1.
Hill, C.: Foreign policy in the twenty-first century. Palgrave, London (2016).
2.
Hill, C.: The changing politics of foreign policy. Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke (2003).
3.
Smith, S., Hadfield, A., Dunne, T.: Foreign policy: theories, actors, cases. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).
4.
Alden, C.: Foreign policy analysis: new approaches. Routledge, London (2012).
5.
Neack, L.: The new foreign policy: power seeking in a globalized era. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, Md (2008).
6.
Rosenau, J.N.: The scientific study of foreign policy. Pinter, London (1980).
7.
Hill, C.: The changing politics of foreign policy. Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke (2003).
8.
Smith, S., Hadfield, A., Dunne, T.: Foreign policy: theories, actors, cases. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).
9.
Neack, L.: The new foreign policy: power seeking in a globalized era. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, Md (2008).
10.
Hudson, V.M.: Foreign policy analysis: classic and contemporary theory. Rowman & Littlefield Pub, Lanham (2014).
11.
Giacomello, G., Ferrari, F., Amadori, A.: With friends like these: foreign policy as personal relationship. Contemporary Politics. 15, 247–264 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/13569770902858202.
12.
Hudson, V.M.: Foreign Policy Analysis: Actor-Specific Theory and the Ground of International Relations. Foreign Policy Analysis. 1, 1–30 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2005.00001.x.
13.
David, C.: Who was the real George Bush? Foreign policy decision‐making under the bush administration. Diplomacy & Statecraft. 7, 197–220 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1080/09592299608406000.
14.
Zhang, Q.: Towards an Integrated Theory of Chinese Foreign Policy: bringing leadership personality back in. Journal of Contemporary China. 23, 902–922 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2014.882566.
15.
Görener, A.Ş., Ucal, M.Ş.: The Personality and Leadership Style of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan: Implications for Turkish Foreign Policy. Turkish Studies. 12, 357–381 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2011.604216.
16.
Rottinghaus, B.: Presidential Leadership on Foreign Policy, Opinion Polling, and the Possible Limits of "Crafted Talk”. Political Communication. 25, 138–157 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600801985334.
17.
Pravda, A.: Is there a Gorbachev foreign policy? Journal of Communist Studies. 4, 100–120 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1080/13523278808414940.
18.
Gallagher, M.E., Allen, S.H.: Presidential Personality: Not Just a Nuisance. Foreign Policy Analysis. 10, 1–21 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/fpa.12006.
19.
DYSON, S.B.: Personality and Foreign Policy: Tony Blair’s Iraq Decisions. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2, 289–306 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2006.00031.x.
20.
Hill, C.: The changing politics of foreign policy. Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke (2003).
21.
Alden, C.: Foreign policy analysis: new approaches. Routledge, London (2012).
22.
Hudson, V.M.: Foreign policy analysis: classic and contemporary theory. Rowman & Littlefield Pub, Lanham (2014).
23.
Neack, L.: The new foreign policy: power seeking in a globalized era. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, Md (2008).
24.
Garrison, J.A.: Foreign Policymaking and Group Dynamics: Where We’ve Been and Where We’re Going. International Studies Review. 5, 155–202 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1111/1521-9488.5020015.
25.
Clarke, M., White, B.: Understanding foreign policy: the foreign policy systems approach. Elgar, Aldershot (1989).
26.
Graham T. Allison and Morton H. Halperin: Bureaucratic Politics: A Paradigm and Some Policy Implications. World Politics. 24, 40–79 (1972).
27.
Hocking, B.: Adaptation and the foreign policy bureaucracy: The experience of federal states. Diplomacy & Statecraft. 5, 47–72 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1080/09592299408405908.
28.
Lai, H., Kang, S.-J.: Domestic Bureaucratic Politics and Chinese Foreign Policy. Journal of Contemporary China. 23, 294–313 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2013.832531.
29.
Badie, D.: Groupthink, Iraq, and the War on Terror: Explaining US Policy Shift toward Iraq. Foreign Policy Analysis. 6, 277–296 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2010.00113.x.
30.
