Abercrombie, Nicholas, and Brian Longhurst. 1998a. Audiences: A Sociological Theory of Performance and Imagination. London: Sage.
Abercrombie, Nicholas, and Brian Longhurst. 1998b. ‘Changing Audiences, Changing Paradigms of Research Chapter One’. in Audiences: a sociological theory of performance and imagination. London: Sage.
Alasuutari, Pertti. 1999. Rethinking the Media Audience: The New Agenda. London: Sage.
Ang, Ien. 1991. Desperately Seeking the Audience. Routledge.
Ang, Ien. 2006. ‘On the Politics of Empirical Audience Research.’ in Media and cultural studies: keyworks. Vol. Keyworks in cultural studies. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Ang, Ien, and Della Couling. 1996. Watching Dallas: Soap Opera and the Melodramatic Imagination. New York: Routledge.
Anon. 7AD. ‘Twitter to Drive TV Ratings beyond an “assumption” of Engagement’. B and T Weekly. Retrieved (http://www.bandt.com.au/media/twitter-to-drive-tv-ratings-beyond-an-assumption-o).
Anon. 2006. ‘The Communication Review (Yverdon, Switzerland)’. 9(2):123–41.
Anon. 2014. ‘Social Comparison, Social Media, and Self-Esteem.’ Psychology of Popular Media Culture.
Anon. n.d.-a. ‘Brand New You | Kanopy’. Retrieved (https://le.kanopy.com/video/brand-new-you-makeover-television-and-american-dream).
Anon. n.d.-b. ‘Mediatization and the “Molding Force” of the Media’. Retrieved (http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/commun.2012.37.1.issue-1/commun-2012-0001/commun-2012-0001.xml).
Anon. n.d.-c. ‘Neilsen Launches “Neilsen Twitter TV Ratings”’. Retrieved (http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=1&sid=263c30ed-675a-4554-859f-e35ae5e4887b%40sessionmgr120&hid=110&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=bwh&AN=bizwire.c51050908).
Anon. n.d.-d. ‘Serials Solutions Article Linker -’. Retrieved (http://gl9sn3dh2u.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=book&rft.title=Audience+Economics&rft.au=PHILIP+M.+NAPOLI&rft.date=2003-09-25&rft.pub=Columbia+University+Press&rft_id=info:doi/10.7312%2Fnapo12652&rft.externalDocID=napo12652&paramdict=en-US).
Arild Fetveit. n.d. ‘Anti-Essentialism and Reception Studies: In Defense of the Text’. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 4:173–99. doi: 10.1177/136787790100400203.
Athique, Adrian. 2018. ‘The Dynamics and Potentials of Big Data for Audience Research’. Media, Culture & Society 40(1):59–74. doi: 10.1177/0163443717693681.
Bainbridge, Caroline, Ivan Ward, and Candida Yates. 2014. Television and Psychoanalysis: Psycho-Cultural Perspectives. London: Karnac.
Barker, Martin. 2006. ‘I Have Seen the Future and It Is Not Here Yet ...; or, On Being Ambitious for Audience Research’. The Communication Review 9(2):123–41. doi: 10.1080/10714420600663310.
Barker, Martin, and Julian Petley. 2001a. Ill Effects: The Media Violence Debate. Vol. Communication and society [Routledge]. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
Barker, Martin, and Julian Petley. 2001b. ‘Introduction: From Bad Research to Good.’ in Ill effects: the media violence debate. Vol. Communication and society [Routledge]. London: Routledge.
Behrenshausen, Bryan G. 2013. ‘The Active Audience, Again: Player-Centric Game Studies and the Problem of Binarism’. New Media & Society 15(6):872–89. doi: 10.1177/1461444812462843.
Bird, S. Elizabeth. 2011. ‘ARE WE ALL PRODUSERS NOW?’ Cultural Studies 25(4–5):502–16. doi: 10.1080/09502386.2011.600532.
Birgitta Höijer. n.d. ‘Ontological Assumptions and Generalizations in Qualitative (Audience) Research’. European Journal of Communication, 23:275–94.
Blackman, Lisa, and Valerie Walkerdine. 2000. Mass Hysteria: Critical Psychology and Media Studies. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Bolongaro, Kaitlyn Alessandra Maria. 2013. ‘Pauline Hope Cheong, Peter Fischer-Nielsen, Stefan Gelfgren & Charles Ess (Eds.): Digital Religion, Social Media and Culture: Perspectives, Practices and Futures. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc. 2012.’ MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research 29(55). doi: 10.7146/mediekultur.v29i55.9716.
