1.
Mytton G, Diem P, Dam PH van. Media Audience Research: A Guide for Professionals. Third edition. SAGE Publications, Incorporated; 2016. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=4440204
2.
Lacey N. Media Institutions and Audiences: Key Concepts in Media Studies. Palgrave; 2002. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=327969
3.
McKee A. Textual Analysis: A Beginner’s Guide. Sage Publications; 2003. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=254647
4.
Sconce J. Haunted Media: Electronic Presence from Telegraphy to Television. Duke University Press; 2000.
5.
Radway JA. Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy, and Popular Literature. 2nd ed. University of North Carolina Press; 1991. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=880363
6.
Kavka M. Reality Television, Affect and Intimacy: Reality Matters. Palgrave Macmillan; 2008.
7.
Duffy BE. Remake, Remodel: Women’s Magazines in the Digital Age. University of Illinois Press; 2013.
8.
Alasuutari P. Rethinking the Media Audience: The New Agenda. Sage; 1999.
9.
Ross K, Nightingale V. Media and Audiences: New Perspectives. Open University Press; 2003. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=295455
10.
Long P, Wall T. Media Studies: Texts, Production, Context. 2nd ed. Pearson; 2012. http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=812615
11.
Eagleton T. Ideology. Vol Longman critical readers. Longman; 1994. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1746767
12.
Gorton K. Media Audiences: Television, Meaning and Emotion. Edinburgh University Press; 2009. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=536997
13.
Cantril H, Gaudet H, Herzog H, Welles O. The Invasion from Mars: A Study in the Psychology of Panic : With the Complete Script of the Famous Orson Welles Broadcast. Princeton University Press; 1982.
14.
Williams K. Effects What Effects chapter 7. In: Understanding Media Theory. Arnold; 2003.
15.
McLeod D, Wise D, Perryman M. Thinking about the media: A review of theory and research on media perceptions, media effects perception and their consequences. Review of Communication REsearch. 2017;Volume 5.
16.
Abercrombie N, Longhurst B. Changing audiences, changing paradigms of research Chapter one. In: Audiences: A Sociological Theory of Performance and Imagination. Sage; 1998. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1024126
17.
Webster, James G. Audience, The. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 1998;42. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jbem42&collection=journals&page=190
18.
Abercrombie N, Longhurst B. Audiences: A Sociological Theory of Performance and Imagination. Sage; 1998. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1024126
19.
Schrøder KC. Convergence of Antagonistic Traditions? The Case of Audience Research. European journal of communication. 1987;2(1):7-31.
20.
Barker M, Petley J. Introduction: from bad research to good. In: Ill Effects: The Media Violence Debate. Vol Communication and society [Routledge]. 2nd ed. Routledge; 2001. http://le.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=5665221790002746&institutionId=2746&customerId=2745
21.
Livingstone SM. Making Sense of Television: The Psychology of Audience Interpretation. Vol International series in social psychology. 2nd ed. Routledge; 1998.
22.
Gauntlett D. Ten things wrong with the "effects model.”. In: Approaches to Audiences: A Reader. Vol Foundations in media. Arnold; 1998.
23.
Redman P, Open University. Attachment: Sociology and Social Worlds. Vol Making social worlds. Manchester University Press in association with the Open University; 2008.
24.
Nightingale V. Studying the Television Audience: The Shock of the Real. Routledge; 1996.
25.
Tulloch J. The implied audience in soap opera production: Everyday Rhetorical Strategies among television professionals. In: Rethinking the Media Audience: The New Agenda. Sage; 1999:151-178. http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.myilibrary.com?id=226264
26.
Gerbner et al G. Growing up with television: The Cultivation Perspective. In: Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. Vol Communication series. Communication theory and methodology. 3rd ed. Routledge; 2009. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=10274244
27.
Blackman L, Walkerdine V. Mass Hysteria: Critical Psychology and Media Studies. Macmillan; 2000.
28.
Barker M, Petley J. Ill Effects: The Media Violence Debate. Vol Communication and society [Routledge]. 2nd ed. Routledge; 2001. http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=84561
29.
Michael O’Shaughnessy. Promoting ‘emotion’: Feelings, film studies and teaching or understanding films; understanding ourselves. Metro Media and Education. 1994;97:44-48.
30.
Mayer V. The Places Where Audience Studies and Production Studies Meet. Television & New Media. 2016;17(8):706-718. doi:10.1177/1527476416652482
31.
