[1]
G. Mytton, P. Diem, and P. H. van Dam, Media audience research: a guide for professionals, Third edition. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Incorporated, 2016 [Online]. Available: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=4440204
[2]
N. Lacey, Media institutions and audiences: key concepts in media studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=327969
[3]
A. McKee, Textual analysis: a beginner’s guide. London: Sage Publications, 2003 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=254647
[4]
J. Sconce, Haunted media: electronic presence from telegraphy to television. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2000.
[5]
J. A. Radway, Reading the romance: women, patriarchy, and popular literature, 2nd ed. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1991 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=880363
[6]
M. Kavka, Reality television, affect and intimacy: reality matters. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
[7]
B. E. Duffy, Remake, remodel: women’s magazines in the digital age. Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press, 2013.
[8]
P. Alasuutari, Rethinking the media audience: the new agenda. London: Sage, 1999.
[9]
K. Ross and V. Nightingale, Media and audiences: new perspectives. Maidenhead, Berkshire, England: Open University Press, 2003 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=295455
[10]
P. Long and T. Wall, Media studies: texts, production, context, 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=812615
[11]
T. Eagleton, Ideology, vol. Longman critical readers. London: Longman, 1994 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1746767
[12]
K. Gorton, Media audiences: television, meaning and emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2009 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=536997
[13]
H. Cantril, H. Gaudet, H. Herzog, and O. Welles, The invasion from Mars: a study in the psychology of panic : with the complete script of the famous Orson Welles broadcast. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1982.
[14]
K. Williams, ‘Effects What Effects chapter 7’, in Understanding Media Theory, Arnold, 2003.
[15]
D. McLeod, D. Wise, and M. Perryman, ‘Thinking about the media: A review of theory and research on media perceptions, media effects perception and their consequences’, Review of Communication REsearch, vol. Volume 5, 2017.
[16]
N. Abercrombie and B. Longhurst, ‘Changing audiences, changing paradigms of research Chapter one’, in Audiences: a sociological theory of performance and imagination, London: Sage, 1998 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1024126
[17]
Webster, James G., ‘Audience, The’, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, vol. 42, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jbem42&collection=journals&page=190
[18]
N. Abercrombie and B. Longhurst, Audiences: a sociological theory of performance and imagination. London: Sage, 1998 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1024126
[19]
K. C. Schrøder, ‘Convergence of Antagonistic Traditions? The Case of Audience Research’, European journal of communication, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 7–31, 1987.
[20]
M. Barker and J. Petley, ‘Introduction: from bad research to good.’, in Ill effects: the media violence debate, 2nd ed., vol. Communication and society [Routledge], London: Routledge, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://le.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=5665221790002746&institutionId=2746&customerId=2745
[21]
S. M. Livingstone, Making sense of television: the psychology of audience interpretation, 2nd ed., vol. International series in social psychology. London: Routledge, 1998.
[22]
D. Gauntlett, ‘Ten things wrong with the "effects model.”’, in Approaches to audiences: a reader, vol. Foundations in media, London: Arnold, 1998.
[23]
P. Redman and Open University, Attachment: sociology and social worlds, vol. Making social worlds. Manchester: Manchester University Press in association with the Open University, 2008.
[24]
V. Nightingale, Studying the television audience: the shock of the real. London: Routledge, 1996.
[25]
J. Tulloch, ‘The implied audience in soap opera production: Everyday Rhetorical Strategies among television professionals’, in Rethinking the media audience: the new agenda, London: Sage, 1999, pp. 151–178 [Online]. Available: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.myilibrary.com?id=226264
[26]
G. Gerbner et al, ‘Growing up with television: The Cultivation Perspective’, in Media effects: advances in theory and research, 3rd ed., vol. Communication series. Communication theory and methodology, New York: Routledge, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=10274244
[27]
L. Blackman and V. Walkerdine, Mass hysteria: critical psychology and media studies. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2000.
