Abercrombie, N., & Longhurst, B. (1998a). Audiences: a sociological theory of performance and imagination. Sage. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1024126
Abercrombie, N., & Longhurst, B. (1998b). Changing audiences, changing paradigms of research Chapter one. In Audiences: a sociological theory of performance and imagination. Sage. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1024126
Alasuutari, P. (1999). Rethinking the media audience: the new agenda. Sage.
Ang, I. (2006). On the politics of empirical audience research. In Media and cultural studies: keyworks: Vol. Keyworks in cultural studies (Rev. ed). Blackwell. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=239901
Ang, I., & Couling, D. (1996). Watching Dallas: soap opera and the melodramatic imagination. Routledge. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=10763823
Ang, Ien. (1991). Desperately Seeking the Audience. Routledge. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=165716
Arild Fetveit. (n.d.). Anti-essentialism and reception studies: In defense of the text. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 4, 173–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/136787790100400203
Athique, A. (2018). The dynamics and potentials of big data for audience research. Media, Culture & Society, 40(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717693681
Bainbridge, C., Ward, I., & Yates, C. (2014). Television and psychoanalysis: psycho-cultural perspectives. Karnac. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1574555
Barker, M. (2006). I Have Seen the Future and It Is Not Here Yet ...; or, On Being Ambitious for Audience Research. The Communication Review, 9(2), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714420600663310
Barker, M., & Petley, J. (2001a). Ill effects: the media violence debate: Vol. Communication and society [Routledge] (2nd ed). Routledge. http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=84561
Barker, M., & Petley, J. (2001b). Introduction: from bad research to good. In Ill effects: the media violence debate: Vol. Communication and society [Routledge] (2nd ed). Routledge. http://le.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=5665221790002746&institutionId=2746&customerId=2745
Behrenshausen, B. G. (2013). The active audience, again: Player-centric game studies and the problem of binarism. New Media & Society, 15(6), 872–889. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812462843
Bird, S. E. (2011). ARE WE ALL PRODUSERS NOW? Cultural Studies, 25(4–5), 502–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2011.600532
Birgitta Höijer. (n.d.). Ontological Assumptions and Generalizations in Qualitative (Audience) Research. European Journal of Communication, 23, 275–294. http://ejc.sagepub.com.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/search?author1=Hoijer&fulltext=Ontological%20Assumptions%20and%20Generalizations%20in%20Qualitative%20(Audience)%20Research&pubdate_year=2008&volume=23&firstpage=275&submit=yes
Blackman, L., & Walkerdine, V. (2000). Mass hysteria: critical psychology and media studies. Macmillan.
Bolongaro, K. A. M. (2013). Pauline Hope Cheong, Peter Fischer-Nielsen, Stefan Gelfgren & Charles Ess (Eds.): Digital Religion, Social Media and Culture: Perspectives, Practices and Futures. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc. 2012. MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research, 29(55). https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v29i55.9716
Bonnett, A. (2001). How to argue: a student’s guide. Pearson Education. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=5185704
Brand New You | Kanopy. (n.d.). https://le.kanopy.com/video/brand-new-you-makeover-television-and-american-dream
Brooker, W., & Jermyn, D. (2003). The audience studies reader. Routledge.
Campbell, H. (2013). Digital religion: understanding religious practice in new media worlds. Routledge. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1097827
Campbell, H. A., & La Pastina, A. C. (2010). How the iPhone became divine: new media, religion and the intertextual circulation of meaning. New Media & Society, 12(7), 1191–1207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810362204
Campbell, H., & Garner, S. (2016). Networked theology: negotiating faith in digital culture. Baker Academic. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=5248646
Campbell, H., & Grieve, G. P. (Eds.). (2014). Playing with religion in digital games. Indiana University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=1680203
Cantril, H., Gaudet, H., Herzog, H., & Welles, O. (1982). The invasion from Mars: a study in the psychology of panic : with the complete script of the famous Orson Welles broadcast. Princeton University Press.
