1
Livingstone S. The changing nature of audiences : from the mass audience to the interactive media user - LSE Research Online. Published Online First: 2003.
2
Highmore B. ‘Absentminded Media’. Ordinary lives: studies in the everyday. London: Routledge 2011:114–38.
3
Livingstone S. On the continuing problems of media effects research - LSE Research Online. 1996. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/21503/
4
Humphreys S. Productive Players: Online Computer Games’ Challenge to Conventional Media Forms. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies. 2005;2:37–51. doi: 10.1080/1479142042000332116
5
Whitehouse-Hart J. Psychosocial explorations of film and television viewing: ordinary audience. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2014.
6
Whitehouse-Hart J. Psychosocial explorations of film and television viewing: ordinary audience. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2014.
7
Kearney MC. ‘Grrrl Zines: Exploring Identity, Transforming Girls’ Written Culture’. Girls make media. New York: Routledge 2006:135–87.
8
Wood H. The mediated conversational floor: an interactive approach to audience reception analysis. Media, Culture & Society. 2007;29:75–103. doi: 10.1177/0163443706072000
9
Das R. Converging perspectives in audience studies and digital literacies: Youthful interpretations of an online genre. European Journal of Communication. 2011;26:343–60. doi: 10.1177/0267323111423379
10
Butsch R, Livingstone SM. Meanings of audiences: comparative discourses. Abingdon: Routledge 2014.
11
various. Rethinking the Media Audience: The New Agenda. 1999.
12
Brooker W, Jermyn D. The audience studies reader. London: Routledge 2003.
13
Dickinson R, Linne O, Harindranath R. Approaches to audiences: a reader. London: Arnold 1998.
14
Gauntlett D. Moving experiences: understanding television’s influences and effects. London: John Libbey 1995.
15
McQuail D. McQuail’s mass communication theory. 6th ed. Los Angeles, Calif: SAGE 2010.
16
Andrew Ruddock. Understanding Audiences: Theory and Method. SAGE 2001.
17
Benjamin W, Arendt H. Illuminations. London: Pimlico 1999.
18
Benjamin W, Tiedemann R. The Arcades Project. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press 1999.
19
Recommended: application of theory of reception as distraction.
20
Livingstone S. On the continuing problems of media effects research - LSE Research Online. 1996. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/21503/
21
Dickinson R, Linne O, Harindranath R. Approaches to audiences: a reader. London: Arnold 1998.
22
O’Neill B. Media Effects in Context. The handbook of media audiences. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell 2011:320–39.
23
David Gauntlett - Ten things wrong with the media ‘effects’ model. http://www.theory.org.uk/david/effects.htm
24
Morgan M, Shanahan J. The State of Cultivation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 2010;54:337–55. doi: 10.1080/08838151003735018
25
Potter WJ. A Critical Analysis of Cultivation Theory. Journal of Communication. 2014;64:1015–36. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12128
26
Gerbner G. Cultivation Analysis: An Overview. Mass Communication and Society. 1998;1:175–94. doi: 10.1080/15205436.1998.9677855
27
Bandura A. Influence of models’ reinforcement contingencies on the acquisition of imitative responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1965;1:589–95. doi: 10.1037/h0022070
28
Humphreys S. Productive Players: Online Computer Games’ Challenge to Conventional Media Forms. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies. 2005;2:37–51. doi: 10.1080/1479142042000332116
29
van Dijck J. Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media, Culture & Society. 2009;31:41–58. doi: 10.1177/0163443708098245
30
Whitehouse-Hart J. Psychosocial explorations of film and television viewing: ordinary audience. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2014.