[28]
M. Barker and J. Petley, Ill effects: the media violence debate, 2nd ed., vol. Communication and society [Routledge]. London: Routledge, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=84561
[29]
Michael O’Shaughnessy, ‘Promoting “emotion”: Feelings, film studies and teaching or understanding films; understanding ourselves’, Metro Media and Education, vol. 97, pp. 44–48, 1994.
[30]
V. Mayer, ‘The Places Where Audience Studies and Production Studies Meet’, Television & New Media, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 706–718, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.1177/1527476416652482.
[31]
J. Gray, ‘Reviving audience studies’, Critical Studies in Media Communication, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 79–83, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1080/15295036.2016.1266680.
[32]
J. Hermes, A. van den Berg, and M. Mol, ‘Sleeping with the enemy: Audience studies and critical literacy’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 457–473, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.1177/1367877912474547.
[33]
B. G. Behrenshausen, ‘The active audience, again: Player-centric game studies and the problem of binarism’, New Media & Society, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 872–889, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.1177/1461444812462843.
[34]
A. Athique, ‘The dynamics and potentials of big data for audience research’, Media, Culture & Society, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 59–74, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1177/0163443717693681.
[35]
R. Das, ‘Audiences: a decade of transformations – reflections from the CEDAR network on emerging directions in audience analysis’, Media, Culture & Society, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 1257–1267, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1177/0163443717717632.
[36]
K. Ross and P. Playdon, Black marks: minority ethnic audiences and media. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2001.
[37]
‘Social comparison, social media, and self-esteem.’, Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy4.lib.le.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pdh&AN=2014-33471-001&site=ehost-live
[38]
J. Sconce, ‘The Voice from the Void’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 211–232, Aug. 1998, doi: 10.1177/13678779980010020401.
[39]
M. Kavka, Reality television, affect and intimacy: reality matters. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
[40]
R. L. Jackson and Sage reference on-line, Encyclopedia of identity. London: SAGE, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://knowledge.sagepub.com/view/identity/SAGE.xml
[41]
k. E. Rosengren, ‘Uses and Gratifications: A Paradigm Outlined’, in The uses of mass communications: current perspectives on gratifications research, vol. Sage annual reviews of communication research, Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage Publications, 1974, pp. 269–286.
[42]
J. Shanahan and M. Morgan, Television and its viewers: cultivation research and theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999 [Online]. Available: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=5001729
[43]
Michael O’Shaughnessy, ‘Promoting “emotion”: Feelings, film studies and teaching or understanding films; understanding ourselves’, Metro Media and Education, vol. 97, pp. 44–48, 1994.
[44]
P. Elliott, ‘Uses and gratifications research: A critique and a sociological alternative.’, in The uses of mass communications: current perspectives on gratifications research, vol. Sage annual reviews of communication research, Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage Publications, 1974, pp. 249–268.
[45]
ellen Seiter, ‘Making distinctions in TV audience research: Case study of a troubling interview’, Cultural Studies, vol. 4, no. 1, 1990.
[46]
p Palmgreen, L. A. Wenner, and K. E. Rosengren, ‘Uses and gratifications research: the past ten years.’, in Media gratifications research: current perspectives, Beverly Hills: Sage, 1985, pp. xx–xxx.
[47]
T. E. Ruggiero, ‘Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st Century’, Mass Communication and Society, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 3–37, Feb. 2000, doi: 10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_02.
[48]
P. Redman and Open University, Attachment: sociology and social worlds. Manchester: Manchester University Press in association with the Open University, 2008.
[49]
J. Whitehouse-Hart, Psychosocial explorations of film and television viewing: ordinary audience. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1880204
[50]
C. Bainbridge, I. Ward, and C. Yates, Television and psychoanalysis: psycho-cultural perspectives. London: Karnac, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1574555
[51]
ellen Seiter, ‘Making distinctions in TV audience research: Case study of a troubling interview’, Cultural Studies, vol. 4, no. 1, 1990.
[52]
K. Rosengren, ‘Chapter 2 - Combinations, comparisons and confrontations: towards a comprehensive theory of audience research’, in The audience and its landscape, vol. Cultural studies [Westview Press], Boulder, Colo: Westview Press, 1996, pp. 23–51.
