Andrew Ruddock (2001) Understanding Audiences: Theory and Method. SAGE. Available at: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=10080942.
‘Are We All Produsers Now?’ (no date). Available at: http://www.tandfonline.com.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/doi/pdf/10.1080/09502386.2011.600532.
Bandura, A. (1965) ‘Influence of models’ reinforcement contingencies on the acquisition of imitative responses.’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1(6), pp. 589–595. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022070.
Banet-Weiser, S. (2011) ‘“Branding the Post-Feminist Self: Girls’ Video Production and YouTube”’, in Mediated girlhoods: new explorations of girls’ media culture. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 277–294.
Benjamin, W. and Arendt, H. (1999) Illuminations. London: Pimlico.
Benjamin, W. and Tiedemann, R. (1999) The Arcades Project. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press.
Brooker, W. and Jermyn, D. (2003) The audience studies reader. London: Routledge.
Buckingham, D. (2009) ‘`Creative’ visual methods in media research: possibilities, problems and proposals’, Media, Culture & Society, 31(4), pp. 633–652. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443709335280.
Butsch, R. and Livingstone, S.M. (2014) Meanings of audiences: comparative discourses. Abingdon: Routledge.
Chabot Davis, K. (no date) ‘An Ethnography of Political Identification: The Birmingham School Meets Psychoanalytic Theory’. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1353/psy.2003.0009.
Das, R. (2010) ‘Meaning at the Interface: New Genres, New Modes of Interpretative Engagement?’, The Communication Review, 13(2), pp. 140–159. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421003795535.
Das, R. (2011a) ‘Converging perspectives in audience studies and digital literacies: Youthful interpretations of an online genre’, European Journal of Communication, 26(4), pp. 343–360. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323111423379.
Das, R. (2011b) ‘Converging perspectives in audience studies and digital literacies: Youthful interpretations of an online genre’, European Journal of Communication, 26(4), pp. 343–360. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323111423379.
David Gauntlett - Ten things wrong with the media ‘effects’ model (no date). Available at: http://www.theory.org.uk/david/effects.htm.
Dickinson, R., Linne, O. and Harindranath, R. (1998a) Approaches to audiences: a reader. London: Arnold.
Dickinson, R., Linne, O. and Harindranath, R. (1998b) Approaches to audiences: a reader. London: Arnold.
van Dijck, J. (2009) ‘Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content’, Media, Culture & Society, 31(1), pp. 41–58. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443708098245.
Gauntlett, D. (1995) Moving experiences: understanding television’s influences and effects. London: John Libbey.
Gerbner, G. (1998) ‘Cultivation Analysis: An Overview’, Mass Communication and Society, 1(3–4), pp. 175–194. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.1998.9677855.
Gorton, K. (2009) Media audiences: television, meaning and emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Available at: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=10391726.
Highmore, B. (2011) ‘“Absentminded Media”’, in Ordinary lives: studies in the everyday. London: Routledge, pp. 114–138.
Hine, C. (2011) ‘Towards ethnography of television on the internet: A mobile strategy for exploring mundane interpretive activities’, Media, Culture & Society, 33(4), pp. 567–582. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443711401940.
Humphreys, S. (2005a) ‘Productive Players: Online Computer Games’ Challenge to Conventional Media Forms’, Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 2(1), pp. 37–51. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1479142042000332116.
Humphreys, S. (2005b) ‘Productive Players: Online Computer Games’ Challenge to Conventional Media Forms’, Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 2(1), pp. 37–51. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1479142042000332116.
Jensen, T. (no date a) "Watching with my hands over my eyes”: Shame and irritation in ambivalent encounters with ‘Bad Mothers’. Available at: http://www.radicalpsychology.org/vol9-2/jensen.html.
Jensen, T. (no date b) "Watching with my hands over my eyes”: Shame and irritation in ambivalent encounters with ‘Bad Mothers’. Available at: http://www.radicalpsychology.org/vol9-2/jensen.html.
Jensen, T. (no date c) "Watching with my hands over my eyes”: Shame and irritation in ambivalent encounters with ‘Bad Mothers’. Available at: http://www.radicalpsychology.org/vol9-2/jensen.html.
Kearney, M.C. (2006a) ‘“Grrrl Zines: Exploring Identity, Transforming Girls’ Written Culture”’, in Girls make media. New York: Routledge, pp. 135–187. Available at: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://lib.myilibrary.com?id=80948.
Kearney, M.C. (2006b) ‘“Grrrl Zines: Exploring Identity, Transforming Girls’ Written Culture”’, in Girls make media. New York: Routledge, pp. 135–187. Available at: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://lib.myilibrary.com?id=80948.
