Alden, Chris. Foreign Policy Analysis: New Approaches. London: Routledge, 2012. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.myilibrary.com?id=368750>.
---. Foreign Policy Analysis: New Approaches. London: Routledge, 2012. Print.
---. Foreign Policy Analysis: New Approaches. London: Routledge, 2012. Print.
---. Foreign Policy Analysis: New Approaches. London: Routledge, 2012. Print.
Badie, Dina. ‘Groupthink, Iraq, and the War on Terror: Explaining US Policy Shift toward Iraq’. Foreign Policy Analysis 6.4 (2010): 277–296. Web.
Baru, Sanjaya. ‘The Influence of Business and Media on Indian Foreign Policy’. India Review 8.3 (2009): 266–285. Web.
Beeson, Mark. ‘Can Australia Save the World? The Limits and Possibilities of Middle Power Diplomacy’. Australian Journal of International Affairs 65.5 (2011): 563–577. Web.
Breuning, Marijke. ‘Roles and Realities: When and Why Gatekeepers Fail to Change Foreign Policy’. Foreign Policy Analysis 9.3 (2013): 307–325. Web.
Brown, Chris. ‘Do Great Powers Have Great Responsibilities? Great Powers and Moral Agency’. Global Society 18.1 (2004): 5–19. Web.
Bruce Bueno de Mesquita, Randolph M. Siverson and Gary Woller. ‘War and the Fate of Regimes: A Comparative Analysis’. The American Political Science Review 86.3 (1992): 638–646. Web. <http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/stable/1964127>.
Cable, James. ‘Foreign Policy Making: Planning or Reflex?’ Diplomacy & Statecraft 3.3 (1992): 357–381. Web.
Carranza, Mario E. ‘Rising Regional Powers and International Relations Theories: Comparing Brazil and India’s Foreign Security Policies and Their Search for Great-Power Status’. Foreign Policy Analysis (2014): n/a-n/a. Web.
CHAN, STEVE, and WILLIAM SAFRAN. ‘Public Opinion as a Constraint against War: Democracies’ Responses to Operation Iraqi Freedom’. Foreign Policy Analysis 2.2 (2006): 137–156. Web.
Charles F. Hermann. ‘Changing Course: When Governments Choose to Redirect Foreign Policy’. International Studies Quarterly 34.1 (1990): 3–21. Web. <http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/stable/10.2307/2600403?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=Changing&searchText=Course:&searchText=When&searchText=Governments&searchText=Choose&searchText=to&searchText=Redirect&searchText=Foreign&searchText=Policy&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3DChanging%2BCourse%253A%2BWhen%2BGovernments%2BChoose%2Bto%2BRedirect%2BForeign%2BPolicy%26amp%3Bfilter%3Djid%253A10.2307%252Fj100193%26amp%3BSearch%3DSearch%26amp%3Bwc%3Don%26amp%3Bfc%3Doff%26amp%3BglobalSearch%3D%26amp%3BsbbBox%3D%26amp%3BsbjBox%3D%26amp%3BsbpBox%3D>.
Clarke, Michael, and Brian White. Understanding Foreign Policy: The Foreign Policy Systems Approach. Aldershot: Elgar, 1989. Print.
David, Charles‐Philippe. ‘Who Was the Real George Bush? Foreign Policy Decision‐making under the Bush Administration’. Diplomacy & Statecraft 7.1 (1996): 197–220. Web.
Dolan, Thomas M. ‘Emotion and Strategic Learning in War’. Foreign Policy Analysis (2014): n/a-n/a. Web.
DYSON, STEPHEN BENEDICT. ‘Personality and Foreign Policy: Tony Blair’s Iraq Decisions’. Foreign Policy Analysis 2.3 (2006): 289–306. Web.
‘Foreign Policy Engineering: From Theory to Practice and Back Again’. International Security 18.4 143–171. Web. <http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/journals/international_security/summary/v018/18.4.zelikow.html>.
