1.
Hill C. Foreign Policy in the Twenty-First Century. Second edition. Palgrave; 2016. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=4763919
2.
Hill C. The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy. Palgrave MacMillan; 2003.
3.
Smith S, Hadfield A, Dunne T. Foreign Policy: Theories, Actors, Cases. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2012.
4.
Alden C. Foreign Policy Analysis: New Approaches. Routledge; 2012. http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.myilibrary.com?id=368750
5.
Neack L. The New Foreign Policy: Power Seeking in a Globalized Era. Vol New millennium books in international studies. 2nd ed. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers; 2008.
6.
Rosenau JN. The Scientific Study of Foreign Policy. Rev. and enl. ed. Pinter; 1980.
7.
Hill C. The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy. Palgrave MacMillan; 2003.
8.
Smith S, Hadfield A, Dunne T. Foreign Policy: Theories, Actors, Cases. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2012.
9.
Neack L. The New Foreign Policy: Power Seeking in a Globalized Era. Vol New millennium books in international studies. 2nd ed. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers; 2008.
10.
Hudson VM. Foreign Policy Analysis: Classic and Contemporary Theory. Second edition. Rowman & Littlefield Pub; 2014.
11.
Giacomello G, Ferrari F, Amadori A. With friends like these: foreign policy as personal relationship. Contemporary Politics. 2009;15(2):247-264. doi:10.1080/13569770902858202
12.
Hudson VM. Foreign Policy Analysis: Actor-Specific Theory and the Ground of International Relations. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2005;1(1):1-30. doi:10.1111/j.1743-8594.2005.00001.x
13.
David C. Who was the real George Bush? Foreign policy decision‐making under the bush administration. Diplomacy & Statecraft. 1996;7(1):197-220. doi:10.1080/09592299608406000
14.
Zhang Q. Towards an Integrated Theory of Chinese Foreign Policy: bringing leadership personality back in. Journal of Contemporary China. 2014;23(89):902-922. doi:10.1080/10670564.2014.882566
15.
Görener AŞ, Ucal MŞ. The Personality and Leadership Style of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan: Implications for Turkish Foreign Policy. Turkish Studies. 2011;12(3):357-381. doi:10.1080/14683849.2011.604216
16.
Rottinghaus B. Presidential Leadership on Foreign Policy, Opinion Polling, and the Possible Limits of "Crafted Talk”. Political Communication. 2008;25(2):138-157. doi:10.1080/10584600801985334
17.
Pravda A. Is there a Gorbachev foreign policy? Journal of Communist Studies. 1988;4(4):100-120. doi:10.1080/13523278808414940
18.
Gallagher ME, Allen SH. Presidential Personality: Not Just a Nuisance. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2014;10(1):1-21. doi:10.1111/fpa.12006
19.
DYSON SB. Personality and Foreign Policy: Tony Blair’s Iraq Decisions. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2006;2(3):289-306. doi:10.1111/j.1743-8594.2006.00031.x
20.
Hill C. The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy. Palgrave MacMillan; 2003.
21.
Alden C. Foreign Policy Analysis: New Approaches. Routledge; 2012.
22.
Hudson VM. Foreign Policy Analysis: Classic and Contemporary Theory. Second edition. Rowman & Littlefield Pub; 2014.
23.
Neack L. The New Foreign Policy: Power Seeking in a Globalized Era. Vol New millennium books in international studies. 2nd ed. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers; 2008.
24.
Garrison JA. Foreign Policymaking and Group Dynamics: Where We’ve Been and Where We’re Going. International Studies Review. 2003;5(2):155-202. doi:10.1111/1521-9488.5020015
25.
Clarke M, White B. Understanding Foreign Policy: The Foreign Policy Systems Approach. Elgar; 1989.
26.
Graham T. Allison and Morton H. Halperin. Bureaucratic Politics: A Paradigm and Some Policy Implications. World Politics. 1972;24:40-79. http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/stable/2010559
27.
Hocking B. Adaptation and the foreign policy bureaucracy: The experience of federal states. Diplomacy & Statecraft. 1994;5(1):47-72. doi:10.1080/09592299408405908
28.
