1.
Catchpole, K. R. A multicenter trial of avaiation-style training for surgical teams. Journal of patient Safety 6, (2010).
2.
Smith, C. D. et al. Re-Engineering the Operating Room Using Variability Methodology to Improve Health Care Value. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 216, 559–568 (2013).
3.
Effect of a ‘Lean’ intervention to improve safety processes and outcomes on a surgical emergency unit. BMJ 341, c6435–c6435 (2010).
4.
BEVAN, G. & HOOD, C. WHAT’S MEASURED IS WHAT MATTERS: TARGETS AND GAMING IN THE ENGLISH PUBLIC HEALTH CARE SYSTEM. Public Administration 84, 517–538 (2006).
5.
Dixon-Woods, M., Yeung, K. & Bosk, C. L. Why is UK medicine no longer a self-regulating profession? The role of scandals involving "bad apple” doctors. Social Science & Medicine 73, 1452–1459 (2011).
6.
McLaughlin, K., Osborne, S. P. & Ferlie, E. New public management: current trends and future prospects. (Routledge, 2002).
7.
Gabe, J., Exworthy, M., Jones, I. R. & Smith, G. Towards a Sociology of Disclosure: The Case of Surgical Performance. Sociology Compass 6, 908–922 (2012).
8.
How to Determine the Best Interventions for Clinical Quality Improvement Projects. https://www.healthcatalyst.com/best-clinical-interventions.
9.
Dena M Bravata. Methods. (2007).
10.
Result List: (SO (Harvard business review.))AND(DT 2000)AND(TI "communities...: EBSCOhost. http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/results?sid=044469a5-943a-44be-96c4-1e3a9c6de052%40sessionmgr120&vid=0&hid=124&bquery=(SO+(Harvard+business+review.))AND(DT+2000)AND(TI+%22communities+of+practice%3a+the+organizational+frontier%22)&bdata=JmRiPWJ1aCZ0eXBlPTEmc2l0ZT1laG9zdC1saXZl.
11.
Bate, S.P.1Robert, G.1. Knowledge management and communities of practice in the private sector: lessons for modernizing the National Health Service in England and Wales. Public Administration 80, 643–663 (2002).
12.
Aveling, E., Martin, G., Armstrong, N., Banerjee, J. & Dixon‐Woods, M. Quality improvement through clinical communities: eight lessons for practice. Journal of Health Organization and Management 26, 158–174 (2012).
13.
NADEEM, E., OLIN, S. S., HILL, L. C., HOAGWOOD, K. E. & HORWITZ, S. M. Understanding the Components of Quality Improvement Collaboratives: A Systematic Literature Review. Milbank Quarterly 91, 354–394 (2013).
14.
Quality Measurement: Beginner’s Guide to Performance Quality Improvement Using the Model for Improvement - ClinicalKey. https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/playContent/1-s2.0-S1546144014005110?returnurl=null&referrer=null.
15.
Institute for Healthcare Improvement: How to Improve. http://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/HowtoImprove/default.aspx.
16.
Siri Steinmo. Characterising an implementation intervention in terms of behaviour change techniques and theory: the ‘Sepsis Six’ clinical care bundle. Implementation Science : IS 10, (2015).
17.
James Cane. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implementation Science : IS 7, (2012).
18.
Siri H. Steinmo. Bridging the gap between pragmatic intervention design and theory: using behavioural science tools to modify an existing quality improvement programme to implement "Sepsis Six”. Implementation Science : IS 11, (2015).
19.
Michie, S., van Stralen, M. M. & West, R. The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science 6, (2011).
20.
Benneyan, J. C. Statistical process control as a tool for research and healthcare improvement. Quality and Safety in Health Care 12, 458–464 (2003).
21.
But the Limits Are Too Wide! | Quality Digest. https://www.qualitydigest.com/inside/quality-insider-column/limits-are-too-wide.html.
22.
