1.
Hill, C. Foreign Policy in the Twenty-First Century. (Palgrave, London, 2016).
2.
Hill, C. The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy. (Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke, 2003).
3.
Smith, S., Hadfield, A. & Dunne, T. Foreign Policy: Theories, Actors, Cases. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012).
4.
Alden, C. Foreign Policy Analysis: New Approaches. (Routledge, London, 2012).
5.
Neack, L. The New Foreign Policy: Power Seeking in a Globalized Era. vol. New millennium books in international studies (Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, Md, 2008).
6.
Rosenau, J. N. The Scientific Study of Foreign Policy. (Pinter, London, 1980).
7.
Hill, C. The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy. (Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke, 2003).
8.
Smith, S., Hadfield, A. & Dunne, T. Foreign Policy: Theories, Actors, Cases. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012).
9.
Neack, L. The New Foreign Policy: Power Seeking in a Globalized Era. vol. New millennium books in international studies (Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, Md, 2008).
10.
Hudson, V. M. Foreign Policy Analysis: Classic and Contemporary Theory. (Rowman & Littlefield Pub, Lanham, 2014).
11.
Giacomello, G., Ferrari, F. & Amadori, A. With friends like these: foreign policy as personal relationship. Contemporary Politics 15, 247–264 (2009).
12.
Hudson, V. M. Foreign Policy Analysis: Actor-Specific Theory and the Ground of International Relations. Foreign Policy Analysis 1, 1–30 (2005).
13.
David, C. Who was the real George Bush? Foreign policy decision‐making under the bush administration. Diplomacy & Statecraft 7, 197–220 (1996).
14.
Zhang, Q. Towards an Integrated Theory of Chinese Foreign Policy: bringing leadership personality back in. Journal of Contemporary China 23, 902–922 (2014).
15.
Görener, A. Ş. & Ucal, M. Ş. The Personality and Leadership Style of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan: Implications for Turkish Foreign Policy. Turkish Studies 12, 357–381 (2011).
16.
Rottinghaus, B. Presidential Leadership on Foreign Policy, Opinion Polling, and the Possible Limits of "Crafted Talk”. Political Communication 25, 138–157 (2008).
17.
Pravda, A. Is there a Gorbachev foreign policy? Journal of Communist Studies 4, 100–120 (1988).
18.
Gallagher, M. E. & Allen, S. H. Presidential Personality: Not Just a Nuisance. Foreign Policy Analysis 10, 1–21 (2014).
19.
DYSON, S. B. Personality and Foreign Policy: Tony Blair’s Iraq Decisions. Foreign Policy Analysis 2, 289–306 (2006).
20.
Hill, C. The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy. (Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke, 2003).
21.
Alden, C. Foreign Policy Analysis: New Approaches. (Routledge, London, 2012).
22.
Hudson, V. M. Foreign Policy Analysis: Classic and Contemporary Theory. (Rowman & Littlefield Pub, Lanham, 2014).
23.
Neack, L. The New Foreign Policy: Power Seeking in a Globalized Era. vol. New millennium books in international studies (Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, Md, 2008).
24.
Garrison, J. A. Foreign Policymaking and Group Dynamics: Where We’ve Been and Where We’re Going. International Studies Review 5, 155–202 (2003).
25.
Clarke, M. & White, B. Understanding Foreign Policy: The Foreign Policy Systems Approach. (Elgar, Aldershot, 1989).
26.
Graham T. Allison and Morton H. Halperin. Bureaucratic Politics: A Paradigm and Some Policy Implications. World Politics 24, 40–79 (1972).
27.
Hocking, B. Adaptation and the foreign policy bureaucracy: The experience of federal states. Diplomacy & Statecraft 5, 47–72 (1994).
28.
Lai, H. & Kang, S.-J. Domestic Bureaucratic Politics and Chinese Foreign Policy. Journal of Contemporary China 23, 294–313 (2014).
29.
