1.
Livingstone, S.: The changing nature of audiences : from the mass audience to the interactive media user - LSE Research Online. (2003).
2.
Highmore, B.: ‘Absentminded Media’. In: Ordinary lives: studies in the everyday. pp. 114–138. Routledge, London (2011).
3.
Livingstone, S.: On the continuing problems of media effects research - LSE Research Online, http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/21503/.
4.
Humphreys, S.: Productive Players: Online Computer Games’ Challenge to Conventional Media Forms. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies. 2, 37–51 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/1479142042000332116.
5.
Whitehouse-Hart, J.: Psychosocial explorations of film and television viewing: ordinary audience. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2014).
6.
Whitehouse-Hart, J.: Psychosocial explorations of film and television viewing: ordinary audience. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2014).
7.
Kearney, M.C.: ‘Grrrl Zines: Exploring Identity, Transforming Girls’ Written Culture’. In: Girls make media. pp. 135–187. Routledge, New York (2006).
8.
Wood, H.: The mediated conversational floor: an interactive approach to audience reception analysis. Media, Culture & Society. 29, 75–103 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443706072000.
9.
Das, R.: Converging perspectives in audience studies and digital literacies: Youthful interpretations of an online genre. European Journal of Communication. 26, 343–360 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323111423379.
10.
Butsch, R., Livingstone, S.M.: Meanings of audiences: comparative discourses. Routledge, Abingdon (2014).
11.
various: Rethinking the Media Audience: The New Agenda. (1999).
12.
Brooker, W., Jermyn, D.: The audience studies reader. Routledge, London (2003).
13.
Dickinson, R., Linne, O., Harindranath, R.: Approaches to audiences: a reader. Arnold, London (1998).
14.
Gauntlett, D.: Moving experiences: understanding television’s influences and effects. John Libbey, London (1995).
15.
McQuail, D.: McQuail’s mass communication theory. SAGE, Los Angeles, Calif (2010).
16.
Andrew Ruddock: Understanding Audiences: Theory and Method. SAGE (2001).
17.
Benjamin, W., Arendt, H.: Illuminations. Pimlico, London (1999).
18.
Benjamin, W., Tiedemann, R.: The Arcades Project. Belknap Press, Cambridge, Mass (1999).
19.
Recommended: application of theory of reception as distraction.
20.
Livingstone, S.: On the continuing problems of media effects research - LSE Research Online, http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/21503/.
21.
Dickinson, R., Linne, O., Harindranath, R.: Approaches to audiences: a reader. Arnold, London (1998).
22.
O’Neill, B.: Media Effects in Context. In: The handbook of media audiences. pp. 320–339. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444340525.ch16.
23.
David Gauntlett - Ten things wrong with the media ‘effects’ model, http://www.theory.org.uk/david/effects.htm.
24.
Morgan, M., Shanahan, J.: The State of Cultivation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 54, 337–355 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151003735018.
25.
Potter, W.J.: A Critical Analysis of Cultivation Theory. Journal of Communication. 64, 1015–1036 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12128.
26.
Gerbner, G.: Cultivation Analysis: An Overview. Mass Communication and Society. 1, 175–194 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.1998.9677855.
27.
Bandura, A.: Influence of models’ reinforcement contingencies on the acquisition of imitative responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1, 589–595 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022070.
28.
Humphreys, S.: Productive Players: Online Computer Games’ Challenge to Conventional Media Forms. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies. 2, 37–51 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/1479142042000332116.
29.
van Dijck, J.: Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media, Culture & Society. 31, 41–58 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443708098245.
30.
Whitehouse-Hart, J.: Psychosocial explorations of film and television viewing: ordinary audience. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2014).
31.
Seiter, E.: Making distinctions in TV audience research: Case study of a troubling interview. Cultural Studies. 4, 61–84 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1080/09502389000490051.
32.
Ortega Breton, H.: A psycho-cultural approach to radio listening and creative production. Radio Journal:International Studies in Broadcast & Audio Media. 11, 75–90 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1386/rjao.11.1.75_1.