GARRISON, J.: Constructing the ‘National Interest’ in U.S.?China Policy Making: How Foreign Policy Decision Groups Define and Signal Policy Choices. Foreign Policy Analysis. 3, 105–126 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2007.00043.x.
31.
Kaarbo, J., Beasley, R.K.: Taking It to the Extreme: The Effect of Coalition Cabinets on Foreign Policy. Foreign Policy Analysis. 4, 67–81 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2007.00058.x.
32.
Marsh, K.: Obama’s Surge: A Bureaucratic Politics Analysis of the Decision to Order a Troop Surge in the Afghanistan War. Foreign Policy Analysis. 10, 265–288 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/fpa.12000.
33.
Hill, C.: The changing politics of foreign policy. Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke (2003).
34.
Hudson, V.M.: Foreign policy analysis: classic and contemporary theory. Rowman & Littlefield Pub, Lanham (2014).
35.
Alden, C.: Foreign policy analysis: new approaches. Routledge, London (2012).
36.
Hadfield, A.: British foreign policy, national identity, and neoclassical realism. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD (2010).
37.
Mattes, M., Rodríguez, M.: Autocracies and International Cooperation. International Studies Quarterly. 58, 527–538 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12107.
38.
Rosenau, J.N.: Domestic sources of foreign policy. Free Press, New York (1967).
39.
Neack, L.: The new foreign policy: power seeking in a globalized era. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, Md (2008).
40.
Reiter, D.: Political structure and foreign policy learning: Are democracies more likely to act on the lessons of history? International Interactions. 21, 39–62 (1995).
41.
Ungerer, J.L.: Assessing the Progress of the Democratic Peace Research Program. International Studies Review. 14, 1–31 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2012.01103.x.
42.
CHAN, S., SAFRAN, W.: Public Opinion as a Constraint against War: Democracies’ Responses to Operation Iraqi Freedom. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2, 137–156 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2006.00024.x.
43.
Bruce Bueno de Mesquita, Randolph M. Siverson and Gary Woller: War and the Fate of Regimes: A Comparative Analysis. The American Political Science Review. 86, 638–646 (1992).
44.
Waltz, K.N.: Foreign policy and democratic politics: the American and British experience. Longmans, Harlow (1968).
45.
Lee, S.: Canadian values in Canadian foreign policy. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal. 10, 1–9 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1080/11926422.2002.9673303.
46.
Hill, C.: The changing politics of foreign policy. Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke (2003).
47.
Smith, S., Hadfield, A., Dunne, T.: Foreign policy: theories, actors, cases. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).
48.
Neack, L.: The new foreign policy: power seeking in a globalized era. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, Md (2008).
49.
Alden, C.: Foreign policy analysis: new approaches. Routledge, London (2012).
50.
Nincic, M., Ramos, J.M.: Ideological structure and foreign policy preferences. Journal of Political Ideologies. 15, 119–141 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2010.482368.
51.
Thorngate, W.: The social psychology of policy analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice. 3, 85–112 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1080/13876980108412655.
52.
Lebow, R.N.: Psychological dimensions of post‐Cold War foreign policy. Israel Affairs. 2, 46–56 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1080/13537129608719392.
53.
Schafer, M.: Science, Empiricism, and Tolerance in the Study of Foreign Policymaking. International Studies Review. 5, 155–202 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1111/1521-9488.5020014.
54.
Jack S. Levy: Learning and Foreign Policy: Sweeping a Conceptual Minefield. International Organization. 48, 279–312 (1994).
55.
Goldsmith, B.: Imitation in International Relations: Analogies, Vicarious Learning, and Foreign Policy. International Interactions. 29, 237–267 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1080/03050620304593.
56.
Oppermann, K., Spencer, A.: Thinking Alike? Salience and Metaphor Analysis as Cognitive Approaches to Foreign Policy Analysis. Foreign Policy Analysis. 9, 39–56 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2011.00167.x.
57.
Dolan, T.M.: Emotion and Strategic Learning in War. Foreign Policy Analysis. n/a-n/a (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/fpa.12052.
58.