Bonnett, Alastair. 2001. How to Argue: A Student’s Guide. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Brooker, Will, and Deborah Jermyn. 2003. The Audience Studies Reader. London: Routledge.
Campbell, Heidi. 2013. Digital Religion: Understanding Religious Practice in New Media Worlds. London: Routledge.
Campbell, Heidi A., and Antonio C. La Pastina. 2010. ‘How the iPhone Became Divine: New Media, Religion and the Intertextual Circulation of Meaning’. New Media & Society 12(7):1191–1207. doi: 10.1177/1461444810362204.
Campbell, Heidi, and St Garner. 2016. Networked Theology: Negotiating Faith in Digital Culture. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Academic.
Campbell, Heidi, and Gregory P. Grieve, eds. 2014. Playing with Religion in Digital Games. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.
Cantril, Hadley, Hazel Gaudet, Herta Herzog, and Orson Welles. 1982. The Invasion from Mars: A Study in the Psychology of Panic : With the Complete Script of the Famous Orson Welles Broadcast. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Cavalcante, Andre, Andrea Press, and Katherine Sender. 2017a. ‘Feminist Reception Studies in a Post-Audience Age: Returning to Audiences and Everyday Life’. Feminist Media Studies 17(1):1–13. doi: 10.1080/14680777.2017.1261822.
Cavalcante, Andre, Andrea Press, and Katherine Sender. 2017b. ‘Feminist Reception Studies in a Post-Audience Age: Returning to Audiences and Everyday Life’. Feminist Media Studies 17(1):1–13. doi: 10.1080/14680777.2017.1261822.
Cheong, Pauline Hope. 2012. Digital Religion, Social Media, and Culture: Perspectives, Practices, and Futures. Vol. v. 78. New York: Peter Lang.
Claydon, EA, and Jo Whitehouse-Hart. 2018. ‘Overcoming’ the “Battlefield of the Mind”: A Psycho-Linguistic Examination of the Discourse of Digital-Televangelists Self-Help Texts’’. Language and Psychoanalysis 7 (2) 2-28. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7565/landp.v7i21587.
Couldry, Nick. 2005. ‘The Extended Audience: Scanning the Horizon’’. in Media audiences. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Dallas, Smythe. 1995. ‘On the Audience Commodity and Its Work’. in Approaches to media: a reader. Vol. Foundations in media. London: Arnold.
Das, Ranjana. 2017. ‘Audiences: A Decade of Transformations – Reflections from the CEDAR Network on Emerging Directions in Audience Analysis’. Media, Culture & Society 39(8):1257–67. doi: 10.1177/0163443717717632.
Das, Ranjana, and Livingstone Sonia. 2013. ‘The End of Audiences? Theoretical Echoes of Reception amidst the Uncertainties of Use’. in A companion to new media dynamics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
David Buckingham. n.d. ‘`Creative’ Visual Methods in Media Research: Possibilities, Problems and Proposals’. Media, Culture & Society, 31:633–52. doi: 10.1177/0163443709335280.
Dovey, Jon. 2000. Freakshow: First Person Media and Factual Television. London: Pluto Press.
Duffy, Brooke Erin. 2013. Remake, Remodel: Women’s Magazines in the Digital Age. Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press.
Eagleton, Terry. 1994. Ideology. Vol. Longman critical readers. London: Longman.
Elizabeth Jane Evans. n.d. ‘Character, Audience Agency and Transmedia Drama’. Media, Culture & Society, 30:197–213. doi: 10.1177/0163443707086861.
Elliott, P. 1974. ‘Uses and Gratifications Research: A Critique and a Sociological Alternative.’ Pp. 249–68 in The uses of mass communications: current perspectives on gratifications research. Vol. Sage annual reviews of communication research. Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage Publications.
Ferrucci, Patrick, and Chad Painter. 2017. ‘Print Versus Digital’. Journal of Communication Inquiry 41(2):124–39. doi: 10.1177/0196859917690533.
Gauntlett, David. 1998. ‘Ten Things Wrong with the "effects Model.”’. in Approaches to audiences: a reader. Vol. Foundations in media. London: Arnold.
