience) Research. European Journal of Communication,;23:275–94.http://ejc.sagepub.com.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/search?author1=Hoijer&fulltext=Ontological%20Assumptions%20and%20Generalizations%20in%20Qualitative%20(Audience)%20Research&pubdate_year=2008&volume=23&firstpage=275&submit=yes
131
Arild Fetveit. Anti-essentialism and reception studies: In defense of the text. International Journal of Cultural Studies,;4:173–99. doi:10.1177/136787790100400203
132
David Buckingham. `Creative’ visual methods in media research: possibilities, problems and proposals. Media, Culture & Society,;31:633–52. doi:10.1177/0163443709335280
133
Cavalcante A, Press A, Sender K. Feminist reception studies in a post-audience age: returning to audiences and everyday life. Feminist Media Studies 2017;17:1–13. doi:10.1080/14680777.2017.1261822
134
Tse T. Reconceptualising prosumption beyond the cultural turn : passive fashion consumption in Korea and China. journal of Consumer Culture 2018;o (o) 1. doi:10.1177/1469540518804300
135
Bird SE. ARE WE ALL PRODUSERS NOW? Cultural Studies 2011;25:502–16. doi:10.1080/09502386.2011.600532
136
Sonia Livingstone. The Challenge of Changing Audiences: Or, What is the Audience Researcher to Do in the Age of the Internet? European Journal of Communication,;19:75–86.http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F0267323104040695
137
Nancy Thumin. Self-Representation and Digital Culture. European Journal of Communication, 2013;28:729–30. doi:10.1177/0267323113505802c
138
Thumim N. Self-representation and digital culture. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=990162
139
Henry Jenkins. The Cultural Logic of Media Convergence. International Journal of Cultural Studies,;7:33–43. doi:10.1177/1367877904040603
140
Morley D. Unanswered Questions in Audience Research. The Communication Review 2006;9:101–21. doi:10.1080/10714420600663286
141
Jermyn D, Holmes S. The Audience is Dead; Long Live the Audience!: Interactivity, ‘Telephilia’ and the Contemporary Television Audience. Critical Studies in Television: The International Journal of Television Studies 2006;1:49–57. doi:10.7227/CST.1.1.8
142
Hartley J, Burgess J, Bruns A, editors. The End of Audiences? In: A Companion to New Media Dynamics. Chichester, [England]: : Wiley-Blackwell 2013. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/reader.action?docID=3422436&ppg=126
143
Press AL. Audience Research in the Post-Audience Age: An Introduction to Barker and Morley. The Communication Review 2006;9:93–100. doi:10.1080/10714420600663278
144
Ranjana Das. Converging perspectives in audience studies and digital literacies: Youthful interpretations of an online genre. European Journal of Communication,;26:343–60.http://ejc.sagepub.com/search?author1=Das&fulltext=Converging%20Perspectives%20in%20Audience%20Studies%20and%20Digital%20Literacies:%20Youthful%20Interpretations%20of%20an%20Online%20Genre&pubdate_year=2011&volume=26&firstpage=343&submit=yes
145
The communication review (Yverdon, Switzerland). 2006;9:123–41.http://gl9sn3dh2u.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=I+have+seen+the+future+and+it+is+not+here+yet+...%3A+Or%2C+on+being+ambitious+for+audience+research&rft.jtitle=The+Communication+Review&rft.au=Barker%2C+M&rft.date=2006&rft.eissn=1547-7487&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=123&rft.epage=141&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=CAX0290060002004&paramdict=en-US
146
José van Dijck. Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media, Culture & Society,;31:41–58. doi:10.1177/0163443708098245
147
Hartley J, Burgess J, Bruns A. A companion to new media dynamics. Chichester: : John Wiley & Sons 2013. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=3422436
148
Lapsley R. Psychoanalytic Criticism. In: The Routledge companion to critical theory. London: : Routledge 2006.
149
O’Shaughnessy M. Promoting ‘emotion’: Feelings, film studies and teaching or understanding films; understanding ourselves. Metro Media and Education 1994;97.
150
Mansfield N. Lacan : The Subject is Language. In: Subjectivity: Theories of the self from Freud to Haraway. Sydney: : Allen & Unwin 2000. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=286495
151
Whitehouse-Hart J, SpringerLink (Online service). Psychosocial Explorations of Film and Television Viewing: Ordinary Audience. London: : Palgrave Macmillan UK 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137465146
152
Kavka M. Reality television, affect and intimacy: reality matters. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2008.
153
Manley J, Crociani-Windland L. Social dreaming, associative thinking and intensities of affect. Cham, Switzerland: : Palgrave Macmillan 2018. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=5497847
154
Rose G. Visual methodologies: an introduction to researching with visual materials. 3rd ed. London: : SAGE 2012.
