1.
Catchpole KR. A multicenter trial of avaiation-style training for surgical teams. Journal of patient Safety. 2010;6(3).
2.
Smith CD, Spackman T, Brommer K, Stewart MW, Vizzini M, Frye J, et al. Re-Engineering the Operating Room Using Variability Methodology to Improve Health Care Value. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2013 Apr;216(4):559–68.
3.
Effect of a ‘Lean’ intervention to improve safety processes and outcomes on a surgical emergency unit. BMJ. 2010 Nov 12;341(nov12 1):c6435–c6435.
4.
BEVAN G, HOOD C. WHAT’S MEASURED IS WHAT MATTERS: TARGETS AND GAMING IN THE ENGLISH PUBLIC HEALTH CARE SYSTEM. Public Administration. 2006 Aug 15;84(3):517–38.
5.
Dixon-Woods M, Yeung K, Bosk CL. Why is UK medicine no longer a self-regulating profession? The role of scandals involving "bad apple” doctors. Social Science & Medicine. 2011 Nov;73(10):1452–9.
6.
McLaughlin K, Osborne SP, Ferlie E. New public management: current trends and future prospects [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2002. Available from: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=235293
7.
Gabe J, Exworthy M, Jones IR, Smith G. Towards a Sociology of Disclosure: The Case of Surgical Performance. Sociology Compass. 2012 Nov;6(11):908–22.
8.
How to Determine the Best Interventions for Clinical Quality Improvement Projects [Internet]. Available from: https://www.healthcatalyst.com/best-clinical-interventions
9.
Dena M Bravata. Methods. 2007; Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK43976/
10.
Result List: (SO (Harvard business review.))AND(DT 2000)AND(TI "communities...: EBSCOhost [Internet]. Available from: http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/results?sid=044469a5-943a-44be-96c4-1e3a9c6de052%40sessionmgr120&vid=0&hid=124&bquery=(SO+(Harvard+business+review.))AND(DT+2000)AND(TI+%22communities+of+practice%3a+the+organizational+frontier%22)&bdata=JmRiPWJ1aCZ0eXBlPTEmc2l0ZT1laG9zdC1saXZl
11.
Bate, S.P.1Robert, G.1. Knowledge management and communities of practice in the private sector: lessons for modernizing the National Health Service in England and Wales. Public Administration [Internet]. 2002;80(4):643–63. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bah&AN=8738560&site=ehost-live
12.
Aveling E, Martin G, Armstrong N, Banerjee J, Dixon‐Woods M. Quality improvement through clinical communities: eight lessons for practice. Journal of Health Organization and Management. 2012 May 18;26(2):158–74.
13.
NADEEM E, OLIN SS, HILL LC, HOAGWOOD KE, HORWITZ SM. Understanding the Components of Quality Improvement Collaboratives: A Systematic Literature Review. Milbank Quarterly. 2013 Jun;91(2):354–94.
14.
Quality Measurement: Beginner’s Guide to Performance Quality Improvement Using the Model for Improvement - ClinicalKey [Internet]. Available from: https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/playContent/1-s2.0-S1546144014005110?returnurl=null&referrer=null
15.
Institute for Healthcare Improvement: How to Improve [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/HowtoImprove/default.aspx
16.
Siri Steinmo. Characterising an implementation intervention in terms of behaviour change techniques and theory: the ‘Sepsis Six’ clinical care bundle. Implementation Science : IS [Internet]. 2015;10. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4529730/
17.
James Cane. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implementation Science : IS [Internet]. 2012;7. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3483008/
18.
Siri H. Steinmo. Bridging the gap between pragmatic intervention design and theory: using behavioural science tools to modify an existing quality improvement programme to implement "Sepsis Six”. Implementation Science : IS [Internet]. 2015;11. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4739425/
19.
Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science. 2011 Dec;6(1).
20.
Benneyan JC. Statistical process control as a tool for research and healthcare improvement. Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2003 Dec 1;12(6):458–64.
21.
But the Limits Are Too Wide! | Quality Digest [Internet]. Available from: https://www.qualitydigest.com/inside/quality-insider-column/limits-are-too-wide.html
22.
Iyer SB, Schubert CJ, Schoettker PJ, Reeves SD. Use of Quality-Improvement Methods to Improve Timeliness of Analgesic Delivery. PEDIATRICS. 2011 Jan 1;127(1):e219–25.
23.
