1.
Mytton, G., Diem, P., Dam, P.H. van: Media audience research: a guide for professionals. SAGE Publications, Incorporated, Thousand Oaks, California (2016).
2.
Lacey, N.: Media institutions and audiences: key concepts in media studies. Palgrave, Basingstoke (2002).
3.
McKee, A.: Textual analysis: a beginner’s guide. Sage Publications, London (2003).
4.
Sconce, J.: Haunted media: electronic presence from telegraphy to television. Duke University Press, Durham, NC (2000).
5.
Radway, J.A.: Reading the romance: women, patriarchy, and popular literature. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill (1991).
6.
Kavka, M.: Reality television, affect and intimacy: reality matters. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2008).
7.
Duffy, B.E.: Remake, remodel: women’s magazines in the digital age. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Illinois (2013).
8.
Alasuutari, P.: Rethinking the media audience: the new agenda. Sage, London (1999).
9.
Ross, K., Nightingale, V.: Media and audiences: new perspectives. Open University Press, Maidenhead, Berkshire, England (2003).
10.
Long, P., Wall, T.: Media studies: texts, production, context. Pearson, Harlow (2012).
11.
Eagleton, T.: Ideology. Longman, London (1994).
12.
Gorton, K.: Media audiences: television, meaning and emotion. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (2009).
13.
Cantril, H., Gaudet, H., Herzog, H., Welles, O.: The invasion from Mars: a study in the psychology of panic : with the complete script of the famous Orson Welles broadcast. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. (1982).
14.
Williams, K.: Effects What Effects chapter 7. In: Understanding Media Theory. Arnold (2003).
15.
McLeod, D., Wise, D., Perryman, M.: Thinking about the media: A review of theory and research on media perceptions, media effects perception and their consequences. Review of Communication REsearch. Volume 5, (2017).
16.
Abercrombie, N., Longhurst, B.: Changing audiences, changing paradigms of research Chapter one. In: Audiences: a sociological theory of performance and imagination. Sage, London (1998).
17.
Webster, James G.: Audience, The. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 42, (1998).
18.
Abercrombie, N., Longhurst, B.: Audiences: a sociological theory of performance and imagination. Sage, London (1998).
19.
Schrøder, K.C.: Convergence of Antagonistic Traditions? The Case of Audience Research. European journal of communication. 2, 7–31 (1987).
20.
Barker, M., Petley, J.: Introduction: from bad research to good. In: Ill effects: the media violence debate. Routledge, London (2001).
21.
Livingstone, S.M.: Making sense of television: the psychology of audience interpretation. Routledge, London (1998).
22.
Gauntlett, D.: Ten things wrong with the "effects model.”. In: Approaches to audiences: a reader. Arnold, London (1998).
23.
Redman, P., Open University: Attachment: sociology and social worlds. Manchester University Press in association with the Open University, Manchester (2008).
24.
Nightingale, V.: Studying the television audience: the shock of the real. Routledge, London (1996).
25.
Tulloch, J.: The implied audience in soap opera production: Everyday Rhetorical Strategies among television professionals. In: Rethinking the media audience: the new agenda. pp. 151–178. Sage, London (1999).
26.
Gerbner et al, G.: Growing up with television: The Cultivation Perspective. In: Media effects: advances in theory and research. Routledge, New York (2009).
27.
Blackman, L., Walkerdine, V.: Mass hysteria: critical psychology and media studies. Macmillan, Basingstoke (2000).
28.
Barker, M., Petley, J.: Ill effects: the media violence debate. Routledge, London (2001).
29.
Michael O’Shaughnessy: Promoting ‘emotion’: Feelings, film studies and teaching or understanding films; understanding ourselves. Metro Media and Education. 97, 44–48 (1994).
30.
Mayer, V.: The Places Where Audience Studies and Production Studies Meet. Television & New Media. 17, 706–718 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476416652482.
31.
Gray, J.: Reviving audience studies. Critical Studies in Media Communication. 34, 79–83 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2016.1266680.
32.
Hermes, J., van den Berg, A., Mol, M.: Sleeping with the enemy: Audience studies and critical literacy. International Journal of Cultural Studies. 16, 457–473 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877912474547.
33.
Behrenshausen, B.G.: The active audience, again: Player-centric game studies and the problem of binarism. New Media & Society. 15, 872–889 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812462843.
34.
