1.
Mintzberg, H.: The Strategy Concept I: Five Ps For Strategy. California Management Review. 30, 11–24 (1987).
2.
Whitley, R.: Eastern Asian Enterprise Structures and the Comparative Analysis of Forms of Business Organization. Organization Studies. 11, 47–74 (1990).
3.
Gavetti, G and Levinthal, D. A.: The Strategy Field from the Perspective. Management Science. 50, 1309–1318 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0282.
4.
Huff, A.: The Continuing Relevance of Strategy. Human Relations. 54, 123–130 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726701541015.
5.
Chaffee, E. E.: Three Models of Strategy. Academy of Management Review. 10, 89–98 (1985). https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1985.4277354.
6.
Grant, R.M. and Jordan, J.: Extract from Chapter 1 - Closing Case: The King of Shaves. In: Foundations of strategy. Wiley, Hoboken, N.J. (2012).
7.
Cummings, S.: Shifting foundations: redrawing strategic management’s military heritage. Critical perspectives on international business. 3, 41–62 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1108/17422040710722551.
8.
Hoskisson, R. E.: Theory and research in strategic management: Swings of a pendulum. Journal of Management. 25, 417–456 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639902500307.
9.
Cummings, S. and Daellenbach, U.: A Guide to the Future of Strategy? Long Range Planning. 42, 234–263 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2008.12.005.
10.
McKiernan, P.: Strategy past; strategy futures. Long Range Planning. 30, 790–798 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(97)00080-0.
11.
Collins, J. and Porras, J.: ‘Organizational Vision and Visionary Organizations’. California Management Review. 34, 30–52 (1991).
12.
Hill, T. and Westbrook, R.: SWOT analysis: It’s time for a product recall. Long Range Planning. 30, 46–52 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(96)00095-7.
13.
IKEA Case Study, https://blackboard.le.ac.uk/bbcswebdav/xid-3897695_2.
14.
Liedtka, J.: In Defence of Strategy as Design’,. California Management Review. 42, 8–30 (2000).
15.
Weihrich, H.: The TOWS matrix—A tool for situational analysis. Long Range Planning. 15, 54–66 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(82)90120-0.
16.
Langley, A.: The roles of formal strategic planning. Long Range Planning. 21, 40–50 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(88)90032-5.
17.
Mintzberg, H.: Rethinking strategic planning part I: Pitfalls and fallacies. Long Range Planning. 27, 12–21 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(94)90185-6.
18.
Mintzberg, H.: Crafting Strategy. Harvard Business Review. 66–75 (1987).
19.
Cyert, R. and March, J.: Organizational Factors in the Theory of Oligopoly. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 70, 44–64 (1956).
20.
Stacey, R.: Strategy as order emerging from chaos. Long Range Planning. 26, 10–17 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(93)90228-8.
21.
Hodgkinson, G. P. and Healey, M. P.: Toward a (Pragmatic) Science of Strategic Intervention: Design Propositions for Scenario Planning. Organization Studies. 29, 435–457 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607088022.
22.
Schoemaker, P.: Scenario planning: a tool for strategic thinking. Sloan Management Review. 36, 25–36 (1995).
23.
Goold, M., Campbell, A. and Alexander, M.: Corporate strategy and parenting theory. Long Range Planning. 31, 308–314 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(98)00017-X.
24.
Hedley, B.: Strategy and the "business portfolio”. Long Range Planning. 10, 9–15 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(77)90042-5.
25.
Paroutis, S. and Pettigrew, A.: Strategizing in the multi-business firm: Strategy teams at multiple levels and over time. Human Relations. 60, 99–135 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726707075285.
26.
Hitt, M., Tihanyi, L., Miller, T. and Connelly, B.: International Diversification: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators. Journal of Management. 32, 831–867 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306293575.
27.
Khanna, T. and Palepu, K.: Policy Shocks, Market Intermediaries, and Corporate Strategy: The Evolution of Business Groups in Chile and India. Journal of Economics Management Strategy. 8, 271–310 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1430-9134.1999.00271.x.
28.