155
Meissner, W W. Notes on identification. I. Origins in Freud. The Psychoanalytic quarterly;39:563–89.https://librarysearch.le.ac.uk/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=TN_medline4921741&context=PC&vid=44UOLE_NUI&lang=en_US&search_scope=default_scope&adaptor=primo_central_multiple_fe&tab=default_tab&query=any,contains,W.W.%20Meissner,%201970.%20Notes%20on%20Identification%20I.%20Origens%20in%20Freud,%20Psychoanalytic%20Quarterly,%2039,%20563-589.%20&pcAvailability=false
156
Sandler J, Sigmund Freud Center for Study and Research in Psychoanalysis (Universiṭah haʻIvrit bi-Yerushalayim). Projection, identification, projective identification. London: : Karnac Books 1988. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=709550
157
Pink S. Doing visual ethnography: images, media and representation in research. 2nd ed. London: : SAGE 2007. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=LeicesterU&isbn=9781446296035
158
Claydon E, Whitehouse-Hart J. Overcoming’ the ‘Battlefield of the Mind’: A Psycho-linguistic Examination of the Discourse of Digital-Televangelists Self-Help Texts’. Language and Psychoanalysis 2018;7 (2) 2-28. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.7565/landp.v7i21587
159
Campbell HA, La Pastina AC. How the iPhone became divine: new media, religion and the intertextual circulation of meaning. New Media & Society 2010;12:1191–207. doi:10.1177/1461444810362204
160
Campbell H. Digital religion: understanding religious practice in new media worlds. London: : Routledge 2013. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1097827
161
Campbell H, Garner S. Networked theology: negotiating faith in digital culture. Grand Rapids, Michigan: : Baker Academic 2016. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=5248646
162
Campbell H, Grieve GP, editors. Playing with religion in digital games. Bloomington, Indiana: : Indiana University Press 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=1680203
163
Tsuria R, Yadlin-Segal A, Vitullo A, et al. Approaches to digital methods in studies of digital religion. The Communication Review 2017;20:73–97. doi:10.1080/10714421.2017.1304137
164
Xu S, Campbell HA. Surveying digital religion in China: Characteristics of religion on the Internet in Mainland China. The Communication Review 2018;21:253–76. doi:10.1080/10714421.2018.1535729
165
Morgan D. Religion and media: A critical review of recent developments. Critical Research on Religion 2013;1:347–56. doi:10.1177/2050303213506476
166
Lundby K. PATTERNS OF BELONGING IN ONLINE/OFFLINE INTERFACES OF RELIGION. Information, Communication & Society 2011;14:1219–35. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2011.594077
167
Rippen A. Internet: Implications and Future Possibilities’. In: Muslims And The New Information And Communication Technologies Notes From An Emerging And Infinite Field. Springer 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1636818
168
Hoover SM, Clark LS. Practicing religion in the age of the media: explorations in media, religion, and culture. New York: : Columbia University Press 2002. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=895172
169
Bolongaro KAM. Pauline Hope Cheong, Peter Fischer-Nielsen, Stefan Gelfgren & Charles Ess (Eds.): Digital Religion, Social Media and Culture: Perspectives, Practices and Futures. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc. 2012. MedieKultur: Journal of media and communication research 2013;29. doi:10.7146/mediekultur.v29i55.9716
170
Cheong PH. Digital religion, social media, and culture: perspectives, practices, and futures. New York: : Peter Lang 2012.
171
Lofton K. Religion and the American Celebrity. Social Compass 2011;58:346–52. doi:10.1177/0037768611412143
172
Nikolas Coupland. The Handbook of Language and Globalization (Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics). Wiley-Blackwell 10AD. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=4041769
173
Stephen Parker. Winnicott’s object relations theory and the work of the Holy Spirit. Journal of Psychology and Theologyhttp://go.galegroup.com.ezproxy4.lib.le.ac.uk/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA192863906&v=2.1&u=leicester&it=r&p=EAIM&sw=w
174
Harris J, Watson E. The Oprah phenomenon. Updated edition. Lexington: : University Press of Kentucky 2007. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/reader.action?docID=1920897&ppg=15
175
Glad B, Beradt C. The Third Reich of Dreams. The American Political Science Review 1969;63. doi:10.2307/1954716
176
Glad B, Beradt C. The Third Reich of Dreams. The American Political Science Review 1969;63. doi:10.2307/1954716
177
Whitehouse-Hart J, SpringerLink (Online service). Psychosocial Explorations of Film and Television Viewing: Ordinary Audience. London: : Palgrave Macmillan UK 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137465146
178
O’Shaughnessy M. Promoting ‘emotion’: Feelings, film studies and teaching or understanding films; understanding ourselves. Metro Media and Education 1994;97.
179
Hills M. Michael Jackson Fans on Trial? "Documenting” Emotivism and Fandom in. Social Semiotics 2007;17:459–77. doi:10.1080/10350330701637056
180
Melissa A. ClickSuzanne Scott. The Routledge Companion to Media Fandom (Routledge Media and Cultural Studies Companions). Routledge; 1 edition 9AD. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=5122937
181
Gorton K. Media audiences: television, meaning and emotion. Edinburgh: : Edinburgh University Press 2009. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=536997