1.
Catchpole, K.R.: A multicenter trial of avaiation-style training for surgical teams. Journal of patient Safety. 6, (2010). https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0b013e3181f100ea.
2.
Smith, C.D., Spackman, T., Brommer, K., Stewart, M.W., Vizzini, M., Frye, J., Rupp, W.C.: Re-Engineering the Operating Room Using Variability Methodology to Improve Health Care Value. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 216, 559–568 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.12.046.
3.
Effect of a ‘Lean’ intervention to improve safety processes and outcomes on a surgical emergency unit. BMJ. 341, c6435–c6435 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c6435.
4.
BEVAN, G., HOOD, C.: WHAT’S MEASURED IS WHAT MATTERS: TARGETS AND GAMING IN THE ENGLISH PUBLIC HEALTH CARE SYSTEM. Public Administration. 84, 517–538 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00600.x.
5.
Dixon-Woods, M., Yeung, K., Bosk, C.L.: Why is UK medicine no longer a self-regulating profession? The role of scandals involving "bad apple” doctors. Social Science & Medicine. 73, 1452–1459 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.08.031.
6.
McLaughlin, K., Osborne, S.P., Ferlie, E.: New public management: current trends and future prospects. Routledge, London (2002).
7.
Gabe, J., Exworthy, M., Jones, I.R., Smith, G.: Towards a Sociology of Disclosure: The Case of Surgical Performance. Sociology Compass. 6, 908–922 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2012.00490.x.
8.
How to Determine the Best Interventions for Clinical Quality Improvement Projects, https://www.healthcatalyst.com/best-clinical-interventions.
9.
Dena M Bravata: Methods. (2007).
10.
Result List: (SO (Harvard business review.))AND(DT 2000)AND(TI "communities...: EBSCOhost, http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/results?sid=044469a5-943a-44be-96c4-1e3a9c6de052%40sessionmgr120&vid=0&hid=124&bquery=(SO+(Harvard+business+review.))AND(DT+2000)AND(TI+%22communities+of+practice%3a+the+organizational+frontier%22)&bdata=JmRiPWJ1aCZ0eXBlPTEmc2l0ZT1laG9zdC1saXZl.
11.
Bate, S.P.1Robert, G.1: Knowledge management and communities of practice in the private sector: lessons for modernizing the National Health Service in England and Wales. Public Administration. 80, 643–663 (2002).
12.
Aveling, E., Martin, G., Armstrong, N., Banerjee, J., Dixon‐Woods, M.: Quality improvement through clinical communities: eight lessons for practice. Journal of Health Organization and Management. 26, 158–174 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1108/14777261211230754.
13.
NADEEM, E., OLIN, S.S., HILL, L.C., HOAGWOOD, K.E., HORWITZ, S.M.: Understanding the Components of Quality Improvement Collaboratives: A Systematic Literature Review. Milbank Quarterly. 91, 354–394 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/milq.12016.
14.
Quality Measurement: Beginner’s Guide to Performance Quality Improvement Using the Model for Improvement - ClinicalKey, https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/playContent/1-s2.0-S1546144014005110?returnurl=null&referrer=null.
15.
Institute for Healthcare Improvement: How to Improve, http://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/HowtoImprove/default.aspx.
16.
Siri Steinmo: Characterising an implementation intervention in terms of behaviour change techniques and theory: the ‘Sepsis Six’ clinical care bundle. Implementation Science : IS. 10, (2015). https://doi.org/doi:  10.1186/s13012-015-0300-7.
17.
James Cane: Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implementation Science : IS. 7, (2012). https://doi.org/doi:  10.1186/1748-5908-7-37.
18.
Siri H. Steinmo: Bridging the gap between pragmatic intervention design and theory: using behavioural science tools to modify an existing quality improvement programme to implement "Sepsis Six”. Implementation Science : IS. 11, (2015). https://doi.org/doi:  10.1186/s13012-016-0376-8.
19.
Michie, S., van Stralen, M.M., West, R.: The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science. 6, (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-42.
20.
Benneyan, J.C.: Statistical process control as a tool for research and healthcare improvement. Quality and Safety in Health Care. 12, 458–464 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.12.6.458.
21.
But the Limits Are Too Wide! | Quality Digest, https://www.qualitydigest.com/inside/quality-insider-column/limits-are-too-wide.html.
22.
Iyer, S.B., Schubert, C.J., Schoettker, P.J., Reeves, S.D.: Use of Quality-Improvement Methods to Improve Timeliness of Analgesic Delivery. PEDIATRICS. 127, e219–e225 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-0632.
23.
Mohammed, M.A.: Using statistical process control to improve the quality of health care. Quality and Safety in Health Care. 13, 243–245 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2004.011650.
24.
Thor, J., Lundberg, J., Ask, J., Olsson, J., Carli, C., Harenstam, K.P., Brommels, M.: Application of statistical process control in healthcare improvement: systematic review. Quality and Safety in Health Care. 16, 387–399 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2006.022194.
25.