Frank R. Baumgartner and Bryan D. Jones. ‘Agenda Dynamics and Policy Subsystems’. The Journal of Politics 53.4 (1991): 1044–1074. Web. <http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/stable/2131866>.
Gallagher, Maryann E., and Susan H. Allen. ‘Presidential Personality: Not Just a Nuisance’. Foreign Policy Analysis 10.1 (2014): 1–21. Web.
GARRISON, JEAN. ‘Constructing the “National Interest” in U.S.?China Policy Making: How Foreign Policy Decision Groups Define and Signal Policy Choices’. Foreign Policy Analysis 3.2 (2007): 105–126. Web.
Garrison, Jean A. ‘Foreign Policymaking and Group Dynamics: Where We’ve Been and Where We’re Going’. International Studies Review 5.2 (2003): 155–202. Web.
Gecelovsky, Paul. ‘Constructing a Middle Power: Ideas and Canadian Foreign Policy’. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal 15.1 (2009): 77–93. Web.
Giacomello, Giampiero, Federica Ferrari, and Alessandro Amadori. ‘With Friends like These: Foreign Policy as Personal Relationship’. Contemporary Politics 15.2 (2009): 247–264. Web.
Gilboa, Eytan. ‘Diplomacy in the Media Age: Three Models of Uses and Effects’. Diplomacy & Statecraft 12.2 (2001): 1–28. Web.
GILBOA, EYTAN. ‘The CNN Effect: The Search for a Communication Theory of International Relations’. Political Communication 22.1 (2005): 27–44. Web.
Goldsmith, Benjamin. ‘Imitation in International Relations: Analogies, Vicarious Learning, and Foreign Policy’. International Interactions 29.3 (2003): 237–267. Web.
Görener, Aylin Ş., and Meltem Ş. Ucal. ‘The Personality and Leadership Style of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan: Implications for Turkish Foreign Policy’. Turkish Studies 12.3 (2011): 357–381. Web.
Graham T. Allison and Morton H. Halperin. ‘Bureaucratic Politics: A Paradigm and Some Policy Implications’. World Politics 24 (1972): 40–79. Web. <http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/stable/2010559>.
Hadfield, Amelia. British Foreign Policy, National Identity, and Neoclassical Realism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2010. Web. <http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=10435057>.
Hagan, Joe D. et al. ‘Foreign Policy by Coalition: Deadlock, Compromise, and Anarchy’. International Studies Review 3.2 (2001): 169–216. Web.
Hill, Christopher. Foreign Policy in the Twenty-First Century. Second edition. London: Palgrave, 2016. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=4763919>.
Hill, Christopher. ‘The Capability-Expectations Gap, or Conceptualizing Europe’s International Role.’ Journal of Common Market Studies 31.3 n. pag. Web. <http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=9408291165&site=ehost-live>.
Hill, Christopher. The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2003. Print.
---. The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2003. Print.
---. The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2003. Print.
---. The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2003. Print.
---. The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2003. Print.
---. The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2003. Print.
---. The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2003. Print.
---. The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2003. Print.
---. The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2003. Print.
Hjarvard, S., and N. N. Kristensen. ‘When Media of a Small Nation Argue for War’. Media, War & Conflict 7.1 (2014): 51–69. Web.
Hocking, Brian. ‘Adaptation and the Foreign Policy Bureaucracy: The Experience of Federal States’. Diplomacy & Statecraft 5.1 (1994): 47–72. Web.
Hoffman, Michael E. S. ‘Discretion, Lobbying, and Political Influence in Models of Trade Policy’. The Journal of Policy Reform 8.3 (2005): 175–188. Web.
Hudson, Valerie M. ‘Foreign Policy Analysis: Actor-Specific Theory and the Ground of International Relations’. Foreign Policy Analysis 1.1 (2005): 1–30. Web.