O?Reilly, K.P.: Perceiving Rogue States: The Use of the ‘Rogue State’ Concept by U.S. Foreign Policy Elites. Foreign Policy Analysis. 3, 295–315 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2007.00052.x.
59.
Hill, C.: The changing politics of foreign policy. Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke (2003).
60.
Hudson, V.M.: Foreign policy analysis: classic and contemporary theory. Rowman & Littlefield Pub, Lanham (2014).
61.
Langhorne, R.: The Diplomacy of Non-State Actors. Diplomacy & Statecraft. 16, 331–339 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/09592290590948388.
62.
Michael A. Cohen and Maria Figueroa Küpçü: Privatizing Foreign Policy. World Policy Journal. 22, 34–52 (2005).
63.
Kim, Y.: How NGOs Influence US Foreign Aid Allocations. Foreign Policy Analysis. n/a-n/a (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/fpa.12064.
64.
McMillan, S.L.: Subnational Foreign Policy Actors: How and Why Governors Participate in U.S. Foreign Policy. Foreign Policy Analysis. 4, 227–253 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2008.00068.x.
65.
True, J., Mintrom, M.: Transnational Networks and Policy Diffusion: The Case of Gender Mainstreaming. International Studies Quarterly. 45, 27–57 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1111/0020-8833.00181.
66.
Price, R.: Reversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Land Mines. International Organization. 52, 613–644 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550671.
67.
Hoffman, M.E.S.: Discretion, Lobbying, and Political Influence in Models of Trade Policy. The Journal of Policy Reform. 8, 175–188 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/13841280500181650.
68.
Warner, C.M., Walker, S.G.: Thinking about the Role of Religion in Foreign Policy: A Framework for Analysis. Foreign Policy Analysis. 7, 113–135 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2010.00125.x.
69.
Joachim, J.: Framing Issues and Seizing Opportunities: The UN, NGOs, and Women’s Rights. International Studies Quarterly. 47, 247–274 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2478.4702005.
70.
Frank R. Baumgartner and Bryan D. Jones: Agenda Dynamics and Policy Subsystems. The Journal of Politics. 53, 1044–1074 (1991).
71.
Nelson, P., Dorsey, E.: New Rights Advocacy in a Global Public Domain. European Journal of International Relations. 13, 187–216 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066107076953.
72.
Hill, C.: The changing politics of foreign policy. Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke (2003).
73.
Smith, S., Hadfield, A., Dunne, T.: Foreign policy: theories, actors, cases. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).
74.
GILBOA, E.: The CNN Effect: The Search for a Communication Theory of International Relations. Political Communication. 22, 27–44 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600590908429.
75.
Robinson, P.: The CNN Effect Revisited. Critical Studies in Media Communication. 22, 344–349 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/07393180500288519.
76.
Gilboa, E.: Diplomacy in the media age: Three models of uses and effects. Diplomacy & Statecraft. 12, 1–28 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1080/09592290108406201.
77.
Rosenau, J.N.: Domestic sources of foreign policy. Free Press, New York (1967).
78.
Neack, L.: The new foreign policy: power seeking in a globalized era. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, Md (2008).
79.
Robinson, P.: Theorizing the Influence of Media on World Politics: Models of Media Influence on Foreign Policy. European Journal of Communication. 16, 523–544 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323101016004005.
80.
Hjarvard, S., Kristensen, N.N.: When media of a small nation argue for war. Media, War & Conflict. 7, 51–69 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635213516560.
81.
Wang, J., Wang, X.: Media and Chinese Foreign Policy. Journal of Contemporary China. 23, 216–235 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2013.832523.
82.
Murray, S.: Broadening the Debate about War: The Inclusion of Foreign Critics in Media Coverage and Its Potential Impact on US Public Opinion. Foreign Policy Analysis. n/a-n/a (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/fpa.12010.
83.
The Relationships Between Mass Media, Public Opinion, and Foreign Policy: Toward a Theoretical Synthesis - Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1):39.
84.
Baru, S.: The Influence of Business and Media on Indian Foreign Policy. India Review. 8, 266–285 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/14736480903116792.
