1
Griffiths M, Roach SC, Solomon MS. Fifty key thinkers in international relations. 2nd rev.ed. London: Routledge 2009.
2
Vasquez JA. Classics of international relations. 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall 1996.
3
Bliddal H, Sylvest C, Wilson P. Classics of International Relations. 2013. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/reader.action?docID=10737877
4
Carr EH, Cox M. The twenty years’ crisis, 1919-1939: an introduction to the study of international relations. Houndmills: Palgrave 2001.
5
Michael Cox. Will the Real E. H. Carr Please Stand up? International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-). 1999;75:643–53.
6
Peter Wilson. Radicalism for a Conservative Purpose: The Peculiar Realism of E.H. Carr. ;30:iii–v.
7
Mearsheimer JJ. E.H. Carr vs. Idealism: The Battle Rages On. International Relations. 2005;19:139–52. doi: 10.1177/0047117805052810
8
David Goldfischer. E. H. Carr: A ‘Historical Realist’ Approach for the Globalisation Era. Review of International Studies. 2002;28:697–717.
9
Waltz KN. Theory of international politics. Boston, Mass: McGraw-Hill 1979.
10
Griffiths M. Realism, idealism, and international politics: a reinterpretation. London: Routledge 1992.
11
Brown C. Structural Realism, Classical Realism and Human Nature. International Relations. 2009;23:257–70. doi: 10.1177/0047117809104638
12
Waltz KN. Realism and international politics: the essays of Ken Waltz. London: Routledge 2008.
13
Mearsheimer JJ. The tragedy of Great Power politics. New York: Norton 2001.
14
Glenn H. Snyder. Mearsheimer’s World-Offensive Realism and the Struggle for Security: A Review Essay. International Security. 2002;27:149–73.
15
Kirshner J. The tragedy of offensive realism: Classical realism and the rise of China. European Journal of International Relations. 2012;18:53–75. doi: 10.1177/1354066110373949
16
Schmidt BC. Competing Realist Conceptions of Power. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 2005;33:523–49. doi: 10.1177/03058298050330031401
17
Keohane RO, Nye JS. Power and interdependence. 3rd ed. London: Longman 2000.
18
Review by: Stanley J. Michalak, Jr. Theoretical Perspectives for Understanding International Interdependence. World Politics. 1979;32:136–50.
19
Friedrich Kratochwil and John Gerard Ruggie. International Organization: A State of the Art on an Art of the State. International Organization. 1986;40:753–75.
20
Rogerson KS. Information Interdependence: Keohane and Nye’s complex interdependence in the information age. Information, Communication & Society. 2000;3:415–36. doi: 10.1080/13691180051033379
21
Keohane RO. Twenty Years of Institutional Liberalism. International Relations. 2012;26:125–38. doi: 10.1177/0047117812438451
22
Wendt A. Social theory of international politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1999.
23
David Dessler. Review of ‘Social Theory of International Politics’ by Alexander Wendt. 2000;94:1002–3.
24
Jeffrey T. Checkel. The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory. World Politics. 1998;50:324–48.
25
Kratochwil F. Constructing a New Orthodoxy? Wendt’s `Social Theory of International Politics’ and the Constructivist Challenge. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 2000;29:73–101. doi: 10.1177/03058298000290010901
26
Peter Lomas. Anthropomorphism, Personification and Ethics: A Reply to Alexander Wendt. Review of International Studies. 2005;31:349–55.
27
Enloe CH. Bananas, beaches & bases: making feminist sense of international politics. Berkeley: University of California Press 1990.
28
Peterson VS. Feminisms and International Relations. Gender <html_ent glyph="@amp;" ascii="&"/> History. 1998;10:581–9. doi: 10.1111/1468-0424.00123
29
Carol Cohn. A Conversation with Cynthia Enloe: Feminists Look at Masculinity and the Men Who Wage War. Signs. 2003;28:1187–1107.
30
Women and Men in the Iraq War: What Can Feminist Curiosity Reveal? 27 AD.
31
Adam Jones. Does ‘Gender’ Make the World Go Round? Feminist Critiques of International Relations. Review of International Studies. 1996;22:405–29.
32
Gillian Youngs. Feminist International Relations: A Contradiction in Terms? Or: Why Women and Gender Are Essential to Understanding the World ‘We’ Live in. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-). 2004;80:75–87.
33
Castro F. The Second Declaration of Havana.
34
Coltman L, Sweig J. The real Fidel Castro. New Haven: Yale University Press 2003.
35
Domínguez JI, Harvard University. To make a world safe for revolution: Cuba’s foreign policy. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press 1989.
36
Young R. Postcolonialism: a very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2003.
37
Brands H. Latin America’s Cold War. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press 2010.
38
Blair T. Doctrine of the International Community. 24 AD. http://www.britishpoliticalspeech.org/speech-archive.htm?speech=279
39
Daddow O. ‘Tony’s war’? Blair, Kosovo and the interventionist impulse in British foreign policy - DADDOW - 2009 - International Affairs - Wiley Online Library. Published Online First: 2009.
40
Ralph J. After Chilcot: The ‘Doctrine of International Community’ and the UK Decision to Invade Iraq. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations. 2011;13:304–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-856X.2010.00444.x
41
Booth K, Wheeler NJ. The security dilemma: fear, cooperation, and trust in world politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2008.
42
Robert Jervis. Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma. World Politics. 1978;30:167–214.
43
Axelrod RM. The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books 1984.
44
Charles Lipson. International Cooperation in Economic and Security Affairs. World Politics. 1984;37:1–23.
45
Taylor M. Anarchy and cooperation. London: Wiley 1976.
46
Campbell R, Snowden L. Paradoxes of rationality and cooperation: Prisoner’s Dilemma and Newcomb’s Problem. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press 1985.
47
The Joker Effect: Cooperation driven by destructive agents. Journal of Theoretical Biology.
48
Gokcek G, Howard A. Movies to the Rescue: Keeping the Cold War Relevant for Twenty-First-Century Students. Journal of Political Science Education. 2013;9:436–52. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2013.835561
49
Gray RJ, Kaklamanidou B. The 21st century superhero: essays on gender, genre and globalization in film. Jefferson, N.C.: McFarland & Co 2011.
50
Orwell G. Nineteen eighty-four. London: Penguin 1989.
51
Crick B. George Orwell: a life. 2nd ed: Penguin 1982.
52
Rodden J. The Cambridge companion to George Orwell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2007.
53
Gleason A, Goldsmith J, Nussbaum MC. On nineteen eighty-four: Orwell and our future. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 2005.
54
Newsinger J. Orwell’s Politics. Basingstoke: Macmillan 1999.
55
Timothy Garton Ash. Orwell’s List. http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2003/sep/25/orwells-list/
56
Slater I. Orwell: the road to airstrip one. 2nd ed. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press 2003.