Gerbner et al, G. 2009. ‘Growing up with Television: The Cultivation Perspective’. in Media effects: advances in theory and research. Vol. Communication series. Communication theory and methodology. New York: Routledge.
Gillespie, Marie. 1995a. Television, Ethnicity and Cultural Change. Vol. Comedia. London: Routledge.
Gillespie, Marie. 1995b. Television, Ethnicity and Cultural Change. Vol. Comedia. London: Routledge.
Ginsburg, Faye D., Lila Abu-Lughod, and Brian Larkin. 2002. Media Worlds: Anthropology on New Terrain. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Gitlin, Todd. 2000. Inside Prime Time. Rev. ed. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press.
Glad, Betty, and Charlotte Beradt. 1969a. ‘The Third Reich of Dreams’. The American Political Science Review 63(2). doi: 10.2307/1954716.
Glad, Betty, and Charlotte Beradt. 1969b. ‘The Third Reich of Dreams’. The American Political Science Review 63(2). doi: 10.2307/1954716.
Gorton, Kristyn. 2009a. Media Audiences: Television, Meaning and Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Gorton, Kristyn. 2009b. Media Audiences: Television, Meaning and Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Gray, Jonathan. 2017. ‘Reviving Audience Studies’. Critical Studies in Media Communication 34(1):79–83. doi: 10.1080/15295036.2016.1266680.
Greene, Kira. 2000. ‘TV’s Test Pilots.’ Broadcasting & Cable. 130(30).
Hall, Stuart. 1980. ‘Encoding/ Decoding’. Pp. 117–28 in Culture, media, language: working papers in cultural studies, 1972-79. Vol. Working papers in cultural studies, 1972-79. London: Hutchinson in association with the Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies, University of Birmingham.
Hall, Stuart. 1994. ‘Reflections upon the Encoding/Decoding Model: An Interview with Stuart Hall’. Pp. 253–74 in Viewing, reading, listening: audiences and cultural reception. Vol. Cultural studies [Westview Press]. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press.
Harris, Jennifer, and Elwood Watson. 2007. The Oprah Phenomenon. Updated edition. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
Hartley, John, Jean Burgess, and Axel Bruns. 2013a. A Companion to New Media Dynamics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Hartley, John, Jean Burgess, and Axel Bruns. 2013b. A Companion to New Media Dynamics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Hartley, John, Jean Burgess, and Axel Bruns, eds. 2013c. ‘The End of Audiences?’ in A Companion to New Media Dynamics. Chichester, [England]: Wiley-Blackwell.
Hayes, Dade dhayes@nbmedia.com. 2015. ‘Inside TV’s Secret Lab. (Cover Story)’. Broadcasting & Cable. 145(19):4–6.
Helen Wood. n.d. ‘The Mediated Conversational Floor: An Interactive Approach to Audience Reception Analysis’. Media, Culture & Society, 29:75–103. doi: 10.1177/0163443706072000.
Henry Jenkins. n.d. ‘The Cultural Logic of Media Convergence’. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 7:33–43. doi: 10.1177/1367877904040603.
Hepp, Andreas. 2012. Cultures of Mediatization. Cambridge: Polity.
Hermes, Joke, Annika van den Berg, and Marloes Mol. 2013. ‘Sleeping with the Enemy: Audience Studies and Critical Literacy’. International Journal of Cultural Studies 16(5):457–73. doi: 10.1177/1367877912474547.
Hills, Matt. 2007. ‘Michael Jackson Fans on Trial? "Documenting” Emotivism and Fandom in’. Social Semiotics 17(4):459–77. doi: 10.1080/10350330701637056.
Hobson, Dorothy. 1982. Crossroads: The Drama of a Soap Opera. London: Methuen.
Hoover, Stewart M., and Lynn Schofield Clark. 2002. Practicing Religion in the Age of the Media: Explorations in Media, Religion, and Culture. New York: Columbia University Press.
Ian Hutchby. 2001. ‘Technologies, Texts and Affordances’. Sociology 35(2):441–56.
Jackson, Ronald L. and Sage reference on-line. 2010. Encyclopedia of Identity. London: SAGE.
Jenkins, Henry. 2008. Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. Updated and with a new afterword. New York, N.Y.: New York University Press.