Mary Dixon-Woods: Explaining Matching Michigan: an ethnographic study of a patient safety program. Implementation Science : IS. 8, (2013). https://doi.org/doi:  10.1186/1748-5908-8-70.
26.
Dixon-Woods, M., McNicol, S., Martin, G.: Ten challenges in improving quality in healthcare: lessons from the Health Foundation’s programme evaluations and relevant literature: Table 1. BMJ Quality & Safety. 21, 876–884 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000760.
27.
Plsek, P.E., Greenhalgh, T.: Complexity science: The challenge of complexity in health care. BMJ. 323, 625–628 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7313.625.
28.
Laura J Damschroder: Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science : IS. 4, (2009). https://doi.org/doi:  10.1186/1748-5908-4-50.
29.
Perspectives on context | The Health Foundation, http://www.health.org.uk/publication/perspectives-context.
30.
Goodman, D., Ogrinc, G., Davies, L., Baker, G.R., Barnsteiner, J., Foster, T.C., Gali, K., Hilden, J., Horwitz, L., Kaplan, H.C., Leis, J., Matulis, J.C., Michie, S., Miltner, R., Neily, J., Nelson, W.A., Niedner, M., Oliver, B., Rutman, L., Thomson, R., Thor, J.: Explanation and elaboration of the SQUIRE (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence) Guidelines, V.2.0: examples of SQUIRE elements in the healthcare improvement literature. BMJ Quality & Safety. 25, e7–e7 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004480.
31.
Hoffmann, T.C., Glasziou, P.P., Boutron, I., Milne, R., Perera, R., Moher, D., Altman, D.G., Barbour, V., Macdonald, H., Johnston, M., Lamb, S.E., Dixon-Woods, M., McCulloch, P., Wyatt, J.C., Chan, A.-W., Michie, S.: Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 348, g1687–g1687 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g1687.
32.
Ogrinc, G., Davies, L., Goodman, D., Batalden, P., Davidoff, F., Stevens, D.: SQUIRE 2.0 (                              : revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process: Table 1. BMJ Quality & Safety. 25, 986–992 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004411.
33.
Kaplan, H.C., Provost, L.P., Froehle, C.M., Margolis, P.A.: The Model for Understanding Success in Quality (MUSIQ): building a theory of context in healthcare quality improvement. BMJ Quality & Safety. 21, 13–20 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000010.
34.
Evaluation: what to consider | The Health Foundation, http://www.health.org.uk/publication/evaluation-what-consider.
35.
Loes M T Schouten: Evidence for the impact of quality improvement collaboratives: systematic review. BMJ : British Medical Journal. 336, (2008). https://doi.org/doi:  10.1136/bmj.39570.749884.BE.
36.
Power, M., Wigglesworth, N., Donaldson, E., Chadwick, P., Gillibrand, S., Goldmann, D.: Reducing Clostridium difficile infection in acute care by using an improvement collaborative. BMJ. 341, c3359–c3359 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c3359.
37.
Maxine Power: Did a quality improvement collaborative make stroke care better? A cluster randomized trial. Implementation Science : IS. 9, (2014). https://doi.org/doi:  10.1186/1748-5908-9-40.
38.
Power, M., Brewster, L., Parry, G., Brotherton, A., Minion, J., Ozieranski, P., McNicol, S., Harrison, A., Dixon-Woods, M.: Multimethod study of a large-scale programme to improve patient safety using a harm-free care approach. BMJ Open. 6, (2016). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011886.
39.
Pam Carter: How collaborative are quality improvement collaboratives: a qualitative study in stroke care. Implementation Science : IS. 9, (2014). https://doi.org/doi:  10.1186/1748-5908-9-32.
40.
Perla, R.J., Provost, L.P., Parry, G.J.: Seven Propositions of the Science of Improvement. Quality Management in Health Care. 22, 170–186 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1097/QMH.0b013e31829a6a15.
41.
Hammersley, M., Atkinson, P.: Ethnography: principles in practice. Routledge, London (2007).
42.
Bryman, A.: Social research methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).
43.
Waring, J., Harrison, S., Mcdonald, R.: A culture of safety or coping? Ritualistic behaviours in the operating theatre. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 12, 3–9 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1258/135581907780318347.
44.
Trisha Greenhalgh: Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations: Systematic Review and Recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly. 82, (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00325.x.
45.
Buchanan, D., Fitzgerald, L., Ketley, D., Gollop, R., Jones, J.L., Lamont, S.S., Neath, A., Whitby, E.: No going back: A review of the literature on sustaining organizational change. International Journal of Management Reviews. 7, 189–205 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2005.00111.x.
46.
The Spread and Sustainability of QI in Healthcare : Quality Improvement – East London NHS Foundation Trust, https://qi.elft.nhs.uk/resource/the-spread-and-sustainability-of-qi-in-healthcare/.
47.
Sutcliffe, K.M., Paine, L., Pronovost, P.J.: Re-examining high reliability: actively organising for safety. BMJ Quality & Safety. 26, 248–251 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004698.