Lai H, Kang SJ. Domestic Bureaucratic Politics and Chinese Foreign Policy. Journal of Contemporary China. 2014;23(86):294-313. doi:10.1080/10670564.2013.832531
29.
Badie D. Groupthink, Iraq, and the War on Terror: Explaining US Policy Shift toward Iraq. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2010;6(4):277-296. doi:10.1111/j.1743-8594.2010.00113.x
30.
GARRISON J. Constructing the ‘National Interest’ in U.S.?China Policy Making: How Foreign Policy Decision Groups Define and Signal Policy Choices. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2007;3(2):105-126. doi:10.1111/j.1743-8594.2007.00043.x
31.
Kaarbo J, Beasley RK. Taking It to the Extreme: The Effect of Coalition Cabinets on Foreign Policy. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2008;4(1):67-81. doi:10.1111/j.1743-8594.2007.00058.x
32.
Marsh K. Obama’s Surge: A Bureaucratic Politics Analysis of the Decision to Order a Troop Surge in the Afghanistan War. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2014;10(3):265-288. doi:10.1111/fpa.12000
33.
Hill C. The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy. Palgrave MacMillan; 2003.
34.
Hudson VM. Foreign Policy Analysis: Classic and Contemporary Theory. Second edition. Rowman & Littlefield Pub; 2014.
35.
Alden C. Foreign Policy Analysis: New Approaches. Routledge; 2012.
36.
Hadfield A. British Foreign Policy, National Identity, and Neoclassical Realism. Rowman & Littlefield; 2010. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=10435057
37.
Mattes M, Rodríguez M. Autocracies and International Cooperation. International Studies Quarterly. 2014;58(3):527-538. doi:10.1111/isqu.12107
38.
Rosenau JN. Domestic Sources of Foreign Policy. Free Press; 1967.
39.
Neack L. The New Foreign Policy: Power Seeking in a Globalized Era. Vol New millennium books in international studies. 2nd ed. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers; 2008.
40.
Reiter D. Political structure and foreign policy learning: Are democracies more likely to act on the lessons of history? International Interactions. 1995;21(1):39-62.
41.
Ungerer JL. Assessing the Progress of the Democratic Peace Research Program. International Studies Review. 2012;14(1):1-31. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2486.2012.01103.x
42.
CHAN S, SAFRAN W. Public Opinion as a Constraint against War: Democracies’ Responses to Operation Iraqi Freedom. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2006;2(2):137-156. doi:10.1111/j.1743-8594.2006.00024.x
43.
Bruce Bueno de Mesquita, Randolph M. Siverson and Gary Woller. War and the Fate of Regimes: A Comparative Analysis. The American Political Science Review. 1992;86(3):638-646. http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/stable/1964127
44.
Waltz KN. Foreign Policy and Democratic Politics: The American and British Experience. Longmans; 1968.
45.
Lee S. Canadian values in Canadian foreign policy. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal. 2002;10(1):1-9. doi:10.1080/11926422.2002.9673303
46.
Hill C. The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy. Palgrave MacMillan; 2003.
47.
Smith S, Hadfield A, Dunne T. Foreign Policy: Theories, Actors, Cases. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2012.
48.
Neack L. The New Foreign Policy: Power Seeking in a Globalized Era. Vol New millennium books in international studies. 2nd ed. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers; 2008.
49.
Alden C. Foreign Policy Analysis: New Approaches. Routledge; 2012.
50.
Nincic M, Ramos JM. Ideological structure and foreign policy preferences. Journal of Political Ideologies. 2010;15(2):119-141. doi:10.1080/13569317.2010.482368
51.
Thorngate W. The social psychology of policy analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice. 2001;3(1):85-112. doi:10.1080/13876980108412655
52.
Lebow RN. Psychological dimensions of post‐Cold War foreign policy. Israel Affairs. 1996;2(3-4):46-56. doi:10.1080/13537129608719392
53.