Jermyn, Deborah, and Su Holmes. 2006. ‘The Audience Is Dead; Long Live the Audience!: Interactivity, “Telephilia” and the Contemporary Television Audience’. Critical Studies in Television: The International Journal of Television Studies 1(1):49–57. doi: 10.7227/CST.1.1.8.
Jin, Dal. 2016. New Korean Wave: Transnational Cultural Power in the Age of Social Media. Baltimore: University of Illinois Press.
José van Dijck. n.d. ‘Users like You? Theorizing Agency in User-Generated Content’. Media, Culture & Society, 31:41–58. doi: 10.1177/0163443708098245.
Kavka, Misha. 2008a. Reality Television, Affect and Intimacy: Reality Matters. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kavka, Misha. 2008b. Reality Television, Affect and Intimacy: Reality Matters. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kavka, Misha. 2008c. Reality Television, Affect and Intimacy: Reality Matters. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kavka, Misha. 2008d. Reality Television, Affect and Intimacy: Reality Matters. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lacey, Nick. 2002. Media Institutions and Audiences: Key Concepts in Media Studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Lapsley, Robert. 2006. ‘Psychoanalytic Criticism’. in The Routledge companion to critical theory. London: Routledge.
Lee McGuigan. 2012. ‘Consumers: The Commodity Product of Interactive Commercial Television, or, Is Dallas Smythe’s Thesis More Germane Than Ever?’ The Journal of Communication Inquiry 36(4). doi: 10.1177/0196859912459756.
Liebes, Tamar, and Elihu Katz. 1993. The Export of Meaning: Cross-Cultural Readings of Dallas. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Livingstone, sonia. 1998. ‘Relationships between Media and Audiences: Prospects for Future Audience Reception Studies.’ in Media, ritual, and identity. Vol. Communication and society. London: Routledge.
Livingstone, Sonia, and Ranjana Das. 2013. ‘The End of Audiences? Theoretical Echoes of Reception amidst the Uncertainties of Use.’ Pp. 104–22 in A companion to new media dynamics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Livingstone, Sonia M. 1998. Making Sense of Television: The Psychology of Audience Interpretation. Vol. International series in social psychology. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
Lofton, Kathryn. 2011. ‘Religion and the American Celebrity’. Social Compass 58(3):346–52. doi: 10.1177/0037768611412143.
Long, Paul, and Tim Wall. 2012a. Media Studies: Texts, Production, Context. 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson.
Long, Paul, and Tim Wall. 2012b. Media Studies: Texts, Production, Context. 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson.
Lowes, Ricky, Helen Peters, and Marie Clare Turner. 2004. The International Student’s Guide: Studying in English at University. Vol. Sage study skills. Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE.
Lundby, Knut. 2011. ‘PATTERNS OF BELONGING IN ONLINE/OFFLINE INTERFACES OF RELIGION’. Information, Communication & Society 14(8):1219–35. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2011.594077.
Madianou, M., and D. Miller. 2013. ‘Polymedia: Towards a New Theory of Digital Media in Interpersonal Communication’. International Journal of Cultural Studies 16(2):169–87. doi: 10.1177/1367877912452486.
Madianou, Mirca. 2014. ‘Smartphones as Polymedia’. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19(3):667–80. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12069.
Manley, Julian, and Lita Crociani-Windland. 2018. Social Dreaming, Associative Thinking and Intensities of Affect. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mansfield, Nick. 2000. ‘Lacan : The Subject Is Language’. in Subjectivity: Theories of the self from Freud to Haraway. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
Martin J. Barker. n.d. ‘The Lord of the Rings and “Identification”: A Critical Encounter’. European Journal of Communication, 20:353–78.
Mayer, Vicki. 2016. ‘The Places Where Audience Studies and Production Studies Meet’. Television & New Media 17(8):706–18. doi: 10.1177/1527476416652482.
McKee, Alan. 2003. Textual Analysis: A Beginner’s Guide. London: Sage Publications.
McLeod, Douglas, David Wise, and Mallory Perryman. 2017. ‘Thinking about the Media: A Review of Theory and Research on Media Perceptions, Media Effects Perception and Their Consequences’. Review of Communication REsearch Volume 5.
Meissner, W W. n.d. ‘Notes on Identification. I. Origins in Freud’. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly 39(4):563–89.
