1.
Livingstone, S. The changing nature of audiences : from the mass audience to the interactive media user - LSE Research Online. (2003).
2.
Highmore, B. ‘Absentminded Media’. in Ordinary lives: studies in the everyday 114–138 (Routledge, London, 2011).
3.
Livingstone, S. On the continuing problems of media effects research - LSE Research Online. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/21503/ (1996).
4.
Humphreys, S. Productive Players: Online Computer Games’ Challenge to Conventional Media Forms. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 2, 37–51 (2005).
5.
Whitehouse-Hart, J. Psychosocial Explorations of Film and Television Viewing: Ordinary Audience. vol. Studies in the psychosocial (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 2014).
6.
Whitehouse-Hart, J. Psychosocial Explorations of Film and Television Viewing: Ordinary Audience. vol. Studies in the psychosocial (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 2014).
7.
Kearney, M. C. ‘Grrrl Zines: Exploring Identity, Transforming Girls’ Written Culture’. in Girls make media 135–187 (Routledge, New York, 2006).
8.
Wood, H. The mediated conversational floor: an interactive approach to audience reception analysis. Media, Culture & Society 29, 75–103 (2007).
9.
Das, R. Converging perspectives in audience studies and digital literacies: Youthful interpretations of an online genre. European Journal of Communication 26, 343–360 (2011).
10.
Butsch, R. & Livingstone, S. M. Meanings of Audiences: Comparative Discourses. (Routledge, Abingdon, 2014).
11.
various. Rethinking the Media Audience: The New Agenda. (1999).
12.
Brooker, W. & Jermyn, D. The Audience Studies Reader. (Routledge, London, 2003).
13.
Dickinson, R., Linne, O. & Harindranath, R. Approaches to Audiences: A Reader. vol. Foundations in media (Arnold, London, 1998).
14.
Gauntlett, D. Moving Experiences: Understanding Television’s Influences and Effects. vol. Acamedia research monographs (John Libbey, London, 1995).
15.
McQuail, D. McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory. (SAGE, Los Angeles, Calif, 2010).
16.
Andrew Ruddock. Understanding Audiences: Theory and Method. (SAGE, 2001).
17.
Benjamin, W. & Arendt, H. Illuminations. vol. Pimlico (Pimlico, London, 1999).
18.
Benjamin, W. & Tiedemann, R. The Arcades Project. (Belknap Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1999).
19.
Recommended: application of theory of reception as distraction.
20.
Livingstone, S. On the continuing problems of media effects research - LSE Research Online. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/21503/ (1996).
21.
Dickinson, R., Linne, O. & Harindranath, R. Approaches to Audiences: A Reader. vol. Foundations in media (Arnold, London, 1998).
22.
O’Neill, B. Media Effects in Context. in The handbook of media audiences vol. Global handbooks in media and communication research 320–339 (Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, 2011).
23.
David Gauntlett - Ten things wrong with the media ‘effects’ model. http://www.theory.org.uk/david/effects.htm.
24.
Morgan, M. & Shanahan, J. The State of Cultivation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 54, 337–355 (2010).
25.
Potter, W. J. A Critical Analysis of Cultivation Theory. Journal of Communication 64, 1015–1036 (2014).
26.
Gerbner, G. Cultivation Analysis: An Overview. Mass Communication and Society 1, 175–194 (1998).
27.
Bandura, A. Influence of models’ reinforcement contingencies on the acquisition of imitative responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1, 589–595 (1965).
28.
Humphreys, S. Productive Players: Online Computer Games’ Challenge to Conventional Media Forms. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 2, 37–51 (2005).
29.
van Dijck, J. Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media, Culture & Society 31, 41–58 (2009).
30.
Whitehouse-Hart, J. Psychosocial Explorations of Film and Television Viewing: Ordinary Audience. vol. Studies in the psychosocial (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 2014).
31.
Seiter, E. Making distinctions in TV audience research: Case study of a troubling interview. Cultural Studies 4, 61–84 (1990).
32.