Iyer, S. B., Schubert, C. J., Schoettker, P. J. & Reeves, S. D. Use of Quality-Improvement Methods to Improve Timeliness of Analgesic Delivery. PEDIATRICS 127, e219–e225 (2011).
23.
Mohammed, M. A. Using statistical process control to improve the quality of health care. Quality and Safety in Health Care 13, 243–245 (2004).
24.
Thor, J. et al. Application of statistical process control in healthcare improvement: systematic review. Quality and Safety in Health Care 16, 387–399 (2007).
25.
Mary Dixon-Woods. Explaining Matching Michigan: an ethnographic study of a patient safety program. Implementation Science : IS 8, (2013).
26.
Dixon-Woods, M., McNicol, S. & Martin, G. Ten challenges in improving quality in healthcare: lessons from the Health Foundation’s programme evaluations and relevant literature: Table 1. BMJ Quality & Safety 21, 876–884 (2012).
27.
Plsek, P. E. & Greenhalgh, T. Complexity science: The challenge of complexity in health care. BMJ 323, 625–628 (2001).
28.
Laura J Damschroder. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science : IS 4, (2009).
29.
Perspectives on context | The Health Foundation. http://www.health.org.uk/publication/perspectives-context.
30.
Goodman, D. et al. Explanation and elaboration of the SQUIRE (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence) Guidelines, V.2.0: examples of SQUIRE elements in the healthcare improvement literature. BMJ Quality & Safety 25, e7–e7 (2016).
31.
Hoffmann, T. C. et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ 348, g1687–g1687 (2014).
32.
Ogrinc, G. et al. SQUIRE 2.0 (                              : revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process: Table 1. BMJ Quality & Safety 25, 986–992 (2016).
33.
Kaplan, H. C., Provost, L. P., Froehle, C. M. & Margolis, P. A. The Model for Understanding Success in Quality (MUSIQ): building a theory of context in healthcare quality improvement. BMJ Quality & Safety 21, 13–20 (2012).
34.
Evaluation: what to consider | The Health Foundation. http://www.health.org.uk/publication/evaluation-what-consider.
35.
Loes M T Schouten. Evidence for the impact of quality improvement collaboratives: systematic review. BMJ : British Medical Journal 336, (2008).
36.
Power, M. et al. Reducing Clostridium difficile infection in acute care by using an improvement collaborative. BMJ 341, c3359–c3359 (2010).
37.
Maxine Power. Did a quality improvement collaborative make stroke care better? A cluster randomized trial. Implementation Science : IS 9, (2014).
38.
Power, M. et al. Multimethod study of a large-scale programme to improve patient safety using a harm-free care approach. BMJ Open 6, (2016).
39.
Pam Carter. How collaborative are quality improvement collaboratives: a qualitative study in stroke care. Implementation Science : IS 9, (2014).
40.
Perla, R. J., Provost, L. P. & Parry, G. J. Seven Propositions of the Science of Improvement. Quality Management in Health Care 22, 170–186 (2013).
41.
Hammersley, M. & Atkinson, P. Ethnography: principles in practice. (Routledge, 2007).
42.
Bryman, A. Social research methods. (Oxford University Press, 2012).
43.
Waring, J., Harrison, S. & Mcdonald, R. A culture of safety or coping? Ritualistic behaviours in the operating theatre. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 12, 3–9 (2007).
44.
Trisha Greenhalgh. Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations: Systematic Review and Recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly 82, (2004).
45.
Buchanan, D. et al. No going back: A review of the literature on sustaining organizational change. International Journal of Management Reviews 7, 189–205 (2005).
46.
The Spread and Sustainability of QI in Healthcare : Quality Improvement – East London NHS Foundation Trust. https://qi.elft.nhs.uk/resource/the-spread-and-sustainability-of-qi-in-healthcare/.
47.
Sutcliffe, K. M., Paine, L. & Pronovost, P. J. Re-examining high reliability: actively organising for safety. BMJ Quality & Safety 26, 248–251 (2017).