Abercrombie, Nicholas, and Brian Longhurst, Audiences: A Sociological Theory of Performance and Imagination (London: Sage, 1998) <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1024126>
———, ‘Changing Audiences, Changing Paradigms of Research Chapter One’, in Audiences: A Sociological Theory of Performance and Imagination (London: Sage, 1998) <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1024126>
Alasuutari, Pertti, Rethinking the Media Audience: The New Agenda (London: Sage, 1999)
Ang, Ien, Desperately Seeking the Audience (Routledge, 1991) <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=165716>
Ang, Ien, ‘On the Politics of Empirical Audience Research.’, in Media and Cultural Studies: Keyworks, Rev. ed (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2006), Keyworks in cultural studies <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=239901>
Ang, Ien, and Della Couling, Watching Dallas: Soap Opera and the Melodramatic Imagination (New York: Routledge, 1996) <http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=10763823>
Arild Fetveit, ‘Anti-Essentialism and Reception Studies: In Defense of the Text’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 4, 173–99 <https://doi.org/10.1177/136787790100400203>
Athique, Adrian, ‘The Dynamics and Potentials of Big Data for Audience Research’, Media, Culture & Society, 40.1 (2018), 59–74 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717693681>
Bainbridge, Caroline, Ivan Ward, and Candida Yates, Television and Psychoanalysis: Psycho-Cultural Perspectives (London: Karnac, 2014) <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1574555>
Barker, Martin, ‘I Have Seen the Future and It Is Not Here Yet ...; or, On Being Ambitious for Audience Research’, The Communication Review, 9.2 (2006), 123–41 <https://doi.org/10.1080/10714420600663310>
Barker, Martin, and Julian Petley, Ill Effects: The Media Violence Debate, 2nd ed (London: Routledge, 2001), Communication and society [Routledge] <http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=84561>
———, ‘Introduction: From Bad Research to Good.’, in Ill Effects: The Media Violence Debate, 2nd ed (London: Routledge, 2001), Communication and society [Routledge] <http://le.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=5665221790002746&institutionId=2746&customerId=2745>
Behrenshausen, Bryan G, ‘The Active Audience, Again: Player-Centric Game Studies and the Problem of Binarism’, New Media & Society, 15.6 (2013), 872–89 <https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812462843>
Bird, S. Elizabeth, ‘ARE WE ALL PRODUSERS NOW?’, Cultural Studies, 25.4–5 (2011), 502–16 <https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2011.600532>
Birgitta Höijer, ‘Ontological Assumptions and Generalizations in Qualitative (Audience) Research’, European Journal of Communication, 23, 275–94 <http://ejc.sagepub.com.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/search?author1=Hoijer&fulltext=Ontological%20Assumptions%20and%20Generalizations%20in%20Qualitative%20(Audience)%20Research&pubdate_year=2008&volume=23&firstpage=275&submit=yes>
Blackman, Lisa, and Valerie Walkerdine, Mass Hysteria: Critical Psychology and Media Studies (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2000)
Bolongaro, Kaitlyn Alessandra Maria, ‘Pauline Hope Cheong, Peter Fischer-Nielsen, Stefan Gelfgren & Charles Ess (Eds.): Digital Religion, Social Media and Culture: Perspectives, Practices and Futures. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc. 2012.’, MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research, 29.55 (2013) <https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v29i55.9716>
Bonnett, Alastair, How to Argue: A Student’s Guide (Harlow: Pearson Education, 2001) <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=5185704>
‘Brand New You | Kanopy’ <https://le.kanopy.com/video/brand-new-you-makeover-television-and-american-dream>
Brooker, Will, and Deborah Jermyn, The Audience Studies Reader (London: Routledge, 2003)
Campbell, Heidi, Digital Religion: Understanding Religious Practice in New Media Worlds (London: Routledge, 2013) <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1097827>
Campbell, Heidi A., and Antonio C. La Pastina, ‘How the iPhone Became Divine: New Media, Religion and the Intertextual Circulation of Meaning’, New Media & Society, 12.7 (2010), 1191–1207 <https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810362204>