Gray J. Reviving audience studies. Critical Studies in Media Communication. 2017;34(1):79-83. doi:10.1080/15295036.2016.1266680
32.
Hermes J, van den Berg A, Mol M. Sleeping with the enemy: Audience studies and critical literacy. International Journal of Cultural Studies. 2013;16(5):457-473. doi:10.1177/1367877912474547
33.
Behrenshausen BG. The active audience, again: Player-centric game studies and the problem of binarism. New Media & Society. 2013;15(6):872-889. doi:10.1177/1461444812462843
34.
Athique A. The dynamics and potentials of big data for audience research. Media, Culture & Society. 2018;40(1):59-74. doi:10.1177/0163443717693681
35.
Das R. Audiences: a decade of transformations – reflections from the CEDAR network on emerging directions in audience analysis. Media, Culture & Society. 2017;39(8):1257-1267. doi:10.1177/0163443717717632
36.
Ross K, Playdon P. Black Marks: Minority Ethnic Audiences and Media. Ashgate; 2001.
37.
Social comparison, social media, and self-esteem. Psychology of Popular Media Culture. Published online 2014. http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy4.lib.le.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pdh&AN=2014-33471-001&site=ehost-live
38.
Sconce J. The Voice from the Void. International Journal of Cultural Studies. 1998;1(2):211-232. doi:10.1177/13678779980010020401
39.
Kavka M. Reality Television, Affect and Intimacy: Reality Matters. Palgrave Macmillan; 2008.
40.
Jackson RL, Sage reference on-line. Encyclopedia of Identity. SAGE; 2010. http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://knowledge.sagepub.com/view/identity/SAGE.xml
41.
Rosengren k. E. Uses and Gratifications: A Paradigm Outlined. In: The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research. Vol Sage annual reviews of communication research. Sage Publications; 1974:269-286.
42.
Shanahan J, Morgan M. Television and Its Viewers: Cultivation Research and Theory. Cambridge University Press; 1999. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=5001729
43.
Michael O’Shaughnessy. Promoting ‘emotion’: Feelings, film studies and teaching or understanding films; understanding ourselves. Metro Media and Education. 1994;97:44-48.
44.
Elliott P. Uses and gratifications research: A critique and a sociological alternative. In: The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research. Vol Sage annual reviews of communication research. Sage Publications; 1974:249-268.
45.
Seiter ellen. Making distinctions in TV audience research: Case study of a troubling interview. Cultural Studies. 1990;4(1).
46.
Palmgreen p, Wenner LA, Rosengren KE. Uses and gratifications research: the past ten years. In: Media Gratifications Research: Current Perspectives. Sage; 1985:xx-xxx.
47.
Ruggiero TE. Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st Century. Mass Communication and Society. 2000;3(1):3-37. doi:10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_02
48.
Redman P, Open University. Attachment: Sociology and Social Worlds. Manchester University Press in association with the Open University; 2008.
49.
Whitehouse-Hart J. Psychosocial Explorations of Film and Television Viewing: Ordinary Audience. Palgrave Macmillan; 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1880204
50.
Bainbridge C, Ward I, Yates C. Television and Psychoanalysis: Psycho-Cultural Perspectives. Karnac; 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1574555
51.
Seiter ellen. Making distinctions in TV audience research: Case study of a troubling interview. Cultural Studies. 1990;4(1).
52.
Rosengren K. Chapter 2 - Combinations, comparisons and confrontations: towards a comprehensive theory of audience research. In: The Audience and Its Landscape. Vol Cultural studies [Westview Press]. Westview Press; 1996:23-51.
53.
Seiter E. Remote Control: Television, Audiences and Cultural Power. Routledge; 1989.
54.
Brooker W, Jermyn D. The Audience Studies Reader. Routledge; 2003.
55.
Modleski T. Loving with a Vengeance: Mass-Produced Fantasies for Women. Methuen; 1984.
56.
Hall S. Encoding/ decoding. In: Culture, Media, Language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 1972-79. Vol Working papers in cultural studies, 1972-79. Hutchinson in association with the Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies, University of Birmingham; 1980:117-128. http://le.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=5665769750002746&institutionId=2746&customerId=2745
57.
Ang I. On the politics of empirical audience research. In: Media and Cultural Studies: Keyworks. Vol Keyworks in cultural studies. Rev. ed. Blackwell; 2006. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=239901
58.