Cavalcante, A., Press, A., & Sender, K. (2017a). Feminist reception studies in a post-audience age: returning to audiences and everyday life. Feminist Media Studies, 17(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2017.1261822
Cavalcante, A., Press, A., & Sender, K. (2017b). Feminist reception studies in a post-audience age: returning to audiences and everyday life. Feminist Media Studies, 17(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2017.1261822
Cheong, P. H. (2012). Digital religion, social media, and culture: perspectives, practices, and futures: Vol. v. 78. Peter Lang.
Claydon, E., & Whitehouse-Hart, J. (2018). Overcoming’ the ‘Battlefield of the Mind’: A Psycho-linguistic Examination of the Discourse of Digital-Televangelists Self-Help Texts’. Language and Psychoanalysis, 7 (2) 2-28. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.7565/landp.v7i21587
Couldry, N. (2005). The Extended Audience: Scanning the Horizon’. In Media audiences. Open University Press.
Dallas, S. (1995). On the Audience Commodity and its work. In Approaches to media: a reader: Vol. Foundations in media. Arnold.
Das, R. (2017). Audiences: a decade of transformations – reflections from the CEDAR network on emerging directions in audience analysis. Media, Culture & Society, 39(8), 1257–1267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717717632
Das, R., & Sonia, L. (2013). The End of Audiences? Theoretical echoes of reception amidst the uncertainties of use. In A companion to new media dynamics. John Wiley & Sons. http://le.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=5665880050002746&institutionId=2746&customerId=2745
David Buckingham. (n.d.). `Creative’ visual methods in media research: possibilities, problems and proposals. Media, Culture & Society, 31, 633–652. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443709335280
Dovey, J. (2000). Freakshow: first person media and factual television. Pluto Press. http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=2001153
Duffy, B. E. (2013). Remake, remodel: women’s magazines in the digital age. University of Illinois Press.
Eagleton, T. (1994). Ideology: Vol. Longman critical readers. Longman. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1746767
Elizabeth Jane Evans. (n.d.). Character, audience agency and transmedia drama. Media, Culture & Society, 30, 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443707086861
Elliott, P. (1974). Uses and gratifications research: A critique and a sociological alternative. In The uses of mass communications: current perspectives on gratifications research: Vol. Sage annual reviews of communication research (pp. 249–268). Sage Publications.
Ferrucci, P., & Painter, C. (2017). Print Versus Digital. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 41(2), 124–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859917690533
Gauntlett, D. (1998). Ten things wrong with the "effects model.”. In Approaches to audiences: a reader: Vol. Foundations in media. Arnold.
Gerbner et al, G. (2009). Growing up with television: The Cultivation Perspective. In Media effects: advances in theory and research: Vol. Communication series. Communication theory and methodology (3rd ed). Routledge. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=10274244
Gillespie, M. (1995a). Television, ethnicity and cultural change: Vol. Comedia. Routledge.
Gillespie, M. (1995b). Television, ethnicity and cultural change: Vol. Comedia. Routledge.
Ginsburg, F. D., Abu-Lughod, L., & Larkin, B. (2002). Media worlds: anthropology on new terrain. University of California Press. http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=10058549
Gitlin, T. (2000). Inside prime time (Rev. ed). University of California Press.
Glad, B., & Beradt, C. (1969a). The Third Reich of Dreams. The American Political Science Review, 63(2). https://doi.org/10.2307/1954716
Glad, B., & Beradt, C. (1969b). The Third Reich of Dreams. The American Political Science Review, 63(2). https://doi.org/10.2307/1954716
Gorton, K. (2009a). Media audiences: television, meaning and emotion. Edinburgh University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=536997
Gorton, K. (2009b). Media audiences: television, meaning and emotion. Edinburgh University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=536997
Gray, J. (2017). Reviving audience studies. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 34(1), 79–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2016.1266680
Greene, Kira. (2000). TV’s test pilots. Broadcasting & Cable., 130(30). http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bah&AN=3364522&site=ehost-live
Hall, S. (1980). Encoding/ decoding. In Culture, media, language: working papers in cultural studies, 1972-79: Vol. Working papers in cultural studies, 1972-79 (pp. 117–128). Hutchinson in association with the Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies, University of Birmingham. http://le.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=5665769750002746&institutionId=2746&customerId=2745
Hall, S. (1994). Reflections upon the Encoding/Decoding Model: An Interview with Stuart Hall. In Viewing, reading, listening: audiences and cultural reception: Vol. Cultural studies [Westview Press] (pp. 253–274). Westview Press.
