[1]
S. Livingstone, ‘The changing nature of audiences : from the mass audience to the interactive media user - LSE Research Online’, 2003, Available: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/417/
[2]
B. Highmore, ‘“Absentminded Media”’, in Ordinary lives: studies in the everyday, London: Routledge, 2011, pp. 114–138.
[3]
S. Livingstone, ‘On the continuing problems of media effects research - LSE Research Online’, 1996. Available: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/21503/
[4]
S. Humphreys, ‘Productive Players: Online Computer Games’ Challenge to Conventional Media Forms’, Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 37–51, Mar. 2005, doi: 10.1080/1479142042000332116
[5]
J. Whitehouse-Hart, Psychosocial explorations of film and television viewing: ordinary audience, vol. Studies in the psychosocial. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. Available: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.myilibrary.com?id=671529
[6]
J. Whitehouse-Hart, Psychosocial explorations of film and television viewing: ordinary audience, vol. Studies in the psychosocial. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. Available: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.myilibrary.com?id=671529
[7]
M. C. Kearney, ‘“Grrrl Zines: Exploring Identity, Transforming Girls’ Written Culture”’, in Girls make media, New York: Routledge, 2006, pp. 135–187. Available: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://lib.myilibrary.com?id=80948
[8]
H. Wood, ‘The mediated conversational floor: an interactive approach to audience reception analysis’, Media, Culture & Society, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 75–103, Jan. 2007, doi: 10.1177/0163443706072000
[9]
R. Das, ‘Converging perspectives in audience studies and digital literacies: Youthful interpretations of an online genre’, European Journal of Communication, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 343–360, Dec. 2011, doi: 10.1177/0267323111423379
[10]
R. Butsch and S. M. Livingstone, Meanings of audiences: comparative discourses. Abingdon: Routledge, 2014.
[11]
various, Rethinking the Media Audience: The New Agenda. 1999. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com.ezproxy4.lib.le.ac.uk/Open.aspx?id=226264
[12]
W. Brooker and D. Jermyn, The audience studies reader. London: Routledge, 2003.
[13]
R. Dickinson, O. Linne, and R. Harindranath, Approaches to audiences: a reader, vol. Foundations in media. London: Arnold, 1998.
[14]
D. Gauntlett, Moving experiences: understanding television’s influences and effects, vol. Acamedia research monographs. London: John Libbey, 1995.
[15]
D. McQuail, McQuail’s mass communication theory, 6th ed. Los Angeles, Calif: SAGE, 2010.
[16]
Andrew Ruddock, Understanding Audiences: Theory and Method. SAGE, 2001. Available: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=10080942
[17]
W. Benjamin and H. Arendt, Illuminations, vol. Pimlico. London: Pimlico, 1999.
[18]
W. Benjamin and R. Tiedemann, The Arcades Project. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press, 1999.
[19]
‘Recommended: application of theory of reception as distraction’.
[20]
S. Livingstone, ‘On the continuing problems of media effects research - LSE Research Online’, 1996. Available: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/21503/
[21]
R. Dickinson, O. Linne, and R. Harindranath, Approaches to audiences: a reader, vol. Foundations in media. London: Arnold, 1998.
[22]
B. O’Neill, ‘Media Effects in Context’, in The handbook of media audiences, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011, pp. 320–339. doi: 10.1002/9781444340525.ch16. Available: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/9781444340525.ch16
[23]
‘David Gauntlett - Ten things wrong with the media “effects” model’. Available: http://www.theory.org.uk/david/effects.htm
[24]
M. Morgan and J. Shanahan, ‘The State of Cultivation’, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 337–355, May 2010, doi: 10.1080/08838151003735018. Available: http://www.tandfonline.com.ezproxy4.lib.le.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/08838151003735018#.VNiQri5yV2A
[25]
W. J. Potter, ‘A Critical Analysis of Cultivation Theory’, Journal of Communication, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 1015–1036, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.1111/jcom.12128
[26]
G. Gerbner, ‘Cultivation Analysis: An Overview’, Mass Communication and Society, vol. 1, no. 3–4, pp. 175–194, June 1998, doi: 10.1080/15205436.1998.9677855. Available: http://www.tandfonline.com.ezproxy4.lib.le.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/15205436.1998.9677855#.VNiSJi5yV2A
[27]
A. Bandura, ‘Influence of models’ reinforcement contingencies on the acquisition of imitative responses.’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 589–595, 1965, doi: 10.1037/h0022070
[28]
S. Humphreys, ‘Productive Players: Online Computer Games’ Challenge to Conventional Media Forms’, Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 37–51, Mar. 2005, doi: 10.1080/1479142042000332116
[29]
J. van Dijck, ‘Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content’, Media, Culture & Society, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 41–58, Jan. 2009, doi: 10.1177/0163443708098245
[30]
J. Whitehouse-Hart, Psychosocial explorations of film and television viewing: ordinary audience, vol. Studies in the psychosocial. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. Available: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.myilibrary.com?id=671529
[31]
E. Seiter, ‘Making distinctions in TV audience research: Case study of a troubling interview’, Cultural Studies, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 61–84, Jan. 1990, doi: 10.1080/09502389000490051
[32]
H. Ortega Breton, ‘A psycho-cultural approach to radio listening and creative production’, Radio Journal:International Studies in Broadcast & Audio Media, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 75–90, Apr. 2013, doi: 10.1386/rjao.11.1.75_1
[33]
‘On Not Being a Fan: Masculine Identity, DVD Culture and the Accidental Collector | Bainbridge | Wide Screen’. Available: http://widescreenjournal.org/index.php/journal/article/view/41
[34]
T. Jensen, ‘"Watching with my hands over my eyes”: Shame and irritation in ambivalent encounters with “Bad Mothers”’. Available: http://www.radicalpsychology.org/vol9-2/jensen.html
[35]
‘Recommended Sources / Reading’.