Mohammed MA. Using statistical process control to improve the quality of health care. Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2004 Aug 1;13(4):243–5.
24.
Thor J, Lundberg J, Ask J, Olsson J, Carli C, Harenstam KP, et al. Application of statistical process control in healthcare improvement: systematic review. Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2007 Oct 1;16(5):387–99.
25.
Mary Dixon-Woods. Explaining Matching Michigan: an ethnographic study of a patient safety program. Implementation Science : IS [Internet]. 2013;8. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3704826/
26.
Dixon-Woods M, McNicol S, Martin G. Ten challenges in improving quality in healthcare: lessons from the Health Foundation’s programme evaluations and relevant literature: Table 1. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2012 Oct;21(10):876–84.
27.
Plsek PE, Greenhalgh T. Complexity science: The challenge of complexity in health care. BMJ. 2001 Sep 15;323(7313):625–8.
28.
Laura J Damschroder. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science : IS [Internet]. 2009;4. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2736161/
29.
Perspectives on context | The Health Foundation [Internet]. Available from: http://www.health.org.uk/publication/perspectives-context
30.
Goodman D, Ogrinc G, Davies L, Baker GR, Barnsteiner J, Foster TC, et al. Explanation and elaboration of the SQUIRE (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence) Guidelines, V.2.0: examples of SQUIRE elements in the healthcare improvement literature. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2016 Dec;25(12):e7–e7.
31.
Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014 Mar 7;348(mar07 3):g1687–g1687.
32.
Ogrinc G, Davies L, Goodman D, Batalden P, Davidoff F, Stevens D. SQUIRE 2.0 (                              : revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process: Table 1. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2016 Dec;25(12):986–92.
33.
Kaplan HC, Provost LP, Froehle CM, Margolis PA. The Model for Understanding Success in Quality (MUSIQ): building a theory of context in healthcare quality improvement. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2012 Jan;21(1):13–20.
34.
Evaluation: what to consider | The Health Foundation [Internet]. Available from: http://www.health.org.uk/publication/evaluation-what-consider
35.
Loes M T Schouten. Evidence for the impact of quality improvement collaboratives: systematic review. BMJ : British Medical Journal [Internet]. 2008;336(7659). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2440907/
36.
Power M, Wigglesworth N, Donaldson E, Chadwick P, Gillibrand S, Goldmann D. Reducing Clostridium difficile infection in acute care by using an improvement collaborative. BMJ. 2010 Jul 21;341(jul21 2):c3359–c3359.
37.
Maxine Power. Did a quality improvement collaborative make stroke care better? A cluster randomized trial. Implementation Science : IS [Internet]. 2014;9. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3997843/
38.
Power M, Brewster L, Parry G, Brotherton A, Minion J, Ozieranski P, et al. Multimethod study of a large-scale programme to improve patient safety using a harm-free care approach. BMJ Open. 2016 Sep;6(9).
39.
Pam Carter. How collaborative are quality improvement collaboratives: a qualitative study in stroke care. Implementation Science : IS [Internet]. 2014;9. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3983902/
40.
Perla RJ, Provost LP, Parry GJ. Seven Propositions of the Science of Improvement. Quality Management in Health Care. 2013;22(3):170–86.
41.
Hammersley M, Atkinson P. Ethnography: principles in practice [Internet]. 3rd ed. London: Routledge; 2007. Available from: https://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=6003348860002746&institutionId=2746&customerId=2745
42.
Bryman A. Social research methods. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
43.
Waring J, Harrison S, Mcdonald R. A culture of safety or coping? Ritualistic behaviours in the operating theatre. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 2007 Apr;12(1_suppl):3–9.
44.
Trisha Greenhalgh. Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations: Systematic Review and Recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly [Internet]. 2004;82(4). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2690184/
45.
Buchanan D, Fitzgerald L, Ketley D, Gollop R, Jones JL, Lamont SS, et al. No going back: A review of the literature on sustaining organizational change. International Journal of Management Reviews. 2005 Sep;7(3):189–205.
46.
The Spread and Sustainability of QI in Healthcare : Quality Improvement – East London NHS Foundation Trust [Internet]. Available from: https://qi.elft.nhs.uk/resource/the-spread-and-sustainability-of-qi-in-healthcare/
47.
Sutcliffe KM, Paine L, Pronovost PJ. Re-examining high reliability: actively organising for safety. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2017 Mar;26(3):248–51.