1
Hill C. Foreign policy in the twenty-first century. Second edition. London: Palgrave 2016.
2
Hill C. The changing politics of foreign policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan 2003.
3
Smith S, Hadfield A, Dunne T. Foreign policy: theories, actors, cases. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
4
Alden C. Foreign policy analysis: new approaches. London: Routledge 2012.
5
Neack L. The new foreign policy: power seeking in a globalized era. 2nd ed. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 2008.
6
Rosenau JN. The scientific study of foreign policy. Rev. and enl. ed. London: Pinter 1980.
7
Hill C. The changing politics of foreign policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan 2003.
8
Smith S, Hadfield A, Dunne T. Foreign policy: theories, actors, cases. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
9
Neack L. The new foreign policy: power seeking in a globalized era. 2nd ed. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 2008.
10
Hudson VM. Foreign policy analysis: classic and contemporary theory. Second edition. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Pub 2014.
11
Giacomello G, Ferrari F, Amadori A. With friends like these: foreign policy as personal relationship. Contemporary Politics. 2009;15:247–64. doi: 10.1080/13569770902858202
12
Hudson VM. Foreign Policy Analysis: Actor-Specific Theory and the Ground of International Relations. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2005;1:1–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-8594.2005.00001.x
13
David C. Who was the real George Bush? Foreign policy decision‐making under the bush administration. Diplomacy & Statecraft. 1996;7:197–220. doi: 10.1080/09592299608406000
14
Zhang Q. Towards an Integrated Theory of Chinese Foreign Policy: bringing leadership personality back in. Journal of Contemporary China. 2014;23:902–22. doi: 10.1080/10670564.2014.882566
15
Görener AŞ, Ucal MŞ. The Personality and Leadership Style of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan: Implications for Turkish Foreign Policy. Turkish Studies. 2011;12:357–81. doi: 10.1080/14683849.2011.604216
16
Rottinghaus B. Presidential Leadership on Foreign Policy, Opinion Polling, and the Possible Limits of "Crafted Talk”. Political Communication. 2008;25:138–57. doi: 10.1080/10584600801985334
17
Pravda A. Is there a Gorbachev foreign policy? Journal of Communist Studies. 1988;4:100–20. doi: 10.1080/13523278808414940
18
Gallagher ME, Allen SH. Presidential Personality: Not Just a Nuisance. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2014;10:1–21. doi: 10.1111/fpa.12006
19
DYSON SB. Personality and Foreign Policy: Tony Blair’s Iraq Decisions. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2006;2:289–306. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-8594.2006.00031.x
20
Hill C. The changing politics of foreign policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan 2003.
21
Alden C. Foreign policy analysis: new approaches. London: Routledge 2012.
22
Hudson VM. Foreign policy analysis: classic and contemporary theory. Second edition. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Pub 2014.
23
Neack L. The new foreign policy: power seeking in a globalized era. 2nd ed. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 2008.
24
Garrison JA. Foreign Policymaking and Group Dynamics: Where We’ve Been and Where We’re Going. International Studies Review. 2003;5:155–202. doi: 10.1111/1521-9488.5020015
25
Clarke M, White B. Understanding foreign policy: the foreign policy systems approach. Aldershot: Elgar 1989.
26
Graham T. Allison and Morton H. Halperin. Bureaucratic Politics: A Paradigm and Some Policy Implications. World Politics. 1972;24:40–79.