[36]
F. Stephen and B. Lisa, ‘Psychoanalysis and Psychosocial Studies’, Psychoanalysis Culture and Society, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 346–365, 2008.
[37]
J. Whitehouse-Hart, Psychosocial explorations of film and television viewing: ordinary audience, vol. Studies in the psychosocial. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. Available: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.myilibrary.com?id=671529
[38]
E. Seiter, ‘Making distinctions in TV audience research: Case study of a troubling interview’, Cultural Studies, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 61–84, Jan. 1990, doi: 10.1080/09502389000490051
[39]
T. Jensen, ‘"Watching with my hands over my eyes”: Shame and irritation in ambivalent encounters with “Bad Mothers”’. Available: http://www.radicalpsychology.org/vol9-2/jensen.html
[40]
K. Chabot Davis, ‘An Ethnography of Political Identification: The Birmingham School Meets Psychoanalytic Theory’, doi: 10.1353/psy.2003.0009. Available: http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy4.lib.le.ac.uk/journals/journal_for_the_psychoanalysis_of_culture_and_society/v008/8.1davis_k.pdf
[41]
various - collection, The gender and media reader. London: Routledge, 2011.
[42]
Rosenbaum and m, ‘Psychosomatics’, vol. 39, no. Jan-feb.
[43]
C. Hine, ‘Towards ethnography of television on the internet: A mobile strategy for exploring mundane interpretive activities’, Media, Culture & Society, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 567–582, May 2011, doi: 10.1177/0163443711401940
[44]
S. Moores, Interpreting audiences: the ethnography of media consumption, vol. The media, culture and society series. London: Sage Publications, 1993.
[45]
D. Buckingham, ‘`Creative’ visual methods in media research: possibilities, problems and proposals’, Media, Culture & Society, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 633–652, July 2009, doi: 10.1177/0163443709335280
[46]
M. C. Kearney, ‘“Grrrl Zines: Exploring Identity, Transforming Girls’ Written Culture”’, in Girls make media, New York: Routledge, 2006, pp. 135–187. Available: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://lib.myilibrary.com?id=80948
[47]
S. Banet-Weiser, ‘“Branding the Post-Feminist Self: Girls’ Video Production and YouTube”’, in Mediated girlhoods: new explorations of girls’ media culture, New York: Peter Lang, 2011, pp. 277–294.
[48]
H. Wood, ‘The mediated conversational floor: an interactive approach to audience reception analysis’, Media, Culture & Society, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 75–103, Jan. 2007, doi: 10.1177/0163443706072000
[49]
T. Jensen, ‘"Watching with my hands over my eyes”: Shame and irritation in ambivalent encounters with “Bad Mothers”’. Available: http://www.radicalpsychology.org/vol9-2/jensen.html
[50]
H. Wood, ‘Television is Happening: Methodological Considerations for Capturing Digital Television Reception"’, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 485–506, Nov. 2007, Available: http://gl9sn3dh2u.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Television+is+happening&rft.jtitle=European+Journal+of+Cultural+Studies&rft.au=Wood%2C+Helen&rft.date=2007-11-01&rft.pub=Sage+Publications&rft.issn=1367-5494&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=485&rft.epage=506&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10.1177%2F1367549407081956&paramdict=en-US
[51]
K. Gorton, Media audiences: television, meaning and emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2009. Available: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=10391726
[52]
R. Das, ‘Converging perspectives in audience studies and digital literacies: Youthful interpretations of an online genre’, European Journal of Communication, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 343–360, Dec. 2011, doi: 10.1177/0267323111423379
[53]
S. Livingstone and R. Das, ‘The End of Audiences? Theoretical Echoes of Reception amid the Uncertainties of Use’. Available: http://www.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/WhosWho/AcademicStaff/SoniaLivingstone/pdf/Livingstone-and-Das,-manuscript.pdf
[54]
M. Madianou and D. Miller, ‘Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 169–187, Mar. 2013, doi: 10.1177/1367877912452486
[55]
S. Livingstone, ‘The Challenge of Changing Audiences: Or, What is the Audience Researcher to do in the Age of the Internet?’, European Journal of Communication, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 75–86, Mar. 2004, doi: 10.1177/0267323104040695
[56]
R. Das, ‘Meaning at the Interface: New Genres, New Modes of Interpretative Engagement?’, The Communication Review, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 140–159, May 2010, doi: 10.1080/10714421003795535
[57]
‘Are We All Produsers Now?’, Available: http://www.tandfonline.com.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/doi/pdf/10.1080/09502386.2011.600532
[58]
Rosenbaum and m, ‘Psychosomatics’, vol. 39, no. Jan-feb.
[59]
Rosenbaum and m, ‘Psychosomatics’, vol. 39, no. Jan-feb.