---. Foreign Policy Analysis: Classic and Contemporary Theory. Second edition. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Pub, 2014. Print.
---. Foreign Policy Analysis: Classic and Contemporary Theory. Second edition. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Pub, 2014. Print.
---. Foreign Policy Analysis: Classic and Contemporary Theory. Second edition. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Pub, 2014. Print.
---. Foreign Policy Analysis: Classic and Contemporary Theory. Second edition. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Pub, 2014. Print.
---. Foreign Policy Analysis: Classic and Contemporary Theory. Second edition. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Pub, 2014. Print.
Jack S. Levy. ‘Learning and Foreign Policy: Sweeping a Conceptual Minefield’. International Organization 48.2 (1994): 279–312. Web. <http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/stable/2706933>.
Joachim, Jutta. ‘Framing Issues and Seizing Opportunities: The UN, NGOs, and Women’s Rights’. International Studies Quarterly 47.2 (2003): 247–274. Web.
John G. Tower. ‘Congress versus the President: The Formulation and Implementation of American Foreign Policy’. Foreign Affairs 60.2 (1981): 229–246. Web. <http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/stable/10.2307/20041078?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=ongress&searchText=versus&searchText=the&searchText=President:&searchText=The&searchText=Formulation&searchText=and&searchText=Implementation&searchText=of&searchText=American&searchText=Foreign&searchText=Policy&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3Dongress%2Bversus%2Bthe%2BPresident%253A%2BThe%2BFormulation%2Band%2BImplementation%2Bof%2BAmerican%2BForeign%2BPolicy%26amp%3Bfilter%3Djid%253A10.2307%252Fj50000070%26amp%3BSearch%3DSearch%26amp%3Bwc%3Don%26amp%3Bfc%3Doff%26amp%3BglobalSearch%3D%26amp%3BsbbBox%3D%26amp%3BsbjBox%3D%26amp%3BsbpBox%3D>.
Jordaan, Eduard. ‘The Concept of a Middle Power in International Relations: Distinguishing between Emerging and Traditional Middle Powers’. Politikon 30.1 (2003): 165–181. Web.
K. J. Holsti. ‘National Role Conceptions in the Study of Foreign Policy’. International Studies Quarterly 14.3 (1970): 233–309. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/3013584>.
Kaarbo, Juliet, and Ryan K. Beasley. ‘Taking It to the Extreme: The Effect of Coalition Cabinets on Foreign Policy’. Foreign Policy Analysis 4.1 (2008): 67–81. Web.
Kim, Youngwan. ‘How NGOs Influence US Foreign Aid Allocations’. Foreign Policy Analysis (2014): n/a-n/a. Web.
Kleiner, Juergen. ‘The Inertia of Diplomacy’. Diplomacy & Statecraft 19.2 (2008): 321–349. Web.
Lai, Hongyi, and Su-Jeong Kang. ‘Domestic Bureaucratic Politics and Chinese Foreign Policy’. Journal of Contemporary China 23.86 (2014): 294–313. Web.
Langhorne, Richard. ‘The Diplomacy of Non-State Actors’. Diplomacy & Statecraft 16.2 (2005): 331–339. Web.
Lebow, Richard Ned. ‘Psychological Dimensions of post‐Cold War Foreign Policy’. Israel Affairs 2.3–4 (1996): 46–56. Web.
Lee, Steve. ‘Canadian Values in Canadian Foreign Policy’. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal 10.1 (2002): 1–9. Web.
Marsh, Kevin. ‘Obama’s Surge: A Bureaucratic Politics Analysis of the Decision to Order a Troop Surge in the Afghanistan War’. Foreign Policy Analysis 10.3 (2014): 265–288. Web.
Mattes, Michaela, and Mariana Rodríguez. ‘Autocracies and International Cooperation’. International Studies Quarterly 58.3 (2014): 527–538. Web.