31
Seiter E. Making distinctions in TV audience research: Case study of a troubling interview. Cultural Studies. 1990;4:61–84. doi: 10.1080/09502389000490051
32
Ortega Breton H. A psycho-cultural approach to radio listening and creative production. Radio Journal:International Studies in Broadcast & Audio Media. 2013;11:75–90. doi: 10.1386/rjao.11.1.75_1
33
On Not Being a Fan: Masculine Identity, DVD Culture and the Accidental Collector | Bainbridge | Wide Screen. http://widescreenjournal.org/index.php/journal/article/view/41
34
Jensen T. "Watching with my hands over my eyes”: Shame and irritation in ambivalent encounters with ‘Bad Mothers’. http://www.radicalpsychology.org/vol9-2/jensen.html
35
Recommended Sources / Reading.
36
Stephen F, Lisa B. Psychoanalysis and Psychosocial Studies. Psychoanalysis Culture and Society. 2008;13:346–65.
37
Whitehouse-Hart J. Psychosocial explorations of film and television viewing: ordinary audience. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2014.
38
Seiter E. Making distinctions in TV audience research: Case study of a troubling interview. Cultural Studies. 1990;4:61–84. doi: 10.1080/09502389000490051
39
Jensen T. "Watching with my hands over my eyes”: Shame and irritation in ambivalent encounters with ‘Bad Mothers’. http://www.radicalpsychology.org/vol9-2/jensen.html
40
Chabot Davis K. An Ethnography of Political Identification: The Birmingham School Meets Psychoanalytic Theory. doi: 10.1353/psy.2003.0009
41
various - collection. The gender and media reader. London: Routledge 2011.
42
Rosenbaum, m. Psychosomatics. ;39.
43
Hine C. Towards ethnography of television on the internet: A mobile strategy for exploring mundane interpretive activities. Media, Culture & Society. 2011;33:567–82. doi: 10.1177/0163443711401940
44
Moores S. Interpreting audiences: the ethnography of media consumption. London: Sage Publications 1993.
45
Buckingham D. `Creative’ visual methods in media research: possibilities, problems and proposals. Media, Culture & Society. 2009;31:633–52. doi: 10.1177/0163443709335280
46
Kearney MC. ‘Grrrl Zines: Exploring Identity, Transforming Girls’ Written Culture’. Girls make media. New York: Routledge 2006:135–87.
47
Banet-Weiser S. ‘Branding the Post-Feminist Self: Girls’ Video Production and YouTube’. Mediated girlhoods: new explorations of girls’ media culture. New York: Peter Lang 2011:277–94.
48
Wood H. The mediated conversational floor: an interactive approach to audience reception analysis. Media, Culture & Society. 2007;29:75–103. doi: 10.1177/0163443706072000
49
Jensen T. "Watching with my hands over my eyes”: Shame and irritation in ambivalent encounters with ‘Bad Mothers’. http://www.radicalpsychology.org/vol9-2/jensen.html
50
Wood H. Television is Happening: Methodological Considerations for Capturing Digital Television Reception". 2007;10:485–506.
51
Gorton K. Media audiences: television, meaning and emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press 2009.
52
Das R. Converging perspectives in audience studies and digital literacies: Youthful interpretations of an online genre. European Journal of Communication. 2011;26:343–60. doi: 10.1177/0267323111423379
53
Livingstone S, Das R. The End of Audiences? Theoretical Echoes of Reception amid the Uncertainties of Use. http://www.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/WhosWho/AcademicStaff/SoniaLivingstone/pdf/Livingstone-and-Das,-manuscript.pdf
54
Madianou M, Miller D. Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies. 2013;16:169–87. doi: 10.1177/1367877912452486
55
Livingstone S. The Challenge of Changing Audiences: Or, What is the Audience Researcher to do in the Age of the Internet? European Journal of Communication. 2004;19:75–86. doi: 10.1177/0267323104040695
56
Das R. Meaning at the Interface: New Genres, New Modes of Interpretative Engagement? The Communication Review. 2010;13:140–59. doi: 10.1080/10714421003795535
57
Are We All Produsers Now?
58
Rosenbaum, m. Psychosomatics. ;39.
59
Rosenbaum, m. Psychosomatics. ;39.