Schafer M. Science, Empiricism, and Tolerance in the Study of Foreign Policymaking. International Studies Review. 2003;5(2):155-202. doi:10.1111/1521-9488.5020014
54.
Jack S. Levy. Learning and Foreign Policy: Sweeping a Conceptual Minefield. International Organization. 1994;48(2):279-312. http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/stable/2706933
55.
Goldsmith B. Imitation in International Relations: Analogies, Vicarious Learning, and Foreign Policy. International Interactions. 2003;29(3):237-267. doi:10.1080/03050620304593
56.
Oppermann K, Spencer A. Thinking Alike? Salience and Metaphor Analysis as Cognitive Approaches to Foreign Policy Analysis. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2013;9(1):39-56. doi:10.1111/j.1743-8594.2011.00167.x
57.
Dolan TM. Emotion and Strategic Learning in War. Foreign Policy Analysis. Published online August 2014:n/a-n/a. doi:10.1111/fpa.12052
58.
O?Reilly KP. Perceiving Rogue States: The Use of the ‘Rogue State’ Concept by U.S. Foreign Policy Elites. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2007;3(4):295-315. doi:10.1111/j.1743-8594.2007.00052.x
59.
Hill C. The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy. Palgrave MacMillan; 2003.
60.
Hudson VM. Foreign Policy Analysis: Classic and Contemporary Theory. Second edition. Rowman & Littlefield Pub; 2014.
61.
Langhorne R. The Diplomacy of Non-State Actors. Diplomacy & Statecraft. 2005;16(2):331-339. doi:10.1080/09592290590948388
62.
Michael A. Cohen and Maria Figueroa Küpçü. Privatizing Foreign Policy. World Policy Journal. 2005;22(3):34-52. http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy4.lib.le.ac.uk/stable/10.2307/40209975?origin=api
63.
Kim Y. How NGOs Influence US Foreign Aid Allocations. Foreign Policy Analysis. Published online August 2014:n/a-n/a. doi:10.1111/fpa.12064
64.
McMillan SL. Subnational Foreign Policy Actors: How and Why Governors Participate in U.S. Foreign Policy. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2008;4(3):227-253. doi:10.1111/j.1743-8594.2008.00068.x
65.
True J, Mintrom M. Transnational Networks and Policy Diffusion: The Case of Gender Mainstreaming. International Studies Quarterly. 2001;45(1):27-57. doi:10.1111/0020-8833.00181
66.
Price R. Reversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Land Mines. International Organization. 1998;52(03):613-644. doi:10.1162/002081898550671
67.
Hoffman MES. Discretion, Lobbying, and Political Influence in Models of Trade Policy. The Journal of Policy Reform. 2005;8(3):175-188. doi:10.1080/13841280500181650
68.
Warner CM, Walker SG. Thinking about the Role of Religion in Foreign Policy: A Framework for Analysis. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2011;7(1):113-135. doi:10.1111/j.1743-8594.2010.00125.x
69.
Joachim J. Framing Issues and Seizing Opportunities: The UN, NGOs, and Women’s Rights. International Studies Quarterly. 2003;47(2):247-274. doi:10.1111/1468-2478.4702005
70.
Frank R. Baumgartner and Bryan D. Jones. Agenda Dynamics and Policy Subsystems. The Journal of Politics. 1991;53(4):1044-1074. http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/stable/2131866
71.
Nelson P, Dorsey E. New Rights Advocacy in a Global Public Domain. European Journal of International Relations. 2007;13(2):187-216. doi:10.1177/1354066107076953
72.
Hill C. The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy. Palgrave MacMillan; 2003.
73.
Smith S, Hadfield A, Dunne T. Foreign Policy: Theories, Actors, Cases. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2012.
74.
GILBOA E. The CNN Effect: The Search for a Communication Theory of International Relations. Political Communication. 2005;22(1):27-44. doi:10.1080/10584600590908429
75.
Robinson P. The CNN Effect Revisited. Critical Studies in Media Communication. 2005;22(4):344-349. doi:10.1080/07393180500288519
76.
Gilboa E. Diplomacy in the media age: Three models of uses and effects. Diplomacy & Statecraft. 2001;12(2):1-28. doi:10.1080/09592290108406201
77.