85.
Hill, C.: The changing politics of foreign policy. Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke (2003).
86.
Smith, S., Hadfield, A., Dunne, T.: Foreign policy: theories, actors, cases. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).
87.
Cable, J.: Foreign policy making: Planning or reflex? Diplomacy & Statecraft. 3, 357–381 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1080/09592299208405861.
88.
Kleiner, J.: The Inertia of Diplomacy. Diplomacy & Statecraft. 19, 321–349 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/09592290802096380.
89.
John G. Tower: Congress versus the President: The Formulation and Implementation of American Foreign Policy. Foreign Affairs. 60, 229–246 (1981).
90.
Breuning, M.: Roles and Realities: When and Why Gatekeepers Fail to Change Foreign Policy. Foreign Policy Analysis. 9, 307–325 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2012.00178.x.
91.
Charles F. Hermann: Changing Course: When Governments Choose to Redirect Foreign Policy. International Studies Quarterly. 34, 3–21 (1990).
92.
Hagan, J.D., Everts, P.P., Fukui, H., Stempel, J.D.: Foreign Policy by Coalition: Deadlock, Compromise, and Anarchy. International Studies Review. 3, 169–216 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1111/1521-9488.00237.
93.
Saideman, S.M., Ayres, R.W.: Pie Crust Promises and the Sources of Foreign Policy: The Limited Impact of Accession and the Priority of Domestic Constituencies. Foreign Policy Analysis. 3, 189–210 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2007.00047.x.
94.
Foreign Policy Engineering: From Theory to Practice and Back Again. International Security. 18, 143–171.
95.
Stern, E.K.: Crisis Studies and Foreign Policy Analysis: Insights, Synergies, and Challenges. International Studies Review. 5, 155–202 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1111/1521-9488.5020016.
96.
T. Knecht and M. S. Weatherford: Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: The Stages of Presidential Decision Making. International Studies Quarterly. 50, 705–727 (2006).
97.
Hill, Christopher: The capability-expectations gap, or conceptualizing Europe’s international role. Journal of Common Market Studies. 31,.
98.
Hill, C.: The changing politics of foreign policy. Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke (2003).
99.
Neack, L.: The new foreign policy: power seeking in a globalized era. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, Md (2008).
100.
K. J. Holsti: National Role Conceptions in the Study of Foreign Policy. International Studies Quarterly. 14, 233–309 (1970).
101.
Hudson, V.M.: Foreign policy analysis: classic and contemporary theory. Rowman & Littlefield Pub, Lanham (2014).
102.
Wehner, L.E., Thies, C.G.: Role Theory, Narratives, and Interpretation: The Domestic Contestation of Roles. International Studies Review. n/a-n/a (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/misr.12149.
103.
Carranza, M.E.: Rising Regional Powers and International Relations Theories: Comparing Brazil and India’s Foreign Security Policies and Their Search for Great-Power Status. Foreign Policy Analysis. n/a-n/a (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/fpa.12065.
104.
Jordaan, E.: The concept of a middle power in international relations: distinguishing between emerging and traditional middle powers. Politikon. 30, 165–181 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1080/0258934032000147282.
105.
Sussex, M.: The impotence of being earnest? Avoiding the pitfalls of ‘creative middle power diplomacy’. Australian Journal of International Affairs. 65, 545–562 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2011.610436.
106.
Gecelovsky, P.: Constructing a middle power: Ideas and Canadian foreign policy. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal. 15, 77–93 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/11926422.2009.9673483.
107.
Beeson, M.: Can Australia save the world? The limits and possibilities of middle power diplomacy. Australian Journal of International Affairs. 65, 563–577 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2011.607149.
108.
Nye, J.S.: Power and foreign policy. Journal of Political Power. 4, 9–24 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2011.555960.
109.
Status Seekers: Chinese and Russian Responses to U.S. Primacy. International Security. 34, 63–95.
110.
Brown, C.: Do Great Powers Have Great Responsibilities? Great Powers and Moral Agency. Global Society. 18, 5–19 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/1360082032000173545.