Campbell, Heidi, and St Garner, Networked Theology: Negotiating Faith in Digital Culture (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Academic, 2016) <http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=5248646>
Campbell, Heidi, and Gregory P. Grieve, eds., Playing with Religion in Digital Games (Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press, 2014) <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&amp;docID=1680203>
Cantril, Hadley, Hazel Gaudet, Herta Herzog, and Orson Welles, The Invasion from Mars: A Study in the Psychology of Panic : With the Complete Script of the Famous Orson Welles Broadcast (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1982)
Cavalcante, Andre, Andrea Press, and Katherine Sender, ‘Feminist Reception Studies in a Post-Audience Age: Returning to Audiences and Everyday Life’, Feminist Media Studies, 17.1 (2017), 1–13 <https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2017.1261822>
———, ‘Feminist Reception Studies in a Post-Audience Age: Returning to Audiences and Everyday Life’, Feminist Media Studies, 17.1 (2017), 1–13 <https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2017.1261822>
Cheong, Pauline Hope, Digital Religion, Social Media, and Culture: Perspectives, Practices, and Futures (New York: Peter Lang, 2012), v. 78
Claydon, EA, and Jo Whitehouse-Hart, ‘Overcoming’ the “Battlefield of the Mind”: A Psycho-Linguistic Examination of the Discourse of Digital-Televangelists Self-Help Texts’’, Language and Psychoanalysis, 7 (2) 2-28 (2018) <https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.7565/landp.v7i21587>
Couldry, Nick, ‘The Extended Audience: Scanning the Horizon’’, in Media Audiences (Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2005)
Dallas, Smythe, ‘On the Audience Commodity and Its Work’, in Approaches to Media: A Reader (London: Arnold, 1995), Foundations in media
Das, Ranjana, ‘Audiences: A Decade of Transformations – Reflections from the CEDAR Network on Emerging Directions in Audience Analysis’, Media, Culture & Society, 39.8 (2017), 1257–67 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717717632>
Das, Ranjana, and Livingstone Sonia, ‘The End of Audiences? Theoretical Echoes of Reception amidst the Uncertainties of Use’, in A Companion to New Media Dynamics (Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2013) <http://le.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=5665880050002746&institutionId=2746&customerId=2745>
David Buckingham, ‘`Creative’ Visual Methods in Media Research: Possibilities, Problems and Proposals’, Media, Culture & Society, 31, 633–52 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443709335280>
Dovey, Jon, Freakshow: First Person Media and Factual Television (London: Pluto Press, 2000) <http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=2001153>
Duffy, Brooke Erin, Remake, Remodel: Women’s Magazines in the Digital Age (Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press, 2013)
Eagleton, Terry, Ideology (London: Longman, 1994), Longman critical readers <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1746767>
Elizabeth Jane Evans, ‘Character, Audience Agency and Transmedia Drama’, Media, Culture & Society, 30, 197–213 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443707086861>
Elliott, P., ‘Uses and Gratifications Research: A Critique and a Sociological Alternative.’, in The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research (Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage Publications, 1974), Sage annual reviews of communication research, 249–68
Ferrucci, Patrick, and Chad Painter, ‘Print Versus Digital’, Journal of Communication Inquiry, 41.2 (2017), 124–39 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859917690533>
Gauntlett, David, ‘Ten Things Wrong with the "effects Model.”’, in Approaches to Audiences: A Reader (London: Arnold, 1998), Foundations in media
Gerbner et al, G, ‘Growing up with Television: The Cultivation Perspective’, in Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research, 3rd ed (New York: Routledge, 2009), Communication series. Communication theory and methodology <http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=10274244>
Gillespie, Marie, Television, Ethnicity and Cultural Change (London: Routledge, 1995), Comedia
———, Television, Ethnicity and Cultural Change (London: Routledge, 1995), Comedia
Ginsburg, Faye D., Lila Abu-Lughod, and Brian Larkin, Media Worlds: Anthropology on New Terrain (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002) <http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=10058549>
Gitlin, Todd, Inside Prime Time, Rev. ed (Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press, 2000)
