[1]
Alden, C. 2012. Foreign policy analysis: new approaches. Routledge.
[2]
Alden, C. 2012. Foreign policy analysis: new approaches. Routledge.
[3]
Alden, C. 2012. Foreign policy analysis: new approaches. Routledge.
[4]
Alden, C. 2012. Foreign policy analysis: new approaches. Routledge.
[5]
Badie, D. 2010. Groupthink, Iraq, and the War on Terror: Explaining US Policy Shift toward Iraq. Foreign Policy Analysis. 6, 4 (Sept. 2010), 277–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2010.00113.x.
[6]
Baru, S. 2009. The Influence of Business and Media on Indian Foreign Policy. India Review. 8, 3 (Aug. 2009), 266–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/14736480903116792.
[7]
Beeson, M. 2011. Can Australia save the world? The limits and possibilities of middle power diplomacy. Australian Journal of International Affairs. 65, 5 (Nov. 2011), 563–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2011.607149.
[8]
Breuning, M. 2013. Roles and Realities: When and Why Gatekeepers Fail to Change Foreign Policy. Foreign Policy Analysis. 9, 3 (July 2013), 307–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2012.00178.x.
[9]
Brown, C. 2004. Do Great Powers Have Great Responsibilities? Great Powers and Moral Agency. Global Society. 18, 1 (Jan. 2004), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360082032000173545.
[10]
Bruce Bueno de Mesquita, Randolph M. Siverson and Gary Woller 1992. War and the Fate of Regimes: A Comparative Analysis. The American Political Science Review. 86, 3 (1992), 638–646.
[11]
Cable, J. 1992. Foreign policy making: Planning or reflex? Diplomacy & Statecraft. 3, 3 (Nov. 1992), 357–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592299208405861.
[12]
Carranza, M.E. 2014. Rising Regional Powers and International Relations Theories: Comparing Brazil and India’s Foreign Security Policies and Their Search for Great-Power Status. Foreign Policy Analysis. (June 2014), n/a-n/a. https://doi.org/10.1111/fpa.12065.
[13]
CHAN, S. and SAFRAN, W. 2006. Public Opinion as a Constraint against War: Democracies’ Responses to Operation Iraqi Freedom. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2, 2 (Apr. 2006), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2006.00024.x.
[14]
Charles F. Hermann 1990. Changing Course: When Governments Choose to Redirect Foreign Policy. International Studies Quarterly. 34, 1 (1990), 3–21.
[15]
Clarke, M. and White, B. 1989. Understanding foreign policy: the foreign policy systems approach. Elgar.
[16]
David, C. 1996. Who was the real George Bush? Foreign policy decision‐making under the bush administration. Diplomacy & Statecraft. 7, 1 (Mar. 1996), 197–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592299608406000.
[17]
Dolan, T.M. 2014. Emotion and Strategic Learning in War. Foreign Policy Analysis. (Aug. 2014), n/a-n/a. https://doi.org/10.1111/fpa.12052.
[18]
DYSON, S.B. 2006. Personality and Foreign Policy: Tony Blair’s Iraq Decisions. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2, 3 (July 2006), 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2006.00031.x.
[19]
Frank R. Baumgartner and Bryan D. Jones 1991. Agenda Dynamics and Policy Subsystems. The Journal of Politics. 53, 4 (1991), 1044–1074.
[20]
Gallagher, M.E. and Allen, S.H. 2014. Presidential Personality: Not Just a Nuisance. Foreign Policy Analysis. 10, 1 (Jan. 2014), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/fpa.12006.
[21]
GARRISON, J. 2007. Constructing the ‘National Interest’ in U.S.?China Policy Making: How Foreign Policy Decision Groups Define and Signal Policy Choices. Foreign Policy Analysis. 3, 2 (Apr. 2007), 105–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2007.00043.x.
[22]
Garrison, J.A. 2003. Foreign Policymaking and Group Dynamics: Where We’ve Been and Where We’re Going. International Studies Review. 5, 2 (June 2003), 155–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/1521-9488.5020015.
[23]
Gecelovsky, P. 2009. Constructing a middle power: Ideas and Canadian foreign policy. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal. 15, 1 (Jan. 2009), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/11926422.2009.9673483.
[24]
Giacomello, G. et al. 2009. With friends like these: foreign policy as personal relationship. Contemporary Politics. 15, 2 (June 2009), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569770902858202.
[25]
Gilboa, E. 2001. Diplomacy in the media age: Three models of uses and effects. Diplomacy & Statecraft. 12, 2 (June 2001), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592290108406201.