[53]
E. Seiter, Remote control: television, audiences and cultural power. London: Routledge, 1989.
[54]
W. Brooker and D. Jermyn, The audience studies reader. London: Routledge, 2003.
[55]
T. Modleski, Loving with a vengeance: mass-produced fantasies for women. New York: Methuen, 1984.
[56]
S. Hall, ‘Encoding/ decoding’, in Culture, media, language: working papers in cultural studies, 1972-79, vol. Working papers in cultural studies, 1972-79, London: Hutchinson in association with the Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies, University of Birmingham, 1980, pp. 117–128 [Online]. Available: http://le.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=5665769750002746&institutionId=2746&customerId=2745
[57]
I. Ang, ‘On the politics of empirical audience research.’, in Media and cultural studies: keyworks, Rev. ed., vol. Keyworks in cultural studies, Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2006 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=239901
[58]
S. Hall, ‘Reflections upon the Encoding/Decoding Model: An Interview with Stuart Hall’, in Viewing, reading, listening: audiences and cultural reception, vol. Cultural studies [Westview Press], Boulder, Colo: Westview Press, 1994, pp. 253–274.
[59]
I. Ang and D. Couling, Watching Dallas: soap opera and the melodramatic imagination. New York: Routledge, 1996 [Online]. Available: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=10763823
[60]
J. A. Radway, Reading the romance: women, patriarchy and popular literature. Chapel Hill, N.C.: University of North Carolina Press, 1991 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=880363
[61]
F. D. Ginsburg, L. Abu-Lughod, and B. Larkin, Media worlds: anthropology on new terrain. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=10058549
[62]
D. Hobson, Crossroads: the drama of a soap opera. London: Methuen, 1982.
[63]
M. Gillespie, Television, ethnicity and cultural change, vol. Comedia. London: Routledge, 1995.
[64]
T. Liebes and E. Katz, The export of meaning: cross-cultural readings of Dallas, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1993.
[65]
Helen Wood, ‘The mediated conversational floor: an interactive approach to audience reception analysis’, Media, Culture & Society, vol. 29, pp. 75–103, doi: 10.1177/0163443706072000.
[66]
Martin J. Barker, ‘The Lord of the Rings and “Identification”: A Critical Encounter’, European Journal of Communication, vol. 20, pp. 353–378 [Online]. Available: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0267323105055262
[67]
E. Tincknell and P. Raghuram, ‘Big Brother: Reconfiguring the `active’ audience of cultural studies?’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 199–215, May 2002, doi: 10.1177/1364942002005002159.
[68]
Victor Costello, ‘Cultural Outlaws: An Examination of Audience Activity and Online Television Fandom’, Television & New Media, vol. 8, pp. 124–143, doi: 10.1177/1527476406299112.
[69]
Elizabeth Jane Evans, ‘Character, audience agency and transmedia drama’, Media, Culture & Society, vol. 30, pp. 197–213, doi: 10.1177/0163443707086861.
[70]
B. Skeggs and H. Wood, ‘The labour of transformation and circuits of value “around” reality television’, Continuum, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 559–572, Aug. 2008, doi: 10.1080/10304310801983664.
[71]
‘Brand New You | Kanopy’. [Online]. Available: https://le.kanopy.com/video/brand-new-you-makeover-television-and-american-dream
[72]
B. Skeggs, N. Thumim, and H. Wood, ‘“Oh goodness, I am watching reality TV”’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 5–24, Feb. 2008, doi: 10.1177/1367549407084961.
[73]
D. Jin, New Korean Wave: Transnational Cultural Power in the Age of Social Media. Baltimore: University of Illinois Press, 2016 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=4443546
[74]
S. Livingstone and R. Das, ‘The End of Audiences? Theoretical echoes of reception amidst the uncertainties of use.’, in A companion to new media dynamics, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2013, pp. 104–122 [Online]. Available: http://le.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=5665206730002746&institutionId=2746&customerId=2745
[75]
A. Cavalcante, A. Press, and K. Sender, ‘Feminist reception studies in a post-audience age: returning to audiences and everyday life’, Feminist Media Studies, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–13, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1080/14680777.2017.1261822.
