Andrew Ruddock. 2001. Understanding Audiences: Theory and Method. SAGE.
Are We All Produsers Now? n.d. http://www.tandfonline.com.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/doi/pdf/10.1080/09502386.2011.600532.
Bandura, Albert. 1965. ‘Influence of Models’ Reinforcement Contingencies on the Acquisition of Imitative Responses.’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1(6):589–95. doi:10.1037/h0022070.
Banet-Weiser, S. 2011. ‘“Branding the Post-Feminist Self: Girls’ Video Production and YouTube”’. Pp. 277–94 in Mediated girlhoods: new explorations of girls’ media culture. Vol. Mediated youth. New York: Peter Lang.
Benjamin, Walter, and Hannah Arendt. 1999. Illuminations. Vol. Pimlico. London: Pimlico.
Benjamin, Walter, and Rolf Tiedemann. 1999. The Arcades Project. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press.
Brooker, Will, and Deborah Jermyn. 2003. The Audience Studies Reader. London: Routledge.
Buckingham, D. 2009. ‘`Creative’ Visual Methods in Media Research: Possibilities, Problems and Proposals’. Media, Culture & Society 31(4):633–52. doi:10.1177/0163443709335280.
Butsch, Richard, and Sonia M. Livingstone. 2014. Meanings of Audiences: Comparative Discourses. Abingdon: Routledge.
Chabot Davis, Kimberly. n.d. ‘An Ethnography of Political Identification: The Birmingham School Meets Psychoanalytic Theory’. doi:10.1353/psy.2003.0009.
Das, Ranjana. 2010. ‘Meaning at the Interface: New Genres, New Modes of Interpretative Engagement?’ The Communication Review 13(2):140–59. doi:10.1080/10714421003795535.
Das, Ranjana. 2011a. ‘Converging Perspectives in Audience Studies and Digital Literacies: Youthful Interpretations of an Online Genre’. European Journal of Communication 26(4):343–60. doi:10.1177/0267323111423379.
Das, Ranjana. 2011b. ‘Converging Perspectives in Audience Studies and Digital Literacies: Youthful Interpretations of an Online Genre’. European Journal of Communication 26(4):343–60. doi:10.1177/0267323111423379.
David Gauntlett - Ten things wrong with the media ‘effects’ model. n.d. http://www.theory.org.uk/david/effects.htm.
Dickinson, Roger, O. Linne, and Ramaswami Harindranath. 1998a. Approaches to Audiences: A Reader. Vol. Foundations in media. London: Arnold.
Dickinson, Roger, O. Linne, and Ramaswami Harindranath. 1998b. Approaches to Audiences: A Reader. Vol. Foundations in media. London: Arnold.
van Dijck, J. 2009. ‘Users like You? Theorizing Agency in User-Generated Content’. Media, Culture & Society 31(1):41–58. doi:10.1177/0163443708098245.
Gauntlett, David. 1995. Moving Experiences: Understanding Television’s Influences and Effects. Vol. Acamedia research monographs. London: John Libbey.
Gerbner, George. 1998. ‘Cultivation Analysis: An Overview’. Mass Communication and Society 1(3–4):175–94. doi:10.1080/15205436.1998.9677855.
Gorton, Kristyn. 2009. Media Audiences: Television, Meaning and Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Highmore, B. 2011. ‘“Absentminded Media”’. Pp. 114–38 in Ordinary lives: studies in the everyday. London: Routledge.
Hine, C. 2011. ‘Towards Ethnography of Television on the Internet: A Mobile Strategy for Exploring Mundane Interpretive Activities’. Media, Culture & Society 33(4):567–82. doi:10.1177/0163443711401940.
Humphreys, Sal. 2005a. ‘Productive Players: Online Computer Games’ Challenge to Conventional Media Forms’. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 2(1):37–51. doi:10.1080/1479142042000332116.
Humphreys, Sal. 2005b. ‘Productive Players: Online Computer Games’ Challenge to Conventional Media Forms’. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 2(1):37–51. doi:10.1080/1479142042000332116.
Jensen, Tracey. n.d.-a. ‘"Watching with My Hands over My Eyes”: Shame and Irritation in Ambivalent Encounters with “Bad Mothers”’. http://www.radicalpsychology.org/vol9-2/jensen.html.
Jensen, Tracey. n.d.-b. ‘"Watching with My Hands over My Eyes”: Shame and Irritation in Ambivalent Encounters with “Bad Mothers”’. http://www.radicalpsychology.org/vol9-2/jensen.html.
Jensen, Tracey. n.d.-c. ‘"Watching with My Hands over My Eyes”: Shame and Irritation in Ambivalent Encounters with “Bad Mothers”’. http://www.radicalpsychology.org/vol9-2/jensen.html.
Kearney, M. C. 2006a. ‘“Grrrl Zines: Exploring Identity, Transforming Girls’ Written Culture”’. Pp. 135–87 in Girls make media. New York: Routledge.
Kearney, M. C. 2006b. ‘“Grrrl Zines: Exploring Identity, Transforming Girls’ Written Culture”’. Pp. 135–87 in Girls make media. New York: Routledge.