Athique, A.: The dynamics and potentials of big data for audience research. Media, Culture & Society. 40, 59–74 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717693681.
35.
Das, R.: Audiences: a decade of transformations – reflections from the CEDAR network on emerging directions in audience analysis. Media, Culture & Society. 39, 1257–1267 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717717632.
36.
Ross, K., Playdon, P.: Black marks: minority ethnic audiences and media. Ashgate, Aldershot (2001).
37.
Social comparison, social media, and self-esteem. Psychology of Popular Media Culture. (2014).
38.
Sconce, J.: The Voice from the Void. International Journal of Cultural Studies. 1, 211–232 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1177/13678779980010020401.
39.
Kavka, M.: Reality television, affect and intimacy: reality matters. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2008).
40.
Jackson, R.L., Sage reference on-line: Encyclopedia of identity. SAGE, London (2010).
41.
Rosengren, k. E.: Uses and Gratifications: A Paradigm Outlined. In: The uses of mass communications: current perspectives on gratifications research. pp. 269–286. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, Calif (1974).
42.
Shanahan, J., Morgan, M.: Television and its viewers: cultivation research and theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (1999).
43.
Michael O’Shaughnessy: Promoting ‘emotion’: Feelings, film studies and teaching or understanding films; understanding ourselves. Metro Media and Education. 97, 44–48 (1994).
44.
Elliott, P.: Uses and gratifications research: A critique and a sociological alternative. In: The uses of mass communications: current perspectives on gratifications research. pp. 249–268. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, Calif (1974).
45.
Seiter, ellen: Making distinctions in TV audience research: Case study of a troubling interview. Cultural Studies. 4, (1990).
46.
Palmgreen, p, Wenner, L.A., Rosengren, K.E.: Uses and gratifications research: the past ten years. In: Media gratifications research: current perspectives. pp. xx–xxx. Sage, Beverly Hills (1985).
47.
Ruggiero, T.E.: Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st Century. Mass Communication and Society. 3, 3–37 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_02.
48.
Redman, P., Open University: Attachment: sociology and social worlds. Manchester University Press in association with the Open University, Manchester (2008).
49.
Whitehouse-Hart, J.: Psychosocial explorations of film and television viewing: ordinary audience. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2014).
50.
Bainbridge, C., Ward, I., Yates, C.: Television and psychoanalysis: psycho-cultural perspectives. Karnac, London (2014).
51.
Seiter, ellen: Making distinctions in TV audience research: Case study of a troubling interview. Cultural Studies. 4, (1990).
52.
Rosengren, K.: Chapter 2 - Combinations, comparisons and confrontations: towards a comprehensive theory of audience research. In: The audience and its landscape. pp. 23–51. Westview Press, Boulder, Colo (1996).
53.
Seiter, E.: Remote control: television, audiences and cultural power. Routledge, London (1989).
54.
Brooker, W., Jermyn, D.: The audience studies reader. Routledge, London (2003).
55.
Modleski, T.: Loving with a vengeance: mass-produced fantasies for women. Methuen, New York (1984).
56.
Hall, S.: Encoding/ decoding. In: Culture, media, language: working papers in cultural studies, 1972-79. pp. 117–128. Hutchinson in association with the Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies, University of Birmingham, London (1980).
57.
Ang, I.: On the politics of empirical audience research. In: Media and cultural studies: keyworks. Blackwell, Malden, MA (2006).
58.
Hall, S.: Reflections upon the Encoding/Decoding Model: An Interview with Stuart Hall. In: Viewing, reading, listening: audiences and cultural reception. pp. 253–274. Westview Press, Boulder, Colo (1994).
59.
Ang, I., Couling, D.: Watching Dallas: soap opera and the melodramatic imagination. Routledge, New York (1996).
60.
Radway, J.A.: Reading the romance: women, patriarchy and popular literature. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, N.C. (1991).
61.
Ginsburg, F.D., Abu-Lughod, L., Larkin, B.: Media worlds: anthropology on new terrain. University of California Press, Berkeley (2002).
62.
Hobson, D.: Crossroads: the drama of a soap opera. Methuen, London (1982).
63.
Gillespie, M.: Television, ethnicity and cultural change. Routledge, London (1995).
64.
Liebes, T., Katz, E.: The export of meaning: cross-cultural readings of Dallas. Polity Press, Cambridge (1993).
65.