Melissa A. ClickSuzanne Scott. 9AD. The Routledge Companion to Media Fandom (Routledge Media and Cultural Studies Companions). Routledge; 1 edition.
Michael O’Shaughnessy. 1994a. ‘Promoting “Emotion”: Feelings, Film Studies and Teaching or Understanding Films; Understanding Ourselves’. Metro Media and Education 97:44–48.
Michael O’Shaughnessy. 1994b. ‘Promoting “Emotion”: Feelings, Film Studies and Teaching or Understanding Films; Understanding Ourselves’. Metro Media and Education 97:44–48.
Miller, Daniel. 2011. Tales from Facebook. Cambridge: Polity.
Mirca Madianou. n.d. ‘Polymedia: Towards a New Theory of Digital Media in Interpersonal Communication’. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16:169–87.
Modleski, Tania. 1984. Loving with a Vengeance: Mass-Produced Fantasies for Women. New York: Methuen.
Morgan, David. 2013. ‘Religion and Media: A Critical Review of Recent Developments’. Critical Research on Religion 1(3):347–56. doi: 10.1177/2050303213506476.
Morley, David. 2006a. ‘Unanswered Questions in Audience Research’. The Communication Review 9(2):101–21. doi: 10.1080/10714420600663286.
Morley, David. 2006b. ‘Unanswered Questions in Audience Research’. The Communication Review 9(2):101–21. doi: 10.1080/10714420600663286.
Mytton, Graham, Peter Diem, and Piet Hein van Dam. 2016. Media Audience Research: A Guide for Professionals. Third edition. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Incorporated.
Nancy Thumin. 2013. ‘Self-Representation and Digital Culture’. European Journal of Communication, 28(6):729–30. doi: 10.1177/0267323113505802c.
Nightingale, Virginia. 1996. Studying the Television Audience: The Shock of the Real. London: Routledge.
Nikolas Coupland. 10AD. The Handbook of Language and Globalization (Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics). Wiley-Blackwell.
Ong, Jonathan Corpus. 2009. ‘Watching the Nation, Singing the Nation: London-Based Filipino Migrants’ Identity Constructions in News and Karaoke Practices’. Communication, Culture & Critique 2(2):160–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-9137.2009.01033.x.
O’Shaughnessy, Mike. 1994a. ‘Promoting “Emotion”: Feelings, Film Studies and Teaching or Understanding Films; Understanding Ourselves’. Metro Media and Education 97.
O’Shaughnessy, Mike. 1994b. ‘Promoting “Emotion”: Feelings, Film Studies and Teaching or Understanding Films; Understanding Ourselves’. Metro Media and Education 97.
P, Miller. 1994. ‘Made to Order and Standardized Audiences: Forms of Reality in Audience Measurements’. Pp. 57–74 in Audience making: how the media create the audience. Vol. Sage annual reviews of communication research. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage.
Paddy Scannell. n.d. ‘Big Brother as a Television Event’. Television & New Media, 3:271–82. doi: 10.1177/152747640200300303.
Palmgreen, p, L. A. Wenner, and K. E. Rosengren. 1985. ‘Uses and Gratifications Research: The Past Ten Years.’ Pp. xx–xxx in Media gratifications research: current perspectives. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Pears, Richard, and Graham J. Shields. 2022. Cite Them Right: The Essential Referencing Guide. 12th edition. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Pink, Sarah. 2007. Doing Visual Ethnography: Images, Media and Representation in Research. 2nd ed. London: SAGE.
Piper, H. 2006. ‘Understanding Reality Television * Reality TV - Audiences and Popular Factual Television * Reality TV - Realism and Revelation’. Screen 47(1):133–38. doi: 10.1093/screen/hjl012.
Press, Andrea L. 2006. ‘Audience Research in the Post-Audience Age: An Introduction to Barker and Morley’. The Communication Review 9(2):93–100. doi: 10.1080/10714420600663278.
Radway, Janice A. 1991a. Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy, and Popular Literature. 2nd ed. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Radway, Janice A. 1991b. Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy and Popular Literature. Chapel Hill, N.C.: University of North Carolina Press.
Radway, Janice A. 1991c. Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy, and Popular Literature. 2nd ed. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Ranjana Das. n.d. ‘Converging Perspectives in Audience Studies and Digital Literacies: Youthful Interpretations of an Online Genre’. European Journal of Communication, 26:343–60.