[76]
M. Kavka, Reality television, affect and intimacy: reality matters. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
[77]
J. Wasko, ‘Reality TV: Performance, Authenticity, and Television Audiences’, in A companion to television, vol. Blackwell companions in cultural studies, Malden, Mass: Blackwell, 2005, p. A-Hill [Online]. Available: http://le.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=5665769740002746&institutionId=2746&customerId=2745
[78]
Paddy Scannell, ‘Big Brother as a Television Event’, Television & New Media, vol. 3, pp. 271–282, doi: 10.1177/152747640200300303.
[79]
H. Piper, ‘Understanding Reality Television * Reality TV - Audiences and Popular Factual Television * Reality TV - Realism and Revelation’, Screen, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 133–138, Jan. 2006, doi: 10.1093/screen/hjl012.
[80]
J. Dovey, Freakshow: first person media and factual television. London: Pluto Press, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=2001153
[81]
B. Skeggs and H. Wood, Reality television and class. London: BFI, 2011.
[82]
B. Skeggs and H. Wood, Reacting to reality television: performance, audience and value. New York: Routledge, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=957761
[83]
N. Couldry, ‘The Extended Audience: Scanning the Horizon’’, in Media audiences, Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2005.
[84]
M. Gillespie, Television, ethnicity and cultural change, vol. Comedia. London: Routledge, 1995.
[85]
H. Wood, ‘What Reading the Romance Did for Us’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 147–154, May 2004, doi: 10.1177/1367549404042487.
[86]
J. C. Ong, ‘Watching the Nation, Singing the Nation: London-Based Filipino Migrants’ Identity Constructions in News and Karaoke Practices’, Communication, Culture & Critique, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 160–181, Jun. 2009, doi: 10.1111/j.1753-9137.2009.01033.x.
[87]
B. Skeggs, N. Thumim, and H. Wood, ‘“Oh goodness, I am watching reality TV”’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 5–24, Feb. 2008, doi: 10.1177/1367549407084961.
[88]
B. Skeggs and H. Wood, ‘Turning it on is a class act: immediated object relations with television’, Media, Culture & Society, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 941–951, Sep. 2011, doi: 10.1177/0163443711412298.
[89]
B. Skeggs and H. Wood, Reacting to Reality Television: Performance, Audience and Value. Florence: Taylor & Francis Group, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=957761
[90]
B. Skeggs and H. Wood, Reality television and class. London: BFI, 2011.
[91]
K. Sender and M. Sullivan, ‘Epidemics of will, failures of self-esteem: Responding to fat bodies in and’, Continuum, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 573–584, Aug. 2008, doi: 10.1080/10304310802190046.
[92]
K. Sender, ‘Reconsidering Reflexivity: Audience Research and Reality Television’, The Communication Review, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 37–52, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1080/10714421.2015.996414.
[93]
T. Readdy and V. Ebbeck, ‘Weighing in on NBC’s The Biggest Loser’, Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 579–586, Dec. 2012, doi: 10.1080/02701367.2012.10599255.
[94]
K. Sender, The makeover: reality television and reflexive audiences. New York: New York University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://dx.doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814740699.001.0001
[95]
K. Sender, ‘Queens for a Day: and the Neoliberal Project’, Critical Studies in Media Communication, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 131–151, Jun. 2006, doi: 10.1080/07393180600714505.
[96]
P. Redman, W. Maples, and Open University, Good essay writing: a social sciences guide, Fifth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2017.
[97]
A. Bonnett, How to argue: a student’s guide. Harlow: Pearson Education, 2001 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=5185704
[98]
R. Pears and G. J. Shields, Cite them right: the essential referencing guide, 12th edition. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2022 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=6992940
[99]
R. Lowes, H. Peters, and M. C. Turner, The international student’s guide: studying in English at university, vol. Sage study skills. Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=10218078
[100]
P. Ferrucci and C. Painter, ‘Print Versus Digital’, Journal of Communication Inquiry, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 124–139, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.1177/0196859917690533.