Livingstone, S. (1996a) On the continuing problems of media effects research - LSE Research Online. Available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/21503/.
Livingstone, S. (1996b) On the continuing problems of media effects research - LSE Research Online. Available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/21503/.
Livingstone, S. (2003) ‘The changing nature of audiences : from the mass audience to the interactive media user - LSE Research Online’. Available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/417/.
Livingstone, S. (2004) ‘The Challenge of Changing Audiences: Or, What is the Audience Researcher to do in the Age of the Internet?’, European Journal of Communication, 19(1), pp. 75–86. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323104040695.
Livingstone, S. and Das, R. (no date) The End of Audiences? Theoretical Echoes of Reception amid the Uncertainties of Use. Available at: http://www.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/WhosWho/AcademicStaff/SoniaLivingstone/pdf/Livingstone-and-Das,-manuscript.pdf.
Madianou, M. and Miller, D. (2013) ‘Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(2), pp. 169–187. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877912452486.
McQuail, D. (2010) McQuail’s mass communication theory. 6th ed. Los Angeles, Calif: SAGE.
Moores, S. (1993) Interpreting audiences: the ethnography of media consumption. London: Sage Publications.
Morgan, M. and Shanahan, J. (2010) ‘The State of Cultivation’, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 54(2), pp. 337–355. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151003735018.
On Not Being a Fan: Masculine Identity, DVD Culture and the Accidental Collector | Bainbridge | Wide Screen (no date). Available at: http://widescreenjournal.org/index.php/journal/article/view/41.
O’Neill, B. (2011) ‘Media Effects in Context’, in The handbook of media audiences. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 320–339. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444340525.ch16.
Ortega Breton, H. (2013) ‘A psycho-cultural approach to radio listening and creative production’, Radio Journal:International Studies in Broadcast & Audio Media, 11(1), pp. 75–90. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1386/rjao.11.1.75_1.
Potter, W.J. (2014) ‘A Critical Analysis of Cultivation Theory’, Journal of Communication, 64(6), pp. 1015–1036. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12128.
‘Recommended: application of theory of reception as distraction’ (no date).
‘Recommended Sources / Reading’ (no date).
Rosenbaum and m (no date a) ‘Psychosomatics’, 39(Jan-feb).
Rosenbaum and m (no date b) ‘Psychosomatics’, 39(Jan-feb).
Rosenbaum and m (no date c) ‘Psychosomatics’, 39(Jan-feb).
Seiter, E. (1990a) ‘Making distinctions in TV audience research: Case study of a troubling interview’, Cultural Studies, 4(1), pp. 61–84. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09502389000490051.
Seiter, E. (1990b) ‘Making distinctions in TV audience research: Case study of a troubling interview’, Cultural Studies, 4(1), pp. 61–84. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09502389000490051.
Stephen, F. and Lisa, B. (2008) ‘Psychoanalysis and Psychosocial Studies’, Psychoanalysis Culture and Society, 13(4), pp. 346–365.
various (1999) Rethinking the Media Audience: The New Agenda. Edited by Alasuutari, Pertti. Available at: http://lib.myilibrary.com.ezproxy4.lib.le.ac.uk/Open.aspx?id=226264.
various - collection (2011) The gender and media reader. Edited by Mary Celeste Kearney. London: Routledge.
Whitehouse-Hart, J. (2014a) Psychosocial explorations of film and television viewing: ordinary audience. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.myilibrary.com?id=671529.
Whitehouse-Hart, J. (2014b) Psychosocial explorations of film and television viewing: ordinary audience. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.myilibrary.com?id=671529.
Whitehouse-Hart, J. (2014c) Psychosocial explorations of film and television viewing: ordinary audience. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.myilibrary.com?id=671529.
Whitehouse-Hart, J. (2014d) Psychosocial explorations of film and television viewing: ordinary audience. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.myilibrary.com?id=671529.
Wood, Helen (2007) ‘Television is Happening: Methodological Considerations for Capturing Digital Television Reception"’, 10(4), pp. 485–506. Available at: http://gl9sn3dh2u.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Television+is+happening&rft.jtitle=European+Journal+of+Cultural+Studies&rft.au=Wood%2C+Helen&rft.date=2007-11-01&rft.pub=Sage+Publications&rft.issn=1367-5494&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=485&rft.epage=506&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10.1177%2F1367549407081956&paramdict=en-US.
Wood, H. (2007a) ‘The mediated conversational floor: an interactive approach to audience reception analysis’, Media, Culture & Society, 29(1), pp. 75–103. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443706072000.
Wood, H. (2007b) ‘The mediated conversational floor: an interactive approach to audience reception analysis’, Media, Culture & Society, 29(1), pp. 75–103. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443706072000.