Rosenau JN. Domestic Sources of Foreign Policy. Free Press; 1967.
78.
Neack L. The New Foreign Policy: Power Seeking in a Globalized Era. Vol New millennium books in international studies. 2nd ed. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers; 2008.
79.
Robinson P. Theorizing the Influence of Media on World Politics: Models of Media Influence on Foreign Policy. European Journal of Communication. 2001;16(4):523-544. doi:10.1177/0267323101016004005
80.
Hjarvard S, Kristensen NN. When media of a small nation argue for war. Media, War & Conflict. 2014;7(1):51-69. doi:10.1177/1750635213516560
81.
Wang J, Wang X. Media and Chinese Foreign Policy. Journal of Contemporary China. 2014;23(86):216-235. doi:10.1080/10670564.2013.832523
82.
Murray S. Broadening the Debate about War: The Inclusion of Foreign Critics in Media Coverage and Its Potential Impact on US Public Opinion. Foreign Policy Analysis. Published online April 2013:n/a-n/a. doi:10.1111/fpa.12010
83.
The Relationships Between Mass Media, Public Opinion, and Foreign Policy: Toward a Theoretical Synthesis - Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1):39. http://www.annualreviews.org.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060406.214132
84.
Baru S. The Influence of Business and Media on Indian Foreign Policy. India Review. 2009;8(3):266-285. doi:10.1080/14736480903116792
85.
Hill C. The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy. Palgrave MacMillan; 2003.
86.
Smith S, Hadfield A, Dunne T. Foreign Policy: Theories, Actors, Cases. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2012.
87.
Cable J. Foreign policy making: Planning or reflex? Diplomacy & Statecraft. 1992;3(3):357-381. doi:10.1080/09592299208405861
88.
Kleiner J. The Inertia of Diplomacy. Diplomacy & Statecraft. 2008;19(2):321-349. doi:10.1080/09592290802096380
89.
John G. Tower. Congress versus the President: The Formulation and Implementation of American Foreign Policy. Foreign Affairs. 1981;60(2):229-246. http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/stable/10.2307/20041078?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=ongress&searchText=versus&searchText=the&searchText=President:&searchText=The&searchText=Formulation&searchText=and&searchText=Implementation&searchText=of&searchText=American&searchText=Foreign&searchText=Policy&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3Dongress%2Bversus%2Bthe%2BPresident%253A%2BThe%2BFormulation%2Band%2BImplementation%2Bof%2BAmerican%2BForeign%2BPolicy%26amp%3Bfilter%3Djid%253A10.2307%252Fj50000070%26amp%3BSearch%3DSearch%26amp%3Bwc%3Don%26amp%3Bfc%3Doff%26amp%3BglobalSearch%3D%26amp%3BsbbBox%3D%26amp%3BsbjBox%3D%26amp%3BsbpBox%3D
90.
Breuning M. Roles and Realities: When and Why Gatekeepers Fail to Change Foreign Policy. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2013;9(3):307-325. doi:10.1111/j.1743-8594.2012.00178.x
91.
Charles F. Hermann. Changing Course: When Governments Choose to Redirect Foreign Policy. International Studies Quarterly. 1990;34(1):3-21. http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/stable/10.2307/2600403?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=Changing&searchText=Course:&searchText=When&searchText=Governments&searchText=Choose&searchText=to&searchText=Redirect&searchText=Foreign&searchText=Policy&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3DChanging%2BCourse%253A%2BWhen%2BGovernments%2BChoose%2Bto%2BRedirect%2BForeign%2BPolicy%26amp%3Bfilter%3Djid%253A10.2307%252Fj100193%26amp%3BSearch%3DSearch%26amp%3Bwc%3Don%26amp%3Bfc%3Doff%26amp%3BglobalSearch%3D%26amp%3BsbbBox%3D%26amp%3BsbjBox%3D%26amp%3BsbpBox%3D
92.