[101]
M. Madianou and D. Miller, ‘Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 169–187, Mar. 2013, doi: 10.1177/1367877912452486.
[102]
M. Madianou, ‘Smartphones as Polymedia’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 667–680, Apr. 2014, doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12069.
[103]
B. Ytre-Arne, ‘“I want to hold it in my hands”: readers’ experiences of the phenomenological differences between women’s magazines online and in print’, Media, Culture & Society, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 467–477, Apr. 2011, doi: 10.1177/0163443711398766.
[104]
R. Das and L. Sonia, ‘The End of Audiences? Theoretical echoes of reception amidst the uncertainties of use’, in A companion to new media dynamics, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://le.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=5665880050002746&institutionId=2746&customerId=2745
[105]
J. Hartley, J. Burgess, and A. Bruns, A companion to new media dynamics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=531267
[106]
Mirca Madianou, ‘Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 16, pp. 169–187 [Online]. Available: http://ics.sagepub.com/search?author1=Madianou&fulltext=Polymedia:%20Towards%20a%20new%20theory%20of%20digital%20media%20in%20interpersonal%20communication&pubdate_year=2013&volume=16&firstpage=169&submit=yes
[107]
‘Mediatization and the “molding force” of the media’. [Online]. Available: http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/commun.2012.37.1.issue-1/commun-2012-0001/commun-2012-0001.xml
[108]
A. Hepp, Cultures of mediatization. Cambridge: Polity, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1180925
[109]
Ian Hutchby, ‘Technologies, Texts and Affordances’, Sociology, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 441–456, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/42856294?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[110]
D. Miller, Tales from Facebook. Cambridge: Polity, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=571931
[111]
H. Jenkins, Convergence culture: where old and new media collide, Updated and with A new afterword. New York, N.Y.: New York University Press, 2008.
[112]
S. Dallas, ‘On the Audience Commodity and its work’, in Approaches to media: a reader, vol. Foundations in media, London: Arnold, 1995.
[113]
J. Toynbee, ‘The Media’s View of the Audience’, in Media Production, Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2006, pp. 91–133.
[114]
P. Long and T. Wall, Media studies: texts, production, context, 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=812615
[115]
Lee McGuigan, ‘Consumers: The Commodity Product of Interactive Commercial Television, or, Is Dallas Smythe’s Thesis More Germane Than Ever?’, The Journal of Communication Inquiry, vol. 36, no. 4, Oct. 2012, doi: 10.1177/0196859912459756.
[116]
Ang, Ien, Desperately Seeking the Audience. Routledge, 1991 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=165716
[117]
J. G. Webster, P. F. Phalen, and L. W. Lichty, Ratings analysis: the theory and practice of audience research, 3rd ed., vol. LEA’s communication series. Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates, 2006.
[118]
T. Gitlin, Inside prime time, Rev. ed. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press, 2000.
[119]
Greene, Kira, ‘TV’s test pilots.’, Broadcasting & Cable., vol. 130, no. 30, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bah&AN=3364522&site=ehost-live
[120]
Hayes, Dade dhayes@nbmedia.com, ‘Inside TV’s Secret Lab. (cover story)’, Broadcasting & Cable., vol. 145, no. 19, pp. 4–6, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bah&AN=102711548&site=ehost-live
[121]
M. P, ‘Made to Order and Standardized Audiences: forms of reality in audience measurements’, in Audience making: how the media create the audience, vol. Sage annual reviews of communication research, Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage, 1994, pp. 57–74.