[26]
GILBOA, E. 2005. The CNN Effect: The Search for a Communication Theory of International Relations. Political Communication. 22, 1 (Feb. 2005), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600590908429.
[27]
Goldsmith, B. 2003. Imitation in International Relations: Analogies, Vicarious Learning, and Foreign Policy. International Interactions. 29, 3 (July 2003), 237–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050620304593.
[28]
Görener, A.Ş. and Ucal, M.Ş. 2011. The Personality and Leadership Style of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan: Implications for Turkish Foreign Policy. Turkish Studies. 12, 3 (Sept. 2011), 357–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2011.604216.
[29]
Graham T. Allison and Morton H. Halperin 1972. Bureaucratic Politics: A Paradigm and Some Policy Implications. World Politics. 24, (1972), 40–79.
[30]
Hadfield, A. 2010. British foreign policy, national identity, and neoclassical realism. Rowman & Littlefield.
[31]
Hagan, J.D. et al. 2001. Foreign Policy by Coalition: Deadlock, Compromise, and Anarchy. International Studies Review. 3, 2 (Sept. 2001), 169–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/1521-9488.00237.
[32]
Hill, C. 2016. Foreign policy in the twenty-first century. Palgrave.
[33]
Hill, C. 2003. The changing politics of foreign policy. Palgrave MacMillan.
[34]
Hill, C. 2003. The changing politics of foreign policy. Palgrave MacMillan.
[35]
Hill, C. 2003. The changing politics of foreign policy. Palgrave MacMillan.
[36]
Hill, C. 2003. The changing politics of foreign policy. Palgrave MacMillan.
[37]
Hill, C. 2003. The changing politics of foreign policy. Palgrave MacMillan.
[38]
Hill, C. 2003. The changing politics of foreign policy. Palgrave MacMillan.
[39]
Hill, C. 2003. The changing politics of foreign policy. Palgrave MacMillan.
[40]
Hill, C. 2003. The changing politics of foreign policy. Palgrave MacMillan.
[41]
Hill, C. 2003. The changing politics of foreign policy. Palgrave MacMillan.
[42]
Hill, Christopher The capability-expectations gap, or conceptualizing Europe’s international role. Journal of Common Market Studies. 31, 3.
[43]
Hjarvard, S. and Kristensen, N.N. 2014. When media of a small nation argue for war. Media, War & Conflict. 7, 1 (Apr. 2014), 51–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635213516560.
[44]
Hocking, B. 1994. Adaptation and the foreign policy bureaucracy: The experience of federal states. Diplomacy & Statecraft. 5, 1 (Mar. 1994), 47–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592299408405908.
[45]
Hoffman, M.E.S. 2005. Discretion, Lobbying, and Political Influence in Models of Trade Policy. The Journal of Policy Reform. 8, 3 (Sept. 2005), 175–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/13841280500181650.
[46]
Hudson, V.M. 2005. Foreign Policy Analysis: Actor-Specific Theory and the Ground of International Relations. Foreign Policy Analysis. 1, 1 (Feb. 2005), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2005.00001.x.
[47]
Hudson, V.M. 2014. Foreign policy analysis: classic and contemporary theory. Rowman & Littlefield Pub.
[48]
Hudson, V.M. 2014. Foreign policy analysis: classic and contemporary theory. Rowman & Littlefield Pub.
[49]
Hudson, V.M. 2014. Foreign policy analysis: classic and contemporary theory. Rowman & Littlefield Pub.
[50]
Hudson, V.M. 2014. Foreign policy analysis: classic and contemporary theory. Rowman & Littlefield Pub.
[51]
Hudson, V.M. 2014. Foreign policy analysis: classic and contemporary theory. Rowman & Littlefield Pub.
[52]
Jack S. Levy 1994. Learning and Foreign Policy: Sweeping a Conceptual Minefield. International Organization. 48, 2 (1994), 279–312.
[53]
Joachim, J. 2003. Framing Issues and Seizing Opportunities: The UN, NGOs, and Women’s Rights. International Studies Quarterly. 47, 2 (June 2003), 247–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2478.4702005.
[54]
John G. Tower 1981. Congress versus the President: The Formulation and Implementation of American Foreign Policy. Foreign Affairs. 60, 2 (1981), 229–246.
[55]
Jordaan, E. 2003. The concept of a middle power in international relations: distinguishing between emerging and traditional middle powers. Politikon. 30, 1 (Nov. 2003), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/0258934032000147282.
[56]
K. J. Holsti 1970. National Role Conceptions in the Study of Foreign Policy. International Studies Quarterly. 14, 3 (1970), 233–309.