Harris, J., & Watson, E. (2007). The Oprah phenomenon (Updated edition). University Press of Kentucky. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/reader.action?docID=1920897&ppg=15
Hartley, J., Burgess, J., & Bruns, A. (2013a). A companion to new media dynamics. John Wiley & Sons. http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=531267
Hartley, J., Burgess, J., & Bruns, A. (2013b). A companion to new media dynamics. John Wiley & Sons. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=3422436
Hartley, J., Burgess, J., & Bruns, A. (Eds.). (2013c). The End of Audiences? In A Companion to New Media Dynamics. Wiley-Blackwell. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/reader.action?docID=3422436&ppg=126
Hayes, Dade dhayes@nbmedia.com. (2015). Inside TV’s Secret Lab. (cover story). Broadcasting & Cable., 145(19), 4–6. http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bah&AN=102711548&site=ehost-live
Helen Wood. (n.d.). The mediated conversational floor: an interactive approach to audience reception analysis. Media, Culture & Society, 29, 75–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443706072000
Henry Jenkins. (n.d.). The Cultural Logic of Media Convergence. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 7, 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877904040603
Hepp, A. (2012). Cultures of mediatization. Polity. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1180925
Hermes, J., van den Berg, A., & Mol, M. (2013). Sleeping with the enemy: Audience studies and critical literacy. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(5), 457–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877912474547
Hills, M. (2007). Michael Jackson Fans on Trial? "Documenting” Emotivism and Fandom in. Social Semiotics, 17(4), 459–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330701637056
Hobson, D. (1982). Crossroads: the drama of a soap opera. Methuen.
Hoover, S. M., & Clark, L. S. (2002). Practicing religion in the age of the media: explorations in media, religion, and culture. Columbia University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=895172
Ian Hutchby. (2001). Technologies, Texts and Affordances. Sociology, 35(2), 441–456. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42856294?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Jackson, R. L. & Sage reference on-line. (2010). Encyclopedia of identity. SAGE. http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://knowledge.sagepub.com/view/identity/SAGE.xml
Jenkins, H. (2008). Convergence culture: where old and new media collide (Updated and with a new afterword). New York University Press.
Jermyn, D., & Holmes, S. (2006). The Audience is Dead; Long Live the Audience!: Interactivity, ‘Telephilia’ and the Contemporary Television Audience. Critical Studies in Television: The International Journal of Television Studies, 1(1), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.7227/CST.1.1.8
Jin, D. (2016). New Korean Wave: Transnational Cultural Power in the Age of Social Media. University of Illinois Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=4443546
José van Dijck. (n.d.). Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media, Culture & Society, 31, 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443708098245
Kavka, M. (2008a). Reality television, affect and intimacy: reality matters. Palgrave Macmillan.
Kavka, M. (2008b). Reality television, affect and intimacy: reality matters. Palgrave Macmillan.
Kavka, M. (2008c). Reality television, affect and intimacy: reality matters. Palgrave Macmillan.
Kavka, M. (2008d). Reality television, affect and intimacy: reality matters. Palgrave Macmillan.
Lacey, N. (2002). Media institutions and audiences: key concepts in media studies. Palgrave. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=327969
Lapsley, R. (2006). Psychoanalytic Criticism. In The Routledge companion to critical theory. Routledge.
Lee McGuigan. (2012). Consumers: The Commodity Product of Interactive Commercial Television, or, Is Dallas Smythe’s Thesis More Germane Than Ever? The Journal of Communication Inquiry, 36(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859912459756
Liebes, T., & Katz, E. (1993). The export of meaning: cross-cultural readings of Dallas (2nd ed). Polity Press.
