Aitken, Colin and Stoney, David Alan (1991) The use of statistics in forensic science. New York: E. Horwood. Available at: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=10060586.
American Academy of Forensic Sciences (no date). Available at: http://www.aafs.org/.
Anderson, C. et al. (2011) ‘The National DNA Database on trial: engaging young people in South Wales with genetics’, Public Understanding of Science, 20(2), pp. 146–162. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510375793.
Brewer, P.R. and Ley, B.L. (2010) ‘Media Use and Public Perceptions of DNA Evidence’, Science Communication, 32(1), pp. 93–117. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547009340343.
Brian C. Smith, Steven D. Penrod, Amy L. Otto and Roger C. Park (1996) ‘Jurors’ Use of Probabilistic Evidence’, Law and Human Behavior, 20(1). Available at: http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/stable/1394042.
Cavender, G. and Deutsch, S.K. (2007) ‘CSI and moral authority: The police and science’, Crime, Media, Culture, 3(1), pp. 67–81. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659007074449.
Cole, Simon A (2007) ‘CSI and its effects: media, juries, and the burden of proof.(The CSI Effect: The True Effect of Crime Scene Television on the Justice System)’, New England Law Review, 41(3). Available at: http://gl9sn3dh2u.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%253Aofi%252Fenc%253AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CSI+and+its+effects%253A+media%252C+juries%252C+and+the+burden+of+proof.%2528The+CSI+Effect%253A+The+True+Effect+of+Crime+Scene+Television+on+the+Justice+System%2529&rft.jtitle=New+England+Law+Review&rft.au=Cole%252C+Simon+A&rft.au=Dioso-Villa%252C+Rachel&rft.date=2007&rft.pub=New+England+School+of+Law&rft.issn=0028-4823&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=435&rft.externalDBID=n%252Fa&rft.externalDocID=166465519&paramdict=en-US.
Dawn McQuiston-Surrett and Michael J. Saks (2009) ‘The Testimony of Forensic Identification Science: What Expert Witnesses Say and What Factfinders Hear’, Law and Human Behavior, 33(5). Available at: http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/stable/40540136.
DiFonzo, J. Herbie (2007) ‘Devil in a white coat: the temptation of forensic evidence in the age of CSI.(Crime Scene Investigation)(The CSI Effect: The True Effect of Crime Scene Television on the Justice System)’, New England Law Review, 41(3). Available at: http://gl9sn3dh2u.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%253Aofi%252Fenc%253AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Devil+in+a+white+coat%253A+the+temptation+of+forensic+evidence+in+the+age+of+CSI.%2528Crime+Scene+Investigation%2529%2528The+CSI+Effect%253A+The+True+Effect+of+Crime+Scene+Television+on+the+Justice+System%2529&rft.jtitle=New+England+Law+Review&rft.au=DiFonzo%252C+J.+Herbie&rft.au=Stern%252C+Ruth+C&rft.date=2007&rft.pub=New+England+School+of+Law&rft.issn=0028-4823&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=503&rft.externalDBID=n%252Fa&rft.externalDocID=166505632&paramdict=en-US.
Dror, I.E. (2013) ‘Practical Solutions to Cognitive and Human Factor Challenges in Forensic Science’, Forensic Science Policy & Management: An International Journal, 4(3–4), pp. 105–113. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/19409044.2014.901437.
Dror, I.E., Charlton, D. and Péron, A.E. (2006) ‘Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications’, Forensic Science International, 156(1), pp. 74–78. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.10.017.
Fisher, Jim (2008) Forensics under fire: are bad science and dueling experts corrupting criminal justice? New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press. Available at: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=10231503.
Fraser, J. (no date) Handbook of Forensic Science. Available at: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.myilibrary.com?id=246270.
Jackson, Andrew R. W. and Jackson, Julie M. (2011) Forensic science. 3rd ed. Harlow: Prentice Hall. Available at: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.myilibrary.com?id=317329.