Hall S. Reflections upon the Encoding/Decoding Model: An Interview with Stuart Hall. In: Viewing, Reading, Listening: Audiences and Cultural Reception. Vol Cultural studies [Westview Press]. Westview Press; 1994:253-274.
59.
Ang I, Couling D. Watching Dallas: Soap Opera and the Melodramatic Imagination. Routledge; 1996. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=10763823
60.
Radway JA. Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy and Popular Literature. University of North Carolina Press; 1991. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=880363
61.
Ginsburg FD, Abu-Lughod L, Larkin B. Media Worlds: Anthropology on New Terrain. University of California Press; 2002. http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=10058549
62.
Hobson D. Crossroads: The Drama of a Soap Opera. Methuen; 1982.
63.
Gillespie M. Television, Ethnicity and Cultural Change. Vol Comedia. Routledge; 1995.
64.
Liebes T, Katz E. The Export of Meaning: Cross-Cultural Readings of Dallas. 2nd ed. Polity Press; 1993.
65.
Helen Wood. The mediated conversational floor: an interactive approach to audience reception analysis. Media, Culture & Society,. 29:75-103. doi:10.1177/0163443706072000
66.
Martin J. Barker. The Lord of the Rings and ‘Identification’: A Critical Encounter. European Journal of Communication,. 20:353-378. http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0267323105055262
67.
Tincknell E, Raghuram P. Big Brother: Reconfiguring the `active’ audience of cultural studies? European Journal of Cultural Studies. 2002;5(2):199-215. doi:10.1177/1364942002005002159
68.
Victor Costello. Cultural Outlaws: An Examination of Audience Activity and Online Television Fandom. Television & New Media,. 8:124-143. doi:10.1177/1527476406299112
69.
Elizabeth Jane Evans. Character, audience agency and transmedia drama. Media, Culture & Society,. 30:197-213. doi:10.1177/0163443707086861
70.
Skeggs B, Wood H. The labour of transformation and circuits of value ‘around’ reality television. Continuum. 2008;22(4):559-572. doi:10.1080/10304310801983664
71.
Brand New You | Kanopy. https://le.kanopy.com/video/brand-new-you-makeover-television-and-american-dream
72.
Skeggs B, Thumim N, Wood H. ‘Oh goodness, I am watching reality TV’. European Journal of Cultural Studies. 2008;11(1):5-24. doi:10.1177/1367549407084961
73.
Jin D. New Korean Wave: Transnational Cultural Power in the Age of Social Media. University of Illinois Press; 2016. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=4443546
74.
Livingstone S, Das R. The End of Audiences? Theoretical echoes of reception amidst the uncertainties of use. In: A Companion to New Media Dynamics. John Wiley & Sons; 2013:104-122. http://le.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=5665206730002746&institutionId=2746&customerId=2745
75.
Cavalcante A, Press A, Sender K. Feminist reception studies in a post-audience age: returning to audiences and everyday life. Feminist Media Studies. 2017;17(1):1-13. doi:10.1080/14680777.2017.1261822
76.
Kavka M. Reality Television, Affect and Intimacy: Reality Matters. Palgrave Macmillan; 2008.
77.
Wasko J. Reality TV: Performance, Authenticity, and Television Audiences. In: A Companion to Television. Vol Blackwell companions in cultural studies. Blackwell; 2005:A-Hill. http://le.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=5665769740002746&institutionId=2746&customerId=2745
78.
Paddy Scannell. Big Brother as a Television Event. Television & New Media,. 3:271-282. doi:10.1177/152747640200300303
79.
Piper H. Understanding Reality Television * Reality TV - Audiences and Popular Factual Television * Reality TV - Realism and Revelation. Screen. 2006;47(1):133-138. doi:10.1093/screen/hjl012
80.
Dovey J. Freakshow: First Person Media and Factual Television. Pluto Press; 2000. http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=2001153
81.
Skeggs B, Wood H. Reality Television and Class. BFI; 2011.
82.
Skeggs B, Wood H. Reacting to Reality Television: Performance, Audience and Value. Routledge; 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=957761
83.
Couldry N. The Extended Audience: Scanning the Horizon’. In: Media Audiences. Open University Press; 2005.
84.
Gillespie M. Television, Ethnicity and Cultural Change. Vol Comedia. Routledge; 1995.
85.
Wood H. What Reading the Romance Did for Us. European Journal of Cultural Studies. 2004;7(2):147-154. doi:10.1177/1367549404042487
86.