27
Hocking B. Adaptation and the foreign policy bureaucracy: The experience of federal states. Diplomacy & Statecraft. 1994;5:47–72. doi: 10.1080/09592299408405908
28
Lai H, Kang S-J. Domestic Bureaucratic Politics and Chinese Foreign Policy. Journal of Contemporary China. 2014;23:294–313. doi: 10.1080/10670564.2013.832531
29
Badie D. Groupthink, Iraq, and the War on Terror: Explaining US Policy Shift toward Iraq. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2010;6:277–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-8594.2010.00113.x
30
GARRISON J. Constructing the ‘National Interest’ in U.S.?China Policy Making: How Foreign Policy Decision Groups Define and Signal Policy Choices. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2007;3:105–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-8594.2007.00043.x
31
Kaarbo J, Beasley RK. Taking It to the Extreme: The Effect of Coalition Cabinets on Foreign Policy. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2008;4:67–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-8594.2007.00058.x
32
Marsh K. Obama’s Surge: A Bureaucratic Politics Analysis of the Decision to Order a Troop Surge in the Afghanistan War. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2014;10:265–88. doi: 10.1111/fpa.12000
33
Hill C. The changing politics of foreign policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan 2003.
34
Hudson VM. Foreign policy analysis: classic and contemporary theory. Second edition. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Pub 2014.
35
Alden C. Foreign policy analysis: new approaches. London: Routledge 2012.
36
Hadfield A. British foreign policy, national identity, and neoclassical realism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield 2010.
37
Mattes M, Rodríguez M. Autocracies and International Cooperation. International Studies Quarterly. 2014;58:527–38. doi: 10.1111/isqu.12107
38
Rosenau JN. Domestic sources of foreign policy. New York: Free Press 1967.
39
Neack L. The new foreign policy: power seeking in a globalized era. 2nd ed. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 2008.
40
Reiter D. Political structure and foreign policy learning: Are democracies more likely to act on the lessons of history? International Interactions. 1995;21:39–62.
41
Ungerer JL. Assessing the Progress of the Democratic Peace Research Program. International Studies Review. 2012;14:1–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2486.2012.01103.x
42
CHAN S, SAFRAN W. Public Opinion as a Constraint against War: Democracies’ Responses to Operation Iraqi Freedom. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2006;2:137–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-8594.2006.00024.x
43
Bruce Bueno de Mesquita, Randolph M. Siverson and Gary Woller. War and the Fate of Regimes: A Comparative Analysis. The American Political Science Review. 1992;86:638–46.
44
Waltz KN. Foreign policy and democratic politics: the American and British experience. Harlow: Longmans 1968.
45
Lee S. Canadian values in Canadian foreign policy. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal. 2002;10:1–9. doi: 10.1080/11926422.2002.9673303
46
Hill C. The changing politics of foreign policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan 2003.
47
Smith S, Hadfield A, Dunne T. Foreign policy: theories, actors, cases. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
48
Neack L. The new foreign policy: power seeking in a globalized era. 2nd ed. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 2008.
49
Alden C. Foreign policy analysis: new approaches. London: Routledge 2012.
50
Nincic M, Ramos JM. Ideological structure and foreign policy preferences. Journal of Political Ideologies. 2010;15:119–41. doi: 10.1080/13569317.2010.482368
51
Thorngate W. The social psychology of policy analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice. 2001;3:85–112. doi: 10.1080/13876980108412655
52
Lebow RN. Psychological dimensions of post‐Cold War foreign policy. Israel Affairs. 1996;2:46–56. doi: 10.1080/13537129608719392
53
Schafer M. Science, Empiricism, and Tolerance in the Study of Foreign Policymaking. International Studies Review. 2003;5:155–202. doi: 10.1111/1521-9488.5020014
54
Jack S. Levy. Learning and Foreign Policy: Sweeping a Conceptual Minefield. International Organization. 1994;48:279–312.
55
Goldsmith B. Imitation in International Relations: Analogies, Vicarious Learning, and Foreign Policy. International Interactions. 2003;29:237–67. doi: 10.1080/03050620304593
56
Oppermann K, Spencer A. Thinking Alike? Salience and Metaphor Analysis as Cognitive Approaches to Foreign Policy Analysis. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2013;9:39–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-8594.2011.00167.x
57
Dolan TM. Emotion and Strategic Learning in War. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2014;n/a-n/a. doi: 10.1111/fpa.12052
58
O?Reilly KP. Perceiving Rogue States: The Use of the ‘Rogue State’ Concept by U.S. Foreign Policy Elites. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2007;3:295–315. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-8594.2007.00052.x
59
Hill C. The changing politics of foreign policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan 2003.
