1.
Gough, D., Oliver, S., Thomas, J.: Learning from research: systematic reviews for informing policy decisions. A paper for the Alliance for Useful Evidence, http://www.alliance4usefulevidence.org/assets/Alliance-FUE-reviews-booklet-3.pdf.
2.
Systematic reviews from astronomy to zoology: myths and misconceptions. BMJ : British Medical Journal. 322, (13)AD.
3.
Sense about Science: Systematic reviews, http://www.senseaboutscience.org/data/files/resources/52/Sense-About-Systematic-Reviews.pdf.
4.
Aveyard, H., Sharp, P.: A beginner’s guide to evidence-based practice in health and social care professions. Open University Press, Maidenhead (2013).
5.
Fletcher, R.H., Fletcher, S.W.: Clinical epidemiology: the essentials. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pa (2013).
6.
Haynes, R.B.: Clinical epidemiology: how to do clinical practice research. Lippincott Willaims & Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pa (2006).
7.
Smith, L., Dixon, L.: Systematic reviews. In: Research methods for health and social care. pp. 63–77. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2009).
8.
Guyatt, G.H.: Users’ guides to the medical literature: a manual for evidence-based clinical practice. McGraw Hill Medical, New York (2008).
9.
Guyatt, G.H.: Users’ guides to the medical literature: essentials of evidence-based clinical practice. McGraw-Hill Medical, New York (2008).
10.
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a step-by-step guide, http://www.ccace.ed.ac.uk/research/software-resources/systematic-reviews-and-meta-analyses.
11.
Bettany-Saltikov, J.: How to do a systematic literature review in nursing: a step-by-step guide. Open University Press, Maidenhead (2012).
12.
Booth, A., Sutton, A., Papaioannou, D.: Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. SAGE, Los Angeles (2016).
13.
Dixon-Woods, M.: Systematic reviews and qualitative methods. In: Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. pp. 331–346. SAGE, London (2011).
14.
Dixon-Woods, M., Agarwal, S., Jones, D., Young, B., Sutton, A.: Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 10, 45-53B (2005).
15.
Edmunds Otter, M., Keen, C.: Finding the evidence to support your research question. In: An introduction to health services research. pp. 17–33. SAGE, Los Angeles, Calif (2014).
16.
Egger, M., Smith, G.D., Altman, D.G.: Systematic reviews in health care: meta analysis in context. BMJ Books, London (2001).
17.
Glasziou, P.: Systematic reviews in health care: a practical guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001).
18.
Gough, D., Oliver, S., Thomas, J.: An introduction to systematic reviews. SAGE, Los Angeles (2017).
19.
Khan, K., Kunz, R., Kleijnen, J., Antes, G.: Systematic reviews to support evidence-based medicine, 2nd edition. CRC Press, London (2011).
20.
Petticrew, M.: The process of systematic review of public health evidence: quality criteria and standards. In: Evidence-based public health: effectiveness and efficiency. pp. 327–335. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010).
21.
Tufanaru, C., Ovid Technologies, Inc: Statistics for systematic review authors. Joanna Briggs Institute, Philadelphia (2012).
22.
Webb, C., Roe, B.H.: Reviewing research evidence for nursing practice: systematic reviews. Blackwell, Oxford (2007).
23.
Higgins, J.P.T.: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, https://training.cochrane.org/handbook.
24.
Institute of Medicine. Committee on Standards for Systematic Reviews of Comparative Effectiveness Research: Finding what works in health care: standards for systematic reviews. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C. (2011). https://doi.org/10.17226/13059.
25.
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination: Systematic reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care, https://www.york.ac.uk/crd/guidance/.
26.
Bryman, A.: Social research methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom (2016).
27.
Collaboration for Environmental Evidence: Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in Environmental Management, http://www.environmentalevidence.org/information-for-authors.
28.
Gough, D., Oliver, S., Thomas, J.: An introduction to systematic reviews. SAGE, Los Angeles (2017).
29.
Koricheva, J., Gurevitch, J., Mengersen, K.L.: Handbook of meta-analysis in ecology and evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2013).
30.
Littell, J.H., Corcoran, J., Pillai, V.K.: Systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008).
31.
Petticrew, M., Roberts, H.: Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide. Blackwell, Malden, Mass (2006).
32.
Grant, M.J., Booth, A.: A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal. 26, 91–108 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x.
33.
Edgley, A., Stickley, T., Timmons, S., Meal, A.: Critical realist review: exploring the real, beyond the empirical. Journal of Further and Higher Education. 1–15 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2014.953458.
34.
Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G., Walshe, K.: Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 10, 21–34 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1258/1355819054308530.
35.
Pawson, R.: Evidence-based policy: a realist perspective. SAGE, London (2006).
36.
SOPHIE Project: An introduction to realist reviews (SOPHIE Newsletter), http://www.sophie-project.eu/pdf/realistreview.pdf.
37.
Other things you should think about.