Glad, Betty, and Charlotte Beradt, ‘The Third Reich of Dreams’, The American Political Science Review, 63.2 (1969) <https://doi.org/10.2307/1954716>
———, ‘The Third Reich of Dreams’, The American Political Science Review, 63.2 (1969) <https://doi.org/10.2307/1954716>
Gorton, Kristyn, Media Audiences: Television, Meaning and Emotion (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2009) <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&amp;docID=536997>
———, Media Audiences: Television, Meaning and Emotion (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2009) <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&amp;docID=536997>
Gray, Jonathan, ‘Reviving Audience Studies’, Critical Studies in Media Communication, 34.1 (2017), 79–83 <https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2016.1266680>
Greene, Kira, ‘TV’s Test Pilots.’, Broadcasting & Cable., 130.30 (2000) <http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bah&AN=3364522&site=ehost-live>
Hall, Stuart, ‘Encoding/ Decoding’, in Culture, Media, Language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 1972-79 (London: Hutchinson in association with the Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies, University of Birmingham, 1980), Working papers in cultural studies, 1972-79, 117–28 <http://le.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=5665769750002746&institutionId=2746&customerId=2745>
———, ‘Reflections upon the Encoding/Decoding Model: An Interview with Stuart Hall’, in Viewing, Reading, Listening: Audiences and Cultural Reception (Boulder, Colo: Westview Press, 1994), Cultural studies [Westview Press], 253–74
Harris, Jennifer, and Elwood Watson, The Oprah Phenomenon, Updated edition (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 2007) <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/reader.action?docID=1920897&ppg=15>
Hartley, John, Jean Burgess, and Axel Bruns, A Companion to New Media Dynamics (Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2013) <http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=531267>
———, A Companion to New Media Dynamics (Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2013) <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=3422436>
———, eds., ‘The End of Audiences?’, in A Companion to New Media Dynamics (Chichester, [England]: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013) <http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/reader.action?docID=3422436&amp;ppg=126>
Hayes, Dade dhayes@nbmedia.com, ‘Inside TV’s Secret Lab. (Cover Story)’, Broadcasting & Cable., 145.19 (2015), 4–6 <http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bah&AN=102711548&site=ehost-live>
Helen Wood, ‘The Mediated Conversational Floor: An Interactive Approach to Audience Reception Analysis’, Media, Culture & Society, 29, 75–103 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443706072000>
Henry Jenkins, ‘The Cultural Logic of Media Convergence’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 7, 33–43 <https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877904040603>
Hepp, Andreas, Cultures of Mediatization (Cambridge: Polity, 2012) <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1180925>
Hermes, Joke, Annika van den Berg, and Marloes Mol, ‘Sleeping with the Enemy: Audience Studies and Critical Literacy’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16.5 (2013), 457–73 <https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877912474547>
Hills, Matt, ‘Michael Jackson Fans on Trial? "Documenting” Emotivism and Fandom in’, Social Semiotics, 17.4 (2007), 459–77 <https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330701637056>
Hobson, Dorothy, Crossroads: The Drama of a Soap Opera (London: Methuen, 1982)
Hoover, Stewart M., and Lynn Schofield Clark, Practicing Religion in the Age of the Media: Explorations in Media, Religion, and Culture (New York: Columbia University Press, 2002) <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&amp;docID=895172>
Ian Hutchby, ‘Technologies, Texts and Affordances’, Sociology, 35.2 (2001), 441–56 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/42856294?pq-origsite=summon&amp;seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
Jackson, Ronald L. and Sage reference on-line, Encyclopedia of Identity (London: SAGE, 2010) <http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://knowledge.sagepub.com/view/identity/SAGE.xml>
Jenkins, Henry, Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide, Updated and with a new afterword (New York, N.Y.: New York University Press, 2008)