McMillan, Samuel Lucas. ‘Subnational Foreign Policy Actors: How and Why Governors Participate in U.S. Foreign Policy’. Foreign Policy Analysis 4.3 (2008): 227–253. Web.
Michael A. Cohen and Maria Figueroa Küpçü. ‘Privatizing Foreign Policy’. World Policy Journal 22.3 (2005): 34–52. Web. <http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy4.lib.le.ac.uk/stable/10.2307/40209975?origin=api>.
Murray, Shoon. ‘Broadening the Debate about War: The Inclusion of Foreign Critics in Media Coverage and Its Potential Impact on US Public Opinion’. Foreign Policy Analysis (2013): n/a-n/a. Web.
Neack, Laura. The New Foreign Policy: Power Seeking in a Globalized Era. 2nd ed. New millennium books in international studies. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2008. Print.
---. The New Foreign Policy: Power Seeking in a Globalized Era. 2nd ed. New millennium books in international studies. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2008. Print.
---. The New Foreign Policy: Power Seeking in a Globalized Era. 2nd ed. New millennium books in international studies. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2008. Print.
---. The New Foreign Policy: Power Seeking in a Globalized Era. 2nd ed. New millennium books in international studies. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2008. Print.
---. The New Foreign Policy: Power Seeking in a Globalized Era. 2nd ed. New millennium books in international studies. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2008. Print.
---. The New Foreign Policy: Power Seeking in a Globalized Era. 2nd ed. New millennium books in international studies. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2008. Print.
---. The New Foreign Policy: Power Seeking in a Globalized Era. 2nd ed. New millennium books in international studies. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2008. Print.
Nelson, P., and E. Dorsey. ‘New Rights Advocacy in a Global Public Domain’. European Journal of International Relations 13.2 (2007): 187–216. Web.
Nincic, Miroslav, and Jennifer M. Ramos. ‘Ideological Structure and Foreign Policy Preferences’. Journal of Political Ideologies 15.2 (2010): 119–141. Web.
Nye, Joseph S. ‘Power and Foreign Policy’. Journal of Political Power 4.1 (2011): 9–24. Web.
Oppermann, Kai, and Alexander Spencer. ‘Thinking Alike? Salience and Metaphor Analysis as Cognitive Approaches to Foreign Policy Analysis’. Foreign Policy Analysis 9.1 (2013): 39–56. Web.
O?Reilly, K. P. ‘Perceiving Rogue States: The Use of the “Rogue State” Concept by U.S. Foreign Policy Elites’. Foreign Policy Analysis 3.4 (2007): 295–315. Web.
Pravda, Alex. ‘Is There a Gorbachev Foreign Policy?’ Journal of Communist Studies 4.4 (1988): 100–120. Web.
Price, Richard. ‘Reversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Land Mines’. International Organization 52.03 (1998): 613–644. Web.
Reiter, Dan. ‘Political Structure and Foreign Policy Learning: Are Democracies More Likely to Act on the Lessons of History?’ International Interactions 21.1 (1995): 39–62. Print.
Robinson, P. ‘Theorizing the Influence of Media on World Politics: Models of Media Influence on Foreign Policy’. European Journal of Communication 16.4 (2001): 523–544. Web.
Robinson, Piers. ‘The CNN Effect Revisited’. Critical Studies in Media Communication 22.4 (2005): 344–349. Web.
Rosenau, James N. Domestic Sources of Foreign Policy. New York: Free Press, 1967. Print.
---. Domestic Sources of Foreign Policy. New York: Free Press, 1967. Print.
---. The Scientific Study of Foreign Policy. Rev. and enl. ed. London: Pinter, 1980. Print.
Rottinghaus, Brandon. ‘Presidential Leadership on Foreign Policy, Opinion Polling, and the Possible Limits of "Crafted Talk”’. Political Communication 25.2 (2008): 138–157. Web.