Jackson, A.R.W. and Jackson, J.M. (2011) Forensic science. 3rd ed. Harlow: Prentice Hall. Available at: http://le.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3045444800002746&institutionId=2746&customerId=2745.
James, S.H., Nordby, J.J. and Bell, S. (eds) (2014) Forensic science: an introduction to scientific and investigative techniques. Fourth edition. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group. Available at: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://leicester.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1543303.
Jamieson, Allan and Moenssens, Andre (2009) Wiley encyclopedia of forensic science. Chichester: John Wiley.
Kassin, S.M., Dror, I.E. and Kukucka, J. (2013) ‘The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions’, Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2(1), pp. 42–52. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.01.001.
Ley, B.L., Jankowski, N. and Brewer, P.R. (2012) ‘Investigating CSI: Portrayals of DNA testing on a forensic crime show and their potential effects’, Public Understanding of Science, 21(1), pp. 51–67. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510367571.
Lieberman, J.D. et al. (2008) ‘Gold versus platinum: Do jurors recognize the superiority and limitations of DNA evidence compared to other types of forensic evidence?’, Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 14(1), pp. 27–62. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.14.1.27.
Lisa L Smith (2012) ‘Identifying and measuring juror pre-trial bias for forensic evidence: development and validation of the Forensic Evidence Evaluation Bias Scale’, Psychology, Crime, 18(9). Available at: http://gl9sn3dh2u.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%253Aofi%252Fenc%253AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Identifying+and+measuring+juror+pre-trial+bias+for+forensic+evidence%253A+development+and+validation+of+the+Forensic+Evidence+Evaluation+Bias+Scale&rft.jtitle=Psychology%252C+Crime+%2526+Law+%253A+PC+%2526+L&rft.au=Lisa+L+Smith&rft.au=Ray+Bull&rft.date=2012&rft.pub=Taylor+%2526+Francis+Ltd&rft.issn=1068-316X&rft.eissn=1477-2744&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=797&rft.externalDocID=2769090011&paramdict=en-US.
Martire, K.A. et al. (2014) ‘On the interpretation of likelihood ratios in forensic science evidence: Presentation formats and the weak evidence effect’, Forensic Science International, 240, pp. 61–68. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.04.005.
Martire, Kristy A.. School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, k.martire@unsw.edu.au Kemp, Richard I.. School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, AustraliaWatkins, Ian. School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, AustraliaSayle, Malindi A.. School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, AustraliaNewell, Ben R.. School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (2013) ‘The expression and interpretation of uncertain forensic science evidence: Verbal equivalence, evidence strength, and the weak evidence effect.’, Law and Human Behavior [Preprint], (3). Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pdh&AN=2013-19701-002&site=ehost-live.
McCartney, C. (2008) ‘LCN DNA: proof beyond reasonable doubt?’, Nature Reviews Genetics, 9(5), pp. 325–325. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2362.
McCartney, Carole (2006) Forensic identification and criminal justice: forensic science, justice and risk. Cullompton: Willan. Available at: http://le.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=5664316050002746&institutionId=2746&customerId=2745.
McCulloch, Helen and Great Britain (1996) Police use of forensic science. London: Home Office. Available at: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/prgpdfs/fprs19.pdf.
Michael Allen (no date) Reading CSI. I. B. Tauris. Available at: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=10267547.
Nance, D.A. and Morris, S.B. (2005) ‘Juror Understanding of DNA Evidence: An Empirical Assessment of Presentation Formats for Trace Evidence with a Relatively Small Random-Match Probability’, The Journal of Legal Studies, 34(2), pp. 395–444. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/428020.
National Research Council (U.S.), National Research Council (U.S.), and National Research Council (U.S.) (2009) Strengthening forensic science in the United States: a path forward. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. Available at: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=10327026.