Ong JC. Watching the Nation, Singing the Nation: London-Based Filipino Migrants’ Identity Constructions in News and Karaoke Practices. Communication, Culture & Critique. 2009;2(2):160-181. doi:10.1111/j.1753-9137.2009.01033.x
87.
Skeggs B, Thumim N, Wood H. ‘Oh goodness, I am watching reality TV’. European Journal of Cultural Studies. 2008;11(1):5-24. doi:10.1177/1367549407084961
88.
Skeggs B, Wood H. Turning it on is a class act: immediated object relations with television. Media, Culture & Society. 2011;33(6):941-951. doi:10.1177/0163443711412298
89.
Skeggs B, Wood H. Reacting to Reality Television: Performance, Audience and Value. Taylor & Francis Group; 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=957761
90.
Skeggs B, Wood H. Reality Television and Class. BFI; 2011.
91.
Sender K, Sullivan M. Epidemics of will, failures of self-esteem: Responding to fat bodies in                              and. Continuum. 2008;22(4):573-584. doi:10.1080/10304310802190046
92.
Sender K. Reconsidering Reflexivity: Audience Research and Reality Television. The Communication Review. 2015;18(1):37-52. doi:10.1080/10714421.2015.996414
93.
Readdy T, Ebbeck V. Weighing in on NBC’s The Biggest Loser. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2012;83(4):579-586. doi:10.1080/02701367.2012.10599255
94.
Sender K. The Makeover: Reality Television and Reflexive Audiences. New York University Press; 2012. https://dx.doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814740699.001.0001
95.
Sender K. Queens for a Day:                              and the Neoliberal Project. Critical Studies in Media Communication. 2006;23(2):131-151. doi:10.1080/07393180600714505
96.
Redman P, Maples W, Open University. Good Essay Writing: A Social Sciences Guide. Fifth edition. SAGE; 2017.
97.
Bonnett A. How to Argue: A Student’s Guide. Pearson Education; 2001. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=5185704
98.
Pears R, Shields GJ. Cite Them Right: The Essential Referencing Guide. 12th edition. Bloomsbury Academic; 2022. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=6992940
99.
Lowes R, Peters H, Turner MC. The International Student’s Guide: Studying in English at University. Vol Sage study skills. SAGE; 2004. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=10218078
100.
Ferrucci P, Painter C. Print Versus Digital. Journal of Communication Inquiry. 2017;41(2):124-139. doi:10.1177/0196859917690533
101.
Madianou M, Miller D. Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies. 2013;16(2):169-187. doi:10.1177/1367877912452486
102.
Madianou M. Smartphones as Polymedia. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2014;19(3):667-680. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12069
103.
Ytre-Arne B. ‘I want to hold it in my hands’: readers’ experiences of the phenomenological differences between women’s magazines online and in print. Media, Culture & Society. 2011;33(3):467-477. doi:10.1177/0163443711398766
104.
Das R, Sonia L. The End of Audiences? Theoretical echoes of reception amidst the uncertainties of use. In: A Companion to New Media Dynamics. John Wiley & Sons; 2013. http://le.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=5665880050002746&institutionId=2746&customerId=2745
105.
Hartley J, Burgess J, Bruns A. A Companion to New Media Dynamics. John Wiley & Sons; 2013. http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=531267
106.
Mirca Madianou. Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies,. 16:169-187. http://ics.sagepub.com/search?author1=Madianou&fulltext=Polymedia:%20Towards%20a%20new%20theory%20of%20digital%20media%20in%20interpersonal%20communication&pubdate_year=2013&volume=16&firstpage=169&submit=yes
107.
Mediatization and the ‘molding force’ of the media. doi:10.1515/commun-2012-0001
108.
Hepp A. Cultures of Mediatization. Polity; 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1180925
109.
Ian Hutchby. Technologies, Texts and Affordances. Sociology. 2001;35(2):441-456. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42856294?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
110.
Miller D. Tales from Facebook. Polity; 2011. http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=571931
111.
Jenkins H. Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. Updated and with a new afterword. New York University Press; 2008.
112.
Dallas S. On the Audience Commodity and its work. In: Approaches to Media: A Reader. Vol Foundations in media. Arnold; 1995.
113.
Toynbee J. The Media’s View of the Audience. In: Media Production. Open University Press; 2006:91-133.
114.
Long P, Wall T. Media Studies: Texts, Production, Context. 2nd ed. Pearson; 2012. http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=812615
115.