Livingstone, sonia. (1998). Relationships between media and audiences: Prospects for future audience reception studies. In Media, ritual, and identity: Vol. Communication and society. Routledge. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=169411
Livingstone, S., & Das, R. (2013). The End of Audiences? Theoretical echoes of reception amidst the uncertainties of use. In A companion to new media dynamics (pp. 104–122). John Wiley & Sons. http://le.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=5665206730002746&institutionId=2746&customerId=2745
Livingstone, S. M. (1998). Making sense of television: the psychology of audience interpretation: Vol. International series in social psychology (2nd ed). Routledge.
Lofton, K. (2011). Religion and the American Celebrity. Social Compass, 58(3), 346–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037768611412143
Long, P., & Wall, T. (2012a). Media studies: texts, production, context (2nd ed). Pearson. http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=812615
Long, P., & Wall, T. (2012b). Media studies: texts, production, context (2nd ed). Pearson. http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=812615
Lowes, R., Peters, H., & Turner, M. C. (2004). The international student’s guide: studying in English at university: Vol. Sage study skills. SAGE. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=10218078
Lundby, K. (2011). PATTERNS OF BELONGING IN ONLINE/OFFLINE INTERFACES OF RELIGION. Information, Communication & Society, 14(8), 1219–1235. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.594077
Madianou, M. (2014). Smartphones as Polymedia. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 667–680. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12069
Madianou, M., & Miller, D. (2013). Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877912452486
Manley, J., & Crociani-Windland, L. (2018). Social dreaming, associative thinking and intensities of affect. Palgrave Macmillan. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=5497847
Mansfield, N. (2000). Lacan : The Subject is Language. In Subjectivity: Theories of the self from Freud to Haraway. Allen & Unwin. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=286495
Martin J. Barker. (n.d.). The Lord of the Rings and ‘Identification’: A Critical Encounter. European Journal of Communication, 20, 353–378. http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0267323105055262
Mayer, V. (2016). The Places Where Audience Studies and Production Studies Meet. Television & New Media, 17(8), 706–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476416652482
McKee, A. (2003). Textual analysis: a beginner’s guide. Sage Publications. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=254647
McLeod, D., Wise, D., & Perryman, M. (2017). Thinking about the media: A review of theory and research on media perceptions, media effects perception and their consequences. Review of Communication REsearch, Volume 5.
Mediatization and the ‘molding force’ of the media. (n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2012-0001
Meissner, W W. (n.d.). Notes on identification. I. Origins in Freud. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 39(4), 563–589. https://librarysearch.le.ac.uk/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=TN_medline4921741&context=PC&vid=44UOLE_NUI&lang=en_US&search_scope=default_scope&adaptor=primo_central_multiple_fe&tab=default_tab&query=any,contains,W.W.%20Meissner,%201970.%20Notes%20on%20Identification%20I.%20Origens%20in%20Freud,%20Psychoanalytic%20Quarterly,%2039,%20563-589.%20&pcAvailability=false
Melissa A. ClickSuzanne Scott. (9 C.E.). The Routledge Companion to Media Fandom (Routledge Media and Cultural Studies Companions). Routledge; 1 edition. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=5122937
Michael O’Shaughnessy. (1994a). Promoting ‘emotion’: Feelings, film studies and teaching or understanding films; understanding ourselves. Metro Media and Education, 97, 44–48.
Michael O’Shaughnessy. (1994b). Promoting ‘emotion’: Feelings, film studies and teaching or understanding films; understanding ourselves. Metro Media and Education, 97, 44–48.
Miller, D. (2011). Tales from Facebook. Polity. http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=571931
Mirca Madianou. (n.d.). Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16, 169–187. http://ics.sagepub.com/search?author1=Madianou&fulltext=Polymedia:%20Towards%20a%20new%20theory%20of%20digital%20media%20in%20interpersonal%20communication&pubdate_year=2013&volume=16&firstpage=169&submit=yes
Modleski, T. (1984). Loving with a vengeance: mass-produced fantasies for women. Methuen.