Helen Wood: The mediated conversational floor: an interactive approach to audience reception analysis. Media, Culture & Society,. 29, 75–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443706072000.
66.
Martin J. Barker: The Lord of the Rings and ‘Identification’: A Critical Encounter. European Journal of Communication,. 20, 353–378.
67.
Tincknell, E., Raghuram, P.: Big Brother: Reconfiguring the `active’ audience of cultural studies? European Journal of Cultural Studies. 5, 199–215 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1177/1364942002005002159.
68.
Victor Costello: Cultural Outlaws: An Examination of Audience Activity and Online Television Fandom. Television & New Media,. 8, 124–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476406299112.
69.
Elizabeth Jane Evans: Character, audience agency and transmedia drama. Media, Culture & Society,. 30, 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443707086861.
70.
Skeggs, B., Wood, H.: The labour of transformation and circuits of value ‘around’ reality television. Continuum. 22, 559–572 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/10304310801983664.
71.
Brand New You | Kanopy, https://le.kanopy.com/video/brand-new-you-makeover-television-and-american-dream.
72.
Skeggs, B., Thumim, N., Wood, H.: ‘Oh goodness, I am watching reality TV’. European Journal of Cultural Studies. 11, 5–24 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549407084961.
73.
Jin, D.: New Korean Wave: Transnational Cultural Power in the Age of Social Media. University of Illinois Press, Baltimore (2016).
74.
Livingstone, S., Das, R.: The End of Audiences? Theoretical echoes of reception amidst the uncertainties of use. In: A companion to new media dynamics. pp. 104–122. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (2013).
75.
Cavalcante, A., Press, A., Sender, K.: Feminist reception studies in a post-audience age: returning to audiences and everyday life. Feminist Media Studies. 17, 1–13 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2017.1261822.
76.
Kavka, M.: Reality television, affect and intimacy: reality matters. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2008).
77.
Wasko, J.: Reality TV: Performance, Authenticity, and Television Audiences. In: A companion to television. p. A-Hill. Blackwell, Malden, Mass (2005).
78.
Paddy Scannell: Big Brother as a Television Event. Television & New Media,. 3, 271–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/152747640200300303.
79.
Piper, H.: Understanding Reality Television * Reality TV - Audiences and Popular Factual Television * Reality TV - Realism and Revelation. Screen. 47, 133–138 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/hjl012.
80.
Dovey, J.: Freakshow: first person media and factual television. Pluto Press, London (2000).
81.
Skeggs, B., Wood, H.: Reality television and class. BFI, London (2011).
82.
Skeggs, B., Wood, H.: Reacting to reality television: performance, audience and value. Routledge, New York (2012).
83.
Couldry, N.: The Extended Audience: Scanning the Horizon’. In: Media audiences. Open University Press, Maidenhead (2005).
84.
Gillespie, M.: Television, ethnicity and cultural change. Routledge, London (1995).
85.
Wood, H.: What Reading the Romance Did for Us. European Journal of Cultural Studies. 7, 147–154 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549404042487.
86.
Ong, J.C.: Watching the Nation, Singing the Nation: London-Based Filipino Migrants’ Identity Constructions in News and Karaoke Practices. Communication, Culture & Critique. 2, 160–181 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-9137.2009.01033.x.
87.
Skeggs, B., Thumim, N., Wood, H.: ‘Oh goodness, I am watching reality TV’. European Journal of Cultural Studies. 11, 5–24 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549407084961.
88.
Skeggs, B., Wood, H.: Turning it on is a class act: immediated object relations with television. Media, Culture & Society. 33, 941–951 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443711412298.
89.
Skeggs, B., Wood, H.: Reacting to Reality Television: Performance, Audience and Value. Taylor & Francis Group, Florence (2014).
90.
Skeggs, B., Wood, H.: Reality television and class. BFI, London (2011).
91.
Sender, K., Sullivan, M.: Epidemics of will, failures of self-esteem: Responding to fat bodies in and. Continuum. 22, 573–584 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/10304310802190046.
92.
Sender, K.: Reconsidering Reflexivity: Audience Research and Reality Television. The Communication Review. 18, 37–52 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2015.996414.
93.
Readdy, T., Ebbeck, V.: Weighing in on NBC’s The Biggest Loser. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 83, 579–586 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2012.10599255.
94.
Sender, K.: The makeover: reality television and reflexive audiences. New York University Press, New York (2012).