[57]
Kaarbo, J. and Beasley, R.K. 2008. Taking It to the Extreme: The Effect of Coalition Cabinets on Foreign Policy. Foreign Policy Analysis. 4, 1 (Jan. 2008), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2007.00058.x.
[58]
Kim, Y. 2014. How NGOs Influence US Foreign Aid Allocations. Foreign Policy Analysis. (Aug. 2014), n/a-n/a. https://doi.org/10.1111/fpa.12064.
[59]
Kleiner, J. 2008. The Inertia of Diplomacy. Diplomacy & Statecraft. 19, 2 (June 2008), 321–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592290802096380.
[60]
Lai, H. and Kang, S.-J. 2014. Domestic Bureaucratic Politics and Chinese Foreign Policy. Journal of Contemporary China. 23, 86 (Mar. 2014), 294–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2013.832531.
[61]
Langhorne, R. 2005. The Diplomacy of Non-State Actors. Diplomacy & Statecraft. 16, 2 (June 2005), 331–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592290590948388.
[62]
Lebow, R.N. 1996. Psychological dimensions of post‐Cold War foreign policy. Israel Affairs. 2, 3–4 (Mar. 1996), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537129608719392.
[63]
Lee, S. 2002. Canadian values in Canadian foreign policy. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal. 10, 1 (Jan. 2002), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/11926422.2002.9673303.
[64]
Marsh, K. 2014. Obama’s Surge: A Bureaucratic Politics Analysis of the Decision to Order a Troop Surge in the Afghanistan War. Foreign Policy Analysis. 10, 3 (July 2014), 265–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/fpa.12000.
[65]
Mattes, M. and Rodríguez, M. 2014. Autocracies and International Cooperation. International Studies Quarterly. 58, 3 (Sept. 2014), 527–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12107.
[66]
McMillan, S.L. 2008. Subnational Foreign Policy Actors: How and Why Governors Participate in U.S. Foreign Policy. Foreign Policy Analysis. 4, 3 (July 2008), 227–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2008.00068.x.
[67]
Michael A. Cohen and Maria Figueroa Küpçü 2005. Privatizing Foreign Policy. World Policy Journal. 22, 3 (2005), 34–52.
[68]
Murray, S. 2013. Broadening the Debate about War: The Inclusion of Foreign Critics in Media Coverage and Its Potential Impact on US Public Opinion. Foreign Policy Analysis. (Apr. 2013), n/a-n/a. https://doi.org/10.1111/fpa.12010.
[69]
Neack, L. 2008. The new foreign policy: power seeking in a globalized era. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
[70]
Neack, L. 2008. The new foreign policy: power seeking in a globalized era. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
[71]
Neack, L. 2008. The new foreign policy: power seeking in a globalized era. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
[72]
Neack, L. 2008. The new foreign policy: power seeking in a globalized era. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
[73]
Neack, L. 2008. The new foreign policy: power seeking in a globalized era. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
[74]
Neack, L. 2008. The new foreign policy: power seeking in a globalized era. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
[75]
Neack, L. 2008. The new foreign policy: power seeking in a globalized era. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
[76]
Nelson, P. and Dorsey, E. 2007. New Rights Advocacy in a Global Public Domain. European Journal of International Relations. 13, 2 (June 2007), 187–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066107076953.
[77]
Nincic, M. and Ramos, J.M. 2010. Ideological structure and foreign policy preferences. Journal of Political Ideologies. 15, 2 (June 2010), 119–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2010.482368.
[78]
Nye, J.S. 2011. Power and foreign policy. Journal of Political Power. 4, 1 (Apr. 2011), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2011.555960.
[79]
Oppermann, K. and Spencer, A. 2013. Thinking Alike? Salience and Metaphor Analysis as Cognitive Approaches to Foreign Policy Analysis. Foreign Policy Analysis. 9, 1 (Jan. 2013), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2011.00167.x.
[80]
O?Reilly, K.P. 2007. Perceiving Rogue States: The Use of the ‘Rogue State’ Concept by U.S. Foreign Policy Elites. Foreign Policy Analysis. 3, 4 (Oct. 2007), 295–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2007.00052.x.
[81]
Pravda, A. 1988. Is there a Gorbachev foreign policy? Journal of Communist Studies. 4, 4 (Dec. 1988), 100–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523278808414940.
[82]
Price, R. 1998. Reversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Land Mines. International Organization. 52, 03 (June 1998), 613–644. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550671.