Morgan, D. (2013). Religion and media: A critical review of recent developments. Critical Research on Religion, 1(3), 347–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050303213506476
Morley, D. (2006a). Unanswered Questions in Audience Research. The Communication Review, 9(2), 101–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714420600663286
Morley, D. (2006b). Unanswered Questions in Audience Research. The Communication Review, 9(2), 101–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714420600663286
Mytton, G., Diem, P., & Dam, P. H. van. (2016). Media audience research: a guide for professionals (Third edition). SAGE Publications, Incorporated. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=4440204
Nancy Thumin. (2013). Self-Representation and Digital Culture. European Journal of Communication, 28(6), 729–730. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323113505802c
Neilsen Launches ‘Neilsen Twitter TV Ratings’. (n.d.). http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=1&sid=263c30ed-675a-4554-859f-e35ae5e4887b%40sessionmgr120&hid=110&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=bwh&AN=bizwire.c51050908
Nightingale, V. (1996). Studying the television audience: the shock of the real. Routledge.
Nikolas Coupland. (10 C.E.). The Handbook of Language and Globalization (Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics). Wiley-Blackwell. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=4041769
Ong, J. C. (2009). Watching the Nation, Singing the Nation: London-Based Filipino Migrants’ Identity Constructions in News and Karaoke Practices. Communication, Culture & Critique, 2(2), 160–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-9137.2009.01033.x
O’Shaughnessy, M. (1994a). Promoting ‘emotion’: Feelings, film studies and teaching or understanding films; understanding ourselves. Metro Media and Education, 97.
O’Shaughnessy, M. (1994b). Promoting ‘emotion’: Feelings, film studies and teaching or understanding films; understanding ourselves. Metro Media and Education, 97.
P, M. (1994). Made to Order and Standardized Audiences: forms of reality in audience measurements. In Audience making: how the media create the audience: Vol. Sage annual reviews of communication research (pp. 57–74). Sage.
Paddy Scannell. (n.d.). Big Brother as a Television Event. Television & New Media, 3, 271–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/152747640200300303
Palmgreen, p, Wenner, L. A., & Rosengren, K. E. (1985). Uses and gratifications research: the past ten years. In Media gratifications research: current perspectives (pp. xx–xxx). Sage.
Pears, R., & Shields, G. J. (2022). Cite them right: the essential referencing guide (12th edition). Bloomsbury Academic. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=6992940
Pink, S. (2007). Doing visual ethnography: images, media and representation in research (2nd ed). SAGE. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=LeicesterU&isbn=9781446296035
Piper, H. (2006). Understanding Reality Television * Reality TV - Audiences and Popular Factual Television * Reality TV - Realism and Revelation. Screen, 47(1), 133–138. https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/hjl012
Press, A. L. (2006). Audience Research in the Post-Audience Age: An Introduction to Barker and Morley. The Communication Review, 9(2), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714420600663278
Radway, J. A. (1991a). Reading the romance: women, patriarchy, and popular literature (2nd ed). University of North Carolina Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=880363
Radway, J. A. (1991b). Reading the romance: women, patriarchy and popular literature. University of North Carolina Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=880363
Radway, J. A. (1991c). Reading the romance: women, patriarchy, and popular literature (2nd ed). University of North Carolina Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=880363
Ranjana Das. (n.d.). Converging perspectives in audience studies and digital literacies: Youthful interpretations of an online genre. European Journal of Communication, 26, 343–360. http://ejc.sagepub.com/search?author1=Das&fulltext=Converging%20Perspectives%20in%20Audience%20Studies%20and%20Digital%20Literacies:%20Youthful%20Interpretations%20of%20an%20Online%20Genre&pubdate_year=2011&volume=26&firstpage=343&submit=yes
Readdy, T., & Ebbeck, V. (2012). Weighing in on NBC’s The Biggest Loser. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 83(4), 579–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2012.10599255
Redman, P., Maples, W., & Open University. (2017). Good essay writing: a social sciences guide (Fifth edition). SAGE.
Redman, P. & Open University. (2008a). Attachment: sociology and social worlds. Manchester University Press in association with the Open University.
Redman, P. & Open University. (2008b). Attachment: sociology and social worlds: Vol. Making social worlds. Manchester University Press in association with the Open University.