Readdy, Tucker, and Vicki Ebbeck. 2012. ‘Weighing in on NBC’s The Biggest Loser’. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 83(4):579–86. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2012.10599255.
Redman, Peter, Wendy Maples, and Open University. 2017. Good Essay Writing: A Social Sciences Guide. Fifth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Redman, Peter and Open University. 2008a. Attachment: Sociology and Social Worlds. Vol. Making social worlds. Manchester: Manchester University Press in association with the Open University.
Redman, Peter and Open University. 2008b. Attachment: Sociology and Social Worlds. Manchester: Manchester University Press in association with the Open University.
Rippen, A. 2014. ‘Internet: Implications and Future Possibilities’’. in Muslims And The New Information And Communication Technologies Notes From An Emerging And Infinite Field. Springer.
Rose, Gillian. 2012. Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials. 3rd ed. London: SAGE.
Rosengren, K. 1996. ‘Chapter 2 - Combinations, Comparisons and Confrontations: Towards a Comprehensive Theory of Audience Research’. Pp. 23–51 in The audience and its landscape. Vol. Cultural studies [Westview Press]. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press.
Rosengren, k. E. 1974. ‘Uses and Gratifications: A Paradigm Outlined’. Pp. 269–86 in The uses of mass communications: current perspectives on gratifications research. Vol. Sage annual reviews of communication research. Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage Publications.
Ross, Karen, and Virginia Nightingale. 2003. Media and Audiences: New Perspectives. Maidenhead, Berkshire, England: Open University Press.
Ross, Karen, and Peter Playdon. 2001. Black Marks: Minority Ethnic Audiences and Media. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Ruggiero, Thomas E. 2000. ‘Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st Century’. Mass Communication and Society 3(1):3–37. doi: 10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_02.
Sandler, Joseph and Sigmund Freud Center for Study and Research in Psychoanalysis (Universiṭah haʻIvrit bi-Yerushalayim). 1988. Projection, Identification, Projective Identification. London: Karnac Books.
Schrøder, K. C. 1987. ‘Convergence of Antagonistic Traditions? The Case of Audience Research’. European Journal of Communication 2(1):7–31.
Sconce, Jeffrey. 1998. ‘The Voice from the Void’. International Journal of Cultural Studies 1(2):211–32. doi: 10.1177/13678779980010020401.
Sconce, Jeffrey. 2000. Haunted Media: Electronic Presence from Telegraphy to Television. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Seiter, Ellen. 1989a. Remote Control: Television, Audiences and Cultural Power. London: Routledge.
Seiter, Ellen. 1989b. Remote Control: Television, Audiences and Cultural Power. London: Routledge.
Seiter, ellen. 1990a. ‘Making Distinctions in TV Audience Research: Case Study of a Troubling Interview’. Cultural Studies 4(1).
Seiter, ellen. 1990b. ‘Making Distinctions in TV Audience Research: Case Study of a Troubling Interview’. Cultural Studies 4(1).
Sender, Katherine. 2006. ‘Queens for a Day:                              and the Neoliberal Project’. Critical Studies in Media Communication 23(2):131–51. doi: 10.1080/07393180600714505.
Sender, Katherine. 2012. The Makeover: Reality Television and Reflexive Audiences. New York: New York University Press.
Sender, Katherine. 2015. ‘Reconsidering Reflexivity: Audience Research and Reality Television’. The Communication Review 18(1):37–52. doi: 10.1080/10714421.2015.996414.
Sender, Katherine, and Margaret Sullivan. 2008. ‘Epidemics of Will, Failures of Self-Esteem: Responding to Fat Bodies in                              And’. Continuum 22(4):573–84. doi: 10.1080/10304310802190046.
Shanahan, Jim, and Michael Morgan. 1999. Television and Its Viewers: Cultivation Research and Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Skeggs, Bev, Nancy Thumim, and Helen Wood. 2008a. ‘“Oh Goodness, I Am Watching Reality TV”’. European Journal of Cultural Studies 11(1):5–24. doi: 10.1177/1367549407084961.
Skeggs, Bev, Nancy Thumim, and Helen Wood. 2008b. ‘“Oh Goodness, I Am Watching Reality TV”’. European Journal of Cultural Studies 11(1):5–24. doi: 10.1177/1367549407084961.