Badie, D. Groupthink, Iraq, and the War on Terror: Explaining US Policy Shift toward Iraq. Foreign Policy Analysis 6, 277–296 (2010).
30.
GARRISON, J. Constructing the ‘National Interest’ in U.S.?China Policy Making: How Foreign Policy Decision Groups Define and Signal Policy Choices. Foreign Policy Analysis 3, 105–126 (2007).
31.
Kaarbo, J. & Beasley, R. K. Taking It to the Extreme: The Effect of Coalition Cabinets on Foreign Policy. Foreign Policy Analysis 4, 67–81 (2008).
32.
Marsh, K. Obama’s Surge: A Bureaucratic Politics Analysis of the Decision to Order a Troop Surge in the Afghanistan War. Foreign Policy Analysis 10, 265–288 (2014).
33.
Hill, C. The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy. (Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke, 2003).
34.
Hudson, V. M. Foreign Policy Analysis: Classic and Contemporary Theory. (Rowman & Littlefield Pub, Lanham, 2014).
35.
Alden, C. Foreign Policy Analysis: New Approaches. (Routledge, London, 2012).
36.
Hadfield, A. British Foreign Policy, National Identity, and Neoclassical Realism. (Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD, 2010).
37.
Mattes, M. & Rodríguez, M. Autocracies and International Cooperation. International Studies Quarterly 58, 527–538 (2014).
38.
Rosenau, J. N. Domestic Sources of Foreign Policy. (Free Press, New York, 1967).
39.
Neack, L. The New Foreign Policy: Power Seeking in a Globalized Era. vol. New millennium books in international studies (Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, Md, 2008).
40.
Reiter, D. Political structure and foreign policy learning: Are democracies more likely to act on the lessons of history? International Interactions 21, 39–62 (1995).
41.
Ungerer, J. L. Assessing the Progress of the Democratic Peace Research Program. International Studies Review 14, 1–31 (2012).
42.
CHAN, S. & SAFRAN, W. Public Opinion as a Constraint against War: Democracies’ Responses to Operation Iraqi Freedom. Foreign Policy Analysis 2, 137–156 (2006).
43.
Bruce Bueno de Mesquita, Randolph M. Siverson and Gary Woller. War and the Fate of Regimes: A Comparative Analysis. The American Political Science Review 86, 638–646 (1992).
44.
Waltz, K. N. Foreign Policy and Democratic Politics: The American and British Experience. (Longmans, Harlow, 1968).
45.
Lee, S. Canadian values in Canadian foreign policy. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal 10, 1–9 (2002).
46.
Hill, C. The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy. (Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke, 2003).
47.
Smith, S., Hadfield, A. & Dunne, T. Foreign Policy: Theories, Actors, Cases. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012).
48.
Neack, L. The New Foreign Policy: Power Seeking in a Globalized Era. vol. New millennium books in international studies (Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, Md, 2008).
49.
Alden, C. Foreign Policy Analysis: New Approaches. (Routledge, London, 2012).
50.
Nincic, M. & Ramos, J. M. Ideological structure and foreign policy preferences. Journal of Political Ideologies 15, 119–141 (2010).
51.
Thorngate, W. The social psychology of policy analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 3, 85–112 (2001).
52.
Lebow, R. N. Psychological dimensions of post‐Cold War foreign policy. Israel Affairs 2, 46–56 (1996).
53.
Schafer, M. Science, Empiricism, and Tolerance in the Study of Foreign Policymaking. International Studies Review 5, 155–202 (2003).
54.
Jack S. Levy. Learning and Foreign Policy: Sweeping a Conceptual Minefield. International Organization 48, 279–312 (1994).
55.
Goldsmith, B. Imitation in International Relations: Analogies, Vicarious Learning, and Foreign Policy. International Interactions 29, 237–267 (2003).
56.
Oppermann, K. & Spencer, A. Thinking Alike? Salience and Metaphor Analysis as Cognitive Approaches to Foreign Policy Analysis. Foreign Policy Analysis 9, 39–56 (2013).
57.