Rippen, A. (2014). Internet: Implications and Future Possibilities’. In Muslims And The New Information And Communication Technologies Notes From An Emerging And Infinite Field. Springer. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1636818
Rose, G. (2012). Visual methodologies: an introduction to researching with visual materials (3rd ed). SAGE.
Rosengren, k. E. (1974). Uses and Gratifications: A Paradigm Outlined. In The uses of mass communications: current perspectives on gratifications research: Vol. Sage annual reviews of communication research (pp. 269–286). Sage Publications.
Rosengren, K. (1996). Chapter 2 - Combinations, comparisons and confrontations: towards a comprehensive theory of audience research. In The audience and its landscape: Vol. Cultural studies [Westview Press] (pp. 23–51). Westview Press.
Ross, K., & Nightingale, V. (2003). Media and audiences: new perspectives. Open University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=295455
Ross, K., & Playdon, P. (2001). Black marks: minority ethnic audiences and media. Ashgate.
Ruggiero, T. E. (2000). Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st Century. Mass Communication and Society, 3(1), 3–37. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_02
Sandler, J. & Sigmund Freud Center for Study and Research in Psychoanalysis (Universiṭah haʻIvrit bi-Yerushalayim). (1988). Projection, identification, projective identification. Karnac Books. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=709550
Schrøder, K. C. (1987). Convergence of Antagonistic Traditions? The Case of Audience Research. European Journal of Communication, 2(1), 7–31.
Sconce, J. (1998). The Voice from the Void. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 1(2), 211–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/13678779980010020401
Sconce, J. (2000). Haunted media: electronic presence from telegraphy to television. Duke University Press.
Seiter, ellen. (1990a). Making distinctions in TV audience research: Case study of a troubling interview. Cultural Studies, 4(1).
Seiter, ellen. (1990b). Making distinctions in TV audience research: Case study of a troubling interview. Cultural Studies, 4(1).
Seiter, E. (1989a). Remote control: television, audiences and cultural power. Routledge.
Seiter, E. (1989b). Remote control: television, audiences and cultural power. Routledge.
Sender, K. (2006). Queens for a Day: and the Neoliberal Project. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 23(2), 131–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393180600714505
Sender, K. (2012). The makeover: reality television and reflexive audiences. New York University Press. https://dx.doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814740699.001.0001
Sender, K. (2015). Reconsidering Reflexivity: Audience Research and Reality Television. The Communication Review, 18(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2015.996414
Sender, K., & Sullivan, M. (2008). Epidemics of will, failures of self-esteem: Responding to fat bodies in and. Continuum, 22(4), 573–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304310802190046
Serials Solutions Article Linker -. (n.d.). http://gl9sn3dh2u.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=book&rft.title=Audience+Economics&rft.au=PHILIP+M.+NAPOLI&rft.date=2003-09-25&rft.pub=Columbia+University+Press&rft_id=info:doi/10.7312%2Fnapo12652&rft.externalDocID=napo12652¶mdict=en-US
Shanahan, J., & Morgan, M. (1999). Television and its viewers: cultivation research and theory. Cambridge University Press. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=5001729
Skeggs, B., Thumim, N., & Wood, H. (2008a). ‘Oh goodness, I am watching reality TV’. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 11(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549407084961
Skeggs, B., Thumim, N., & Wood, H. (2008b). ‘Oh goodness, I am watching reality TV’. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 11(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549407084961
Skeggs, B., & Wood, H. (2008). The labour of transformation and circuits of value ‘around’ reality television. Continuum, 22(4), 559–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304310801983664
Skeggs, B., & Wood, H. (2011a). Reality television and class. BFI.
Skeggs, B., & Wood, H. (2011b). Reality television and class. BFI.