Lee McGuigan. Consumers: The Commodity Product of Interactive Commercial Television, or, Is Dallas Smythe’s Thesis More Germane Than Ever? The Journal of Communication Inquiry. 2012;36(4). doi:10.1177/0196859912459756
116.
Ang, Ien. Desperately Seeking the Audience. Routledge; 1991. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=165716
117.
Webster JG, Phalen PF, Lichty LW. Ratings Analysis: The Theory and Practice of Audience Research. Vol LEA’s communication series. 3rd ed. L. Erlbaum Associates; 2006.
118.
Gitlin T. Inside Prime Time. Rev. ed. University of California Press; 2000.
119.
Greene, Kira. TV’s test pilots. Broadcasting & Cable. 2000;130(30). http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bah&AN=3364522&site=ehost-live
120.
Hayes, Dade dhayes@nbmedia.com. Inside TV’s Secret Lab. (cover story). Broadcasting & Cable. 2015;145(19):4-6. http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bah&AN=102711548&site=ehost-live
121.
P M. Made to Order and Standardized Audiences: forms of reality in audience measurements. In: Audience Making: How the Media Create the Audience. Vol Sage annual reviews of communication research. Sage; 1994:57-74.
122.
Serials Solutions Article Linker -. http://gl9sn3dh2u.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=book&rft.title=Audience+Economics&rft.au=PHILIP+M.+NAPOLI&rft.date=2003-09-25&rft.pub=Columbia+University+Press&rft_id=info:doi/10.7312%2Fnapo12652&rft.externalDocID=napo12652&paramdict=en-US
123.
Twitter to drive TV Ratings beyond an ‘assumption’ of engagement. B and T Weekly. Published 7AD. http://www.bandt.com.au/media/twitter-to-drive-tv-ratings-beyond-an-assumption-o
124.
Neilsen Launches ‘Neilsen Twitter TV Ratings’. http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=1&sid=263c30ed-675a-4554-859f-e35ae5e4887b%40sessionmgr120&hid=110&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=bwh&AN=bizwire.c51050908
125.
Radway JA. Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy, and Popular Literature. 2nd ed. University of North Carolina Press; 1991. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=880363
126.
Livingstone sonia. Relationships between media and audiences: Prospects for future audience reception studies. In: Media, Ritual, and Identity. Vol Communication and society. Routledge; 1998. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=169411
127.
Morley D. Unanswered Questions in Audience Research. The Communication Review. 2006;9(2):101-121. doi:10.1080/10714420600663286
128.
Barker M. I Have Seen the Future and It Is Not Here Yet ...; or, On Being Ambitious for Audience Research. The Communication Review. 2006;9(2):123-141. doi:10.1080/10714420600663310
129.
Seiter E. Remote Control: Television, Audiences and Cultural Power. Routledge; 1989.
130.
Birgitta Höijer. Ontological Assumptions and Generalizations in Qualitative (Audience) Research. European Journal of Communication,. 23:275-294. http://ejc.sagepub.com.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/search?author1=Hoijer&fulltext=Ontological%20Assumptions%20and%20Generalizations%20in%20Qualitative%20(Audience)%20Research&pubdate_year=2008&volume=23&firstpage=275&submit=yes
131.
Arild Fetveit. Anti-essentialism and reception studies: In defense of the text. International Journal of Cultural Studies,. 4:173-199. doi:10.1177/136787790100400203
132.
David Buckingham. `Creative’ visual methods in media research: possibilities, problems and proposals. Media, Culture & Society,. 31:633-652. doi:10.1177/0163443709335280
133.
Cavalcante A, Press A, Sender K. Feminist reception studies in a post-audience age: returning to audiences and everyday life. Feminist Media Studies. 2017;17(1):1-13. doi:10.1080/14680777.2017.1261822
134.
Tse T. Reconceptualising prosumption beyond the cultural turn : passive fashion consumption in Korea and China. journal of Consumer Culture. 2018;o (o) 1. doi:10.1177/1469540518804300
135.
Bird SE. ARE WE ALL PRODUSERS NOW? Cultural Studies. 2011;25(4-5):502-516. doi:10.1080/09502386.2011.600532
136.
Sonia Livingstone. The Challenge of Changing Audiences: Or, What is the Audience Researcher to Do in the Age of the Internet? European Journal of Communication,. 19(1):75-86. http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F0267323104040695
137.