[83]
Reiter, D. 1995. Political structure and foreign policy learning: Are democracies more likely to act on the lessons of history? International Interactions. 21, 1 (Feb. 1995), 39–62.
[84]
Robinson, P. 2005. The CNN Effect Revisited. Critical Studies in Media Communication. 22, 4 (Oct. 2005), 344–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393180500288519.
[85]
Robinson, P. 2001. Theorizing the Influence of Media on World Politics: Models of Media Influence on Foreign Policy. European Journal of Communication. 16, 4 (Dec. 2001), 523–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323101016004005.
[86]
Rosenau, J.N. 1967. Domestic sources of foreign policy. Free Press.
[87]
Rosenau, J.N. 1967. Domestic sources of foreign policy. Free Press.
[88]
Rosenau, J.N. 1980. The scientific study of foreign policy. Pinter.
[89]
Rottinghaus, B. 2008. Presidential Leadership on Foreign Policy, Opinion Polling, and the Possible Limits of "Crafted Talk”. Political Communication. 25, 2 (Apr. 2008), 138–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600801985334.
[90]
Saideman, S.M. and Ayres, R.W. 2007. Pie Crust Promises and the Sources of Foreign Policy: The Limited Impact of Accession and the Priority of Domestic Constituencies. Foreign Policy Analysis. 3, 3 (July 2007), 189–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2007.00047.x.
[91]
Schafer, M. 2003. Science, Empiricism, and Tolerance in the Study of Foreign Policymaking. International Studies Review. 5, 2 (June 2003), 155–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/1521-9488.5020014.
[92]
Smith, S. et al. 2012. Foreign policy: theories, actors, cases. Oxford University Press.
[93]
Smith, S. et al. 2012. Foreign policy: theories, actors, cases. Oxford University Press.
[94]
Smith, S. et al. 2012. Foreign policy: theories, actors, cases. Oxford University Press.
[95]
Smith, S. et al. 2012. Foreign policy: theories, actors, cases. Oxford University Press.
[96]
Smith, S. et al. 2012. Foreign policy: theories, actors, cases. Oxford University Press.
[97]
Stern, E.K. 2003. Crisis Studies and Foreign Policy Analysis: Insights, Synergies, and Challenges. International Studies Review. 5, 2 (June 2003), 155–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/1521-9488.5020016.
[98]
Sussex, M. 2011. The impotence of being earnest? Avoiding the pitfalls of ‘creative middle power diplomacy’. Australian Journal of International Affairs. 65, 5 (Nov. 2011), 545–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2011.610436.
[99]
T. Knecht and M. S. Weatherford 2006. Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: The Stages of Presidential Decision Making. International Studies Quarterly. 50, 3 (2006), 705–727.
[100]
Thorngate, W. 2001. The social psychology of policy analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice. 3, 1 (June 2001), 85–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876980108412655.
[101]
True, J. and Mintrom, M. 2001. Transnational Networks and Policy Diffusion: The Case of Gender Mainstreaming. International Studies Quarterly. 45, 1 (Mar. 2001), 27–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/0020-8833.00181.
[102]
Ungerer, J.L. 2012. Assessing the Progress of the Democratic Peace Research Program. International Studies Review. 14, 1 (Mar. 2012), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2012.01103.x.
[103]
Waltz, K.N. 1968. Foreign policy and democratic politics: the American and British experience. Longmans.
[104]
Wang, J. and Wang, X. 2014. Media and Chinese Foreign Policy. Journal of Contemporary China. 23, 86 (Mar. 2014), 216–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2013.832523.
[105]
Warner, C.M. and Walker, S.G. 2011. Thinking about the Role of Religion in Foreign Policy: A Framework for Analysis. Foreign Policy Analysis. 7, 1 (Jan. 2011), 113–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2010.00125.x.
[106]
Wehner, L.E. and Thies, C.G. 2014. Role Theory, Narratives, and Interpretation: The Domestic Contestation of Roles. International Studies Review. (Aug. 2014), n/a-n/a. https://doi.org/10.1111/misr.12149.
[107]
Zhang, Q. 2014. Towards an Integrated Theory of Chinese Foreign Policy: bringing leadership personality back in. Journal of Contemporary China. 23, 89 (Sept. 2014), 902–922. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2014.882566.
[108]
Foreign Policy Engineering: From Theory to Practice and Back Again. International Security. 18, 4, 143–171.
[109]
Status Seekers: Chinese and Russian Responses to U.S. Primacy. International Security. 34, 4, 63–95.
[110]
The Relationships Between Mass Media, Public Opinion, and Foreign Policy: Toward a Theoretical Synthesis - Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1):39.