Skeggs, B., & Wood, H. (2011c). Turning it on is a class act: immediated object relations with television. Media, Culture & Society, 33(6), 941–951. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443711412298
Skeggs, B., & Wood, H. (2012). Reacting to reality television: performance, audience and value. Routledge. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=957761
Skeggs, B., & Wood, H. (2014). Reacting to Reality Television: Performance, Audience and Value. Taylor & Francis Group. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=957761
Social comparison, social media, and self-esteem. (2014). Psychology of Popular Media Culture. http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy4.lib.le.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pdh&AN=2014-33471-001&site=ehost-live
Sonia Livingstone. (n.d.). The Challenge of Changing Audiences: Or, What is the Audience Researcher to Do in the Age of the Internet? European Journal of Communication, 19(1), 75–86. http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F0267323104040695
Stephen Parker. (n.d.). Winnicott’s object relations theory and the work of the Holy Spirit. Journal of Psychology and Theology. http://go.galegroup.com.ezproxy4.lib.le.ac.uk/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA192863906&v=2.1&u=leicester&it=r&p=EAIM&sw=w
The communication review (Yverdon, Switzerland). (2006). 9(2), 123–141. http://gl9sn3dh2u.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=I+have+seen+the+future+and+it+is+not+here+yet+...%3A+Or%2C+on+being+ambitious+for+audience+research&rft.jtitle=The+Communication+Review&rft.au=Barker%2C+M&rft.date=2006&rft.eissn=1547-7487&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=123&rft.epage=141&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=CAX0290060002004¶mdict=en-US
Thumim, N. (2012). Self-representation and digital culture. Palgrave Macmillan. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=990162
Tincknell, E., & Raghuram, P. (2002). Big Brother: Reconfiguring the `active’ audience of cultural studies? European Journal of Cultural Studies, 5(2), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1364942002005002159
Toynbee, J. (2006). The Media’s View of the Audience. In Media Production (pp. 91–133). Open University Press.
Tse, T. (2018). Reconceptualising prosumption beyond the cultural turn : passive fashion consumption in Korea and China. Journal of Consumer Culture, o (o) 1. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540518804300
Tsuria, R., Yadlin-Segal, A., Vitullo, A., & Campbell, H. A. (2017). Approaches to digital methods in studies of digital religion. The Communication Review, 20(2), 73–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2017.1304137
Tulloch, J. (1999). The implied audience in soap opera production: Everyday Rhetorical Strategies among television professionals. In Rethinking the media audience: the new agenda (pp. 151–178). Sage. http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.myilibrary.com?id=226264
Twitter to drive TV Ratings beyond an ‘assumption’ of engagement. (7 C.E.). B and T Weekly. http://www.bandt.com.au/media/twitter-to-drive-tv-ratings-beyond-an-assumption-o
Victor Costello. (n.d.). Cultural Outlaws: An Examination of Audience Activity and Online Television Fandom. Television & New Media, 8, 124–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476406299112
Wasko, J. (2005). Reality TV: Performance, Authenticity, and Television Audiences. In A companion to television: Vol. Blackwell companions in cultural studies (p. A-Hill). Blackwell. http://le.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=5665769740002746&institutionId=2746&customerId=2745
Webster, J. G., Phalen, P. F., & Lichty, L. W. (2006). Ratings analysis: the theory and practice of audience research: Vol. LEA’s communication series (3rd ed). L. Erlbaum Associates.
Webster, James G. (1998). Audience, The. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 42. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jbem42&collection=journals&page=190
Whitehouse-Hart, J. (2014). Psychosocial explorations of film and television viewing: ordinary audience. Palgrave Macmillan. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1880204
Whitehouse-Hart, J. & SpringerLink (Online service). (2014a). Psychosocial Explorations of Film and Television Viewing: Ordinary Audience. Palgrave Macmillan UK. http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137465146
Whitehouse-Hart, J. & SpringerLink (Online service). (2014b). Psychosocial Explorations of Film and Television Viewing: Ordinary Audience. Palgrave Macmillan UK. http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137465146
Williams, K. (2003). Effects What Effects chapter 7. In Understanding Media Theory. Arnold.
Wood, H. (2004). What Reading the Romance Did for Us. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 7(2), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549404042487
Xu, S., & Campbell, H. A. (2018). Surveying digital religion in China: Characteristics of religion on the Internet in Mainland China. The Communication Review, 21(4), 253–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2018.1535729
Ytre-Arne, B. (2011). ‘I want to hold it in my hands’: readers’ experiences of the phenomenological differences between women’s magazines online and in print. Media, Culture & Society, 33(3), 467–477. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443711398766