95.
Sender, K.: Queens for a Day: and the Neoliberal Project. Critical Studies in Media Communication. 23, 131–151 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/07393180600714505.
96.
Redman, P., Maples, W., Open University: Good essay writing: a social sciences guide. SAGE, Los Angeles (2017).
97.
Bonnett, A.: How to argue: a student’s guide. Pearson Education, Harlow (2001).
98.
Pears, R., Shields, G.J.: Cite them right: the essential referencing guide. Bloomsbury Academic, New York (2022).
99.
Lowes, R., Peters, H., Turner, M.C.: The international student’s guide: studying in English at university. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, Calif (2004).
100.
Ferrucci, P., Painter, C.: Print Versus Digital. Journal of Communication Inquiry. 41, 124–139 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859917690533.
101.
Madianou, M., Miller, D.: Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies. 16, 169–187 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877912452486.
102.
Madianou, M.: Smartphones as Polymedia. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 19, 667–680 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12069.
103.
Ytre-Arne, B.: ‘I want to hold it in my hands’: readers’ experiences of the phenomenological differences between women’s magazines online and in print. Media, Culture & Society. 33, 467–477 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443711398766.
104.
Das, R., Sonia, L.: The End of Audiences? Theoretical echoes of reception amidst the uncertainties of use. In: A companion to new media dynamics. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (2013).
105.
Hartley, J., Burgess, J., Bruns, A.: A companion to new media dynamics. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (2013).
106.
Mirca Madianou: Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies,. 16, 169–187.
107.
Mediatization and the ‘molding force’ of the media, http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/commun.2012.37.1.issue-1/commun-2012-0001/commun-2012-0001.xml. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2012-0001.
108.
Hepp, A.: Cultures of mediatization. Polity, Cambridge (2012).
109.
Ian Hutchby: Technologies, Texts and Affordances. Sociology. 35, 441–456 (2001).
110.
Miller, D.: Tales from Facebook. Polity, Cambridge (2011).
111.
Jenkins, H.: Convergence culture: where old and new media collide. New York University Press, New York, N.Y. (2008).
112.
Dallas, S.: On the Audience Commodity and its work. In: Approaches to media: a reader. Arnold, London (1995).
113.
Toynbee, J.: The Media’s View of the Audience. In: Media Production. pp. 91–133. Open University Press, Maidenhead (2006).
114.
Long, P., Wall, T.: Media studies: texts, production, context. Pearson, Harlow (2012).
115.
Lee McGuigan: Consumers: The Commodity Product of Interactive Commercial Television, or, Is Dallas Smythe’s Thesis More Germane Than Ever? The Journal of Communication Inquiry. 36, (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859912459756.
116.
Ang, Ien: Desperately Seeking the Audience. Routledge (1991).
117.
Webster, J.G., Phalen, P.F., Lichty, L.W.: Ratings analysis: the theory and practice of audience research. L. Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, N.J. (2006).
118.
Gitlin, T.: Inside prime time. University of California Press, Berkeley, Calif (2000).
119.
Greene, Kira: TV’s test pilots. Broadcasting & Cable. 130, (2000).
120.
Hayes, Dade dhayes@nbmedia.com: Inside TV’s Secret Lab. (cover story). Broadcasting & Cable. 145, 4–6 (2015).
121.
P, M.: Made to Order and Standardized Audiences: forms of reality in audience measurements. In: Audience making: how the media create the audience. pp. 57–74. Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif (1994).
122.
Serials Solutions Article Linker -, http://gl9sn3dh2u.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=book&rft.title=Audience+Economics&rft.au=PHILIP+M.+NAPOLI&rft.date=2003-09-25&rft.pub=Columbia+University+Press&rft_id=info:doi/10.7312%2Fnapo12652&rft.externalDocID=napo12652¶mdict=en-US.
123.
Twitter to drive TV Ratings beyond an ‘assumption’ of engagement, http://www.bandt.com.au/media/twitter-to-drive-tv-ratings-beyond-an-assumption-o.
124.
Neilsen Launches ‘Neilsen Twitter TV Ratings’, http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=1&sid=263c30ed-675a-4554-859f-e35ae5e4887b%40sessionmgr120&hid=110&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=bwh&AN=bizwire.c51050908.
125.
Radway, J.A.: Reading the romance: women, patriarchy, and popular literature. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill (1991).