60
Hudson VM. Foreign policy analysis: classic and contemporary theory. Second edition. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Pub 2014.
61
Langhorne R. The Diplomacy of Non-State Actors. Diplomacy & Statecraft. 2005;16:331–9. doi: 10.1080/09592290590948388
62
Michael A. Cohen and Maria Figueroa Küpçü. Privatizing Foreign Policy. World Policy Journal. 2005;22:34–52.
63
Kim Y. How NGOs Influence US Foreign Aid Allocations. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2014;n/a-n/a. doi: 10.1111/fpa.12064
64
McMillan SL. Subnational Foreign Policy Actors: How and Why Governors Participate in U.S. Foreign Policy. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2008;4:227–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-8594.2008.00068.x
65
True J, Mintrom M. Transnational Networks and Policy Diffusion: The Case of Gender Mainstreaming. International Studies Quarterly. 2001;45:27–57. doi: 10.1111/0020-8833.00181
66
Price R. Reversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Land Mines. International Organization. 1998;52:613–44. doi: 10.1162/002081898550671
67
Hoffman MES. Discretion, Lobbying, and Political Influence in Models of Trade Policy. The Journal of Policy Reform. 2005;8:175–88. doi: 10.1080/13841280500181650
68
Warner CM, Walker SG. Thinking about the Role of Religion in Foreign Policy: A Framework for Analysis. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2011;7:113–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-8594.2010.00125.x
69
Joachim J. Framing Issues and Seizing Opportunities: The UN, NGOs, and Women’s Rights. International Studies Quarterly. 2003;47:247–74. doi: 10.1111/1468-2478.4702005
70
Frank R. Baumgartner and Bryan D. Jones. Agenda Dynamics and Policy Subsystems. The Journal of Politics. 1991;53:1044–74.
71
Nelson P, Dorsey E. New Rights Advocacy in a Global Public Domain. European Journal of International Relations. 2007;13:187–216. doi: 10.1177/1354066107076953
72
Hill C. The changing politics of foreign policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan 2003.
73
Smith S, Hadfield A, Dunne T. Foreign policy: theories, actors, cases. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
74
GILBOA E. The CNN Effect: The Search for a Communication Theory of International Relations. Political Communication. 2005;22:27–44. doi: 10.1080/10584600590908429
75
Robinson P. The CNN Effect Revisited. Critical Studies in Media Communication. 2005;22:344–9. doi: 10.1080/07393180500288519
76
Gilboa E. Diplomacy in the media age: Three models of uses and effects. Diplomacy & Statecraft. 2001;12:1–28. doi: 10.1080/09592290108406201
77
Rosenau JN. Domestic sources of foreign policy. New York: Free Press 1967.
78
Neack L. The new foreign policy: power seeking in a globalized era. 2nd ed. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 2008.
79
Robinson P. Theorizing the Influence of Media on World Politics: Models of Media Influence on Foreign Policy. European Journal of Communication. 2001;16:523–44. doi: 10.1177/0267323101016004005
80
Hjarvard S, Kristensen NN. When media of a small nation argue for war. Media, War & Conflict. 2014;7:51–69. doi: 10.1177/1750635213516560
81
Wang J, Wang X. Media and Chinese Foreign Policy. Journal of Contemporary China. 2014;23:216–35. doi: 10.1080/10670564.2013.832523
82
Murray S. Broadening the Debate about War: The Inclusion of Foreign Critics in Media Coverage and Its Potential Impact on US Public Opinion. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2013;n/a-n/a. doi: 10.1111/fpa.12010
83
The Relationships Between Mass Media, Public Opinion, and Foreign Policy: Toward a Theoretical Synthesis - Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1):39.
84
Baru S. The Influence of Business and Media on Indian Foreign Policy. India Review. 2009;8:266–85. doi: 10.1080/14736480903116792
85
Hill C. The changing politics of foreign policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan 2003.