[122]
‘Serials Solutions Article Linker -’. [Online]. Available: http://gl9sn3dh2u.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=book&rft.title=Audience+Economics&rft.au=PHILIP+M.+NAPOLI&rft.date=2003-09-25&rft.pub=Columbia+University+Press&rft_id=info:doi/10.7312%2Fnapo12652&rft.externalDocID=napo12652¶mdict=en-US
[123]
‘Twitter to drive TV Ratings beyond an “assumption” of engagement’, B and T Weekly, 7AD. [Online]. Available: http://www.bandt.com.au/media/twitter-to-drive-tv-ratings-beyond-an-assumption-o
[124]
‘Neilsen Launches “Neilsen Twitter TV Ratings”’. [Online]. Available: http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=1&sid=263c30ed-675a-4554-859f-e35ae5e4887b%40sessionmgr120&hid=110&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=bwh&AN=bizwire.c51050908
[125]
J. A. Radway, Reading the romance: women, patriarchy, and popular literature, 2nd ed. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1991 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=880363
[126]
sonia Livingstone, ‘Relationships between media and audiences: Prospects for future audience reception studies.’, in Media, ritual, and identity, vol. Communication and society, London: Routledge, 1998 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=169411
[127]
D. Morley, ‘Unanswered Questions in Audience Research’, The Communication Review, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 101–121, Jul. 2006, doi: 10.1080/10714420600663286.
[128]
M. Barker, ‘I Have Seen the Future and It Is Not Here Yet ...; or, On Being Ambitious for Audience Research’, The Communication Review, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 123–141, Jul. 2006, doi: 10.1080/10714420600663310.
[129]
E. Seiter, Remote control: television, audiences and cultural power. London: Routledge, 1989.
[130]
Birgitta Höijer, ‘Ontological Assumptions and Generalizations in Qualitative (Audience) Research’, European Journal of Communication, vol. 23, pp. 275–294 [Online]. Available: http://ejc.sagepub.com.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/search?author1=Hoijer&fulltext=Ontological%20Assumptions%20and%20Generalizations%20in%20Qualitative%20(Audience)%20Research&pubdate_year=2008&volume=23&firstpage=275&submit=yes
[131]
Arild Fetveit, ‘Anti-essentialism and reception studies: In defense of the text’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 4, pp. 173–199, doi: 10.1177/136787790100400203.
[132]
David Buckingham, ‘`Creative’ visual methods in media research: possibilities, problems and proposals’, Media, Culture & Society, vol. 31, pp. 633–652, doi: 10.1177/0163443709335280.
[133]
A. Cavalcante, A. Press, and K. Sender, ‘Feminist reception studies in a post-audience age: returning to audiences and everyday life’, Feminist Media Studies, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–13, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1080/14680777.2017.1261822.
[134]
T. Tse, ‘Reconceptualising prosumption beyond the cultural turn : passive fashion consumption in Korea and China’, journal of Consumer Culture, vol. o (o) 1, 2018, doi: 10.1177/1469540518804300.
[135]
S. E. Bird, ‘ARE WE ALL PRODUSERS NOW?’, Cultural Studies, vol. 25, no. 4–5, pp. 502–516, Sep. 2011, doi: 10.1080/09502386.2011.600532.
[136]
Sonia Livingstone, ‘The Challenge of Changing Audiences: Or, What is the Audience Researcher to Do in the Age of the Internet?’, European Journal of Communication, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 75–86 [Online]. Available: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F0267323104040695
[137]
Nancy Thumin, ‘Self-Representation and Digital Culture’, European Journal of Communication, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 729–730, 2013, doi: 10.1177/0267323113505802c.
[138]
N. Thumim, Self-representation and digital culture. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=990162
[139]
Henry Jenkins, ‘The Cultural Logic of Media Convergence’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 7, pp. 33–43, doi: 10.1177/1367877904040603.
[140]
D. Morley, ‘Unanswered Questions in Audience Research’, The Communication Review, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 101–121, Jul. 2006, doi: 10.1080/10714420600663286.
[141]
D. Jermyn and S. Holmes, ‘The Audience is Dead; Long Live the Audience!: Interactivity, “Telephilia” and the Contemporary Television Audience’, Critical Studies in Television: The International Journal of Television Studies, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 49–57, Mar. 2006, doi: 10.7227/CST.1.1.8.
[142]
J. Hartley, J. Burgess, and A. Bruns, Eds., ‘The End of Audiences?’, in A Companion to New Media Dynamics, Chichester, [England]: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/reader.action?docID=3422436&ppg=126
[143]
A. L. Press, ‘Audience Research in the Post-Audience Age: An Introduction to Barker and Morley’, The Communication Review, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 93–100, Jul. 2006, doi: 10.1080/10714420600663278.