33.
On Not Being a Fan: Masculine Identity, DVD Culture and the Accidental Collector | Bainbridge | Wide Screen, http://widescreenjournal.org/index.php/journal/article/view/41.
34.
Jensen, T.: "Watching with my hands over my eyes”: Shame and irritation in ambivalent encounters with ‘Bad Mothers’, http://www.radicalpsychology.org/vol9-2/jensen.html.
35.
Recommended Sources / Reading.
36.
Stephen, F., Lisa, B.: Psychoanalysis and Psychosocial Studies. Psychoanalysis Culture and Society. 13, 346–365 (2008).
37.
Whitehouse-Hart, J.: Psychosocial explorations of film and television viewing: ordinary audience. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2014).
38.
Seiter, E.: Making distinctions in TV audience research: Case study of a troubling interview. Cultural Studies. 4, 61–84 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1080/09502389000490051.
39.
Jensen, T.: "Watching with my hands over my eyes”: Shame and irritation in ambivalent encounters with ‘Bad Mothers’, http://www.radicalpsychology.org/vol9-2/jensen.html.
40.
Chabot Davis, K.: An Ethnography of Political Identification: The Birmingham School Meets Psychoanalytic Theory. https://doi.org/10.1353/psy.2003.0009.
41.
various - collection: The gender and media reader. Routledge, London (2011).
42.
Rosenbaum, m: Psychosomatics. 39,.
43.
Hine, C.: Towards ethnography of television on the internet: A mobile strategy for exploring mundane interpretive activities. Media, Culture & Society. 33, 567–582 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443711401940.
44.
Moores, S.: Interpreting audiences: the ethnography of media consumption. Sage Publications, London (1993).
45.
Buckingham, D.: `Creative’ visual methods in media research: possibilities, problems and proposals. Media, Culture & Society. 31, 633–652 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443709335280.
46.
Kearney, M.C.: ‘Grrrl Zines: Exploring Identity, Transforming Girls’ Written Culture’. In: Girls make media. pp. 135–187. Routledge, New York (2006).
47.
Banet-Weiser, S.: ‘Branding the Post-Feminist Self: Girls’ Video Production and YouTube’. In: Mediated girlhoods: new explorations of girls’ media culture. pp. 277–294. Peter Lang, New York (2011).
48.
Wood, H.: The mediated conversational floor: an interactive approach to audience reception analysis. Media, Culture & Society. 29, 75–103 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443706072000.
49.
Jensen, T.: "Watching with my hands over my eyes”: Shame and irritation in ambivalent encounters with ‘Bad Mothers’, http://www.radicalpsychology.org/vol9-2/jensen.html.
50.
Wood, H.: Television is Happening: Methodological Considerations for Capturing Digital Television Reception". 10, 485–506 (2007).
51.
Gorton, K.: Media audiences: television, meaning and emotion. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (2009).
52.
Das, R.: Converging perspectives in audience studies and digital literacies: Youthful interpretations of an online genre. European Journal of Communication. 26, 343–360 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323111423379.
53.
Livingstone, S., Das, R.: The End of Audiences? Theoretical Echoes of Reception amid the Uncertainties of Use, http://www.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/WhosWho/AcademicStaff/SoniaLivingstone/pdf/Livingstone-and-Das,-manuscript.pdf.
54.
Madianou, M., Miller, D.: Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies. 16, 169–187 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877912452486.
55.
Livingstone, S.: The Challenge of Changing Audiences: Or, What is the Audience Researcher to do in the Age of the Internet? European Journal of Communication. 19, 75–86 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323104040695.
56.
Das, R.: Meaning at the Interface: New Genres, New Modes of Interpretative Engagement? The Communication Review. 13, 140–159 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421003795535.
57.
Are We All Produsers Now?
58.
Rosenbaum, m: Psychosomatics. 39,.
59.
Rosenbaum, m: Psychosomatics. 39,.