Nancy Thumin. Self-Representation and Digital Culture. European Journal of Communication,. 2013;28(6):729-730. doi:10.1177/0267323113505802c
138.
Thumim N. Self-Representation and Digital Culture. Palgrave Macmillan; 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=990162
139.
Henry Jenkins. The Cultural Logic of Media Convergence. International Journal of Cultural Studies,. 7:33-43. doi:10.1177/1367877904040603
140.
Morley D. Unanswered Questions in Audience Research. The Communication Review. 2006;9(2):101-121. doi:10.1080/10714420600663286
141.
Jermyn D, Holmes S. The Audience is Dead; Long Live the Audience!: Interactivity, ‘Telephilia’ and the Contemporary Television Audience. Critical Studies in Television: The International Journal of Television Studies. 2006;1(1):49-57. doi:10.7227/CST.1.1.8
142.
Hartley J, Burgess J, Bruns A, eds. The End of Audiences? In: A Companion to New Media Dynamics. Wiley-Blackwell; 2013. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/reader.action?docID=3422436&ppg=126
143.
Press AL. Audience Research in the Post-Audience Age: An Introduction to Barker and Morley. The Communication Review. 2006;9(2):93-100. doi:10.1080/10714420600663278
144.
Ranjana Das. Converging perspectives in audience studies and digital literacies: Youthful interpretations of an online genre. European Journal of Communication,. 26:343-360. http://ejc.sagepub.com/search?author1=Das&fulltext=Converging%20Perspectives%20in%20Audience%20Studies%20and%20Digital%20Literacies:%20Youthful%20Interpretations%20of%20an%20Online%20Genre&pubdate_year=2011&volume=26&firstpage=343&submit=yes
145.
The communication review (Yverdon, Switzerland). 2006;9(2):123-141. http://gl9sn3dh2u.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=I+have+seen+the+future+and+it+is+not+here+yet+...%3A+Or%2C+on+being+ambitious+for+audience+research&rft.jtitle=The+Communication+Review&rft.au=Barker%2C+M&rft.date=2006&rft.eissn=1547-7487&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=123&rft.epage=141&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=CAX0290060002004&paramdict=en-US
146.
José van Dijck. Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media, Culture & Society,. 31:41-58. doi:10.1177/0163443708098245
147.
Hartley J, Burgess J, Bruns A. A Companion to New Media Dynamics. John Wiley & Sons; 2013. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=3422436
148.
Lapsley R. Psychoanalytic Criticism. In: The Routledge Companion to Critical Theory. Routledge; 2006.
149.
O’Shaughnessy M. Promoting ‘emotion’: Feelings, film studies and teaching or understanding films; understanding ourselves. Metro Media and Education. 1994;97.
150.
Mansfield N. Lacan : The Subject is Language. In: Subjectivity: Theories of the Self from Freud to Haraway. Allen & Unwin; 2000. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=286495
151.
Whitehouse-Hart J, SpringerLink (Online service). Psychosocial Explorations of Film and Television Viewing: Ordinary Audience. Palgrave Macmillan UK; 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137465146
152.
Kavka M. Reality Television, Affect and Intimacy: Reality Matters. Palgrave Macmillan; 2008.
153.
Manley J, Crociani-Windland L. Social Dreaming, Associative Thinking and Intensities of Affect. Palgrave Macmillan; 2018. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=5497847
154.
Rose G. Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials. 3rd ed. SAGE; 2012.
155.
Meissner, W W. Notes on identification. I. Origins in Freud. The Psychoanalytic quarterly. 39(4):563-589. https://librarysearch.le.ac.uk/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=TN_medline4921741&context=PC&vid=44UOLE_NUI&lang=en_US&search_scope=default_scope&adaptor=primo_central_multiple_fe&tab=default_tab&query=any,contains,W.W.%20Meissner,%201970.%20Notes%20on%20Identification%20I.%20Origens%20in%20Freud,%20Psychoanalytic%20Quarterly,%2039,%20563-589.%20&pcAvailability=false
156.
Sandler J, Sigmund Freud Center for Study and Research in Psychoanalysis (Universiṭah haʻIvrit bi-Yerushalayim). Projection, Identification, Projective Identification. Karnac Books; 1988. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=709550
157.
Pink S. Doing Visual Ethnography: Images, Media and Representation in Research. 2nd ed. SAGE; 2007. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=LeicesterU&isbn=9781446296035
158.