Livingstone, Sonia. 1996a. ‘On the Continuing Problems of Media Effects Research - LSE Research Online’. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/21503/.
Livingstone, Sonia. 1996b. ‘On the Continuing Problems of Media Effects Research - LSE Research Online’. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/21503/.
Livingstone, Sonia. 2003. ‘The Changing Nature of Audiences : From the Mass Audience to the Interactive Media User - LSE Research Online’. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/417/.
Livingstone, Sonia. 2004. ‘The Challenge of Changing Audiences: Or, What Is the Audience Researcher to Do in the Age of the Internet?’ European Journal of Communication 19(1):75–86. doi:10.1177/0267323104040695.
Livingstone, Sonia, and Ranjana Das. n.d. ‘The End of Audiences? Theoretical Echoes of Reception amid the Uncertainties of Use’. http://www.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/WhosWho/AcademicStaff/SoniaLivingstone/pdf/Livingstone-and-Das,-manuscript.pdf.
Madianou, M., and D. Miller. 2013. ‘Polymedia: Towards a New Theory of Digital Media in Interpersonal Communication’. International Journal of Cultural Studies 16(2):169–87. doi:10.1177/1367877912452486.
McQuail, Denis. 2010. McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory. 6th ed. Los Angeles, Calif: SAGE.
Moores, Shaun. 1993. Interpreting Audiences: The Ethnography of Media Consumption. Vol. The media, culture and society series. London: Sage Publications.
Morgan, Michael, and James Shanahan. 2010. ‘The State of Cultivation’. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 54(2):337–55. doi:10.1080/08838151003735018.
On Not Being a Fan: Masculine Identity, DVD Culture and the Accidental Collector | Bainbridge | Wide Screen. n.d. http://widescreenjournal.org/index.php/journal/article/view/41.
O’Neill, Brian. 2011. ‘Media Effects in Context’. Pp. 320–39 in The handbook of media audiences. Vol. Global handbooks in media and communication research. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Ortega Breton, Hugh. 2013. ‘A Psycho-Cultural Approach to Radio Listening and Creative Production’. Radio Journal:International Studies in Broadcast & Audio Media 11(1):75–90. doi:10.1386/rjao.11.1.75_1.
Potter, W. James. 2014. ‘A Critical Analysis of Cultivation Theory’. Journal of Communication 64(6):1015–36. doi:10.1111/jcom.12128.
Recommended: application of theory of reception as distraction. n.d.
Recommended Sources / Reading. n.d.
Rosenbaum, and m. n.d.-a. ‘Psychosomatics’. 39(Jan-feb).
Rosenbaum, and m. n.d.-b. ‘Psychosomatics’. 39(Jan-feb).
Rosenbaum, and m. n.d.-c. ‘Psychosomatics’. 39(Jan-feb).
Seiter, Ellen. 1990a. ‘Making Distinctions in TV Audience Research: Case Study of a Troubling Interview’. Cultural Studies 4(1):61–84. doi:10.1080/09502389000490051.
Seiter, Ellen. 1990b. ‘Making Distinctions in TV Audience Research: Case Study of a Troubling Interview’. Cultural Studies 4(1):61–84. doi:10.1080/09502389000490051.
Stephen, Frosh, and Baraitser Lisa. 2008. ‘Psychoanalysis and Psychosocial Studies’. Psychoanalysis Culture and Society 13(4):346–65.
various. 1999. Rethinking the Media Audience: The New Agenda. edited by Alasuutari, Pertti.
various - collection. 2011. The Gender and Media Reader. edited by Mary Celeste Kearney. London: Routledge.
Whitehouse-Hart, Jo. 2014a. Psychosocial Explorations of Film and Television Viewing: Ordinary Audience. Vol. Studies in the psychosocial. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Whitehouse-Hart, Jo. 2014b. Psychosocial Explorations of Film and Television Viewing: Ordinary Audience. Vol. Studies in the psychosocial. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Whitehouse-Hart, Jo. 2014c. Psychosocial Explorations of Film and Television Viewing: Ordinary Audience. Vol. Studies in the psychosocial. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Whitehouse-Hart, Jo. 2014d. Psychosocial Explorations of Film and Television Viewing: Ordinary Audience. Vol. Studies in the psychosocial. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wood, H. 2007a. ‘The Mediated Conversational Floor: An Interactive Approach to Audience Reception Analysis’. Media, Culture & Society 29(1):75–103. doi:10.1177/0163443706072000.
Wood, H. 2007b. ‘The Mediated Conversational Floor: An Interactive Approach to Audience Reception Analysis’. Media, Culture & Society 29(1):75–103. doi:10.1177/0163443706072000.
Wood, Helen. 2007. ‘Television Is Happening: Methodological Considerations for Capturing Digital Television Reception"’. 10(4):485–506. http://gl9sn3dh2u.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Television+is+happening&rft.jtitle=European+Journal+of+Cultural+Studies&rft.au=Wood%2C+Helen&rft.date=2007-11-01&rft.pub=Sage+Publications&rft.issn=1367-5494&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=485&rft.epage=506&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10.1177%2F1367549407081956&paramdict=en-US.