Dolan, T. M. Emotion and Strategic Learning in War. Foreign Policy Analysis n/a-n/a (2014) doi:10.1111/fpa.12052.
58.
O?Reilly, K. P. Perceiving Rogue States: The Use of the ‘Rogue State’ Concept by U.S. Foreign Policy Elites. Foreign Policy Analysis 3, 295–315 (2007).
59.
Hill, C. The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy. (Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke, 2003).
60.
Hudson, V. M. Foreign Policy Analysis: Classic and Contemporary Theory. (Rowman & Littlefield Pub, Lanham, 2014).
61.
Langhorne, R. The Diplomacy of Non-State Actors. Diplomacy & Statecraft 16, 331–339 (2005).
62.
Michael A. Cohen and Maria Figueroa Küpçü. Privatizing Foreign Policy. World Policy Journal 22, 34–52 (2005).
63.
Kim, Y. How NGOs Influence US Foreign Aid Allocations. Foreign Policy Analysis n/a-n/a (2014) doi:10.1111/fpa.12064.
64.
McMillan, S. L. Subnational Foreign Policy Actors: How and Why Governors Participate in U.S. Foreign Policy. Foreign Policy Analysis 4, 227–253 (2008).
65.
True, J. & Mintrom, M. Transnational Networks and Policy Diffusion: The Case of Gender Mainstreaming. International Studies Quarterly 45, 27–57 (2001).
66.
Price, R. Reversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Land Mines. International Organization 52, 613–644 (1998).
67.
Hoffman, M. E. S. Discretion, Lobbying, and Political Influence in Models of Trade Policy. The Journal of Policy Reform 8, 175–188 (2005).
68.
Warner, C. M. & Walker, S. G. Thinking about the Role of Religion in Foreign Policy: A Framework for Analysis. Foreign Policy Analysis 7, 113–135 (2011).
69.
Joachim, J. Framing Issues and Seizing Opportunities: The UN, NGOs, and Women’s Rights. International Studies Quarterly 47, 247–274 (2003).
70.
Frank R. Baumgartner and Bryan D. Jones. Agenda Dynamics and Policy Subsystems. The Journal of Politics 53, 1044–1074 (1991).
71.
Nelson, P. & Dorsey, E. New Rights Advocacy in a Global Public Domain. European Journal of International Relations 13, 187–216 (2007).
72.
Hill, C. The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy. (Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke, 2003).
73.
Smith, S., Hadfield, A. & Dunne, T. Foreign Policy: Theories, Actors, Cases. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012).
74.
GILBOA, E. The CNN Effect: The Search for a Communication Theory of International Relations. Political Communication 22, 27–44 (2005).
75.
Robinson, P. The CNN Effect Revisited. Critical Studies in Media Communication 22, 344–349 (2005).
76.
Gilboa, E. Diplomacy in the media age: Three models of uses and effects. Diplomacy & Statecraft 12, 1–28 (2001).
77.
Rosenau, J. N. Domestic Sources of Foreign Policy. (Free Press, New York, 1967).
78.
Neack, L. The New Foreign Policy: Power Seeking in a Globalized Era. vol. New millennium books in international studies (Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, Md, 2008).
79.
Robinson, P. Theorizing the Influence of Media on World Politics: Models of Media Influence on Foreign Policy. European Journal of Communication 16, 523–544 (2001).
80.
Hjarvard, S. & Kristensen, N. N. When media of a small nation argue for war. Media, War & Conflict 7, 51–69 (2014).
81.
Wang, J. & Wang, X. Media and Chinese Foreign Policy. Journal of Contemporary China 23, 216–235 (2014).
82.
Murray, S. Broadening the Debate about War: The Inclusion of Foreign Critics in Media Coverage and Its Potential Impact on US Public Opinion. Foreign Policy Analysis n/a-n/a (2013) doi:10.1111/fpa.12010.
83.
The Relationships Between Mass Media, Public Opinion, and Foreign Policy: Toward a Theoretical Synthesis - Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1):39.
84.