Jermyn, Deborah, and Su Holmes, ‘The Audience Is Dead; Long Live the Audience!: Interactivity, “Telephilia” and the Contemporary Television Audience’, Critical Studies in Television: The International Journal of Television Studies, 1.1 (2006), 49–57 <https://doi.org/10.7227/CST.1.1.8>
Jin, Dal, New Korean Wave: Transnational Cultural Power in the Age of Social Media (Baltimore: University of Illinois Press, 2016) <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=4443546>
José van Dijck, ‘Users like You? Theorizing Agency in User-Generated Content’, Media, Culture & Society, 31, 41–58 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443708098245>
Kavka, Misha, Reality Television, Affect and Intimacy: Reality Matters (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008)
———, Reality Television, Affect and Intimacy: Reality Matters (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008)
———, Reality Television, Affect and Intimacy: Reality Matters (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008)
———, Reality Television, Affect and Intimacy: Reality Matters (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008)
Lacey, Nick, Media Institutions and Audiences: Key Concepts in Media Studies (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002) <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=327969>
Lapsley, Robert, ‘Psychoanalytic Criticism’, in The Routledge Companion to Critical Theory (London: Routledge, 2006)
Lee McGuigan, ‘Consumers: The Commodity Product of Interactive Commercial Television, or, Is Dallas Smythe’s Thesis More Germane Than Ever?’, The Journal of Communication Inquiry, 36.4 (2012) <https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859912459756>
Liebes, Tamar, and Elihu Katz, The Export of Meaning: Cross-Cultural Readings of Dallas, 2nd ed (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1993)
Livingstone, sonia, ‘Relationships between Media and Audiences: Prospects for Future Audience Reception Studies.’, in Media, Ritual, and Identity (London: Routledge, 1998), Communication and society <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=169411>
Livingstone, Sonia, and Ranjana Das, ‘The End of Audiences? Theoretical Echoes of Reception amidst the Uncertainties of Use.’, in A Companion to New Media Dynamics (Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2013), pp. 104–22 <http://le.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=5665206730002746&institutionId=2746&customerId=2745>
Livingstone, Sonia M., Making Sense of Television: The Psychology of Audience Interpretation, 2nd ed (London: Routledge, 1998), International series in social psychology
Lofton, Kathryn, ‘Religion and the American Celebrity’, Social Compass, 58.3 (2011), 346–52 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0037768611412143>
Long, Paul, and Tim Wall, Media Studies: Texts, Production, Context, 2nd ed (Harlow: Pearson, 2012) <http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&amp;db=nlebk&amp;AN=812615>
———, Media Studies: Texts, Production, Context, 2nd ed (Harlow: Pearson, 2012) <http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&amp;db=nlebk&amp;AN=812615>
Lowes, Ricky, Helen Peters, and Marie Clare Turner, The International Student’s Guide: Studying in English at University (Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE, 2004), Sage study skills <http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=10218078>
Lundby, Knut, ‘PATTERNS OF BELONGING IN ONLINE/OFFLINE INTERFACES OF RELIGION’, Information, Communication & Society, 14.8 (2011), 1219–35 <https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.594077>
Madianou, M., and D. Miller, ‘Polymedia: Towards a New Theory of Digital Media in Interpersonal Communication’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16.2 (2013), 169–87 <https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877912452486>
Madianou, Mirca, ‘Smartphones as Polymedia’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19.3 (2014), 667–80 <https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12069>
Manley, Julian, and Lita Crociani-Windland, Social Dreaming, Associative Thinking and Intensities of Affect (Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018) <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=5497847>
Mansfield, Nick, ‘Lacan : The Subject Is Language’, in Subjectivity: Theories of the Self from Freud to Haraway (Sydney: Allen & Unwin, 2000) <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=286495>