Podlas, Kimberlianne (2006) ‘“The CSI effect”: exposing the media myth.(crime scene investigation)’, Fordham Intellectual Property, Media, 16(2). Available at: http://gl9sn3dh2u.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%253Aofi%252Fenc%253AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%2522The+CSI+effect%2522%253A+exposing+the+media+myth.%2528crime+scene+investigation%2529&rft.jtitle=Fordham+Intellectual+Property%252C+Media+%2526+Entertainment+Law+Journal&rft.au=Podlas%252C+Kimberlianne&rft.date=2006&rft.pub=Fordham+University%252C+School+of+Law&rft.issn=1079-9699&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=429&rft.externalDBID=n%252Fa&rft.externalDocID=146281102&paramdict=en-US.
Ramotowski, Robert, Lee, Henry C., and Gaensslen, R. E. (2012) Lee and Gaensslen’s Advances in fingerprint technology. 3rd ed. Boca Raton, Fla: CRC. Available at: http://le.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=5664152980002746&institutionId=2746&customerId=2745.
Robbers, M.L.P. (2008) ‘Blinded by Science: The Social Construction of Reality in Forensic Television Shows and its Effect on Criminal Jury Trials’, Criminal Justice Policy Review, 19(1), pp. 84–102. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403407305982.
Saferstein, R. (2014) Criminalistics: an introduction to forensic science. 10th ed., New International ed. Harlow: Pearson. Available at: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://lib.myilibrary.com?id=527170.
Saks, Michael J (2008) ‘The individualization fallacy in forensic science evidence’, Vanderbilt Law Review, 61(1). Available at: http://gl9sn3dh2u.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%253Aofi%252Fenc%253AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+individualization+fallacy+in+forensic+science+evidence&rft.jtitle=Vanderbilt+Law+Review&rft.au=Saks%252C+Michael+J&rft.au=Koehler%252C+Jonathan+J&rft.date=2008-01-01&rft.pub=Vanderbilt+University%252C+School+of+Law&rft.issn=0042-2533&rft.eissn=1942-9886&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=199&rft.externalDBID=n%252Fa&rft.externalDocID=177655355&paramdict=en-US.
Saks, M.J. (2005) ‘The Coming Paradigm Shift in Forensic Identification Science’, Science, 309(5736), pp. 892–895. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1111565.
Shelton, Donald E. (2012) Forensic science evidence: can the law keep up with science? El Paso, Tex: LFB Scholarly Pub. LLC. Available at: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=10561090.
Smith, L. and Bond, J. (2015) Criminal justice and forensic science: a multidisciplinary introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=4763537.
Taroni, Franco (2006) Bayesian networks and probablistic inference in forensic science. Chichester: Wiley.
The Chartered Society of Forensic Sciences (no date). Available at: http://www.csofs.org.
Ubelaker, Douglas H. and American Academy of Forensic Sciences (2012) Forensic science: current issues, future directions. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell. Available at: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=10605333.
Ungvarsky, Edward J (2007) ‘Remarks on the use and misuse of forensic science to lead to false convictions.(The CSI Effect: The True Effect of Crime Scene Television on the Justice System)’, New England Law Review, 41(3). Available at: http://gl9sn3dh2u.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%253Aofi%252Fenc%253AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Remarks+on+the+use+and+misuse+of+forensic+science+to+lead+to+false+convictions.%2528The+CSI+Effect%253A+The+True+Effect+of+Crime+Scene+Television+on+the+Justice+System%2529&rft.jtitle=New+England+Law+Review&rft.au=Ungvarsky%252C+Edward+J&rft.date=2007&rft.pub=New+England+School+of+Law&rft.issn=0028-4823&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=609&rft.externalDBID=n%252Fa&rft.externalDocID=166506614&paramdict=en-US.
White, P. and Royal Society of Chemistry (Great Britain) (2010) Crime scene to court: the essentials of forensic science. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry.
Williams, Robin and Johnson, Paul (2008a) Genetic policing: the use of DNA in chemical investigations. Cullompton: Willan. Available at: http://le.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=5664137380002746&institutionId=2746&customerId=2745.
Williams, Robin and Johnson, Paul (2008b) Genetic policing: the use of DNA in chemical investigations. Cullompton: Willan. Available at: http://le.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=5664137380002746&institutionId=2746&customerId=2745.