Baru, S. The Influence of Business and Media on Indian Foreign Policy. India Review 8, 266–285 (2009).
85.
Hill, C. The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy. (Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke, 2003).
86.
Smith, S., Hadfield, A. & Dunne, T. Foreign Policy: Theories, Actors, Cases. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012).
87.
Cable, J. Foreign policy making: Planning or reflex? Diplomacy & Statecraft 3, 357–381 (1992).
88.
Kleiner, J. The Inertia of Diplomacy. Diplomacy & Statecraft 19, 321–349 (2008).
89.
John G. Tower. Congress versus the President: The Formulation and Implementation of American Foreign Policy. Foreign Affairs 60, 229–246 (1981).
90.
Breuning, M. Roles and Realities: When and Why Gatekeepers Fail to Change Foreign Policy. Foreign Policy Analysis 9, 307–325 (2013).
91.
Charles F. Hermann. Changing Course: When Governments Choose to Redirect Foreign Policy. International Studies Quarterly 34, 3–21 (1990).
92.
Hagan, J. D., Everts, P. P., Fukui, H. & Stempel, J. D. Foreign Policy by Coalition: Deadlock, Compromise, and Anarchy. International Studies Review 3, 169–216 (2001).
93.
Saideman, S. M. & Ayres, R. W. Pie Crust Promises and the Sources of Foreign Policy: The Limited Impact of Accession and the Priority of Domestic Constituencies. Foreign Policy Analysis 3, 189–210 (2007).
94.
Foreign Policy Engineering: From Theory to Practice and Back Again. International Security 18, 143–171.
95.
Stern, E. K. Crisis Studies and Foreign Policy Analysis: Insights, Synergies, and Challenges. International Studies Review 5, 155–202 (2003).
96.
T. Knecht and M. S. Weatherford. Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: The Stages of Presidential Decision Making. International Studies Quarterly 50, 705–727 (2006).
97.
Hill, Christopher. The capability-expectations gap, or conceptualizing Europe’s international role. Journal of Common Market Studies 31,.
98.
Hill, C. The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy. (Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke, 2003).
99.
Neack, L. The New Foreign Policy: Power Seeking in a Globalized Era. vol. New millennium books in international studies (Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, Md, 2008).
100.
K. J. Holsti. National Role Conceptions in the Study of Foreign Policy. International Studies Quarterly 14, 233–309 (1970).
101.
Hudson, V. M. Foreign Policy Analysis: Classic and Contemporary Theory. (Rowman & Littlefield Pub, Lanham, 2014).
102.
Wehner, L. E. & Thies, C. G. Role Theory, Narratives, and Interpretation: The Domestic Contestation of Roles. International Studies Review n/a-n/a (2014) doi:10.1111/misr.12149.
103.
Carranza, M. E. Rising Regional Powers and International Relations Theories: Comparing Brazil and India’s Foreign Security Policies and Their Search for Great-Power Status. Foreign Policy Analysis n/a-n/a (2014) doi:10.1111/fpa.12065.
104.
Jordaan, E. The concept of a middle power in international relations: distinguishing between emerging and traditional middle powers. Politikon 30, 165–181 (2003).
105.
Sussex, M. The impotence of being earnest? Avoiding the pitfalls of ‘creative middle power diplomacy’. Australian Journal of International Affairs 65, 545–562 (2011).
106.
Gecelovsky, P. Constructing a middle power: Ideas and Canadian foreign policy. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal 15, 77–93 (2009).
107.
Beeson, M. Can Australia save the world? The limits and possibilities of middle power diplomacy. Australian Journal of International Affairs 65, 563–577 (2011).
108.
Nye, J. S. Power and foreign policy. Journal of Political Power 4, 9–24 (2011).
109.
Status Seekers: Chinese and Russian Responses to U.S. Primacy. International Security 34, 63–95.
110.
Brown, C. Do Great Powers Have Great Responsibilities? Great Powers and Moral Agency. Global Society 18, 5–19 (2004).