126.
Livingstone, sonia: Relationships between media and audiences: Prospects for future audience reception studies. In: Media, ritual, and identity. Routledge, London (1998).
127.
Morley, D.: Unanswered Questions in Audience Research. The Communication Review. 9, 101–121 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/10714420600663286.
128.
Barker, M.: I Have Seen the Future and It Is Not Here Yet ...; or, On Being Ambitious for Audience Research. The Communication Review. 9, 123–141 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/10714420600663310.
129.
Seiter, E.: Remote control: television, audiences and cultural power. Routledge, London (1989).
130.
Birgitta Höijer: Ontological Assumptions and Generalizations in Qualitative (Audience) Research. European Journal of Communication,. 23, 275–294.
131.
Arild Fetveit: Anti-essentialism and reception studies: In defense of the text. International Journal of Cultural Studies,. 4, 173–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/136787790100400203.
132.
David Buckingham: `Creative’ visual methods in media research: possibilities, problems and proposals. Media, Culture & Society,. 31, 633–652. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443709335280.
133.
Cavalcante, A., Press, A., Sender, K.: Feminist reception studies in a post-audience age: returning to audiences and everyday life. Feminist Media Studies. 17, 1–13 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2017.1261822.
134.
Tse, T.: Reconceptualising prosumption beyond the cultural turn : passive fashion consumption in Korea and China. journal of Consumer Culture. o (o) 1, (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540518804300.
135.
Bird, S.E.: ARE WE ALL PRODUSERS NOW? Cultural Studies. 25, 502–516 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2011.600532.
136.
Sonia Livingstone: The Challenge of Changing Audiences: Or, What is the Audience Researcher to Do in the Age of the Internet? European Journal of Communication,. 19, 75–86.
137.
Nancy Thumin: Self-Representation and Digital Culture. European Journal of Communication,. 28, 729–730 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323113505802c.
138.
Thumim, N.: Self-representation and digital culture. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2012).
139.
Henry Jenkins: The Cultural Logic of Media Convergence. International Journal of Cultural Studies,. 7, 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877904040603.
140.
Morley, D.: Unanswered Questions in Audience Research. The Communication Review. 9, 101–121 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/10714420600663286.
141.
Jermyn, D., Holmes, S.: The Audience is Dead; Long Live the Audience!: Interactivity, ‘Telephilia’ and the Contemporary Television Audience. Critical Studies in Television: The International Journal of Television Studies. 1, 49–57 (2006). https://doi.org/10.7227/CST.1.1.8.
142.
Hartley, J., Burgess, J., Bruns, A. eds: The End of Audiences? In: A Companion to New Media Dynamics. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, [England] (2013).
143.
Press, A.L.: Audience Research in the Post-Audience Age: An Introduction to Barker and Morley. The Communication Review. 9, 93–100 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/10714420600663278.
144.
Ranjana Das: Converging perspectives in audience studies and digital literacies: Youthful interpretations of an online genre. European Journal of Communication,. 26, 343–360.
145.
The communication review (Yverdon, Switzerland). 9, 123–141 (2006).
146.
José van Dijck: Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media, Culture & Society,. 31, 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443708098245.
147.
Hartley, J., Burgess, J., Bruns, A.: A companion to new media dynamics. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (2013).
148.
Lapsley, R.: Psychoanalytic Criticism. In: The Routledge companion to critical theory. Routledge, London (2006).
149.
O’Shaughnessy, M.: Promoting ‘emotion’: Feelings, film studies and teaching or understanding films; understanding ourselves. Metro Media and Education. 97, (1994).
150.
Mansfield, N.: Lacan : The Subject is Language. In: Subjectivity: Theories of the self from Freud to Haraway. Allen & Unwin, Sydney (2000).
151.
Whitehouse-Hart, J., SpringerLink (Online service): Psychosocial Explorations of Film and Television Viewing: Ordinary Audience. Palgrave Macmillan UK, London (2014).
152.
Kavka, M.: Reality television, affect and intimacy: reality matters. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2008).
153.
Manley, J., Crociani-Windland, L.: Social dreaming, associative thinking and intensities of affect. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, Switzerland (2018).
154.
Rose, G.: Visual methodologies: an introduction to researching with visual materials. SAGE, London (2012).
155.
Meissner, W W: Notes on identification. I. Origins in Freud. The Psychoanalytic quarterly. 39, 563–89.