[144]
Ranjana Das, ‘Converging perspectives in audience studies and digital literacies: Youthful interpretations of an online genre’, European Journal of Communication, vol. 26, pp. 343–360 [Online]. Available: http://ejc.sagepub.com/search?author1=Das&fulltext=Converging%20Perspectives%20in%20Audience%20Studies%20and%20Digital%20Literacies:%20Youthful%20Interpretations%20of%20an%20Online%20Genre&pubdate_year=2011&volume=26&firstpage=343&submit=yes
[145]
‘The communication review (Yverdon, Switzerland)’, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 123–141, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://gl9sn3dh2u.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=I+have+seen+the+future+and+it+is+not+here+yet+...%3A+Or%2C+on+being+ambitious+for+audience+research&rft.jtitle=The+Communication+Review&rft.au=Barker%2C+M&rft.date=2006&rft.eissn=1547-7487&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=123&rft.epage=141&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=CAX0290060002004¶mdict=en-US
[146]
José van Dijck, ‘Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content’, Media, Culture & Society, vol. 31, pp. 41–58, doi: 10.1177/0163443708098245.
[147]
J. Hartley, J. Burgess, and A. Bruns, A companion to new media dynamics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2013 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=3422436
[148]
R. Lapsley, ‘Psychoanalytic Criticism’, in The Routledge companion to critical theory, London: Routledge, 2006.
[149]
M. O’Shaughnessy, ‘Promoting “emotion”: Feelings, film studies and teaching or understanding films; understanding ourselves’, Metro Media and Education, vol. 97, 1994.
[150]
N. Mansfield, ‘Lacan : The Subject is Language’, in Subjectivity: Theories of the self from Freud to Haraway, Sydney: Allen & Unwin, 2000 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=286495
[151]
J. Whitehouse-Hart and SpringerLink (Online service), Psychosocial Explorations of Film and Television Viewing: Ordinary Audience. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137465146
[152]
M. Kavka, Reality television, affect and intimacy: reality matters. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
[153]
J. Manley and L. Crociani-Windland, Social dreaming, associative thinking and intensities of affect. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=5497847
[154]
G. Rose, Visual methodologies: an introduction to researching with visual materials, 3rd ed. London: SAGE, 2012.
[155]
Meissner, W W, ‘Notes on identification. I. Origins in Freud’, The Psychoanalytic quarterly, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 563–89 [Online]. Available: https://librarysearch.le.ac.uk/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=TN_medline4921741&context=PC&vid=44UOLE_NUI&lang=en_US&search_scope=default_scope&adaptor=primo_central_multiple_fe&tab=default_tab&query=any,contains,W.W.%20Meissner,%201970.%20Notes%20on%20Identification%20I.%20Origens%20in%20Freud,%20Psychoanalytic%20Quarterly,%2039,%20563-589.%20&pcAvailability=false
[156]
J. Sandler and Sigmund Freud Center for Study and Research in Psychoanalysis (Universiṭah haʻIvrit bi-Yerushalayim), Projection, identification, projective identification. London: Karnac Books, 1988 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=709550
[157]
S. Pink, Doing visual ethnography: images, media and representation in research, 2nd ed. London: SAGE, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=LeicesterU&isbn=9781446296035
[158]
E. Claydon and J. Whitehouse-Hart, ‘Overcoming’ the “Battlefield of the Mind”: A Psycho-linguistic Examination of the Discourse of Digital-Televangelists Self-Help Texts’’, Language and Psychoanalysis, vol. 7 (2) 2-28, 2018, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7565/landp.v7i21587. [Online]. Available: http://www.language-and-psychoanalysis.com/article/view/2824
[159]
H. A. Campbell and A. C. La Pastina, ‘How the iPhone became divine: new media, religion and the intertextual circulation of meaning’, New Media & Society, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 1191–1207, Nov. 2010, doi: 10.1177/1461444810362204.