Ortega Breton, H. A psycho-cultural approach to radio listening and creative production. Radio Journal:International Studies in Broadcast & Audio Media 11, 75–90 (2013).
33.
On Not Being a Fan: Masculine Identity, DVD Culture and the Accidental Collector | Bainbridge | Wide Screen. http://widescreenjournal.org/index.php/journal/article/view/41.
34.
Jensen, T. "Watching with my hands over my eyes”: Shame and irritation in ambivalent encounters with ‘Bad Mothers’. http://www.radicalpsychology.org/vol9-2/jensen.html.
35.
Recommended Sources / Reading.
36.
Stephen, F. & Lisa, B. Psychoanalysis and Psychosocial Studies. Psychoanalysis Culture and Society 13, 346–365 (2008).
37.
Whitehouse-Hart, J. Psychosocial Explorations of Film and Television Viewing: Ordinary Audience. vol. Studies in the psychosocial (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 2014).
38.
Seiter, E. Making distinctions in TV audience research: Case study of a troubling interview. Cultural Studies 4, 61–84 (1990).
39.
Jensen, T. "Watching with my hands over my eyes”: Shame and irritation in ambivalent encounters with ‘Bad Mothers’. http://www.radicalpsychology.org/vol9-2/jensen.html.
40.
Chabot Davis, K. An Ethnography of Political Identification: The Birmingham School Meets Psychoanalytic Theory. doi:10.1353/psy.2003.0009.
41.
various - collection. The Gender and Media Reader. (Routledge, London, 2011).
42.
Rosenbaum & m. Psychosomatics. 39,.
43.
Hine, C. Towards ethnography of television on the internet: A mobile strategy for exploring mundane interpretive activities. Media, Culture & Society 33, 567–582 (2011).
44.
Moores, S. Interpreting Audiences: The Ethnography of Media Consumption. vol. The media, culture and society series (Sage Publications, London, 1993).
45.
Buckingham, D. `Creative’ visual methods in media research: possibilities, problems and proposals. Media, Culture & Society 31, 633–652 (2009).
46.
Kearney, M. C. ‘Grrrl Zines: Exploring Identity, Transforming Girls’ Written Culture’. in Girls make media 135–187 (Routledge, New York, 2006).
47.
Banet-Weiser, S. ‘Branding the Post-Feminist Self: Girls’ Video Production and YouTube’. in Mediated girlhoods: new explorations of girls’ media culture vol. Mediated youth 277–294 (Peter Lang, New York, 2011).
48.
Wood, H. The mediated conversational floor: an interactive approach to audience reception analysis. Media, Culture & Society 29, 75–103 (2007).
49.
Jensen, T. "Watching with my hands over my eyes”: Shame and irritation in ambivalent encounters with ‘Bad Mothers’. http://www.radicalpsychology.org/vol9-2/jensen.html.
50.
Wood, H. Television is Happening: Methodological Considerations for Capturing Digital Television Reception". 10, 485–506 (2007).
51.
Gorton, K. Media Audiences: Television, Meaning and Emotion. (Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 2009).
52.
Das, R. Converging perspectives in audience studies and digital literacies: Youthful interpretations of an online genre. European Journal of Communication 26, 343–360 (2011).
53.
Livingstone, S. & Das, R. The End of Audiences? Theoretical Echoes of Reception amid the Uncertainties of Use. http://www.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/WhosWho/AcademicStaff/SoniaLivingstone/pdf/Livingstone-and-Das,-manuscript.pdf.
54.
Madianou, M. & Miller, D. Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies 16, 169–187 (2013).
55.
Livingstone, S. The Challenge of Changing Audiences: Or, What is the Audience Researcher to do in the Age of the Internet? European Journal of Communication 19, 75–86 (2004).
56.
Das, R. Meaning at the Interface: New Genres, New Modes of Interpretative Engagement? The Communication Review 13, 140–159 (2010).
57.
Are We All Produsers Now?
58.
Rosenbaum & m. Psychosomatics. 39,.
59.
Rosenbaum & m. Psychosomatics. 39,.
