1.
Hathaway J, Foster M. The law of refugee status [Internet]. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511998300
2.
Storey H. ‘Persecution: Towards a working definition’. In: Chetail V, Bauloz C, editors. Research handbook on international law and migration [Internet]. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar; 2014. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.myilibrary.com?id=586122
3.
Zimmermann A. The 1951 Convention relating to the status of refugees and its 1967 Protocol: a commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
4.
Foster M. International refugee law and socio-economic rights: refuge from deprivation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
5.
Teitiota v Chief Executive of the Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment [2014] NZCA 173 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.refugeeresearch.net/sites/default/files/Teitiota Article.pdf
6.
Dowd R. Dissecting Discrimination in Refugee Law: an Analysis of its Meaning and its Cumulative Effect. International Journal of Refugee Law. 2011;23(1):28–53.
7.
Shepherd (Case C‑472/13), CJEU, 26 February 2015 [Internet]. Available from: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=162544&pageIndex=0&doclang=en&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=68878
8.
Sepet and another v SSHD [2003] UKHL 15 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2003/15.html
9.
Gashi (Asylum; Persecution) Kosovo [1996] UKIAT 13695 (22 July 1996) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIAT/1996/13695.html
10.
Ravichandran v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [1996] Imm AR 97 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.refworld.org/cgi-bin/texis/vtx/rwmain?page=search&docid=3ae6b677c&skip=0&query=ravichandran
11.
Shepherd v. Germany (CJEU) [Internet]. 26AD. Available from: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=162544&pageIndex=0&doclang=en&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=527759
12.
Horvath v. SSHD [2000] UKHL 37 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b6e04.html
13.
Hathaway J, Foster M. The law of refugee status [Internet]. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511998300
14.
Persecution by Non-state Agents: Comparative Judicial Interpretations of the 1951 Refugee Convention. European Journal of Migration and Law. 2003;4(4):521–532.
15.
Marx, Reinhard. Notion of Persecution by Non-State Agents in German Jurisprudence, The. Georgetown Immigration Law Journal [Internet]. 2001;15. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/geoimlj15&div=28&g_sent=1&collection=journals
16.
Schoenholtz A. The New Refugees and the Old Treaty: Persecutors and Persecuted in the Twenty-First Century. Available from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2617336
17.
Januzi v. SSHD [2006] UKHL 5 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2006/5.html
18.
Ni Ghrainne B. The Internal Protection Alternative Inquiry and Human Rights Considerations - Irrelevant or Indispensable? International Journal of Refugee Law. 2015. p. 29–51.
19.
Hathaway J, Foster M. The law of refugee status [Internet]. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511998300
20.
Marx R. The Criteria of Applying the ‘Internal Flight Alternative’ Test in National Refugee Status Determination Procedures. International Journal of Refugee Law. 2002;14(2 and 3):179–218.
21.
M.E. v. Sweden (ECtHR, Fifth Section) [Internet]. 26AD. Available from: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-145018#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-145018%22]}
22.
X, Y and Z, Cases C-199/12 to C-201/12, CJEU, 7 November 2013 [Internet]. Available from: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?docid=144215&doclang=EN
23.
Y and Z, Cases C-71/11 and C-99/11, CJEU, 5 September 2012 [Internet]. Available from: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?docid=126364&doclang=EN
24.
RT (Zimbabwe) v SSHD [2012] UKSC 38 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2012/38.pdf
25.
HJ (Iran) and HT (Cameroon) [2010] UKSC 31 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2010/31.pdf
26.
Appellant S395/2002 v. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (High Court of Australia, 9 December 2003) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.refworld.org/docid/3fd9eca84.html
27.
UNHCR. Guidelines on International Protection No. 9 Sexual Orientation and or Gender Identity [Internet]. 23AD. Available from: http://www.refworld.org/pdfid/50348afc2.pdf
28.
Hathaway J, Pobjoy J. ‘Queer Cases make Bad Law’. NYU Journal of International Law and Politics [Internet]. 2012; Available from: http://nyujilp.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/44.2-Hathaway-Pobjoy.pdf