[160]
H. Campbell, Digital religion: understanding religious practice in new media worlds. London: Routledge, 2013 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1097827
[161]
H. Campbell and S. Garner, Networked theology: negotiating faith in digital culture. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Academic, 2016 [Online]. Available: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=5248646
[162]
H. Campbell and G. P. Grieve, Eds., Playing with religion in digital games. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=1680203
[163]
R. Tsuria, A. Yadlin-Segal, A. Vitullo, and H. A. Campbell, ‘Approaches to digital methods in studies of digital religion’, The Communication Review, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 73–97, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.1080/10714421.2017.1304137.
[164]
S. Xu and H. A. Campbell, ‘Surveying digital religion in China: Characteristics of religion on the Internet in Mainland China’, The Communication Review, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 253–276, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1080/10714421.2018.1535729.
[165]
D. Morgan, ‘Religion and media: A critical review of recent developments’, Critical Research on Religion, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 347–356, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.1177/2050303213506476.
[166]
K. Lundby, ‘PATTERNS OF BELONGING IN ONLINE/OFFLINE INTERFACES OF RELIGION’, Information, Communication & Society, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 1219–1235, Dec. 2011, doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2011.594077.
[167]
A. Rippen, ‘Internet: Implications and Future Possibilities’’, in Muslims And The New Information And Communication Technologies Notes From An Emerging And Infinite Field, Springer, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1636818
[168]
S. M. Hoover and L. S. Clark, Practicing religion in the age of the media: explorations in media, religion, and culture. New York: Columbia University Press, 2002 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=895172
[169]
K. A. M. Bolongaro, ‘Pauline Hope Cheong, Peter Fischer-Nielsen, Stefan Gelfgren & Charles Ess (Eds.): Digital Religion, Social Media and Culture: Perspectives, Practices and Futures. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc. 2012.’, MedieKultur: Journal of media and communication research, vol. 29, no. 55, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.7146/mediekultur.v29i55.9716.
[170]
P. H. Cheong, Digital religion, social media, and culture: perspectives, practices, and futures, vol. v. 78. New York: Peter Lang, 2012.
[171]
K. Lofton, ‘Religion and the American Celebrity’, Social Compass, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 346–352, Sep. 2011, doi: 10.1177/0037768611412143.
[172]
Nikolas Coupland, The Handbook of Language and Globalization (Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics). Wiley-Blackwell, 10AD [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=4041769
[173]
Stephen Parker, ‘Winnicott’s object relations theory and the work of the Holy Spirit’, Journal of Psychology and Theology [Online]. Available: http://go.galegroup.com.ezproxy4.lib.le.ac.uk/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA192863906&v=2.1&u=leicester&it=r&p=EAIM&sw=w
[174]
J. Harris and E. Watson, The Oprah phenomenon, Updated edition. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 2007 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/reader.action?docID=1920897&ppg=15
[175]
B. Glad and C. Beradt, ‘The Third Reich of Dreams’, The American Political Science Review, vol. 63, no. 2, Jun. 1969, doi: 10.2307/1954716.
[176]
B. Glad and C. Beradt, ‘The Third Reich of Dreams’, The American Political Science Review, vol. 63, no. 2, Jun. 1969, doi: 10.2307/1954716.
[177]
J. Whitehouse-Hart and SpringerLink (Online service), Psychosocial Explorations of Film and Television Viewing: Ordinary Audience. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137465146
[178]
M. O’Shaughnessy, ‘Promoting “emotion”: Feelings, film studies and teaching or understanding films; understanding ourselves’, Metro Media and Education, vol. 97, 1994.
[179]
M. Hills, ‘Michael Jackson Fans on Trial? "Documenting” Emotivism and Fandom in’, Social Semiotics, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 459–477, Dec. 2007, doi: 10.1080/10350330701637056.
[180]
Melissa A. ClickSuzanne Scott, The Routledge Companion to Media Fandom (Routledge Media and Cultural Studies Companions). Routledge; 1 edition, 9AD [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=5122937
[181]
K. Gorton, Media audiences: television, meaning and emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2009 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=536997