Skeggs, Beverley, and Helen Wood. 2008. ‘The Labour of Transformation and Circuits of Value “around” Reality Television’. Continuum 22(4):559–72. doi: 10.1080/10304310801983664.
Skeggs, Beverley, and Helen Wood. 2011a. Reality Television and Class. London: BFI.
Skeggs, Beverley, and Helen Wood. 2011b. Reality Television and Class. London: BFI.
Skeggs, Beverley, and Helen Wood. 2011c. ‘Turning It on Is a Class Act: Immediated Object Relations with Television’. Media, Culture & Society 33(6):941–51. doi: 10.1177/0163443711412298.
Skeggs, Beverley, and Helen Wood. 2012. Reacting to Reality Television: Performance, Audience and Value. New York: Routledge.
Skeggs, Beverley, and Helen Wood. 2014. Reacting to Reality Television: Performance, Audience and Value. Florence: Taylor & Francis Group.
Sonia Livingstone. n.d. ‘The Challenge of Changing Audiences: Or, What Is the Audience Researcher to Do in the Age of the Internet?’ European Journal of Communication, 19(1):75–86.
Stephen Parker. n.d. ‘Winnicott’s Object Relations Theory and the Work of the Holy Spirit’. Journal of Psychology and Theology.
Thumim, Nancy. 2012. Self-Representation and Digital Culture. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Tincknell, E., and P. Raghuram. 2002. ‘Big Brother: Reconfiguring the `active’ Audience of Cultural Studies?’ European Journal of Cultural Studies 5(2):199–215. doi: 10.1177/1364942002005002159.
Toynbee, Jason. 2006. ‘The Media’s View of the Audience’. Pp. 91–133 in Media Production. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Tse, Tommy. 2018. ‘Reconceptualising Prosumption beyond the Cultural Turn : Passive Fashion Consumption in Korea and China’. Journal of Consumer Culture o (o) 1. doi: 10.1177/1469540518804300.
Tsuria, Ruth, Aya Yadlin-Segal, Alessandra Vitullo, and Heidi A. Campbell. 2017. ‘Approaches to Digital Methods in Studies of Digital Religion’. The Communication Review 20(2):73–97. doi: 10.1080/10714421.2017.1304137.
Tulloch, John. 1999. ‘The Implied Audience in Soap Opera Production: Everyday Rhetorical Strategies among Television Professionals’. Pp. 151–78 in Rethinking the media audience: the new agenda. London: Sage.
Victor Costello. n.d. ‘Cultural Outlaws: An Examination of Audience Activity and Online Television Fandom’. Television & New Media, 8:124–43. doi: 10.1177/1527476406299112.
Wasko, Janet. 2005. ‘Reality TV: Performance, Authenticity, and Television Audiences’. P. A-Hill in A companion to television. Vol. Blackwell companions in cultural studies. Malden, Mass: Blackwell.
Webster, James G. 1998. ‘Audience, The’. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 42.
Webster, James G., Patricia F. Phalen, and Lawrence W. Lichty. 2006. Ratings Analysis: The Theory and Practice of Audience Research. Vol. LEA’s communication series. 3rd ed. Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Whitehouse-Hart, Jo. 2014. Psychosocial Explorations of Film and Television Viewing: Ordinary Audience. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Whitehouse-Hart, Jo and SpringerLink (Online service). 2014a. Psychosocial Explorations of Film and Television Viewing: Ordinary Audience. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Whitehouse-Hart, Jo and SpringerLink (Online service). 2014b. Psychosocial Explorations of Film and Television Viewing: Ordinary Audience. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Williams, Kevin. 2003. ‘Effects What Effects Chapter 7’. in Understanding Media Theory. Arnold.
Wood, Helen. 2004. ‘What Reading the Romance Did for Us’. European Journal of Cultural Studies 7(2):147–54. doi: 10.1177/1367549404042487.
Xu, Shengju, and Heidi A. Campbell. 2018. ‘Surveying Digital Religion in China: Characteristics of Religion on the Internet in Mainland China’. The Communication Review 21(4):253–76. doi: 10.1080/10714421.2018.1535729.
Ytre-Arne, Brita. 2011. ‘“I Want to Hold It in My Hands”: Readers’ Experiences of the Phenomenological Differences between Women’s Magazines Online and in Print’. Media, Culture & Society 33(3):467–77. doi: 10.1177/0163443711398766.