Hagan JD, Everts PP, Fukui H, Stempel JD. Foreign Policy by Coalition: Deadlock, Compromise, and Anarchy. International Studies Review. 2001;3(2):169-216. doi:10.1111/1521-9488.00237
93.
Saideman SM, Ayres RW. Pie Crust Promises and the Sources of Foreign Policy: The Limited Impact of Accession and the Priority of Domestic Constituencies. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2007;3(3):189-210. doi:10.1111/j.1743-8594.2007.00047.x
94.
Foreign Policy Engineering: From Theory to Practice and Back Again. International Security. 18(4):143-171. http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/journals/international_security/summary/v018/18.4.zelikow.html
95.
Stern EK. Crisis Studies and Foreign Policy Analysis: Insights, Synergies, and Challenges. International Studies Review. 2003;5(2):155-202. doi:10.1111/1521-9488.5020016
96.
T. Knecht and M. S. Weatherford. Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: The Stages of Presidential Decision Making. International Studies Quarterly. 2006;50(3):705-727. http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/stable/10.2307/4092800?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=Changing&searchText=Course:&searchText=When&searchText=Governments&searchText=Choose&searchText=to&searchText=Redirect&searchText=Foreign&searchText=Policy&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3DChanging%2BCourse%253A%2BWhen%2BGovernments%2BChoose%2Bto%2BRedirect%2BForeign%2BPolicy%26amp%3Bfilter%3Djid%253A10.2307%252Fj100193%26amp%3BSearch%3DSearch%26amp%3Bwc%3Don%26amp%3Bfc%3Doff%26amp%3BglobalSearch%3D%26amp%3BsbbBox%3D%26amp%3BsbjBox%3D%26amp%3BsbpBox%3D
97.
Hill, Christopher. The capability-expectations gap, or conceptualizing Europe’s international role. Journal of Common Market Studies. 31(3). http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=9408291165&site=ehost-live
98.
Hill C. The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy. Palgrave MacMillan; 2003.
99.
Neack L. The New Foreign Policy: Power Seeking in a Globalized Era. Vol New millennium books in international studies. 2nd ed. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers; 2008.
100.
K. J. Holsti. National Role Conceptions in the Study of Foreign Policy. International Studies Quarterly. 1970;14(3):233-309. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3013584
101.
Hudson VM. Foreign Policy Analysis: Classic and Contemporary Theory. Second edition. Rowman & Littlefield Pub; 2014.
102.
Wehner LE, Thies CG. Role Theory, Narratives, and Interpretation: The Domestic Contestation of Roles. International Studies Review. Published online August 2014:n/a-n/a. doi:10.1111/misr.12149
103.
Carranza ME. Rising Regional Powers and International Relations Theories: Comparing Brazil and India’s Foreign Security Policies and Their Search for Great-Power Status. Foreign Policy Analysis. Published online June 2014:n/a-n/a. doi:10.1111/fpa.12065
104.
Jordaan E. The concept of a middle power in international relations: distinguishing between emerging and traditional middle powers. Politikon. 2003;30(1):165-181. doi:10.1080/0258934032000147282
105.
Sussex M. The impotence of being earnest? Avoiding the pitfalls of ‘creative middle power diplomacy’. Australian Journal of International Affairs. 2011;65(5):545-562. doi:10.1080/10357718.2011.610436
106.
Gecelovsky P. Constructing a middle power: Ideas and Canadian foreign policy. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal. 2009;15(1):77-93. doi:10.1080/11926422.2009.9673483
107.
Beeson M. Can Australia save the world? The limits and possibilities of middle power diplomacy. Australian Journal of International Affairs. 2011;65(5):563-577. doi:10.1080/10357718.2011.607149
108.
Nye JS. Power and foreign policy. Journal of Political Power. 2011;4(1):9-24. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2011.555960
109.
Status Seekers: Chinese and Russian Responses to U.S. Primacy. International Security. 34(4):63-95. http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/journals/international_security/v034/34.4.larson.html
110.
Brown C. Do Great Powers Have Great Responsibilities? Great Powers and Moral Agency. Global Society. 2004;18(1):5-19. doi:10.1080/1360082032000173545