Martin J. Barker, ‘The Lord of the Rings and “Identification”: A Critical Encounter’, European Journal of Communication, 20, 353–78 <http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0267323105055262>
Mayer, Vicki, ‘The Places Where Audience Studies and Production Studies Meet’, Television & New Media, 17.8 (2016), 706–18 <https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476416652482>
McKee, Alan, Textual Analysis: A Beginner’s Guide (London: Sage Publications, 2003) <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&amp;docID=254647>
McLeod, Douglas, David Wise, and Mallory Perryman, ‘Thinking about the Media: A Review of Theory and Research on Media Perceptions, Media Effects Perception and Their Consequences’, Review of Communication REsearch, Volume 5 (2017)
‘Mediatization and the “Molding Force” of the Media’ <https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2012-0001>
Meissner, W W, ‘Notes on Identification. I. Origins in Freud’, The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 39.4, 563–89 <https://librarysearch.le.ac.uk/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=TN_medline4921741&amp;context=PC&amp;vid=44UOLE_NUI&amp;lang=en_US&amp;search_scope=default_scope&amp;adaptor=primo_central_multiple_fe&amp;tab=default_tab&amp;query=any,contains,W.W.%20Meissner,%201970.%20Notes%20on%20Identification%20I.%20Origens%20in%20Freud,%20Psychoanalytic%20Quarterly,%2039,%20563-589.%20&amp;pcAvailability=false>
Melissa A. ClickSuzanne Scott, The Routledge Companion to Media Fandom (Routledge Media and Cultural Studies Companions) (Routledge; 1 edition, 9AD) <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=5122937>
Michael O’Shaughnessy, ‘Promoting “Emotion”: Feelings, Film Studies and Teaching or Understanding Films; Understanding Ourselves’, Metro Media and Education, 97 (1994), 44–48
———, ‘Promoting “Emotion”: Feelings, Film Studies and Teaching or Understanding Films; Understanding Ourselves’, Metro Media and Education, 97 (1994), 44–48
Miller, Daniel, Tales from Facebook (Cambridge: Polity, 2011) <http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=571931>
Mirca Madianou, ‘Polymedia: Towards a New Theory of Digital Media in Interpersonal Communication’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16, 169–87 <http://ics.sagepub.com/search?author1=Madianou&fulltext=Polymedia:%20Towards%20a%20new%20theory%20of%20digital%20media%20in%20interpersonal%20communication&pubdate_year=2013&volume=16&firstpage=169&submit=yes>
Modleski, Tania, Loving with a Vengeance: Mass-Produced Fantasies for Women (New York: Methuen, 1984)
Morgan, David, ‘Religion and Media: A Critical Review of Recent Developments’, Critical Research on Religion, 1.3 (2013), 347–56 <https://doi.org/10.1177/2050303213506476>
Morley, David, ‘Unanswered Questions in Audience Research’, The Communication Review, 9.2 (2006), 101–21 <https://doi.org/10.1080/10714420600663286>
———, ‘Unanswered Questions in Audience Research’, The Communication Review, 9.2 (2006), 101–21 <https://doi.org/10.1080/10714420600663286>
Mytton, Graham, Peter Diem, and Piet Hein van Dam, Media Audience Research: A Guide for Professionals, Third edition (Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Incorporated, 2016) <http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=4440204>
Nancy Thumin, ‘Self-Representation and Digital Culture’, European Journal of Communication, 28.6 (2013), 729–30 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323113505802c>
‘Neilsen Launches “Neilsen Twitter TV Ratings”’ <http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=1&amp;sid=263c30ed-675a-4554-859f-e35ae5e4887b%40sessionmgr120&amp;hid=110&amp;bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=bwh&amp;AN=bizwire.c51050908>
Nightingale, Virginia, Studying the Television Audience: The Shock of the Real (London: Routledge, 1996)
Nikolas Coupland, The Handbook of Language and Globalization (Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics) (Wiley-Blackwell, 10AD) <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=4041769>
Ong, Jonathan Corpus, ‘Watching the Nation, Singing the Nation: London-Based Filipino Migrants’ Identity Constructions in News and Karaoke Practices’, Communication, Culture & Critique, 2.2 (2009), 160–81 <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-9137.2009.01033.x>
O’Shaughnessy, Mike, ‘Promoting “Emotion”: Feelings, Film Studies and Teaching or Understanding Films; Understanding Ourselves’, Metro Media and Education, 97 (1994)