Claydon E, Whitehouse-Hart J. Overcoming’ the ‘Battlefield of the Mind’: A Psycho-linguistic Examination of the Discourse of Digital-Televangelists Self-Help Texts’. Language and Psychoanalysis. 2018;7 (2) 2-28. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.7565/landp.v7i21587
159.
Campbell HA, La Pastina AC. How the iPhone became divine: new media, religion and the intertextual circulation of meaning. New Media & Society. 2010;12(7):1191-1207. doi:10.1177/1461444810362204
160.
Campbell H. Digital Religion: Understanding Religious Practice in New Media Worlds. Routledge; 2013. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1097827
161.
Campbell H, Garner S. Networked Theology: Negotiating Faith in Digital Culture. Baker Academic; 2016. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=5248646
162.
Campbell H, Grieve GP, eds. Playing with Religion in Digital Games. Indiana University Press; 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=1680203
163.
Tsuria R, Yadlin-Segal A, Vitullo A, Campbell HA. Approaches to digital methods in studies of digital religion. The Communication Review. 2017;20(2):73-97. doi:10.1080/10714421.2017.1304137
164.
Xu S, Campbell HA. Surveying digital religion in China: Characteristics of religion on the Internet in Mainland China. The Communication Review. 2018;21(4):253-276. doi:10.1080/10714421.2018.1535729
165.
Morgan D. Religion and media: A critical review of recent developments. Critical Research on Religion. 2013;1(3):347-356. doi:10.1177/2050303213506476
166.
Lundby K. PATTERNS OF BELONGING IN ONLINE/OFFLINE INTERFACES OF RELIGION. Information, Communication & Society. 2011;14(8):1219-1235. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2011.594077
167.
Rippen A. Internet: Implications and Future Possibilities’. In: Muslims And The New Information And Communication Technologies Notes From An Emerging And Infinite Field. Springer; 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1636818
168.
Hoover SM, Clark LS. Practicing Religion in the Age of the Media: Explorations in Media, Religion, and Culture. Columbia University Press; 2002. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=895172
169.
Bolongaro KAM. Pauline Hope Cheong, Peter Fischer-Nielsen, Stefan Gelfgren & Charles Ess (Eds.): Digital Religion, Social Media and Culture: Perspectives, Practices and Futures. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc. 2012. MedieKultur: Journal of media and communication research. 2013;29(55). doi:10.7146/mediekultur.v29i55.9716
170.
Cheong PH. Digital Religion, Social Media, and Culture: Perspectives, Practices, and Futures. Vol v. 78. Peter Lang; 2012.
171.
Lofton K. Religion and the American Celebrity. Social Compass. 2011;58(3):346-352. doi:10.1177/0037768611412143
172.
Nikolas Coupland. The Handbook of Language and Globalization (Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics). Wiley-Blackwell; 10AD. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=4041769
173.
Stephen Parker. Winnicott’s object relations theory and the work of the Holy Spirit. Journal of Psychology and Theology. http://go.galegroup.com.ezproxy4.lib.le.ac.uk/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA192863906&v=2.1&u=leicester&it=r&p=EAIM&sw=w
174.
Harris J, Watson E. The Oprah Phenomenon. Updated edition. University Press of Kentucky; 2007. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/reader.action?docID=1920897&ppg=15
175.
Glad B, Beradt C. The Third Reich of Dreams. The American Political Science Review. 1969;63(2). doi:10.2307/1954716
176.
Glad B, Beradt C. The Third Reich of Dreams. The American Political Science Review. 1969;63(2). doi:10.2307/1954716
177.
Whitehouse-Hart J, SpringerLink (Online service). Psychosocial Explorations of Film and Television Viewing: Ordinary Audience. Palgrave Macmillan UK; 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137465146
178.
O’Shaughnessy M. Promoting ‘emotion’: Feelings, film studies and teaching or understanding films; understanding ourselves. Metro Media and Education. 1994;97.
179.
Hills M. Michael Jackson Fans on Trial? "Documenting” Emotivism and Fandom in. Social Semiotics. 2007;17(4):459-477. doi:10.1080/10350330701637056
180.
Melissa A. ClickSuzanne Scott. The Routledge Companion to Media Fandom (Routledge Media and Cultural Studies Companions). Routledge; 1 edition; 9AD. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=5122937
181.
Gorton K. Media Audiences: Television, Meaning and Emotion. Edinburgh University Press; 2009. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=536997