86
Smith S, Hadfield A, Dunne T. Foreign policy: theories, actors, cases. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
87
Cable J. Foreign policy making: Planning or reflex? Diplomacy & Statecraft. 1992;3:357–81. doi: 10.1080/09592299208405861
88
Kleiner J. The Inertia of Diplomacy. Diplomacy & Statecraft. 2008;19:321–49. doi: 10.1080/09592290802096380
89
John G. Tower. Congress versus the President: The Formulation and Implementation of American Foreign Policy. Foreign Affairs. 1981;60:229–46.
90
Breuning M. Roles and Realities: When and Why Gatekeepers Fail to Change Foreign Policy. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2013;9:307–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-8594.2012.00178.x
91
Charles F. Hermann. Changing Course: When Governments Choose to Redirect Foreign Policy. International Studies Quarterly. 1990;34:3–21.
92
Hagan JD, Everts PP, Fukui H, et al. Foreign Policy by Coalition: Deadlock, Compromise, and Anarchy. International Studies Review. 2001;3:169–216. doi: 10.1111/1521-9488.00237
93
Saideman SM, Ayres RW. Pie Crust Promises and the Sources of Foreign Policy: The Limited Impact of Accession and the Priority of Domestic Constituencies. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2007;3:189–210. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-8594.2007.00047.x
94
Foreign Policy Engineering: From Theory to Practice and Back Again. International Security. ;18:143–71.
95
Stern EK. Crisis Studies and Foreign Policy Analysis: Insights, Synergies, and Challenges. International Studies Review. 2003;5:155–202. doi: 10.1111/1521-9488.5020016
96
T. Knecht and M. S. Weatherford. Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: The Stages of Presidential Decision Making. International Studies Quarterly. 2006;50:705–27.
97
Hill, Christopher. The capability-expectations gap, or conceptualizing Europe’s international role. Journal of Common Market Studies. ;31.
98
Hill C. The changing politics of foreign policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan 2003.
99
Neack L. The new foreign policy: power seeking in a globalized era. 2nd ed. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 2008.
100
K. J. Holsti. National Role Conceptions in the Study of Foreign Policy. International Studies Quarterly. 1970;14:233–309.
101
Hudson VM. Foreign policy analysis: classic and contemporary theory. Second edition. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Pub 2014.
102
Wehner LE, Thies CG. Role Theory, Narratives, and Interpretation: The Domestic Contestation of Roles. International Studies Review. 2014;n/a-n/a. doi: 10.1111/misr.12149
103
Carranza ME. Rising Regional Powers and International Relations Theories: Comparing Brazil and India’s Foreign Security Policies and Their Search for Great-Power Status. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2014;n/a-n/a. doi: 10.1111/fpa.12065
104
Jordaan E. The concept of a middle power in international relations: distinguishing between emerging and traditional middle powers. Politikon. 2003;30:165–81. doi: 10.1080/0258934032000147282
105
Sussex M. The impotence of being earnest? Avoiding the pitfalls of ‘creative middle power diplomacy’. Australian Journal of International Affairs. 2011;65:545–62. doi: 10.1080/10357718.2011.610436
106
Gecelovsky P. Constructing a middle power: Ideas and Canadian foreign policy. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal. 2009;15:77–93. doi: 10.1080/11926422.2009.9673483
107
Beeson M. Can Australia save the world? The limits and possibilities of middle power diplomacy. Australian Journal of International Affairs. 2011;65:563–77. doi: 10.1080/10357718.2011.607149
108
Nye JS. Power and foreign policy. Journal of Political Power. 2011;4:9–24. doi: 10.1080/2158379X.2011.555960
109
Status Seekers: Chinese and Russian Responses to U.S. Primacy. International Security. ;34:63–95.
110
Brown C. Do Great Powers Have Great Responsibilities? Great Powers and Moral Agency. Global Society. 2004;18:5–19. doi: 10.1080/1360082032000173545