———, ‘Promoting “Emotion”: Feelings, Film Studies and Teaching or Understanding Films; Understanding Ourselves’, Metro Media and Education, 97 (1994)
P, Miller, ‘Made to Order and Standardized Audiences: Forms of Reality in Audience Measurements’, in Audience Making: How the Media Create the Audience (Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage, 1994), Sage annual reviews of communication research, 57–74
Paddy Scannell, ‘Big Brother as a Television Event’, Television & New Media, 3, 271–82 <https://doi.org/10.1177/152747640200300303>
Palmgreen, p, L A Wenner, and K.E. Rosengren, ‘Uses and Gratifications Research: The Past Ten Years.’, in Media Gratifications Research: Current Perspectives (Beverly Hills: Sage, 1985), pp. xx–xxx
Pears, Richard, and Graham J. Shields, Cite Them Right: The Essential Referencing Guide, 12th edition (New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2022) <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=6992940>
Pink, Sarah, Doing Visual Ethnography: Images, Media and Representation in Research, 2nd ed (London: SAGE, 2007) <http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=LeicesterU&amp;isbn=9781446296035>
Piper, H., ‘Understanding Reality Television * Reality TV - Audiences and Popular Factual Television * Reality TV - Realism and Revelation’, Screen, 47.1 (2006), 133–38 <https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/hjl012>
Press, Andrea L., ‘Audience Research in the Post-Audience Age: An Introduction to Barker and Morley’, The Communication Review, 9.2 (2006), 93–100 <https://doi.org/10.1080/10714420600663278>
Radway, Janice A., Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy, and Popular Literature, 2nd ed (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1991) <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=880363>
———, Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy and Popular Literature (Chapel Hill, N.C.: University of North Carolina Press, 1991) <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&amp;docID=880363>
———, Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy, and Popular Literature, 2nd ed (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1991) <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=880363>
Ranjana Das, ‘Converging Perspectives in Audience Studies and Digital Literacies: Youthful Interpretations of an Online Genre’, European Journal of Communication, 26, 343–60 <http://ejc.sagepub.com/search?author1=Das&amp;fulltext=Converging%20Perspectives%20in%20Audience%20Studies%20and%20Digital%20Literacies:%20Youthful%20Interpretations%20of%20an%20Online%20Genre&amp;pubdate_year=2011&amp;volume=26&amp;firstpage=343&amp;submit=yes>
Readdy, Tucker, and Vicki Ebbeck, ‘Weighing in on NBC’s The Biggest Loser’, Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 83.4 (2012), 579–86 <https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2012.10599255>
Redman, Peter, Wendy Maples, and Open University, Good Essay Writing: A Social Sciences Guide, Fifth edition (Los Angeles: SAGE, 2017)
Redman, Peter and Open University, Attachment: Sociology and Social Worlds (Manchester: Manchester University Press in association with the Open University, 2008), Making social worlds
———, Attachment: Sociology and Social Worlds (Manchester: Manchester University Press in association with the Open University, 2008)
Rippen, A, ‘Internet: Implications and Future Possibilities’’, in Muslims And The New Information And Communication Technologies Notes From An Emerging And Infinite Field (Springer, 2014) <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1636818>
Rose, Gillian, Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials, 3rd ed (London: SAGE, 2012)
Rosengren, K, ‘Chapter 2 - Combinations, Comparisons and Confrontations: Towards a Comprehensive Theory of Audience Research’, in The Audience and Its Landscape (Boulder, Colo: Westview Press, 1996), Cultural studies [Westview Press], 23–51
Rosengren, k.E., ‘Uses and Gratifications: A Paradigm Outlined’, in The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research (Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage Publications, 1974), Sage annual reviews of communication research, 269–86
Ross, Karen, and Virginia Nightingale, Media and Audiences: New Perspectives (Maidenhead, Berkshire, England: Open University Press, 2003) <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&amp;docID=295455>
Ross, Karen, and Peter Playdon, Black Marks: Minority Ethnic Audiences and Media (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2001)