156.
Sandler, J., Sigmund Freud Center for Study and Research in Psychoanalysis (Universiṭah haʻIvrit bi-Yerushalayim): Projection, identification, projective identification. Karnac Books, London (1988).
157.
Pink, S.: Doing visual ethnography: images, media and representation in research. SAGE, London (2007).
158.
Claydon, E., Whitehouse-Hart, J.: Overcoming’ the ‘Battlefield of the Mind’: A Psycho-linguistic Examination of the Discourse of Digital-Televangelists Self-Help Texts’. Language and Psychoanalysis. 7 (2) 2-28, (2018). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.7565/landp.v7i21587.
159.
Campbell, H.A., La Pastina, A.C.: How the iPhone became divine: new media, religion and the intertextual circulation of meaning. New Media & Society. 12, 1191–1207 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810362204.
160.
Campbell, H.: Digital religion: understanding religious practice in new media worlds. Routledge, London (2013).
161.
Campbell, H., Garner, S.: Networked theology: negotiating faith in digital culture. Baker Academic, Grand Rapids, Michigan (2016).
162.
Campbell, H., Grieve, G.P. eds: Playing with religion in digital games. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana (2014).
163.
Tsuria, R., Yadlin-Segal, A., Vitullo, A., Campbell, H.A.: Approaches to digital methods in studies of digital religion. The Communication Review. 20, 73–97 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2017.1304137.
164.
Xu, S., Campbell, H.A.: Surveying digital religion in China: Characteristics of religion on the Internet in Mainland China. The Communication Review. 21, 253–276 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2018.1535729.
165.
Morgan, D.: Religion and media: A critical review of recent developments. Critical Research on Religion. 1, 347–356 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/2050303213506476.
166.
Lundby, K.: PATTERNS OF BELONGING IN ONLINE/OFFLINE INTERFACES OF RELIGION. Information, Communication & Society. 14, 1219–1235 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.594077.
167.
Rippen, A.: Internet: Implications and Future Possibilities’. In: Muslims And The New Information And Communication Technologies Notes From An Emerging And Infinite Field. Springer (2014).
168.
Hoover, S.M., Clark, L.S.: Practicing religion in the age of the media: explorations in media, religion, and culture. Columbia University Press, New York (2002).
169.
Bolongaro, K.A.M.: Pauline Hope Cheong, Peter Fischer-Nielsen, Stefan Gelfgren & Charles Ess (Eds.): Digital Religion, Social Media and Culture: Perspectives, Practices and Futures. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc. 2012. MedieKultur: Journal of media and communication research. 29, (2013). https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v29i55.9716.
170.
Cheong, P.H.: Digital religion, social media, and culture: perspectives, practices, and futures. Peter Lang, New York (2012).
171.
Lofton, K.: Religion and the American Celebrity. Social Compass. 58, 346–352 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/0037768611412143.
172.
Nikolas Coupland: The Handbook of Language and Globalization (Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics). Wiley-Blackwell (10)AD.
173.
Stephen Parker: Winnicott’s object relations theory and the work of the Holy Spirit. Journal of Psychology and Theology.
174.
Harris, J., Watson, E.: The Oprah phenomenon. University Press of Kentucky, Lexington (2007).
175.
Glad, B., Beradt, C.: The Third Reich of Dreams. The American Political Science Review. 63, (1969). https://doi.org/10.2307/1954716.
176.
Glad, B., Beradt, C.: The Third Reich of Dreams. The American Political Science Review. 63, (1969). https://doi.org/10.2307/1954716.
177.
Whitehouse-Hart, J., SpringerLink (Online service): Psychosocial Explorations of Film and Television Viewing: Ordinary Audience. Palgrave Macmillan UK, London (2014).
178.
O’Shaughnessy, M.: Promoting ‘emotion’: Feelings, film studies and teaching or understanding films; understanding ourselves. Metro Media and Education. 97, (1994).
179.
Hills, M.: Michael Jackson Fans on Trial? "Documenting” Emotivism and Fandom in. Social Semiotics. 17, 459–477 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330701637056.
180.
Melissa A. ClickSuzanne Scott: The Routledge Companion to Media Fandom (Routledge Media and Cultural Studies Companions). Routledge; 1 edition (9)AD.
181.
Gorton, K.: Media audiences: television, meaning and emotion. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (2009).