Saideman, Stephen M., and R. William Ayres. ‘Pie Crust Promises and the Sources of Foreign Policy: The Limited Impact of Accession and the Priority of Domestic Constituencies’. Foreign Policy Analysis 3.3 (2007): 189–210. Web.
Schafer, Mark. ‘Science, Empiricism, and Tolerance in the Study of Foreign Policymaking’. International Studies Review 5.2 (2003): 155–202. Web.
Smith, Steve, Amelia Hadfield, and Timothy Dunne. Foreign Policy: Theories, Actors, Cases. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Print.
---. Foreign Policy: Theories, Actors, Cases. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Print.
---. Foreign Policy: Theories, Actors, Cases. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Print.
---. Foreign Policy: Theories, Actors, Cases. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Print.
---. Foreign Policy: Theories, Actors, Cases. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Print.
‘Status Seekers: Chinese and Russian Responses to U.S. Primacy’. International Security 34.4 63–95. Web. <http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/journals/international_security/v034/34.4.larson.html>.
Stern, Eric K. ‘Crisis Studies and Foreign Policy Analysis: Insights, Synergies, and Challenges’. International Studies Review 5.2 (2003): 155–202. Web.
Sussex, Matthew. ‘The Impotence of Being Earnest? Avoiding the Pitfalls of “Creative Middle Power Diplomacy”’. Australian Journal of International Affairs 65.5 (2011): 545–562. Web.
T. Knecht and M. S. Weatherford. ‘Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: The Stages of Presidential Decision Making’. International Studies Quarterly 50.3 (2006): 705–727. Web. <http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/stable/10.2307/4092800?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=Changing&searchText=Course:&searchText=When&searchText=Governments&searchText=Choose&searchText=to&searchText=Redirect&searchText=Foreign&searchText=Policy&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3DChanging%2BCourse%253A%2BWhen%2BGovernments%2BChoose%2Bto%2BRedirect%2BForeign%2BPolicy%26amp%3Bfilter%3Djid%253A10.2307%252Fj100193%26amp%3BSearch%3DSearch%26amp%3Bwc%3Don%26amp%3Bfc%3Doff%26amp%3BglobalSearch%3D%26amp%3BsbbBox%3D%26amp%3BsbjBox%3D%26amp%3BsbpBox%3D>.
‘The Relationships Between Mass Media, Public Opinion, and Foreign Policy: Toward a Theoretical Synthesis - Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1):39’. n. pag. Web. <http://www.annualreviews.org.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060406.214132>.
Thorngate, Warren. ‘The Social Psychology of Policy Analysis’. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 3.1 (2001): 85–112. Web.
True, Jacqui, and Michael Mintrom. ‘Transnational Networks and Policy Diffusion: The Case of Gender Mainstreaming’. International Studies Quarterly 45.1 (2001): 27–57. Web.
Ungerer, Jameson Lee. ‘Assessing the Progress of the Democratic Peace Research Program’. International Studies Review 14.1 (2012): 1–31. Web.
Waltz, Kenneth N. Foreign Policy and Democratic Politics: The American and British Experience. Harlow: Longmans, 1968. Print.
Wang, Jianwei, and Xiaojie Wang. ‘Media and Chinese Foreign Policy’. Journal of Contemporary China 23.86 (2014): 216–235. Web.
Warner, Carolyn M., and Stephen G. Walker. ‘Thinking about the Role of Religion in Foreign Policy: A Framework for Analysis’. Foreign Policy Analysis 7.1 (2011): 113–135. Web.
Wehner, Leslie E., and Cameron G. Thies. ‘Role Theory, Narratives, and Interpretation: The Domestic Contestation of Roles’. International Studies Review (2014): n/a-n/a. Web.
Zhang, Qingmin. ‘Towards an Integrated Theory of Chinese Foreign Policy: Bringing Leadership Personality Back In’. Journal of Contemporary China 23.89 (2014): 902–922. Web.