Ruggiero, Thomas E., ‘Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st Century’, Mass Communication and Society, 3.1 (2000), 3–37 <https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_02>
Sandler, Joseph and Sigmund Freud Center for Study and Research in Psychoanalysis (Universiṭah haʻIvrit bi-Yerushalayim), Projection, Identification, Projective Identification (London: Karnac Books, 1988) <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=709550>
Schrøder, K.C, ‘Convergence of Antagonistic Traditions? The Case of Audience Research’, European Journal of Communication, 2.1 (1987), 7–31
Sconce, Jeffrey, Haunted Media: Electronic Presence from Telegraphy to Television (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2000)
———, ‘The Voice from the Void’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 1.2 (1998), 211–32 <https://doi.org/10.1177/13678779980010020401>
Seiter, ellen, ‘Making Distinctions in TV Audience Research: Case Study of a Troubling Interview’, Cultural Studies, 4.1 (1990)
———, ‘Making Distinctions in TV Audience Research: Case Study of a Troubling Interview’, Cultural Studies, 4.1 (1990)
Seiter, Ellen, Remote Control: Television, Audiences and Cultural Power (London: Routledge, 1989)
———, Remote Control: Television, Audiences and Cultural Power (London: Routledge, 1989)
Sender, Katherine, ‘Queens for a Day:                              and the Neoliberal Project’, Critical Studies in Media Communication, 23.2 (2006), 131–51 <https://doi.org/10.1080/07393180600714505>
———, ‘Reconsidering Reflexivity: Audience Research and Reality Television’, The Communication Review, 18.1 (2015), 37–52 <https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2015.996414>
———, The Makeover: Reality Television and Reflexive Audiences (New York: New York University Press, 2012) <http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814740699.001.0001>
Sender, Katherine, and Margaret Sullivan, ‘Epidemics of Will, Failures of Self-Esteem: Responding to Fat Bodies in                              And’, Continuum, 22.4 (2008), 573–84 <https://doi.org/10.1080/10304310802190046>
‘Serials Solutions Article Linker -’ <http://gl9sn3dh2u.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=book&rft.title=Audience+Economics&rft.au=PHILIP+M.+NAPOLI&rft.date=2003-09-25&rft.pub=Columbia+University+Press&rft_id=info:doi/10.7312%2Fnapo12652&rft.externalDocID=napo12652&paramdict=en-US>
Shanahan, Jim, and Michael Morgan, Television and Its Viewers: Cultivation Research and Theory (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999) <http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=5001729>
Skeggs, Bev, Nancy Thumim, and Helen Wood, ‘“Oh Goodness, I Am Watching Reality TV”’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 11.1 (2008), 5–24 <https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549407084961>
———, ‘“Oh Goodness, I Am Watching Reality TV”’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 11.1 (2008), 5–24 <https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549407084961>
Skeggs, Beverley, and Helen Wood, Reacting to Reality Television: Performance, Audience and Value (New York: Routledge, 2012) <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=957761>
———, Reacting to Reality Television: Performance, Audience and Value (Florence: Taylor & Francis Group, 2014) <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=957761>
———, Reality Television and Class (London: BFI, 2011)
———, Reality Television and Class (London: BFI, 2011)
———, ‘The Labour of Transformation and Circuits of Value “around” Reality Television’, Continuum, 22.4 (2008), 559–72 <https://doi.org/10.1080/10304310801983664>
———, ‘Turning It on Is a Class Act: Immediated Object Relations with Television’, Media, Culture & Society, 33.6 (2011), 941–51 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443711412298>
‘Social Comparison, Social Media, and Self-Esteem.’, Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 2014 <http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy4.lib.le.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&amp;db=pdh&amp;AN=2014-33471-001&amp;site=ehost-live>
Sonia Livingstone, ‘The Challenge of Changing Audiences: Or, What Is the Audience Researcher to Do in the Age of the Internet?’, European Journal of Communication, 19.1, 75–86 <http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F0267323104040695>
Stephen Parker, ‘Winnicott’s Object Relations Theory and the Work of the Holy Spirit’, Journal of Psychology and Theology <http://go.galegroup.com.ezproxy4.lib.le.ac.uk/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA192863906&amp;v=2.1&amp;u=leicester&amp;it=r&amp;p=EAIM&amp;sw=w>