Morrison, A. and Wensley, R.: Boxing up or Boxed in?: A Short History of the Boston Consulting Group Share/ Growth Matrix. Journal of Marketing Management. 7, 105–129 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.1991.9964145.
29.
Barney, J.: ‘Types of Competition and the Theory of Strategy: Toward an Integrative Framework’. Academy of Management Review. 11, 791–800 (1986).
30.
Porter, M.: The Five Competitive Forces that Shape Strategy. Harvard Business Review. 78–84 (2008).
31.
Bowman, C.: ‘Generic Strategies: A Substitute for Thinking?’ 360, The Ashridge Journal. 6–11 (2008).
32.
Porter, M.: How Information gives you competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review. 149–174 (1985).
33.
Grant, R.M. and Jordan, J.: Extract from Chapter 7 - Diversification at Disney. In: Foundations of strategy. Wiley, Hoboken, N.J. (2012).
34.
Stonehouse, G. and Snowdon, B.: Competitive Advantage Revisited: Michael Porter on Strategy and Competitiveness. Journal of Management Inquiry. 16, 256–273 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492607306333.
35.
Argyres, N. and McGahan, A. M.: Introduction: Michael Porter’s Competitive Strategy. Academy of Management Executive. 16, 41–42 (2002).
36.
Miller, A. and Dess, G.: Assessing Porter’s (1980) Model in terms of its Generalizability, Accuracy and Simplicity. Journal of Management Studies. 30, 553–585 (1993).
37.
Wernerfelt, B.: A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal. 5, 171–180 (1984).
38.
Hamel, G. and Prahalad, C.: Strategic Intent. Harvard Business Review. 67, 63–76 (1989).
39.
Prahalad, C. K. and Hamel, G.: The Core Competence of the Corporation. Harvard Business Review. 79–91 (1990).
40.
Hamel, G. and Prahalad, C.: Strategy as Stretch and Leverage. Harvard Business Review. 71, 75–84 (1993).
41.
Kor, Y. and Mahoney, J.: Edith Penrose’s (1959) Contributions to the Resource-based View of Strategic Management. Journal of Management Studies. 41, 183–191 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00427.x.
42.
Barney, J.: Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management. 17, 99–120 (1991).
43.
Prahalad, C. K. and Hamel, G.: Strategy as a field of study: Why search for a new paradigm? Strategic Management Journal. 15, 5–16 (2007).
44.
Mantere, S. and Sillince, J.: Strategic intent as a rhetorical device. Scandinavian Journal of Management. 23, 406–423 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2007.03.002.
45.
Kim, W. and Mauborgne, R.: Blue Ocean Strategy. Harvard Business Strategy. 76–84 (2004).
46.
Christensen, C. and Overdorf, M.: Meeting the Challenge of Disruptive Change. Harvard Business Review. 67–76 (2000).
47.
Prahalad, C. K.: The Blinders of Dominant Logic. Long Range Planning. 37, 171–179 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2004.01.010.
48.
Prahalad, C. K. and Ramaswamy, V.: Co‐creating unique value with customers. Strategy & Leadership. 32, 4–9 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1108/10878570410699249.
49.
Grant, R.M. and Jordan J., Grant, R. and Jordan J.: Extract from Chapter 4 - The Rise and Fall of Starbucks. In: Foundations of strategy. Wiley, Hoboken, N.J. (2012).
50.
Bovel, D. and Martha, J.: FROM SUPPLY CHAIN TO VALUE NET. Journal of Business Strategy. 21, 24–28 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1108/eb040101.
51.
Ezzamel, M. and Willmott, H.: Strategy as Discourse in a Global Retailer: A Supplement to Rationalist and Interpretive Accounts. Organization Studies. 29, 191–217 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607082226.
52.
Knights, D. and Morgan, G.: ‘Corporate Strategy, Organizations, and Subjectivity: A Critique’. Organization Studies. 12, 251–273 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069101200205.
53.
A Guide to the Future of Strategy? Long Range Planning. 42, 234–263 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2008.12.005.
54.
Dess, G., Peng, M., and Lei, D.: Strategic Management: Current Issues and Future Directions. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies. 20, 373–374 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051812471859.