‘The Communication Review (Yverdon, Switzerland)’, 9.2 (2006), 123–41 <http://gl9sn3dh2u.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=I+have+seen+the+future+and+it+is+not+here+yet+...%3A+Or%2C+on+being+ambitious+for+audience+research&rft.jtitle=The+Communication+Review&rft.au=Barker%2C+M&rft.date=2006&rft.eissn=1547-7487&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=123&rft.epage=141&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=CAX0290060002004&paramdict=en-US>
Thumim, Nancy, Self-Representation and Digital Culture (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012) <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=990162>
Tincknell, E., and P. Raghuram, ‘Big Brother: Reconfiguring the `active’ Audience of Cultural Studies?’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 5.2 (2002), 199–215 <https://doi.org/10.1177/1364942002005002159>
Toynbee, Jason, ‘The Media’s View of the Audience’, in Media Production (Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2006), pp. 91–133
Tse, Tommy, ‘Reconceptualising Prosumption beyond the Cultural Turn : Passive Fashion Consumption in Korea and China’, Journal of Consumer Culture, o (o) 1 (2018) <https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540518804300>
Tsuria, Ruth, Aya Yadlin-Segal, Alessandra Vitullo, and Heidi A. Campbell, ‘Approaches to Digital Methods in Studies of Digital Religion’, The Communication Review, 20.2 (2017), 73–97 <https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2017.1304137>
Tulloch, John, ‘The Implied Audience in Soap Opera Production: Everyday Rhetorical Strategies among Television Professionals’, in Rethinking the Media Audience: The New Agenda (London: Sage, 1999), pp. 151–78 <http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.myilibrary.com?id=226264>
‘Twitter to Drive TV Ratings beyond an “assumption” of Engagement’, B and T Weekly, 7AD <http://www.bandt.com.au/media/twitter-to-drive-tv-ratings-beyond-an-assumption-o>
Victor Costello, ‘Cultural Outlaws: An Examination of Audience Activity and Online Television Fandom’, Television & New Media, 8, 124–43 <https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476406299112>
Wasko, Janet, ‘Reality TV: Performance, Authenticity, and Television Audiences’, in A Companion to Television (Malden, Mass: Blackwell, 2005), Blackwell companions in cultural studies, A-Hill <http://le.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=5665769740002746&institutionId=2746&customerId=2745>
Webster, James G., ‘Audience, The’, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 42 (1998) <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jbem42&collection=journals&page=190>
Webster, James G., Patricia F. Phalen, and Lawrence W. Lichty, Ratings Analysis: The Theory and Practice of Audience Research, 3rd ed (Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates, 2006), LEA’s communication series
Whitehouse-Hart, Jo, Psychosocial Explorations of Film and Television Viewing: Ordinary Audience (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014) <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1880204>
Whitehouse-Hart, Jo and SpringerLink (Online service), Psychosocial Explorations of Film and Television Viewing: Ordinary Audience (London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2014) <http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137465146>
———, Psychosocial Explorations of Film and Television Viewing: Ordinary Audience (London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2014) <http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137465146>
Williams, Kevin, ‘Effects What Effects Chapter 7’, in Understanding Media Theory (Arnold, 2003)
Wood, Helen, ‘What Reading the Romance Did for Us’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 7.2 (2004), 147–54 <https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549404042487>
Xu, Shengju, and Heidi A. Campbell, ‘Surveying Digital Religion in China: Characteristics of Religion on the Internet in Mainland China’, The Communication Review, 21.4 (2018), 253–76 <https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2018.1535729>
Ytre-Arne, Brita, ‘“I Want to Hold It in My Hands”: Readers’ Experiences of the Phenomenological Differences between Women’s Magazines Online and in Print’, Media, Culture & Society, 33.3 (2011), 467–77 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443711398766>